1: \begin{abstract} 

2: In an era where societal narratives are increasingly shaped by algorithmic curation, investigating the political neutrality of LLMs is an important research question. This study presents a fresh perspective on quantifying the political neutrality of LLMs through the lens of abstractive text summarization of polarizing news articles. We consider five pressing issues in current US politics: \textit{abortion}, \textit{gun control/rights}, \textit{healthcare}, \textit{immigration}, and \textit{LGBTQ+ rights}. Via a substantial corpus of 20,344 news articles, our study reveals a consistent trend towards pro-Democratic biases in several well-known LLMs, with gun control and healthcare exhibiting the most pronounced biases (max polarization differences of -9.49\% and -6.14\%, respectively). Further analysis uncovers a strong convergence in the vocabulary of the LLM outputs for these divisive topics (55\% overlap for Democrat-leaning representations, 52\% for Republican). Being months away from a US election of consequence, we consider our findings important. 

3: \end{abstract}

4: