1: \begin{abstract}	

2: 	Complex Langevin simulations are an attempt to solve the sign (or complex-action) problem 

3:     encountered in various physical systems of interest. The method is based on a complexification 

4:     of the underlying degrees of freedom and an evolution in an auxiliary time dimension. The 

5:     complexification, however, does not come without drawbacks, the most severe of which is the 

6:     infamous `wrong convergence' problem, stating that complex Langevin simulations sometimes fail 

7:     to produce correct answers despite their apparent convergence. It has long been realized that 

8:     wrong convergence may -- in principle -- be fixed by the introduction of a suitable kernel 

9:     into the complex Langevin equation, such that the conventional correctness criteria are met. 

10:     However, as we discuss in this work, complex Langevin results may -- especially in the 

11:     presence of a kernel -- still be affected by unwanted so-called integration cycles of the theory 

12:     spoiling them.  Indeed, we confirm numerically that in the absence of boundary terms the complex 

13:     Langevin results are given by a linear combination of such integration cycles, as put forward by 

14:     Salcedo \& Seiler \cite{SS19}. In particular, we shed light on the way different choices of kernel 

15:     affect which integration cycles are being sampled in a simulation and how this knowledge can be 

16:     used to ensure correct convergence in simple toy models.

17: \end{abstract}