1: \begin{abstract}

2: Let $n$ respondents rank order $d$ items, and suppose that $d<<n$. Our main

3: task is to uncover and display the structure of the observed rank data by an

4: exploratory riffle shuffling procedure which sequentially decomposes the n

5: voters into a finite number of coherent groups plus a noisy group: where the

6: noisy group represents the outlier voters and each coherent group is

7: composed of a finite number of coherent clusters. We consider exploratory

8: riffle shuffling of a set of items to be equivalent to optimal two blocks

9: seriation of the items with crossing of some scores between the two blocks.

10: A riffle shuffled coherent cluster of voters within its coherent group is

11: essentially characterized by the following facts: a) Voters have identical

12: first TCA factor score, where TCA designates taxicab correspondence

13: analysis, an L$_{1}$ variant of correspondence analysis; b) Any preference

14: is easily interpreted as riffle shuffling of its items; c) The nature of

15: different riffle shuffling of items can be seen in the structure of the

16: contingency table of the first-order marginals constructed from the Borda

17: scorings of the voters; d) The first TCA factor scores of the items of a

18: coherent cluster are interpreted as Borda scale of the items. We also

19: introduce a crossing index, which measures the extent of crossing of scores

20: of voters between the two blocks seriation of the items. The novel approach

21: is explained on the benchmarking SUSHI data set, where we show that this

22: data set has a very simple structure, which can also be communicated in a

23: tabular form.

24: 

25: Key words: Borda score and scale; exploratory riffle shuffle; coherent

26: group; coherent cluster; crossing index; taxicab correspondence analysis.

27: 

28: AMS 2010 subject classifications: 62H25, 62H30

29: \end{abstract}