1: \begin{abstract}

2: We propose two Hybrid High-Order (HHO) methods for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations and investigate their robustness

3: with respect to the Reynolds number.

4: While both methods rely on a HHO formulation of the viscous term, the pressure-velocity coupling is fundamentally different, 

5: up to the point that the two approaches can be considered antithetical. 

6: The first method is kinetic energy preserving, meaning that the skew-symmetric discretization of the convective term

7: is guaranteed not to alter the kinetic energy balance. 

8: The approximated velocity fields exactly satisfy the divergence free constraint and 

9: continuity of the normal component of the velocity is weakly enforced on the mesh skeleton, leading to H-div conformity.

10: The second scheme relies on Godunov fluxes for pressure-velocity coupling: 

11: a Harten, Lax and van Leer (HLL) approximated Riemann Solver designed for cell centered formulations

12: is adapted to hybrid face centered formulations. The resulting numerical scheme is robust up to the inviscid limit, meaning 

13: that it can be applied for seeking approximate solutions of the incompressible Euler equations.

14: The schemes are numerically validated performing steady and unsteady two dimensional test cases and evaluating the convergence rates on $h$-refined mesh sequences. 

15: In addition to standard benchmark flow problems, specifically conceived test cases are conducted for studying the error behaviour when approaching the inviscid limit.

16: 

17: 

18: %Insert your abstract here. Include keywords, PACS and mathematical

19: %subject classification numbers as needed.

20: \keywords{Hybrid High-Order \and Navier--Stokes equations \and Euler equations \and Pressure-robust \and Pointwise divergence free}

21: % \PACS{PACS code1 \and PACS code2 \and more}

22: \subclass{MSC 65M60 \and MSC 76B47 \and MSC 76D05}

23: \end{abstract}

24: