1: \begin{abstract}

2: Let $(X,Y)\in\mathcal{X}\times \mathcal{Y}$ be a random couple with unknown distribution $P$. Let $\GG$ be a class of measurable functions  and $\ell$ a loss function. The problem of statistical learning deals with the estimation of the Bayes:

3: $$g^*=\arg\min_{g\in\GG}\E_P \ell(g(X),Y).

4: $$

5: In this paper, we study this problem when we deal with a contaminated sample $(Z_1,Y_1),\ldots , (Z_n,Y_n)$ of i.i.d. indirect observations. Each input $Z_i$, $i=1,\ldots ,n$ is distributed from a density $Af$, where $A$ is a known compact linear operator and $f$ is the density of the direct input $X$. \\

6: We derive fast rates of convergence for empirical risk minimizers based on regularization methods, such as deconvolution kernel density estimators or spectral cut-off. These results are comparable to the existing fast rates in \cite{kolt} for the direct case. It gives some insights into the effect of indirect measurements in the presence of fast rates of convergence.

7: 

8: %A classical example is the errors in variables setting where $Z_i$ are corrupted by noise as follows:

9: %\beqn

10: %\label{additive}

11: %Z_i=X_i+\epsilon_i,\forall i=1 \ldots n,

12: %\eeqn

13: %where in this case $Af=f*\eta$ is the convolution operator related to the density of $\epsilon$. 

14: %We propose an empirical risk minimization method based on regularization methods from the inverse problem literature. We state a general upper bound for this method in classification under complexity and regularity assumptions, which coincides with a recent lower bound proposed in \cite{pinkfloyds} in a particular setting.

15: \end{abstract}

16: