1: \begin{abstract}

2: 

3: 

4: The Method of Brackets (MoB) is a technique used to compute definite integrals, that {has its origin} in the {negative dimensional integration method}. It was originally proposed for the evaluation of Feynman integrals for which, when {applicable, it gives} the results in terms of combinations of (multiple) series. We focus here on some of the {limitations} of MoB and {address them by studying the} Mellin-Barnes (MB) representation technique. {There has been significant process recently in the study of the latter} due to the development of a new computational approach based on conic hulls (see Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 151601 (2021)). 

5: The comparison between the two methods helps to {understand} the limitations of the MoB, in particular when termwise divergent series appear. {As a consequence, the MB technique is found to be} superior over MoB for two major reasons: 1. the selection of the sets of series that form a series representation for a given integral follows, in the MB approach, from specific intersections of conic hulls, which, in contrast to MoB, does not need any convergence analysis of the involved series, and 2. {MB can be used to evaluate resonant (i.e. logarithmic) cases where MoB fails due to the appearance of termwise divergent series.}

6: Furthermore, we show that the recently added Rule 5 of MoB naturally emerges as a consequence of the residue theorem in the context of MB.

7: 

8: 

9: \end{abstract}

10: