8d56da9f31f7b2c9.tex
1: \begin{abstract}
2: We consider the numerical approximation of parabolic-elliptic interface problems 
3: by the non-symmetric coupling method of 
4: MacCamy and Suri [Quart. Appl. Math., 44 (1987), pp. 675--690]. 
5: We establish
6: well-posedness of this formulation for problems with non-smooth interfaces and 
7: prove quasi-optimality for a 
8: class of conforming Galerkin approximations in space. 
9: Therefore, 
10: error estimates with optimal order can be deduced for the 
11: semi-discretization in space by appropriate finite and boundary elements.
12: %
13: Moreover, we investigate the subsequent discretization in time by a variant of 
14: the implicit Euler method. 
15: As for the semi-discretization, we establish well-posedness and quasi-optimality 
16: for the fully discrete scheme
17: under minimal regularity assumptions on the solution. Error estimates with optimal order 
18: follow again directly.
19: %
20: Our analysis is based on estimates in appropriate energy norms. 
21: Thus, we do not use duality arguments and corresponding estimates 
22: for an elliptic projection which 
23: are not available for the non-symmetric coupling method. 
24: Additionally, we provide again error estimates under minimal 
25: regularity assumptions.
26: %
27: Some numerical examples illustrate our theoretical results.\\[0.25\baselineskip]
28: %
29: \noindent \textbf{Keywords.}
30: parabolic-elliptic interface problem,
31: finite element method, boundary element method, non-symmetric coupling,
32:  method of lines, convergence, quasi-optimality, optimal error estimates\\[0.25\baselineskip]
33: %
34: \noindent \textbf{Mathematics subject classification.}
35: 65N30, 65N38, 65N40, 65N12, 65N15, 82B24
36: \end{abstract}
37: