1: \begin{abstract}~

2:   \emph{Objective:}

3:   The purpose of this study is to introduce and evaluate the unfitted discontinuous Galerkin finite element method (UDG-FEM) for solving the electroencephalography (EEG) forward problem.

4:   \emph{Methods:}

5:   This new approach for source analysis does not use a geometry conforming volume triangulation, but instead uses a structured mesh that does not resolve the geometry.

6:   The geometry is described using level set functions and is incorporated implicitly in its mathematical formulation.

7:   As no triangulation is necessary, the complexity of a simulation pipeline and the need for manual interaction for patient specific simulations can be reduced and is comparable with that of the FEM for hexahedral meshes. 

8:   In addition\changedReview{,} it maintains conservation laws on a discrete level.

9:   Here, we present the theory for UDG-FEM forward modeling, its \changedReview{verification} using quasi\changedReview{-}analytical solutions in multi-layer sphere models and an evaluation in a comparison with a discontinuous Galerkin (DG-FEM) method on hexahedral and on conforming tetrahedral meshes.

10:   We furthermore apply the UDG-FEM forward approach in a realistic head model simulation study.

11:   \emph{Results:}

12:   The given results show convergence and indicate a good overall accuracy of the UDG-FEM approach. 

13:   UDG-FEM performs comparable or even better than DG-FEM on a conforming tetrahedral mesh while providing a less complex simulation pipeline. When compared to DG-FEM on hexahedral meshes, an overall better accuracy is achieved.

14:   \emph{Conclusion:}

15:   The UDG-FEM approach is an accurate, flexible and promising method to solve the EEG forward problem.

16:   \emph{Significance:}

17:   This study shows the first application of the UDG-FEM approach to the EEG forward problem.\\

18: \end{abstract}

19: