1: \begin{abstract}
2: Deep Learning (DL) algorithms are becoming increasingly popular for the
3: reconstruction of high-resolution turbulent flows (\emph{aka}
4: super-resolution). However, current DL approaches perform spatially
5: \emph{uniform} super-resolution -- a key performance limiter for
6: scalability of DL-based surrogates for Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD).
7:
8: To address the above challenge, we introduce \name, a deep
9: learning-based adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) framework for non-uniform
10: super-resolution of turbulent flows. \name\ divides the input low-resolution
11: flow field into \emph{patches}, scores each patch, and predicts
12: their target resolution. As a result, it outputs a spatially non-uniform flow
13: field, adaptively refining regions of the fluid domain to achieve the target
14: accuracy. We train \name\ with Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS)
15: solutions from three different canonical flows, namely turbulent channel
16: flow, flat plate, and flow around ellipses. \name\ shows remarkable
17: discerning properties, refining areas with complex flow features, such as
18: near-wall domains and the wake region in flow around solid bodies, while
19: leaving areas with smooth variations (such as the freestream) in the
20: low-precision range. Hence, \name\ demonstrates an excellent qualitative and quantitative
21: alignment with the traditional OpenFOAM AMR solver. Moreover, it reaches the
22: same convergence guarantees as the AMR solver while accelerating it by
23: $3.2-5.5\times$, including unseen-during-training geometries and boundary
24: conditions, demonstrating its generalization capacities. Due to \name's
25: ability to super-resolve only regions of interest, it predicts the same
26: target $1024\times1024$ spatial resolution $7-28.5\times$ faster than
27: state-of-the-art DL methods and reduces the memory usage by $4.4-7.65\times$,
28: showcasing improved scalability.
29: \end{abstract}
30: