1: \begin{abstract}

2: \noindent

3: This paper provides a comprehensive 

4: discussion of the equivalences 

5: between splitting methods.

6: These equivalences have been studied 

7: over the past few decades and, in fact, 

8: have proven to be very useful.

9: In this paper, we survey known results 

10: and also present new ones.

11: In particular, we provide simplified proofs 

12: of the equivalence of

13: the ADMM and the Douglas--Rachford method

14: and the equivalence of

15: the ADMM with intermediate update of multipliers and 

16: the Peaceman--Rachford method.

17: Other splitting methods are also considered.

18: 

19: %The Douglas--Rachford algorithm 

20: %is a very popular splitting technique 

21: %for finding a zero of the sum of

22: %two maximally monotone operators.

23: %\textcolor{blue}{Nonetheless}, the behaviour of the algorithm 

24: %remains mysterious in the general inconsistent  case, i.e.,

25: %when the sum problem has no zeros.

26: %More than a decade ago, however, it was shown 

27: %that in the (possibly inconsistent) convex

28: %feasibility setting, the shadow sequence

29: %remains bounded and it is weak cluster 

30: %points solve a best approximation problem.

31: %

32: %In this paper, we advance the understanding of the inconsistent

33: %case significantly by providing a complete proof

34: %of the full weak convergence in the 

35: %convex feasibility setting. In fact,

36: %a more general sufficient condition for the 

37: %weak convergence in the general case is presented.

38: %Several examples illustrate the results. 

39: \end{abstract}

40: