1: \begin{abstract}

2: The ground state parameters of the two-dimensional $S=1/2$ antiferromagnetic 

3: Heisenberg model are calculated using the Stochastic Series Expansion 

4: quantum Monte Carlo method for $L \times L$ lattices with $L$ up to $16$. 

5: The finite-size results for the energy $E$, the sublattice magnetization $M$,

6: the long-wavelength susceptibility $\chi_\perp (q=2\pi/L)$, and the spin 

7: stiffness $\rho_{\rm s}$, are extrapolated to the thermodynamic limit using 

8: fits to polynomials in $1/L$, constrained by scaling forms previously obtained

9: from renormalization group calculations for the nonlinear $\sigma$ model and 

10: chiral perturbation theory. The results are fully consistent with the 

11: predicted leading finite-size corrections and are of sufficient accuracy for 

12: extracting also subleading terms. The subleading energy correction 

13: ($\sim 1/L^4$) agrees with chiral perturbation theory to within a statistical 

14: error of a few percent, thus providing the first numerical confirmation of the 

15: finite-size scaling forms to this order. The extrapolated ground state energy 

16: per spin, $E=-0.669437(5)$, is the most accurate estimate reported to date. 

17: The most accurate Green's function Monte Carlo (GFMC) result is slightly 

18: higher than this value, most likely due to a small systematic error 

19: originating from ``population control'' bias in GFMC. The other extrapolated 

20: parameters are $M=0.3070(3)$, $\rho_{\rm s} = 0.175(2)$, $\chi_\perp = 

21: 0.0625(9)$, and the spinwave velocity $c=1.673(7)$. The statistical errors are

22: comparable with those of the best previous estimates, obtained by fitting loop

23: algorithm quantum Monte Carlo data to finite-temperature scaling forms. 

24: Both $M$ and $\rho_s$ obtained from the finite-$T$ data are, however, 

25: a few error bars higher than the present estimates. It is argued that the 

26: $T=0$ extrapolations performed here are less sensitive to effects of neglected 

27: higher-order corrections and therefore should be more reliable.

28: \end{abstract}

29: