1: \begin{abstract}

2: The {\emph{direct problem}} of optoacoustic signal generation in biological

3: media consists of solving the inhomogeneous optoacoustic wave equation for an

4: initial acoustic stress profile. In contrast, the mathematically challenging

5: {\emph{inverse problem}} requires the reconstruction of the initial stress 

6: profile from a proper set of observed signals.

7: 

8: In this article, we consider the particular case of a Gaussian transverse

9: irradiation source profile in the paraxial approximation of the wave equation,

10: for which the direct problem along the beam axis can be cast into a linear

11: Volterra integral equation of the second kind.  This integral equation can be

12: used in two ways: as a {\emph{forward solver}} to predict optoacoustic signals

13: in terms of the direct problem, and as an {\emph{inverse solver}} for which we

14: here devise highly efficient numerical schemes used for the reconstruction of

15: initial pressure profiles from observed signals, constituting a methodical

16: progress of computational aspects of optoacoustics.

17: 

18: In this regard, we explore the validity as well as the limits of the inversion

19: scheme via numerical experiments, with parameters geared towards actual

20: optoacoustic problem instances. The considered inversion input consists of

21: {\emph{synthetic}} data, obtained by means of forward solvers based on the

22: Volterra integral, and, more generally, the optoacoustic Poisson integral.

23: Regarding the latter, we numerically invert signals that correspond to

24: different detector-to-sample distances and assess the convergence to the true

25: initial stress profiles upon approaching the far-field.  Finally, we also

26: address the effect of noise on the quality of the reconstructed pressure

27: profiles. 

28: \end{abstract}

29: