a9cfb8c18ab430f2.tex
1: \begin{abstract}
2: Chaos in the orbits of black hole pairs has
3: by now been confirmed by several independent groups. 
4: While the chaotic behavior of binary black hole orbits is no longer
5: argued, it remains difficult to quantify the importance of chaos to
6: the evolutionary dynamics of a pair of
7: comparable mass black holes. None of our existing approximations are
8: robust enough to offer convincing quantitative conclusions in the most
9: highly nonlinear regime. 
10: It is intriguing to note that
11: in three different approximations to 
12: a black hole pair built of a spinning black hole and a {\it
13:   non-spinning} companion,  
14: two approximations exhibit chaos and one approximation does not. The
15: fully relativistic scenario of 
16: a spinning test-mass around a Schwarzschild black hole shows chaos, as does the
17: Post-Newtonian Lagrangian approximation. However, the approximately
18: equivalent Post-Newtonian Hamiltonian approximation does not show
19: chaos when only one body spins.
20: It is well known in dynamical
21: systems theory that one system can be regular while an approximately
22: related system is chaotic, so there is no formal conflict. However,the 
23: physical question remains, Is there chaos for comparable mass
24: binaries when only one object spins? We are unable to answer this
25: question given the poor convergence of the Post-Newtonian
26: approximation to the fully relativistic system. A resolution awaits
27: better approximations that can be trusted in the highly nonlinear regime.
28: \end{abstract}
29: