1: % aa.dem
2: % AA vers. 5.2, LaTeX class for Astronomy & Astrophysics
3: % demonstration file
4: % (c) Springer-Verlag HD
5: % revised by EDP Sciences
6: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------
7: %
8: %\documentclass[referee]{aa} % for a referee version
9: %
10: %\documentclass[onecolumn]{aa}
11: \documentclass{aa}
12: \usepackage{graphicx}
13: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
14: \usepackage{txfonts}
15: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
16: %
17: \begin{document}
18: %
19: \title{Nuclear star formation in the quasar PG1126$-$041 from adaptive
20: optics assisted spectroscopy \thanks{Based on data obtained
21: at the VLT through the ESO program 71.B-0453(A).}}
22:
23:
24: \author{G. Cresci \inst{1} \and R. Maiolino \inst{2} \and A. Marconi \inst{2}
25: \and F. Mannucci \inst{3} \and G.~L. Granato \inst{4}}
26:
27: \offprints{G. Cresci}
28:
29: \institute{Dip. di Astronomia - Universit\`a di Firenze,
30: Largo E. Fermi 5, I-50125 Firenze, Italy;
31: \email{gcresci@arcetri.astro.it}
32: \and INAF, Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri,
33: Largo E. Fermi 5, I-50125, Firenze, Italy
34: \and Istituto di Radioastronomia, sezione di Firenze,
35: Largo E. Fermi 5, I-50125, Firenze, Italy
36: \and INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova,
37: Vicolo dell'Osservatorio 5, I-35100 Padova, Italy}
38:
39: \date{Received ; accepted }
40:
41:
42: \abstract{We present adaptive optics assisted spectroscopy of three quasars
43: obtained with NACO at VLT. The high angular resolution achieved with the
44: adaptive optics ($\sim0.08''$), joined to the diagnostic power of near-IR
45: spectroscopy,
46: allow us to investigate the properties of the innermost 100~pc of
47: these quasars.
48: In the quasar with the best adaptive optics correction, PG1126$-$041,
49: we spatially resolve the Pa$\alpha$ emission within the
50: nuclear 100~pc. The comparison with higher excitation lines suggests that
51: the narrow Pa$\alpha$ emission is due to nuclear star formation.
52: The inferred intensity of the nuclear star formation
53: (13~$\rm M_{\odot}~yr^{-1}$)
54: may account for most of the far-IR luminosity observed in this quasar.
55:
56: \keywords{Galaxies: active -- Galaxies: nuclei -- quasars: emission lines --
57: Galaxies: starburst -- Techniques: high angular resolution --
58: Instrumentation: adaptive optics}
59: }
60:
61: \maketitle
62: %
63: %________________________________________________________________
64:
65: \section{Introduction}
66:
67: The study of the stellar populations and star formation
68: in the host galaxies of Active Galactic Nuclei (AGNs) is
69: fundamental to understand the connection between black-hole
70: growth and galaxy formation.
71: Several evidences for such a connection have been obtained in
72: local low-luminosity AGNs, i.e. Seyfert galaxies
73: (e.g. Cid Fernandes et al. \cite{cid01}, Heckman et al. \cite{heckman97},
74: Maiolino et al. \cite{maiolino95}, Oliva et al. \cite{oliva99}).
75: At higher, quasar-like luminosities the
76: investigation of star formation and stellar population is much
77: more difficult because the tracers of star formation are heavily
78: diluted by the strong active nucleus. Nevertheless a few observational programs
79: have been successful in disentangling the host galaxy
80: and star formation from the quasar light. The separation
81: of the two components has been achieved either through a
82: spectroscopic decomposition or through high angular resolution
83: imaging observations (e.g.
84: Canalizo \& Stockton \cite{canalizo01},
85: Courbin et al. \cite{courbin02}, Dunlop et al. \cite{dunlop03},
86: Jahnke et al. \cite{jahnke03}, Schade et al. \cite{schade00}).
87: By using such observating strategies,
88: evidence both for active star formation and relatively
89: quiescent hosts was found. However, all these studies probed
90: the stellar population on scales of a few kpc, while the stellar
91: activity within the central 100~pc, where any interplay with the quasar
92: activity is expected to occur, remains poorly explored.
93:
94: During recent years the performances of adaptive optics systems have improved
95: significantly,
96: achieving very high angular resolutions ($\la 0.1''$) even on relatively
97: faint sources.
98: Such high angular resolution, coupled with spectroscopic capabilities
99: of some of these systems, allows us to efficiently disentangle components
100: associated with stellar activity even in the circumnuclear region of
101: luminous quasars. In this letter we present NACO observations of
102: three quasars at z $\sim$0.06 selected to have an excess of far-Infrared
103: emission. In one of the quasars we find evidence for star formation
104: within the central 100 pc with a rate of $\rm \sim 13~M_{\odot}~yr^{-1}$,
105: which may account for most of its far-IR emission.
106: We assume a "standard" cosmology, with $\rm H_0 = 70~km~s^{-1}~Mpc^{-1}$,
107: $\rm \Omega _m =0.3$ and $\rm \Omega _{\Lambda}=0.7$.
108:
109: %__________________________________________________________________
110:
111: \section{Sample selection, observations and data reduction}
112:
113: The targets were selected from the sample
114: of Andreani et al. (\cite{andreani01}) who provide mid-IR and far-IR data for a large number
115: of optically selected quasars.
116: We selected quasars matching the following constraints:
117: 1) z$\sim$0.06, so that the CONICA projected resolution
118: on the source is better than 100~pc (in the K band) and, at the
119: same time, both Pa$\alpha$ and [SiVI]1.97$\mu$m emission lines
120: are shifted into the K band;
121: 2) far-IR luminosity $\rm L_{FIR}>10^{44}~erg~s^{-1}$, i.e.
122: objects more IR luminous than the average of quasars at the same
123: redshift and, therefore, suspected to harbor starburst activity;
124: 3) radio quiet, to avoid synchrotron contamination to the far-IR
125: radiation;
126: 4) visible magnitude V$<$14.5 mag, so that the Adaptive Optics correction can
127: achieve good performances with Strehl ratios of $\sim$0.2
128: by using the quasar itself as a reference to close the loop.
129: Four quasars were selected and three of them, whose
130: properties are listed in Tab.~1, were observed in service mode with NACO.
131: %
132: \begin{table*}
133: \label{osservazioni}
134: \begin{center}
135: \begin{tabular}{l c c c c c c c c c}
136: \hline
137: \hline
138: Name & RA(J2000) & DEC(J2000) & z & m$_V$ & L$_{\rm FIR}$ & Date & seeing & FWHM & SR \\
139: \hline
140: IRAS09149$-$6206 & 09 16 09.4 & $-$62 19 29 & 0.057 & 14.1 & 7.9 & Apr 20, 2003 & 1.0$''$ & 0.09$''$ (100 pc) & 5\% \\
141: PG1126$-$041 & 11 29 16.6 & $-$04 24 08 & 0.060 & 14.5 & 3.2 & Jun 17, 2003 & 0.4$''$ & 0.07$''$ (81 pc) & 26\% \\
142: PG2214+139 & 22 17 12.3 & +14 14 21 & 0.066 & 14.5 & 1.5 & Jun 18, 2003 & 0.8$''$ & 0.09$''$ (114 pc) & 11\% \\
143: % PG1211+14 & 12 14 17.7 & +14 03 12 & 0.080 & 14.2 & & 0.5'' & & \\
144: \hline
145: \hline
146: \end{tabular}
147: \caption{List of the bserved quasars, along with their properties and log of
148: the observations. L$_{\rm FIR}$ is in units of
149: $\rm 10^{44}erg~s^{-1}$;
150: \textit{seeing} is the median DIMM seeing
151: during the observation;
152: \textit{FWHM} is the Full Width Half Maximum of the PSF on the Adaptive Optics corrected images, in arcsec
153: and in parsec; \textit{SR} is the Strehl Ratio measured on the images.}
154: \end{center}
155: \end{table*}
156: %
157: Both images and spectra were obtained in the K band. Images were
158: obtained in the IB\_2.18 filter (to avoid saturation)
159: with the S27 camera, yielding a pixel scale of
160: $0.027''$/pix. Spectra were obtained with a $0.086''$ slit
161: at PA$=$0$^{\circ}$, with the Grism2
162: coupled with the SK order sorting filter,
163: yielding a spectral resolution $\rm R=\lambda/\Delta \lambda=1400$,
164: and with the S54 camera yielding a pixel scale along the slit of $0.054''$/pix.
165: During each observing run we obtained a diffraction limited nuclear
166: spike of $\sim0.08''$ (corresponding to $\sim$100~pc projected on these
167: quasars). In the spectroscopic mode the pixel size
168: undersamples the PSF. The Strehl Ratio ranges from 5\% to 26\% (see Tab.~1).
169:
170: The spectra were reduced following the standard steps for NIR spectroscopy. The spectra obtained
171: at different positions along the slit were subtracted from each other to remove the background,
172: then flat fielded, aligned, co-added and calibrated.
173: Atmospheric features were corrected by dividing for the spectrum of a reference star.
174: B3III and B5V stars were used for PG1126 and IRAS09149 respectively, and
175: in these cases
176: the spectra were then multiplied by a blackbody at 20000~K to
177: re-establish the correct slope of the
178: continuum. For PG2214 we used a G0V star, and the spectra were then
179: multiplied by the
180: solar spectrum to remove the stellar features and continuum slope
181: (see Maiolino et al. \cite{maiolino96} for details). Images were instead
182: reduced using the \textit{eclipse} software and the CONICA pipeline.
183:
184: \section{Analysis and results}
185:
186: In this letter we focus on the analysis of the spectra, since they provide the most
187: interesting information.
188: Of the three quasar spectra we obtain spatially resolved features only for the
189: case
190: with the best Adaptive Optics correction, i.e. PG1126$-$041 which was observed with a
191: Strehl Ratio of 26\%. The integrated spectrum is shown in Fig.~\ref{spectra}. In the
192: following we will concentrate on the analysis of this spectrum.
193:
194: %
195: \begin{figure}[!h]
196: \centering
197: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{Gd071_f1.eps}}
198: \caption{Continuum subtracted spectra of PG1126$-$04. The Br$\gamma$*
199: introduced by the division of the reference B star is marked.}
200: \label{spectra}
201: \end{figure}
202: %
203: Pa$\alpha$ is clearly broad and certainly dominated by the Broad Line Region (BLR).
204: It is more difficult to indentify the presence of a narrow component associated
205: either with a Narrow Line Region (NLR) or with star formation.
206: A method to investigate the presence of a narrow component,
207: while exploiting the high angular resolution delivered by the AO,
208: is to study the spatial variation of the Pa$\alpha$ profile along
209: the slit. The BLR is certainly unresolved at our resolution (R$<$1pc) and
210: therefore the profile of the Pa$\alpha$, if totally attributed to the BLR,
211: should not change spatially along the slit, and should simply scale
212: in intensity following the profile of the PSF. We have investigated the
213: variation of the Pa$\alpha$ profile along the slit by
214: subtracting the continuum of all spectra at different locations
215: along the slit and then rescaled the spectra to match the Pa$\alpha$
216: flux on the central spectrum. In Fig.~\ref{compare} we show this comparison for
217: the spectrum $0.054''$ north of the central spectrum for PG1126: the
218: solid line shows the (continuum subtracted) central spectrum, while
219: the dashed line shows the rescaled off-nuclear spectrum. The lower
220: panel shows the difference between the two spectra which, although noisy,
221: shows the presence of a excess narrow component ($\rm FWHM \sim 200\ km/s$)
222: in the off-nuclear spectrum. This demonstrates the presence of
223: a narrow component of Pa$\alpha$,
224: associated either with a NLR or with star forming regions.
225:
226: Once proved the existence of a narrow component, separated
227: from the BLR, we can follow its spatial behavior along with
228: other spectral features.
229: We have fitted the Pa$\alpha$ of PG1126 profile with two
230: broad gaussians, which reproduce the broad (BLR) component, and a narrow
231: component. The resulting fit for the central spectrum is shown in Fig.~\ref{fit}.
232: %
233: \begin{table}
234: \label{parametri}
235: \begin{center}
236: \begin{tabular}{l c c c c}
237: \hline
238: \hline
239: Line & Flux & v$-$v$_{\rm sys}$ & FWHM \\
240: \hline
241: \textbf{Pa$\alpha$} - Broad 1 & 953.3 $\pm$ 43.3 & 14 $\pm$ 37 & 3003 $\pm$ 134 \\
242: \textbf{Pa$\alpha$} - Broad 2 & 457.1 $\pm$ 41.7 & 37 $\pm$ 32 & 1312 $\pm$ 142 \\
243: \textbf{Pa$\alpha$} - Narrow & 27.6 $\pm$ 7.0 & 71 $\pm$ 32 & Unresolved \\ %183 $\pm$ 212 \\
244: \hline
245: \textbf{Br$\delta$} - Broad & 129.0 $\pm$ 10.4 & $-$75 $\pm$ 191 & 2277 $\pm$ 258 \\
246: \textbf{Br$\delta$} - Narrow & 13.8 $\pm$ 6.3 & $-$124 $\pm$ 123 & 697 $\pm$ 413 \\
247: \hline
248: \textbf{[SiVI]} - Broad & 89.7 $\pm$ 6.8 & $-$203 $\pm$ 333 & 2797 $\pm$ 240 \\
249: \textbf{[SiVI]} - Narrow & 8.0 $\pm$ 1.7 & 42 $\pm$ 89 & 360 $\pm$ 185 \\
250: \hline
251: \hline
252: \end{tabular}
253: \caption{Best fit parameters for the components of the central spectrum of PG1126$-$041,
254: for Pa$\alpha$,
255: Br$\delta$ and [SiVI]. \textit{Flux} is in units of $10^{-16}$ erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$;
256: the shift the various component from the systemic velocity
257: (\textit{v$-$v$_{sys}$}) and their \textit{FWHM} are in km s$^{-1}$.}
258: \end{center}
259: \end{table}
260: %
261: \begin{figure}%[!ht]
262: \centering
263: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{Gd071_f2.eps}}
264: \caption{Comparison between the central spectrum and the spectrum $0.054''$
265: to the north, around
266: the Pa$\alpha$ region.
267: In the \textit{upper panel} the solid gray line shows the (continuum subtracted)
268: central spectrum, while the black dashed line shows the rescaled off-nuclear spectrum.
269: The \textit{loer panel} shows the difference between the two spectra.}
270: \label{compare}
271: \end{figure}
272: %
273: In Tab.~2 we list the best fit parameters for the components.
274: For what concerns the blend of [SiVI]1.96$\mu$m and Br$\delta$, each of the two lines
275: was fitted by using two gaussian components only (additional components are not
276: required given the lower S/N for these fainter lines)\footnote{Note that the profile
277: of the Pa$\alpha$ cannot be used to fit the Br$\delta$ because different hydrogen
278: lines originating from the BLR have often different profiles, like in this case.}.
279: [SiVI] in particular is
280: well fitted by a broad and a narrow component. The presence of both narrow and broad
281: components of coronal lines (such as [SiVI]) is well known in AGNs. A component
282: with a width intermediate between BLR and NLR ($\rm \sim 1000-2000\ km~s^{-1}$)
283: is commonly observed and ascribed to an ``Intermediate Emission Line Region''
284: (Giannuzzo et al. \cite{giannuzzo95}). The narrow component of the coronal lines
285: comes instead
286: from the ``classical'' NLR and extends for a few 100~pc
287: (Maiolino et al. \cite{maiolino00}, Thompson et al. \cite{thompson01}).
288: The broad component requires also the profile to be asymmetric,
289: and specifically with a blue wing.
290: Such a blue asymmetry is also commonly observed
291: on high excitation lines from the nuclear region of several Seyferts
292: (e.g. Marconi et al. \cite{marconi96}, Oliva et al. \cite{oliva94}).
293: %
294: \begin{figure}
295: \centering
296: \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{Gd071_f3.ps}
297: \caption{Fit of the Pa$\alpha$ profile for the central spectrum of PG112.
298: The fit is overplotted
299: on the original spectrum, together with the single gaussian components (see text).}
300: \label{fit}
301: \end{figure}
302: %
303:
304: The line profiles on the off-nuclear spectra were fitted by keeping frozen
305: the parameters of the broad components (except for a scaling factor)
306: while the narrow components were left free to vary. In Fig.~\ref{andamento} we show
307: the intensity of the various lines as a function of the offset from the nucleus.
308: The broad component of the Pa$\alpha$ gives the profiles of the
309: PSF along the slit (and it is also consistent with the profile of the
310: continuum, not shown). The most interesting result, expected from the
311: analysis discussed above, is that the intensity
312: of the narrow component of Pa$\alpha$ does not follow the PSF profile and shows an
313: excess of emission to the North, tracing an emission line region extending
314: for 0.05$''$--0.1$''$, or 60--120~pc, from the nucleus.
315:
316: We investigate the nature of the narrow Pa$\alpha$ emitting region by
317: comparing its flux with the observed [SiVI] emission. The narrow component
318: of the latter traces the NLR as it is not produced by star forming regions,
319: while the narrow Pa$\alpha$ may either
320: come from star formation or from the NLR. The different trends of
321: the narrow Pa$\alpha$ and [SiVI] in Fig.~\ref{andamento} suggest that the two lines
322: have different origins. We have further investigated this issue by
323: comparing the ratio between narrow Pa$\alpha$ and [SiVI] in the
324: narrow line region of Sy2 galaxies observed by other authors
325: (Sy1 cannot be used because the hydrogen lines include the broad
326: component and generally a decomposition of narrow and broad components
327: is not given). Pa$\alpha$ is not observable
328: in low redshift Sy2s, but it can be easily derived from Br$\gamma$
329: by using the
330: case B recombination ratio (which holds for the NLR):
331: Br$\gamma$/Pa$\alpha$=0.082. The additional problem
332: is however that in Sy2 galaxies Br$\gamma$ may well be contributed by star
333: formation, since there are several evidences for nuclear and circumnuclear
334: star formation, as discussed in Sect.~1. For this reason we decided to focus
335: on two specific templates: NGC~1068 and Circinus. These are very
336: nearby Sy2's, extremely well studied, for which there is no evidence in the
337: central region for significant contribution to Br$\gamma$ by active star
338: formation (star formation occurs in rings at a radius of $\sim10''-30''$).
339: The Pa$\alpha$/[SiVI] ratio inferred for the NLR is 2.2 in Circinus
340: (Maiolino et al. \cite{maiolino98}) and 1.1 in NGC~1068
341: (Reunanen et al. \cite{reunanen03}).
342: In PG1126 the ratio between narrow Pa$\alpha$/[SiVI] is 3.4 on the
343: nucleus and 6.4 in the northern region at 60~pc from the nucleus.
344: This comparison indicates that there is a strong excess of narrow Pa$\alpha$
345: emission with respect to that expected from a NLR.
346: Such a Pa$\alpha$ excess is probably
347: due to active star formation in the nuclear and circumnuclear region, within
348: the central $\sim$100~pc.
349: %
350: \begin{figure}%[!h]
351: \centering
352: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{Gd071_f4.ps}}
353: \caption{Intensity of the various lines as a function of the offset from the nucleus,
354: normalized at the flux in the central spectrum. The peak emission of the narrow Pa$\alpha$
355: is not aligned with the nucleus, but shows an excess $\sim$60 pc to the north.}
356: \label{andamento}
357: \end{figure}
358: %
359:
360: Assuming that all the narrow Pa$\alpha$ is associated with star
361: formation we can estimate the star formation rate in the central
362: region of this quasar. Unfortunately, our data do not provide a
363: bi-dimensional information of the Pa$\alpha$ distribution
364: in the central region. However, we can roughly estimate the circumnuclear
365: integrated Pa$\alpha$ emission by assuming that the emission is well represented by the
366: average of the northern and southern sides in our spectrum. The inferred total
367: narrow Pa$\alpha$ flux estimated in this way is
368: $\rm F_{tot}(Pa\alpha _{Narrow}) = 2.15~10^{-14}~erg~s^{-1}cm^{-2}$.
369: From case B recombination ($\rm Pa\alpha/H\alpha=0.107$),
370: we infer a total H$\alpha$ luminosity due to star formation of
371: $\rm L(H\alpha)_{SF}=1.7~10^{42}~erg~s^{-1}$. By using the relation
372: between H$\alpha$ luminosity and star formation rate given in
373: Kennicutt et al. (\cite{kennicutt98}) we derive a nuclear star formation rate of
374: $\rm SFR \approx 13~M_{\odot}$ $\rm yr^{-1}$. According to the relation
375: between SFR and far-IR emission obtained by Kennicutt et al. (\cite{kennicutt98}),
376: such a star formation rate is expected to produce a far-IR
377: luminosity of $\rm \sim 3~10^{44}~erg~s^{-1}$, which matches the luminosity
378: observed from this quasar (Tab.~1). Therefore, the nuclear star formation
379: detected in the nuclear few 100~pc may well account for most
380: of the far-IR luminosity emitted by this quasar and could
381: explain the excess of far-IR emission in this object (Sect.~2).
382: A similar result was found at higher redshift by Alexander et al. (\cite{alexander}),
383: who derived that star formation appears to dominate the bolometric output
384: of AGNs hosted in bright SCUBA galaxies.
385:
386: Of course, the estimated nuclear star formation rate is derived from a
387: monodimensional spectrum and, in particular, the inferred nuclear (R$<$250~pc)
388: Pa$\alpha$ luminosity has required a large aperture correction
389: (a factor of $\sim$3). As consequence, a confirmation of these findings is
390: certainly required with integral field spectroscopy. %for instance through
391: %the Adaptive Optics assisted integral field spectrometer SINFONI which
392: %will soon be available at VLT.
393: Another source of uncertainty is the possible star formation activity occurring in
394: the host galaxy at radii larger than 250~pc; indeed the limited signal-to-noise
395: ratio
396: of our spectra in the outer regions can only provide a relatively loose upper
397: limit of 0.18 $\rm M_{\odot}~yr^{-1}~kpc^{-2}$ on the star formation rate per
398: unit surface area. Deeper observations are required to further constrain the
399: star formation in the host galaxy.
400:
401: In the other two quasars the analysis of the line profile is more complex
402: due to imperfect subtraction of some deep atmospheric absorption features
403: and to a much lower Strehl ratio than in PG1126.
404: There are some hints of a resolved narrow component of Pa$\alpha$, but need
405: to be confirmed with higher quality spectra and higher Strehl Ratios.
406:
407: \section{Conclusions}
408:
409: We have obtained K-band spectroscopic observations assisted
410: by adaptive optics of three quasars at z$\sim$0.06
411: which are luminous in the far-IR. The adaptive optics correction
412: allows us the reach a diffraction limited angular resolution
413: ($\sim0.08''$, corresponding to $\sim100$ pc),
414: with Strehl ratios ranging from 5\% to 26\%.
415: In the quasar observed with the highest Strehl ratio (PG1126$-$041)
416: we spatially resolve a narrow component of Pa$\alpha$ on scales
417: of $\sim$50--100~pc. By comparing the spatial distribution of the
418: narrow Pa$\alpha$ with the distribution of the coronal line
419: [SiVI]1.96$\mu$m, we infer that most of the narrow Pa$\alpha$ is
420: due to star formation in the nuclear and circumnuclear region
421: of the quasar. We also derive that most of the far-IR emission
422: of this quasar is due to the nuclear star formation detected by us.
423:
424: These observations clearly demonstrate that adaptive optics assisted
425: spectroscopy is a powerful tool to investigate the nuclear region
426: even in bright quasars.
427:
428:
429: \begin{acknowledgements}
430: This work was partially supported by
431: the Italian Ministry of Research (MIUR).
432: We are grateful to the ESO staff on Paranal for having
433: performed these observations in service mode.
434: \end{acknowledgements}
435:
436: \begin{thebibliography}{}
437:
438: \bibitem[2004]{alexander} Alexander, D.~M.,
439: Bauer, F.~E., Chapman, S.~C., et al.\
440: %Smail, I., Blain, A.~W., Brandt, W.~N., \& Ivison, R.~J.,
441: 2004, astro-ph/0401129
442:
443: \bibitem[1999]{andreani01}
444: Andreani, P., Franceschini, A., \& Granato, G.\ 1999, \mnras, 306, 161
445:
446: \bibitem[2001]{canalizo01} Canalizo, G.~\&
447: Stockton, A.\ 2001, \apj, 555, 719
448:
449: \bibitem[2001]{cid01} Cid Fernandes,
450: R., Heckman, T., Schmitt, H., Delgado, R.~M.~G., \& Storchi-Bergmann, T.\
451: 2001, \apj, 558, 81
452:
453: \bibitem[2002]{courbin02} Courbin, F., et al.\
454: 2002, \aap, 394, 863
455:
456: \bibitem[2003]{dunlop03} Dunlop, J.~S., et al.
457: McLure, R.~J., Kukula, M.~J., Baum, S.~A., O'Dea, C.~P., \& Hughes, D.~H.\
458: 2003, \mnras, 340, 1095
459:
460: \bibitem[1995]{giannuzzo95} Giannuzzo,
461: E., Rieke, G.~H., \& Rieke, M.~J.\ 1995, \apjl, 446, L5
462:
463: \bibitem[1997]{heckman97} Heckman, T.~M.,
464: Gonzalez-Delgado, R., Leitherer, C., et al.\ %Meurer, G.~R., Krolik, J., Wilson,
465: %A.~S., Koratkar, A., \& Kinney, A.\,
466: 1997, \apj, 482, 114
467:
468: \bibitem[2003]{jahnke03} Jahnke, K.~\&
469: Wisotzki, L.\ 2003, \mnras, 346, 304
470:
471: \bibitem[1998]{kennicutt98} Kennicutt, R.~C.\ 1998,
472: \araa, 36, 189
473:
474: \bibitem[1995]{maiolino95}
475: Maiolino, R., Ruiz, M., Rieke, G.~H., \& Keller, L.~D.\ 1995, \apj, 446,
476: 561
477:
478: \bibitem[1996]{maiolino96} Maiolino,
479: R., Rieke, G.~H., \& Rieke, M.~J.\ 1996, \aj, 111, 537
480:
481: \bibitem[1998]{maiolino98}
482: Maiolino, R., Krabbe, A., Thatte, N., \& Genzel, R.\ 1998, \apj, 493, 650
483:
484: \bibitem[2000]{maiolino00} Maiolino, R.
485: Alonso-Herrero, A., Anders, S., et al.\ %Quillen, A., Rieke, M.~J., Rieke, G.~H., \&
486: %Tacconi-Garman, L.~E.\
487: 2000, \apj, 531, 219
488:
489: \bibitem[1996]{marconi96} Marconi, A., van der Werf, P.~P.,
490: Moorwood, A.~F.~M., \& Oliva, E.\ 1996, \aap, 315, 335
491:
492: \bibitem[1994]{oliva94}
493: Oliva, E., Salvati, M., Moorwood, A.~F.~M., \& Marconi, A.\ 1994, \aap,
494: 288, 457
495:
496: \bibitem[1999]{oliva99}
497: Oliva, E., Origlia, L., Maiolino, R., \& Moorwood, A.~F.~M.\ 1999, \aap,
498: 350, 9
499:
500: \bibitem[2003]{reunanen03}
501: Reunanen, J., Kotilainen, J.~K., \& Prieto, M.~A.\ 2003, \mnras, 343, 192
502:
503: \bibitem[2000]{schade00} Schade,
504: D.~J., Boyle, B.~J., \& Letawsky, M.\ 2000, \mnras, 315, 498
505:
506: \bibitem[2001]{thompson01} Thompson, R.~I., Chary, R., Corbin, M.~R., \&
507: Epps, H.\ 2001, \apjl, 558, L97
508:
509: \end{thebibliography}
510:
511: \end{document}
512: