98765f1f157af1b1.tex
1: \begin{abstract}
2: We study %discuss 
3: the $\h$- and $\p$-versions %and $\h\p$-versions
4: of non-conforming harmonic virtual element methods (VEM) for the
5: approximation of %a 
6: the Dirichlet-Laplace problem on a 2D polygonal %/polyhedral 
7: domain,
8: providing quasi-optimal error bounds. %for the
9: % $H^1$ and $L^2$
10: %explicitly 
11: %in terms of the mesh size and of the degree of accuracy of
12: %the method.
13: Harmonic VEM do not make use of internal degrees of freedom. 
14: This leads to a faster convergence, in terms of the number
15: of degrees of freedom, as compared to standard VEM.
16: % The main difference between harmonic and standard VEM is that the former method avoid the usage of internal degrees of freedom;
17: % this actually provides a convergence of the $\h\p$-version of
18: % the method in terms of the number of degrees of freedom which is
19: % faster than its counterpart in the finite element methods (FEM) and
20: % standard VEM.
21: Importantly, the technical tools used in our %developing the
22: $\p$-analysis %of the method 
23: can be employed as well in the analysis
24: of more general
25: non-conforming finite element methods and VEM.
26: The theoretical results are validated in a series of numerical
27:   experiments. The $hp$-version of the method is numerically tested,
28: demonstrating exponential convergence with rate given by the square
29: root of the number of degrees of freedom.
30: \begin{comment}
31: This study of harmonic VEM in the non-conforming setting also paves the way for
32: %work can be seen as an intermediate step towards 
33: the %more challenging 
34: Trefftz-VEM %non-conforming 
35: approximation of the Helmholtz equation. %via Trefftz-like spaces.
36: \todo{Do we keep the last sentence?}
37: \end{comment}
38: 
39: 
40: \medskip\noindent
41: \textbf{AMS subject classification}: 65N30, 65N12, 65N15, 35J05, 31A05
42: 
43: \medskip\noindent
44: \textbf{Keywords}: Virtual element methods, non-conforming methods,
45: Laplace problem, approximation by harmonic functions, $hp$ error bounds, polytopal meshes
46: \end{abstract}