aa2fa4483f35c274.tex
1: \begin{abstract}
2: \noindent
3: We consider the minimization or maximization of the $J$th largest eigenvalue of 
4: an analytic and Hermitian matrix-valued function, and build on  
5: Mengi \emph{et al.} (2014, \emph{SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl.}, 35, 699-724).  
6: This work addresses the setting when the matrix-valued function involved is 
7: very large. We describe subspace procedures that convert the original problem into a small-scale 
8: one by means of orthogonal projections and restrictions to certain subspaces,
9: and that gradually expand these subspaces based on the optimal solutions of small-scale 
10: problems. Global convergence and superlinear rate-of-convergence results with respect to the dimensions of 
11: the subspaces are presented in the infinite dimensional setting, where  the matrix-valued function is 
12: replaced by a compact operator depending on parameters. In practice, it suffices to solve eigenvalue 
13: optimization problems involving matrices with sizes on the scale of tens, instead of the original 
14: problem involving matrices with sizes on the scale of thousands. 
15: \\
16: 
17: 
18: \noindent
19: \textbf{Key words.}
20: Eigenvalue optimization, large-scale, orthogonal projection, eigenvalue perturbation theory, parameter dependent compact operator, matrix-valued function
21: \\
22: 
23: \noindent
24: \textbf{AMS subject classifications.} 65F15, 90C26, 47B37, 47B07
25: 
26: \end{abstract}
27: