1: %
2: % Murayama et al.
3: %
4: % Submitted version Dec. 4, 1999
5: % Revised on Dec. 24, 1999
6: % very minor revisions on Dec. 25, 1999
7:
8: %\documentstyle[aasms4,12pt]{article}
9: \documentstyle[emulateapj]{article}
10: \newcommand{\ts}{\thinspace}
11: \begin{document}
12:
13: \title{%
14: DISCOVERY OF A LOW SURFACE BRIGHTNESS OBJECT
15: NEAR SEYFERT'S SEXTET
16: }
17:
18: \author{\sc
19: Takashi Murayama\altaffilmark{1},
20: Shingo Nishiura,
21: and
22: Tohru Nagao\altaffilmark{1}
23: }
24:
25: \affil{%
26: Astronomical Institute, Graduate School of Science,
27: Tohoku University, Aoba, Sendai 980-8578, Japan;
28: murayama@astr.tohoku.ac.jp, nishiura@astr.tohoku.ac.jp,
29: tohru@astr.tohoku.ac.jp
30: }
31:
32: \author{\sc
33: Yasunori Sato\altaffilmark{1}
34: }
35:
36: \affil{%
37: Institute of Space and Astronautical Science,
38: 3-1-1 Yoshinodai, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 229-8510, Japan;
39: sato@astro.isas.ac.jp
40: }
41:
42: \author{\sc
43: Yoshiaki Taniguchi\altaffilmark{1}
44: }
45:
46: \affil{
47: Astronomical Institute, Graduate School of Science,
48: Tohoku University, Aoba, Sendai 980-8578, Japan;
49: tani@astr.tohoku.ac.jp
50: }
51:
52: \author{\sc and}
53: %\and
54:
55: \author{\sc
56: D.~B.~Sanders
57: }
58:
59: \affil{%
60: Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii,
61: 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI 96822;
62: sanders@ifa.hawaii.edu
63: }
64:
65: \altaffiltext{1}{%
66: Visiting Astronomer of the University of Hawaii
67: 2.2 meter telescope.
68: }
69:
70:
71: \authoremail{murayama@astr.tohoku.ac.jp}
72:
73: \begin{abstract}
74: We report the discovery of a low surface brightness
75: (LSB) object serendipitously found during deep CCD imaging of
76: a compact group of galaxies, Seyfert's Sextet,
77: in $V\!R$ and $I$ bands.
78: The LSB object is located 2\farcm3 southwest from
79: the group center.
80: Its surface brightness within the angular effective radii of
81: $r_{\rm e}(V\!R)=4\farcs8$ and
82: $r_{\rm e}(I)=4\farcs8$ is very low --
83: $\mu_{\rm e} (V\!R)=25.28$ mag arcsec$^{-2}$ and
84: $\mu_{\rm e}(I)=24.47$ mag arcsec$^{-2}$, respectively.
85: The apparent magnitudes are $m_{\rm AB}(V\!R)=19.87$ mag and
86: $m(I)=19.06$ mag.
87: The object is most likely a LSB dwarf galaxy, but
88: other possibilities are also discussed.
89: \end{abstract}
90:
91: \keywords{%
92: galaxies: dwarf ---
93: galaxies: photometry % ---
94: }
95:
96: \section{INTRODUCTION}
97: Low surface brightness (LSB) galaxies
98: have been extensively discussed within the context of the
99: overall formation and evolution of galaxies as well as
100: observational cosmology, and in particular for their possible contribution
101: as a major fraction of the total galaxy population
102: (see \markcite{Imp97}Impey \& Bothun 1997, for a review).
103: During deep imaging observations of the compact
104: group of galaxies known as Seyert's Sextet
105: (\markcite{Nis99}Nishiura et al.\ 1999)
106: we found a LSB galaxy candidate near the group.
107: In the present paper, we report on
108: the photometric properties of this LSB candidate.
109: We adopt a Hubble constant of 100 $h$ km s$^{-1}$
110: Mpc$^{-1}$ throughout this paper.
111:
112: \section{OBSERVATIONS AND DATA REDUCTION}
113: The observations were carried out
114: at the University of Hawaii 2.2{\ts}m telescope
115: using the 8192$\times$8192 (8k) CCD Mosaic camera
116: (\markcite{Lup96}Luppino et al.\ 1996).
117: The camera was attached at the f/10 Cassegrain focus
118: and provided a $\sim 18\arcmin\times18\arcmin$ field of view.
119: The CCDs were read out in the $2 \times 2$ pixel binning mode
120: which gave an image scale of 0\farcs26 pixel$^{-1}$.
121: We obtained broad band images with the $V\!R$ and $I$ filters on
122: 1999 May 20 and May 23 (UT), respectively.
123: The integration time for each exposure was set to 8 minutes.
124: Twenty-three exposures for the $V\!R$-band and 24 exposures for the $I$-band
125: were taken, thus the total integration time amounted
126: to 184 minutes in $V\!R$ and 192 minutes in $I$.
127:
128: Data processing was done in a standard way
129: using IRAF\footnote{%
130: Image Reduction and Analysis Facility (IRAF) is distributed
131: by the National Optical Astronomy Observatories, which are operated
132: by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy,
133: Inc., under cooperative agreement with the National Science
134: Foundation.}.
135: After bias and dark counts were subtracted,
136: each frame was divided by the flatfield image,
137: which was a median image of all of the object frames
138: obtained during a night.
139: The object frames were median-combined with their
140: positions registered.
141: Typical seeing, as estimated from the processed images,
142: was $\sim${\ts}0\farcs8 in both bands.
143: Standard stars from Landolt (1992\markcite{Lan92}) were observed
144: and used for calibration of absolute fluxes.
145: Since the $V\!R$ filter is not a standard photometric band
146: (see \markcite{Jew96}Jewitt, Luu, \& Chen 1996),
147: we adopted an AB magnitude scale for this bandpass.
148: The absolute photometric errors were estimated to be
149: $\pm 0.05$ mag for the $V\!R$-band and
150: $\pm 0.03$ mag for $I$-band.
151: The limiting surface brightnesses are
152: $\mu_{V\!R}^{\rm lim}=28.7$ mag arcsec$^{-2}$ and
153: $\mu_{I}^{\rm lim}=28.1$ mag arcsec$^{-2}$, corresponding to
154: a 1$\sigma$ variation in the background.
155:
156: \section{RESULTS}
157: In Figure \ref{ssimage}
158: we show the $V\!R$- and $I$-band images
159: of Seyfert's Sextet.
160: A faint, extended object is
161: located in both bands at 2\farcm3 southwest
162: from the group center of Seyfert's Sextet.
163: Our estimate of the centroid position of this faint object is
164: $\alpha$(B1950)=15$^{\rm h}$ 56$^{\rm m}$ 51\fs6,
165: $\delta$(B1950)=+20\arcdeg{} 52\arcmin{} 42\arcsec.
166: As shown in the lower panels of Figure \ref{ssimage},
167: the shape of the object appears to be nearly spherical in both bands
168: and very diffuse compared with the
169: foreground/background galaxies around it.
170: There is no evidence that the object moved during
171: the $V\!R$ and $I$ observations
172: (the $V\!R$ image was taken three days prior to the $I$ band image),
173: thus the object is not likely to be within our solar-system.
174:
175: \placefigure{ssimage}
176:
177: Using a wavelet package in ESO-MIDAS,\footnote{%
178: European Southern Observatory Munich Image Data Analysis System
179: (ESO-MIDAS) is developed and maintained by
180: the European Southern Observatory.}
181: we applied a Wiener-like wavelet filter
182: to the images in order to improve the signal-to-noise.
183: The results are shown in Figure \ref{lsbimage}.
184: In the central region of the processed $V\!R$ image
185: there seem to be two intensity peaks lying along
186: a northwest-southeast direction
187: with a separation of $\sim 2\farcs5$.
188: On the other hand, the $I$-band image shows a single
189: peak which is located between the two $V\!R$ peaks.
190: This could be interpreted as being due to an inhomogeneous distribution of
191: dust, or perhaps a strong emission line from ionized gas that
192: appears in either band.
193: Alternatively, the intensity peaks near the center
194: may be background galaxies.
195: At 19\arcsec{} west of the center of the faint object
196: there is another diffuse condensation which
197: could perhaps be interpreted as a tidal structure.
198: This companion structure appears to be present
199: in the original images, but given that the strength of this
200: feature is comparable
201: to the noise uncertainty in the original images,
202: we will not discuss it further in this paper.
203:
204: \placefigure{lsbimage}
205:
206: Next we discuss the photometric properties of this LSB object.
207: Since the object appears to be nearly spherical, we will adopt a
208: circular aperture for computing the radial light distribution.
209: Apparent foreground/background objects were first masked,
210: and the surface brightness on the original images
211: was then determined using 0\farcs8 radial bins where the binwidth was set
212: to be approximately equal to the seeing.
213: The center of the aperture was fixed at the position of
214: the intensity peak in the noise reduced $I$-band image.
215: Figure \ref{profile} shows the surface brightness profiles
216: in both bands.
217: These profiles cannot be simply fit with an exponential disk
218: as can be seen by the fact that an exponential profile would appear as a straight line
219: on the $\mu$-$r$ plot (the upper panel of Figure \ref{profile}).
220: Although the observed radial profiles could be approximated by a
221: straight line fit at radii $4\arcsec{} \lesssim r \lesssim 10\arcsec$,
222: it is clear that the profiles flatten
223: at $r\lesssim 4\arcsec$.
224: Furthermore, a $r^{1/4}$-law profile, which is more centrally concentrated
225: than an exponential profile, is also a poor approximation to
226: the observed data points.
227: We also note that since the flattened region of the profiles is large
228: compared to the seeing size of $\sim 0\farcs8$,
229: the flat profiles at $r \lesssim 4\arcsec$ are a genuine property of this LSB object.
230:
231: In order to more accurately approximate the observed radial surface brightness distribution,
232: we decided to adopt a $r^{1/n}$-law fit with $n<1$;
233: \[
234: \mu(r) = \mu_0 + 2.5 (\log_{10} e) \left(\frac{r}{s}\right)^{1/n},
235: \]
236: where $\mu(r)$ is the surface brightness at a radius of
237: $r$ from the center, $\mu_0$ is the central surface brightness, and
238: $s$ is the angular scale length.
239: This profile is less concentrated than an exponential profile, i.e.,
240: shallower at the inner area and a steeper
241: profile at the outer area than an exponential profile.
242: The solid curves shown in Figure \ref{profile}
243: are the best fit for each band.
244: We used only the points at $1\arcsec < r < 10\arcsec$
245: (shown by the filled circles in Figure \ref{profile})
246: to avoid the seeing effect at the center
247: and the sky-noise limited area at large radii.
248: Table \ref{nfit} lists the fit parameters
249: ($n$, $\mu_0$, and $s$) as well as other photometric properties
250: which were subsequently derived.
251: Our analysis shows that the LSB galaxy has a $r^{1/n}$ surface
252: brightness profile with $n\sim0.6$.
253:
254: %% TABLE 1 %%
255: \begin{deluxetable}{lcc}
256: \tablenum{1}
257: \tablecaption{%
258: Results of $r^{1/n}$-law Fitting and Photometric Properties.\tablenotemark{a}
259: \label{nfit}}
260: \tablehead{
261: &
262: \colhead{$V\!R$} &
263: \colhead{$I$}
264: }
265: \startdata
266: Exponent of $r^{1/n}$ law ($n$) & $0.57 \pm 0.01$ & $0.65 \pm 0.01$ \nl
267: Central surface brightness ($\mu_0$) [mag arcsec$^{-2}$]
268: & $24.83 \pm 0.02$ & $23.90\pm 0.03$ \nl
269: Angular scale length ($s$) [arcsec]
270: & $5.35 \pm 0.07$ & $4.84 \pm 0.08$ \nl
271: \hline
272: Total apparent magnitude ($m$) [mag]
273: & $19.87 \pm 0.02$ & $19.06 \pm 0.03$ \nl
274: Angular effective radius ($r_{\rm e}$) [arcsec]
275: & $4.81\pm 0.07$ & $4.81 \pm 0.08$ \nl
276: Effective surface brightness ($\mu_{\rm e}$) [mag arcsec$^{-2}$]
277: & $25.28 \pm 0.02$ & $24.47 \pm 0.03$
278: \enddata
279: \tablenotetext{a}{Errors quoted in this table are formal errors
280: in the fitting.}
281: \end{deluxetable}
282:
283: \placefigure{profile}
284:
285: \section{DISCUSSION}
286: We first discuss the observed properties of our candidate LSB galaxy in terms of
287: the known properties of LSB galaxies.
288: The color of our LSB candidate is $V\!R-I \simeq 0.81$.
289: Since the $V\!R$-band is inconvenient for comparison with standard photometry of galaxies,
290: we first estimated that $V-I \simeq 0.94$ and $R-I \simeq 0.49$ by
291: interpolating the observed fluxes in the $V\!R$-band and $I$-band.
292: These colors are not peculiar for LSB dwarfs or LSB disk galaxies
293: (e.g., \markcite{Imp97}Impey \& Bothun 1997).
294: One of the characteristics of our LSB object is
295: the $r^{1/n}$ surface brightness profile with $n \sim 0.6$, however
296: the majority of LSB galaxies exhibit an exponential profile, i.e.,
297: $n=1$ (\markcite{One97}O'Neil, Bothun, \& Cornell 1997).
298: On the other hand, many of the faiter dwarf ellipticals in the
299: Fornax cluster have less concentrated profiles than the exponential
300: (\markcite{Cal87}Caldwell \& Bothun 1987).
301: \markcite{Dav88}Davies et al.\ 1988 also showed that
302: a significant number of LSB dwarf galaxies
303: in the Fornax cluster show $r^{1/n}$-law profiles with $n<1$.
304: Furthermore, \markcite{One97}O'Neil et al.\ (1997)
305: showed that 17{\ts}\% of the LSB galaxies in their sample have
306: less concentrated surface brightness profiles
307: than an exponential disk although they did not fit the profiles
308: with the $r^{1/n}$ law but instead used a King model profile.
309:
310: \markcite{Cao93}Caon, Capaccioli, \& D'Onofrio (1993)
311: found that the value of $n$ is well correlated with the effective
312: radius ($R_{\rm e}$)
313: for spheroidal galaxies ranging from the LSB dwarfs in
314: the sample of \markcite{Dav88}Davies et al.\ (1988) to
315: the giant ellipticals in the Virgo cluster. In this context, the observed
316: exponent of $n \sim 0.6$ for our LSB candidate
317: implies that this object is indeed a good candidate for a LSB dwarf galaxy.
318: As shown in Figure 5 of \markcite{Cao93}Caon et al.\ (1993),
319: the LSB dwarfs with $n<1$ have $R_{\rm e}$ in a range between
320: $\simeq 0.13$ kpc and $\simeq 1.3$ kpc.
321: Given the angular effective radius of our LSB galaxy candidate
322: of $r_{\rm e}=4\farcs8$, this would imply a distance somewhere in the range
323: of 5.4 Mpc to 54 Mpc, and a corresponding absolute $I$-band magnitude of
324: between $-10$ mag and $-15$ mag,
325: which is comparable to those of dwarf galaxies in the Local Group
326: (\markcite{Mat98}Mateo 1998).
327: This would imply that our LSB galaxy candidate would be at the faint end of
328: the luminosity function of LSB galaxies
329: (e.g. \markcite{Imp97}Impey \& Bothun 1997).
330:
331: If the LSB galaxy is located at the same distance
332: as Seyfert's Sextet (44 $h^{-1}$ Mpc),
333: one might conclude that the LSB galaxy may have been formed
334: through possible tidal interactions
335: between the group galaxies.
336: The projected separation of the LSB galaxy from
337: the group center is $\approx 30$ $h^{-1}$ kpc.
338: The LSB galaxy could travel this distance
339: in $2 \times 10^8$ years assuming a a projected velocity equal to
340: the radial velocity dispersion (138 km s$^{-1}$)
341: of the group.
342:
343: At smaller distances than that of Seyfert's Sextet,
344: only one galaxy is known within 1\arcdeg{}
345: of the LSB candidate.
346: It is also a LSB galaxy, F583-1 (= D584-04:
347: \markcite{Sch88}Schombert \& Bothun 1988;
348: \markcite{Sch92}Schombert et al.\ 1992;
349: \markcite{Sch97}Schombert, Pildis, \& Eder 1997).
350: The distance toward F583-1 corresponding to its redshift
351: is 25 $h^{-1}$ Mpc.
352: If our LSB galaxy is located at the same distance as F583-1,
353: the apparent separation of 23\arcmin{} between
354: F583-1 and the LSB galaxy corresponds to 170 $h^{-1}$ kpc.
355: %% F583-1 (D584-04)
356: %% (15h55m15.6s +20d48m42s) V(helio) 2576 km/s (23 arcmin from the LSB)
357:
358: Another possibility is that the LSB object
359: is located at a much smaller distance.
360: This would imply that the LSB object may be a system more like
361: Galactic globular clusters.
362: %The light profiles of the object can be also well fitted with
363: %a King model profile (\markcite{Kin66}King 1966) as
364: %shown in Figure \ref{king}.
365: %Table \ref{kingparam} lists the parameters
366: %of the best fitting King model.
367: In fact, a King model profile with a concentration parameter
368: of $\sim 0.7$ and a core radius of $\sim 4\farcs{}0$ is also a food fit to
369: the present LSB object (Note: we have not shown this fit since it is
370: very similar to that shown in Fig.\ 3).
371: \markcite{One97}O'Neil et al.\ (1997) noted a possibility that some
372: LSB objects well fitted with the King profile that were found in their survey
373: may be Galactic LSB globular clusters.
374: Although the concentration parameter of $c \sim 0.7$ of our LSB object
375: is smaller than those of typical Galactic globular clusters
376: (e.g., \markcite{Chr89}Chernoff \& Djorgovski 1989),
377: globular clusters in the outer halo of the Galaxy
378: ($\sim${\ts}30--100 kpc from the Galactic center)
379: have concentration parameters as small as our LSB object
380: (see, for example, \markcite{Djo94}Djorgovski \& Meylan 1994).
381: The central surface brightness of the globular clusters
382: in the Galactic halo can be as faint as
383: $\sim 24$ mag arcsec$^{-2}$ in $V$,
384: which is comparable to those of LSB galaxies.
385: The clusters in the Galactic halo have larger core radii of $\sim 20$ pc
386: than globular clusters at smaller galactocentric radii because of smaller tidal forces at
387: larger distance from the galactic center.
388: If the present LSB object is such a distant globular cluster,
389: it should have a core radius of $\sim 20$ pc.
390: Thus, the apparent core radius of $r_{\rm c} \sim 4\farcs0$
391: leads to a distance toward the LSB object of $\sim 1$ Mpc.
392: However if this is the case, stars in the LSB would be resolved
393: spatially in our images. Therefore, this possibility can be rejected.
394:
395: In summary, we have discovered a LSB object near the compact group of
396: galaxies known as Seyfert's Sextet.
397: The LSB object is likely to be one of the following:
398: 1) a field LSB dwarf galaxy at a distance of 5.4--54 Mpc, or
399: 2) a LSB dwarf galaxy at the same distance of Seyfert's Sextet
400: (44 $h^{-1}$ Mpc).
401: Measurement of the redshift, either by optical spectroscopy
402: or by radio observations of \ion{H}{1} gas
403: will be necessary to determine which of these descriptions applies.
404:
405:
406: \acknowledgments
407: The authors are very grateful to the staff of the UH 2.2 m telescope.
408: In particular, we would like to thank
409: Andrew Pickles for his technical support and assistance during
410: the observations.
411: We also thank Richard Wainscoat and Shinki Oyabu for their kind help on
412: photometric calibration,
413: Tadashi Okazaki for kindly providing us
414: his program for calculating King model profiles,
415: and Daisuke Kawata for helpful comments.
416: This work was financially supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for
417: Scientific Research (Nos. 07055044, 10044052, and 10304013)
418: from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture
419: by the Foundation for Promotion of Astronomy, Japan.
420: TM is thankful for support from a Research Fellowship from the Japan
421: Society for the Promotion of Science for Young Scientists.
422: This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database
423: (NED) and the NASA Astrophysics Data System Abstract Service.
424:
425:
426: \begin{references}
427: %\reference{Bar96}Barton, E., Geller, M.\ J.,
428: % Rammela, M., Marzke, R.\ O., \&
429: % da Costa, L.\ N.\ 1996,
430: % \aj, 112, 871
431: \reference{Cad87}Caldwell, N., \& Bothun, G.\ D.\ 1987
432: \aj, 94, 1126
433: \reference{Cao93}Caon, N., Capaccioli, M., \&
434: D'Onofrio, M.\ 1993,
435: \mnras, 265, 1013
436: \reference{Che89}Chernoff, D.\ F., \&
437: Djorgovski, S.\ 1989
438: \apj, 339, 904
439: \reference{Dav88}Davies, J.\ I., Phillipps, S.,
440: Cawson, M.\ G.\ M., Disney, M.\ J., \&
441: Kibblewhite, E.\ J.\ 1988,
442: \mnras, 232, 239
443: \reference{Djo94}Djorgovski, R., \& Meylan, G.\ 1994
444: \aj, 108, 1292
445: \reference{Imp97}Impey, C., \& Bothun, G.\ 1997,
446: \araa, 35, 267
447: \reference{Jew96}Jewitt, D., Luu, J., \& Chen, J.\ 1996
448: \aj, 112, 1225
449: \reference{Kin66}King, I.\ R.\ 1966, \aj, 71, 64
450: \reference{Lan92}Landolt A.\ U.\ 1992, \aj, 104, 340
451: \reference{Lup96}Luppino, G., Metzger, M., Kaiser, N.,
452: Clowe, D., Gioia, I., \&
453: Mayazaki, S.\ 1996,
454: ASP Conf.\ Ser.\ 88,
455: Clusters, Lensing, and the Future of the Universe,
456: ed.\ V.\ Trimble \& A.\ Reisenegger
457: (San Francisco: ASP), 229
458: \reference{Mat98}Mateo, M.\ L.\ 1998,
459: \araa, 36, 435
460: \reference{Nis99}Nishiura, S., Shimada, M., Taniguchi, Y.,
461: Murayama, T., Sato, Y., Nagao, T., \&
462: Sanders, D.\ B.\ 1999,
463: in preparation
464: \reference{One97}O'Neil, K., Bothun, G.\ D., \&
465: Cornell, M.\ E.\ 1997,
466: \aj, 113, 1212
467: \reference{Sch88}Schombert, J.\ M., \& Bothun, G.\ D.\ 1988,
468: \aj, 95, 1389
469: \reference{Sch92}Schombert, J.\ M., Bothun, G.\ D.,
470: Schneider, S.\ E., \&
471: McGaugh, S.\ S.\ 1992,
472: \aj, 103,1107
473: \reference{Sch97}Schombert, S.\ E., Pildis, R.\ A., \&
474: Eder, J.\ A.\ 1997,
475: \apjs, 111, 233
476: \end{references}
477:
478:
479: \clearpage
480:
481: %%%%% FIGURE CAPTIONS %%%%%
482: \figcaption[fig1.ps]{%
483: The $V\!R$- and $I$-band images of Seyfert's Sextet (upper panels).
484: The newly discovered LSB object is in the center of the box at the lower right.
485: \label{ssimage}
486: }
487:
488: \figcaption[fig2.ps]{%
489: The noise reduced images of the LSB object
490: processed with a Wiener-like wavelet filter.
491: In the lower panels the boxed region is shown at a
492: different intensity scale.
493: \label{lsbimage}
494: }
495:
496: \figcaption[fig3.ps]{%
497: The surface brightness profiles of the LSB object
498: in the $V\!R$- and $I$-bands versus
499: the angular radius in linear scale (upper panel) and
500: in logarithmic scale (lower panel).
501: Observed data are shown as filled and open circles with
502: error bars.
503: The filled circles denote the data points which were used
504: for the $r^{1/n}$-law fit.
505: The results of the $r^{1/n}$-law fit are shown by
506: the solid lines.
507: \label{profile}
508: }
509:
510:
511: \end{document}
512: