93d1cb3493530144.tex
1: \begin{proof}
2: 
3: Assuming that $2|\sigma|<\lambda$, we consider the following
4: decomposition of the Hamiltonian:
5: $$
6: H=(\lambda-2|\sigma|)H_0
7: \,+\,
8: \big(2|\sigma|H_0+I\big).
9: $$
10: Using the result 1, we know that the operator $(2|\sigma|H_0+I)$ is positive. Thus we have the operator inequality $0\le (\lambda-2|\sigma|)H_0 \le H$.
11: 
12: Finally, we use the facts that $H$ is essentially self-adjoint for our choice of coupling and that $(\lambda-2|\sigma|)H_0$ has a discrete positive spectrum and we apply the lemma in \cite{lqc_spectrum1} (p.16) to conclude that $H$ has a discrete spectrum.
13: 
14: We do not repeat the rigorous proof of this lemma here. Nevertheless, the intuitive idea is that the subspace generated by eigenvectors of $H$ with eigenvalue inferior to an arbitrary value $\beta_m$ is automatically included in the subspace of of eigenvectors of $(\lambda-2|\sigma|)H_0$ with eigenvalue inferior to the same max value $\beta_m$. Since the latter has a finite dimension, the first also does.
15: 
16: \end{proof}
17: