1: \begin{abstract}

2: 

3: Human-in-the-loop (HiL) reinforcement learning is gaining traction in domains with large action and state spaces, and sparse rewards by allowing the agent to take advice from HiL. Beyond advice accommodation, a sequential decision-making agent must be able to express the extent to which it was able to utilize the human advice. Subsequently, the agent should provide a means for the HiL to inspect parts of advice that it had to reject in favor of the overall environment objective. We introduce the problem of Advice-Conformance Verification which requires reinforcement learning (RL) agents to 

4: provide assurances to the human in the loop regarding how much of their advice is being conformed to. We then propose a Tree-based lingua-franca to support this communication, called a Preference Tree. We study two cases of good and bad advice scenarios in MuJoCo's Humanoid environment. Through our experiments, we show that our method can provide an interpretable means of solving the Advice-Conformance Verification problem by conveying whether or not the agent is using the human's advice. Finally, we present a human-user study that validates our method.

5: 

6: % We study two cases of aligned and misaligned preferences being provided to the RL agent by the human and show that our method not only allows the agent to utilize the preferences for achieving faster convergence compared to vanilla PPO but also to provide an interpretable means of solving the Advice-Conformation Verification problem using our Preference Trees.

7: 

8: \end{abstract}

9: