1: \begin{abstract}

2: %

3: The multi-population replicator dynamics (RD) can be considered a

4: dynamic approach to the study of multi-player games, where it was shown 

5: to be related to Cross' learning, as well as of systems of coevolving

6: populations.

7: %

8: However, not all of its equilibria are Nash equilibria (NE)

9: of the underlying game, and neither convergence to an NE nor 

10: convergence in general are guaranteed.

11: %

12: Although interior equilibria are guaranteed to be NE, no interior 

13: equilibrium can be asymptotically stable in the multi-population RD, 

14: resulting, e.g., in cyclic orbits around a single interior NE.

15: %

16: %

17: We introduce a new notion of equilibria of RD, called mutation limits, 

18: which is based on the inclusion of a naturally arising, simple form of 

19: mutation, but is invariant under the specific choice of mutation 

20: parameters.

21: %

22: We prove the existence of such mutation limits for a large range of 

23: games, and consider a subclass of particular interest, that of 

24: attracting mutation limits.

25: %

26: Attracting mutation limits are approximated by asymptotically stable 

27: equilibria of the (mutation-)perturbed RD, and hence, offer an 

28: approximate dynamic solution of the underlying game, especially if the 

29: original dynamic has no asymptotically stable equilibria.

30: %

31: In this sense, mutation stabilises the system in certain cases and 

32: makes attracting mutation limits near-attainable.

33: %

34: %

35: Furthermore, the relevance of attracting mutation limits as a game 

36: theoretic equilibrium concept is emphasised by a similarity of 

37: (mutation-)perturbed RD to the Q-learning algorithm in the context of

38: multi-agent reinforcement learning.

39: %

40: In contrast to the guaranteed existence of mutation limits, 

41: attracting mutation limits do not exist in all games, raising the 

42: question of their characterization. 

43: \end{abstract}

44: