94a5b8070f073679.tex
1: \begin{abstract}
2: {In this paper we present a shape optimization scheme which utilizes the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) to approximate a direction of steepest descent in $\InfBanach$.
3: The followed strategy is a combination of the approaches presented in Deckelnick, Herbert, and Hinze, ESAIM: COCV 28 (2022) and M\"uller et al.~SIAM SISC 45 (2023).
4: This has appeared previously for relatively simple elliptic PDEs with geometric constraints which were handled using an ad-hoc projection.
5: Here, however, the optimization problem is expanded to include geometric constraints, which are systematically fulfilled.
6: Moreover, this results in a nonlinear system of equations, which is challenging from a computational perspective. 
7: Simulations of a fluid dynamics case study are carried out to benchmark the novel method.
8: Results are given to show that, compared to other methods, the proposed methodology allows for larger deformations without affecting the convergence of the used numerical methods. 
9: The mesh quality is studied across the surface of the optimized obstacle, and is further compared to previous approaches which used descents in $\PBanach$. 
10: The parallel scalability is tested on a distributed-memory system to illustrate the potential of the proposed techniques in a more complex, industrial setting.
11: }
12: 
13: %multigrid
14: \par
15: {\noindent\small \textbf{Keywords}: PDE-constrained shape optimization, Lipschitz transformations, $\InfBanach$-descent, ADMM, parallel computing}
16: \par
17: \par
18: {\noindent\small \textbf{MSC codes}: 
19: 35Q93, 49Q10, 65Y05, 65K10
20: }
21: \par
22: 
23: \end{abstract}
24: