1: \begin{abstract}

2: 

3: %Context. 

4: Magnetohydrodynamical (MHD) dynamos emerge in many different astrophysical situations where turbulence is present, but the interaction between large-scale (LSD) and small-scale dynamos (SSD) is not fully understood. 

5: %Aims and physical methods. 

6: We performed a systematic study of turbulent dynamos driven by isotropic forcing in isothermal MHD with magnetic Prandtl number of unity, focusing on the exponential growth stage. Both helical and non-helical forcing was employed to separate the effects of LSD and SSD in a periodic domain. Reynolds numbers ($\Rem$) up to $\approx 250$ were examined and multiple resolutions used for convergence checks. 

7: %Numerical Methods. 

8: We ran our simulations with the \textit{Astaroth} code, designed to accelerate 3D stencil computations on graphics processing units (GPUs) and to employ multiple GPUs with peer-to-peer communication. We observed a speedup of $\approx 35$ in single-node performance compared to the widely used multi-CPU MHD solver \textit{Pencil Code}.

9: %Results

10: We estimated the growth rates both from the averaged magnetic fields and their power spectra. At low $\Rem$, LSD growth dominates, but at high $\Rem$ SSD appears to dominate 

11: in both helically and non-helically forced cases. Pure SSD growth rates follow a logarithmic scaling as a function of $\Rem$.

12: Probability density functions of the magnetic field from the growth stage exhibit SSD behaviour in helically forced cases even at intermediate $\Rem$.

13: We estimated mean-field turbulence transport coefficients using closures like the second-order correlation approximation (SOCA). They yield growth rates similar to the directly measured ones

14: and provide evidence of $\alpha$ quenching. 

15: Our results are consistent with the SSD inhibiting the growth 

16: of the LSD at moderate $\Rem$, while the dynamo growth is enhanced at higher $\Rem$.

17: 

18: 

19: \end{abstract}

20: