1: \begin{abstract}

2:     Semi-supervised Learning (SSL) has witnessed great success owing to the impressive performances brought by various methods based on pseudo labeling and consistency regularization.

3:     % Pseudo labeling and consistency regularization approaches based on confidence thresholding have made great progress in semi-supervised learning (SSL).

4:     However, we argue that existing methods might fail to utilize the unlabeled data more effectively since they either use a pre-defined / fixed threshold or an ad-hoc threshold adjusting scheme, resulting in inferior performance and slow convergence. We first analyze a motivating example to obtain intuitions on the relationship between the desirable threshold and model's learning status. Based on the analysis, we hence propose \emph{FreeMatch} to adjust the confidence threshold in a self-adaptive manner according to the model's learning status. We further introduce a self-adaptive class fairness regularization penalty to encourage the model for diverse predictions during the early training stage. Extensive experiments indicate the superiority of FreeMatch especially when the labeled data are extremely rare. FreeMatch achieves \textbf{5.78}\%, \textbf{13.59}\%, and \textbf{1.28}\% error rate reduction over the latest state-of-the-art method FlexMatch on CIFAR-10 with 1 label per class, STL-10 with 4 labels per class, and ImageNet with 100 labels per class, respectively. Moreover, FreeMatch can also boost the performance of imbalanced SSL. The codes can be found at \url{https://github.com/microsoft/Semi-supervised-learning}.\footnote{Note the results of this paper are obtained using TorchSSL~\citep{zhang2021flexmatch}. We also provide codes and logs in USB~\citep{wang2022usb}.}

5: \end{abstract}

6: