1: \begin{abstract} 

2: There has been significant recent work on the theory and application of randomized coordinate descent algorithms, beginning with the work of~\citeauthor{nesterov2012efficiency} [\textit{SIAM J. Optim., 22(2), 2012}], who showed that a random-coordinate selection rule achieves the same convergence rate as the Gauss-Southwell selection rule. This result

3: suggests that we should never use the Gauss-Southwell rule, because it is typically much more expensive than random selection. However, the empirical behaviours of these algorithms contradict this theoretical result: in applications where the computational costs of the selection rules are comparable, the Gauss-Southwell selection rule tends to perform substantially better than random coordinate selection. We give a simple analysis of the Gauss-Southwell rule showing that---except in extreme cases---its convergence rate is faster than choosing random coordinates. We also (i) show that exact coordinate optimization improves the convergence rate for certain sparse problems, (ii) propose a Gauss-Southwell-Lipschitz 

4: rule that gives an even faster convergence rate given knowledge of the Lipschitz constants of the partial derivatives, (iii) analyze the effect of approximate Gauss-Southwell rules, and (iv) analyze proximal-gradient variants of the Gauss-Southwell rule.

5: \end{abstract}