1: \begin{abstract}	

2:  		

3:  			

4:  	 In Bayesian statistics, improper distributions and finitely additive probabilities (FAPs) are the two main alternatives to proper distributions, i.e. countably additive probabilities. Both of them  can be seen as limits of proper distribution sequences w.r.t. to some  specific convergence modes. Therefore, some authors attempt to link  these two notions by this means, partly  using heuristic arguments. The aim of the paper is to compare these two kinds of limits. We show that improper distributions and FAPs  represent two distinct characteristics of a sequence of proper distributions and therefore, surprisingly,  cannot be connected by the mean of proper distribution sequences.    More specifically, for a sequence of proper distribution which converge  to both  an improper distribution and a set of FAPs,  we show that  another sequence of proper distributions can be constructed having the same FAP limits and   converging to any given improper distribution.    This result can be mainly explained by the fact that  improper distributions describe   the behavior of the  sequence inside the domain  after rescaling, whereas  FAP limits describe how the mass concentrates on the boundary of the domain. We illustrate our results with  several examples and we show the difficulty to define properly a uniform FAP distribution on  the natural numbers as an equivalent of the improper flat prior. 

5:  	\end{abstract}