1: \begin{abstract}

2:   Several popular best-practice manifestos for IT design and

3:   architecture use terms like `stateful', `stateless', `shared

4:   nothing', etc, and describe `fact based' or `functional'

5:   descriptions of causal evolution to describe computer processes,

6:   especially in cloud computing. The concepts are used ambiguously and

7:   sometimes in contradictory ways, which has led to many imprecise

8:   beliefs about their implications.  This paper outlines the simple

9:   view of state and causation in Promise Theory, which accounts for

10:   the scaling of processes and the relativity of different observers

11:   in a natural way. It's shown that the concepts of statefulness or

12:   statelessness are artifacts of observational scale and causal bias

13:   towards functional evaluation. If we include feedback loops,

14:   recursion, and process convergence, which appear acausal to

15:   external observers, the arguments about (im)mutable state need to be

16:   modified in a scale-dependent way.  In most cases the intended focus

17:   of such remarks is not terms like `statelessness' but process

18:   predictability. A simple principle may be substituted in most cases

19:   as a guide to system design: the principle the separation of dynamic

20:   scales.

21: 

22:   Understanding data reliance and the ability to keep stable promises

23:   is of crucial importance to the consistency of data pipelines, and

24:   distributed client-server interactions, albeit in different ways.

25:   With increasingly data intensive processes over widely separated

26:   distributed deployments, e.g. in the Internet of Things and AI

27:   applications, the effects of instability need a more careful

28:   treatment. 

29: 

30:   These notes are part of an initiative to engage with thinkers and

31:   practitioners towards a more rational and disciplined language for

32:   systems engineering for era of ubiquitous extended-cloud computing.

33: \end{abstract}

34: