91999e5054e33d37.tex
1: \begin{abstract}
2: 
3: We use tools of mathematical logic to analyse the notion of a path on an complex algebraic variety, 
4: and are led to formulate a ''rigidity'' property of fundamental groups specific to algebraic varieties,
5: as well as to define a bona fide topology closely related to etale topology. These appear as criteria for 
6: $\aleph_1$-categoricity, or rather stability and homogeneity, of the formal countable language we propose to describe 
7: homotopy classes of paths on a variety, or equivalently, its universal covering space. 
8: 
9: 
10: Technically, for a variety $A$ defined over a finite field extension of the field $\Q$ of rational numbers,
11: we introduce a countable language $L(A)$ describing the universal covering space of $\A(\C) $, or,
12: equivalently, homotopy classes of paths in $\pi_1(\A(\C) )$. Under some assumptions 
13: on $A$ we show that the universal covering space of $\A(\C) $ is an analytic Zariski 
14: structure \cite{ZilberBook}, and present an $\Lww(L(A))$-sentence axiomatising the class
15: containing the structure and that is stable and homogeneous over elementary submodels.
16: The ''rigidity'' condition on fundamental groups says that projection of of the fundamental group of a variety
17: is the fundamental group of the projection, up to finite index and under some irreducibility assumptions,
18: and is used to prove that the projection of an irreducible closed set is closed in the analytic Zariski structure.
19: 
20: 
21: In particular, we define an analytic Zariski structure on the universal covering space
22: of an Abelian variety defined over a finite extension of the field $\Q$ of rational numbers.
23: 
24: 
25: %We prove Theorem 2 of [Zilber:AnalyticZariskiStructures]. 
26: %Moreover, we explicitly define an $\Lww$-class containing our model,
27: %and show it is $\aleph_1$-categorical. 
28: %...............
29: 
30: 
31: \end{abstract}
32: