a04471322f9964e8.tex
1: \begin{abstract}
2: Bayesian procedures designed to quantify truncation errors in perturbative
3: calculations of quantum chromodynamics observables are adapted to expansions
4: in effective field theory (EFT).
5: In the Bayesian approach, such truncation errors are derived from
6: degree-of-belief (DOB) intervals for EFT predictions.
7: Computation of these intervals requires specification of prior probability
8: distributions (``priors") for the expansion coefficients.
9: By encoding expectations about the naturalness of these coefficients, this
10: framework provides a statistical interpretation of the standard EFT procedure where
11: truncation errors are estimated using the order-by-order convergence of the expansion.
12: It also permits exploration of the ways in which such error bars are, and are not,
13: sensitive to assumptions about EFT-coefficient naturalness.
14: We first demonstrate the calculation of Bayesian probability distributions
15: for the EFT truncation error in some representative examples, and then
16: focus on the application of chiral EFT to neutron-proton scattering. Epelbaum, Krebs, and
17: Mei{\ss}ner recently articulated explicit rules for estimating truncation errors in such
18: EFT calculations of few-nucleon-system properties.
19: We find that their basic procedure emerges generically from one class of
20: naturalness priors considered, and that all such priors result in consistent quantitative
21: predictions for 68\% DOB intervals.
22: We then explore
23: several methods by which the convergence properties of the EFT for a set of
24: observables may be used to check the statistical consistency of the EFT expansion parameter.
25: \end{abstract}
26: