9e478bb8d921de83.tex
1: \begin{abstract}
2: Cauchy's sum theorem of 1821 has been the subject of rival
3: interpretations ever since Robinson proposed a novel reading in the
4: 1960s.  Some claim that Cauchy modified the hypothesis of his theorem
5: in 1853 by introducing uniform convergence, whose traditional
6: formulation requires a pair of independent variables.  Meanwhile,
7: Cauchy's hypothesis is formulated in terms of a single variable~$x$,
8: rather than a pair of variables, and requires the error
9: term~$r_n=r_n(x)$ to go to zero at {\em all\/} values of~$x$,
10: including the infinitesimal value generated by~$\frac{1}{n}$,
11: explicitly specified by Cauchy.  If one wishes to understand Cauchy's
12: modification/clarification of the hypothesis of the sum theorem in
13: 1853, one has to jettison the automatic translation-to-limits.
14: \end{abstract}
15: