a770bebcf4bae554.tex
1: \begin{abstract}
2:   This is a continuation, and conclusion, of our study
3:   of bounded solutions $u$ of the semilinear
4:   parabolic equation $u_t=u_{xx}+f(u)$ on the real line whose
5:   initial data  $u_0=u(\cdot,0)$ have finite limits
6:   $\theta^\pm$ as $x\to\pm\infty$. We assume that 
7:   $f$ is  a locally Lipschitz function on $\R$ satisfying 
8:   minor nondegeneracy conditions. Our goal is to describe the
9:   asymptotic behavior of $u(x,t)$ as $t\to\infty$.  In the first two
10:   parts of this series we mainly considered the cases where either
11:   $\theta^-\ne \theta^+$;
12:   or $\theta^\pm=\theta_0$ and $f(\theta_0)\ne0$; or else 
13:   $\theta^\pm=\theta_0$, $f(\theta_0)=0$, and $\theta_0$ is a stable
14:   equilibrium of the 
15:   equation $\dot \xi=f(\xi)$. In all these cases we proved that  the
16:   corresponding solution $u$ is
17:   quasiconvergent---if bounded---which is to say that all limit
18:   profiles of $u(\cdot,t)$  as  $t\to\infty$ are steady states.
19:   The limit profiles, or accumulation points, are taken in
20:   $L^\infty_{loc}(\R)$. In the present paper, we take on the
21:   case that $\theta^\pm=\theta_0$,
22:   $f(\theta_0)=0$, and $\theta_0$ is an 
23:   unstable equilibrium of the equation $\dot \xi=f(\xi)$.
24:   Our earlier  quasiconvergence theorem in this case involved some
25:   restrictive technical conditions on the solution, which
26:   we now remove. Our sole
27:   condition on $u(\cdot,t)$ is that it is nonoscillatory (has only
28:   finitely many  critical points) at some $t\ge 0$.
29:   Since it is known that oscillatory
30:   bounded solutions are not always
31:   quasiconvergent, our result is nearly optimal. 
32: \end{abstract}
33: