1: \begin{subequations}

2: \begin{eqnarray}

3: \zeta _{1}+\zeta _{2} &=&k\pi \text{ for }2\pi \delta \gg 1,  \label{B12a} \\

4: \zeta _{1}-\zeta _{2} &=&k\pi \text{ for }2\pi \delta \ll 1.

5: \end{eqnarray}

6: 

7: The resonance condition (\ref{res_cond_gen}) was derived in \cite%

8: {Ashhab:2007} using an alternative, geometric visualization of the dynamics.

9: There, the evolution matrix for one full driving period, i.e.~$%

10: (NU_{2}NU_{1}) $, is decomposed into two rotations, a rotation around an

11: axis in the $xy$ plane followed by a rotation around the $z$-axis. The

12: resonance condition is then identified as the requirement that the $z$-axis

13: rotation does not affect the dynamics, i.e.~the $z$-axis rotation is a

14: rotation by a multiple of $2\pi $. Straightforward algebra then gives Eq.~(%

15: \ref{res_cond_gen}). A related alternative derivation of the resonance

16: condition relies on visualizing the evolution matrix for one full driving

17: period as a single rotation: on resonance the rotation axis lies in the $xy$%

18: -plane

19: 

20: First, let us consider the case of the \textit{slow-passage limit}, where $%

21: \delta\gg 1$ and $P_{\mathrm{LZ}}\ll 1$. We now neglect the difference

22: between $\overline{P_{+}^{(\mathrm{I})}}$ and $\overline{P_{+}^{(\mathrm{II}%

23: )}}$ and, from Eq.~(\ref{P_II_avrgd}) to the lowest order approximation in $%

24: P_{\mathrm{LZ}}$, we obtain:

25: 

26: \end{subequations}