1: \begin{abstract}

2: \noindent We investigate {volume-element} sampling strategies {for the stochastic} homogenization {of particle-reinforced composites} and show, via computational {experiments}, that an improper treatment of particles intersecting the boundary of the computational cell may {affect} the accuracy of the computed effective properties. Motivated by {recent} results on a superior convergence rate of the systematic error for {periodized ensembles compared to taking snapshots of ensembles}, we conduct computational experiments for microstructures with circular, spherical and cylindrical inclusions and monitor the systematic errors in the effective thermal conductivity for snapshots of ensembles compared to working with microstructures sampled from periodized ensembles.\\

3: We observe that the standard deviation {of the apparent properties computed on microstructures sampled from} the periodized ensembles decays at the scaling expected from the central limit theorem. In contrast, the standard deviation for the {snapshot} ensembles shows an inferior decay rate at high filler content. The latter effect is caused by additional long-range correlations that necessarily appear in particle-reinforced composites at high, industrially relevant, volume fractions. Periodized ensembles, however, appear to be {less} affected by these correlations.\\

4: Our findings provide guidelines for working with digital volume images of material microstructures and the design of representative volume elements for computational homogenization.\\

5: \quad \\

6: {\noindent\textbf{Keywords:} Quantitative stochastic homogenization; FFT-based computational homogenization; Thermal conductivity; {Screening the} boundary-layer error; Microstructure modeling }

7: \end{abstract}

8: