1: %\documentstyle[12pt,aasms4]{article}
2: %\documentstyle[11pt,aaspp4]{article}
3: \documentstyle[aas2pp4]{article}
4:
5: \def\rem#1{{\bf #1}}
6: \def\simless{\mathbin{\lower 3pt\hbox
7: {$\rlap{\raise 5pt\hbox{$\char'074$}}\mathchar"7218$}}} %< or of order
8: \def\simmore{\mathbin{\lower 3pt\hbox
9: {$\rlap{\raise 5pt\hbox{$\char'076$}}\mathchar"7218$}}} %> or of order
10: \def\Msun{{\rm M}_\odot} % solar masses
11: \def\msun{{\rm M}_\odot} % solar masses
12:
13: \received{}
14: \accepted{}
15: %\journalid{337}{15 January 1989}
16: %\articleid{11}{14}
17: \slugcomment{Submitted to Ap.J, 8 Jan 2000}
18:
19: \lefthead{Reig et al.}
20: \righthead{Lags in GRS 1915+105}
21:
22: \begin{document}
23:
24: \title{Phase lag variability associated with the 0.5--10 Hz QPO \\
25: in GRS~1915+105}
26:
27: \author{
28: P.~Reig\altaffilmark{1,2},
29: T. Belloni\altaffilmark{3},
30: M.~van~der~Klis\altaffilmark{4},
31: M. M\'endez\altaffilmark{4,5},
32: N. D. Kylafis\altaffilmark{1,2},
33: E. C. Ford\altaffilmark{4}
34: }
35:
36: \altaffiltext{1}{Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas, 711 10
37: Heraklion, Crete, Greece}
38:
39: \altaffiltext{2}{Physics Department, University of Crete, 710 03 Heraklion,
40: Crete, Greece}
41:
42: \altaffiltext{3}{Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera, Via E. Bianchi 46, I-23807
43: Merate (LC), Italy}
44:
45: \altaffiltext{4}{Astronomical Institute ``Anton Pannekoek'',
46: University of Amsterdam and Center for High-Energy Astrophysics,
47: Kruislaan 403, NL-1098 SJ Amsterdam, the Netherlands}
48:
49: \altaffiltext{5}{Facultad de Ciencias Astron\'omicas y Geof\'{\i}sicas,
50: Universidad Nacional de La Plata, paseo del Bosque S/N, 1900 La Plata,
51: Argentina}
52:
53: \begin{abstract}
54:
55: We have used {\em Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer} data to measure the
56: lags between soft (2--5 keV) and hard (5--13 keV) photons and to
57: study the aperiodic variability of the superluminal black hole candidate
58: GRS 1915+105 during low-flux states. The power density spectra exhibit
59: quasi-periodic oscillations (QPO) whose frequency increases with
60: increasing count rate and varies in the frequency range 0.6--8 Hz. A
61: correlation between the QPO frequency and the phase lag spectra is
62: reported for the first time. This correlation is found for both the
63: phase lag continuum and the phase lag at the QPO frequency. We find that
64: as the QPO frequency moves to higher values the phase lags reverse
65: sign from positive to negative. The absolute value of the lag always
66: increases with photon energy. The negative (soft) lags are associated
67: with a softer energy spectrum, whereas the positive (hard) lags are seen
68: when the source is harder. We describe a possible scenario that may
69: account for the change in the sign of the lags.
70:
71: \end{abstract}
72:
73: \keywords{accretion --- accretion disks --- stars: neutron --- stars:
74: individual (GRS 1915 +105) --- X-rays: stars}
75:
76: \section{Introduction}
77:
78: The X-ray source GRS~1915+105 was discovered in 1992 with the
79: WATCH instrument onboard GRANAT (Castro-Tirado et al. 1992).
80: Since {\em RXTE} established continuous coverage in 1996 February,
81: GRS~1915+105 has never switched off completely. It was the first
82: galactic object to show superluminal radio expansion (Mirabel \&
83: Rodr\'{\i}guez 1994). It is located at a distance between 6 to 12.5 kpc
84: (Mirabel \& Rodr\'{\i}guez 1994; Fender et al. 1999). Due to high
85: extinction in the line of sight no optical study of GRS 1915+105
86: has been possible and a near infrared counterpart has been suggested
87: (Mirabel et al. 1994; Bo\"er et al. 1996). No binary mass function or
88: orbital period are known.
89:
90: The source is believed to host a black hole on the basis of its
91: similarities to the dynamically proven black hole system GRO 1655--40
92: (Orosz \& Bailyn 1997) and its X-ray luminosity, which is above the
93: Eddington limit for a neutron star. The X-ray spectrum of GRS~1915+105 is
94: also typical of black hole candidates, requiring two main components
95: (Belloni et al. 1997a): a power-law component which accounts for the high
96: energy part of the spectrum and a thermal component (multi-color black
97: body) which dominates at energies below 10 keV (Mitsuda et al. 1984). At
98: times, only the power law component is observed (Trudolyubov, Churazov, \&
99: Gilfanov 1999; Belloni et al. 2000).
100:
101: GRS~1915+105 displays a remarkable richness in variability (see
102: e.g. Greiner, Morgan \& Remillard 1997). Belloni et al. (1997a,b)
103: modeled the main type of variations observed in this source as due to
104: the onset of a thermal-viscous instability. In this framework, the
105: intervals of low flux correspond to the non-observability of the
106: innermost portion of the accretion disk. During three long (30-100
107: days) periods in 1996 and 1997, no strong flux variability was observed
108: from GRS~1915+105. On the basis of an X-ray color analysis of the {\em
109: RXTE}/PCA data, Belloni et al. (2000) interpreted these quiet periods
110: as the result of the recovery from an instability that affected a
111: larger portion of the accretion disk, combined with a relatively
112: lower value of the accretion rate. Detailed timing analysis of part
113: of these observations has been presented by Trudolyubov et al.
114: (1999).
115:
116:
117: Three different types of QPOs have been identified in GRS~1915+105 (Morgan,
118: Remillard \& Greiner 1997). At higher frequencies a sharp ($Q \approx$ 20)
119: QPO with constant centroid frequency at 67 Hz and whose rms amplitude
120: increases with photon energy has been detected. This QPO has been proposed
121: to arise in the inner accretion disk and its frequency is thought to
122: reflect the properties of the black hole. At much lower frequencies
123: (0.001--0.1 Hz), the source occasionally shows high-amplitude QPOs or
124: brightness "sputters". These variations probably correspond to a disk
125: instability. The third class of QPOs observed in GRS~1915+105 comprises
126: those detected in the frequency range 0.5--10 Hz. They are linked to the
127: properties of the accretion disk since their centroid frequency and
128: fractional rms have been reported to correlate with the thermal flux
129: (Markwardt, Swank, \& Taam 1999; Trudolyubov et al. 1999) and apparent
130: temperature (Muno, Morgan, \& Remillard 1999) of the disk. These QPOs are
131: observed only during the low-flux intervals when, according to the model of
132: the thermal-viscous instability, a portion of the inner accretion disk is
133: not observable.
134:
135: A phase-lag analysis of the observation which showed the strongest signal
136: at 67 Hz was presented by Cui (1999): the 67 Hz QPO shows a marked hard
137: lag, while the low frequency (well below 1 Hz) QPO shows a complex
138: hard/soft lag structure.
139:
140: In this paper, we concentrate on the phase lags associated with the
141: properties of the 0.5--10 Hz QPO during two of the long quiet intervals
142: mentioned above.
143:
144:
145: \section{Observations}
146:
147: The data used in this work were retrieved from the public {\em
148: RXTE} archive and correspond to two different sets of observations.
149: The first set took place between 1996 July 11 and 1996 August 18 and
150: consists of 27 observation intervals (OBI). The second set comprises 16
151: observation intervals covering the period between 1997 September 29
152: and 1997 October 24. These two sets of observations correspond to
153: low-flux intervals in which the source did not display structured
154: variability either in the PCA or in the ASM data (Belloni et al.
155: 2000). The journal of the {\em RXTE} observations is given in
156: Table~\ref{observ}. Due to its low-Earth orbit, {\em RXTE} data consist
157: of a number of contiguous data intervals (typically 1 hour
158: long) interspersed with observational gaps produced by Earth occultations
159: of the source and passages of the satellite through the South Atlantic
160: Anomaly. Each observation interval was analysed separately and
161: appear as different entries in Table~\ref{observ}. A suffix
162: $a, b, c ,...$ has been added to the data set identifiers accordingly.
163:
164: \section{Analysis and Results}
165:
166: \subsection{Power density spectrum}
167:
168: In order to study the source variability, we
169: divided the 2--60 keV PCA light curves (no energy selection was made) of
170: each observation into 16 s segments and calculated the Fourier power
171: spectrum of each segment. The Nyquist frequency was 256 Hz for the first
172: set of observations and 64 Hz for the second. The contribution by the
173: photon counting noise was computed and subtracted from each power spectrum.
174: The power spectra were normalized such that their integral gives the
175: squared fractional rms variability (Belloni \& Hasinger 1990). The power
176: spectra were then averaged together to produce one power spectrum for each
177: observation interval.
178:
179: In all power spectra a strong band-limited noise component was present,
180: together with one or more QPO peaks. We fitted the power spectra using a
181: model that consisted of a broken power law and two Lorentzian peaks,
182: representing the band-limited noise
183: continuum and the QPO plus its second harmonic, respectively. While all
184: power spectra clearly showed one QPO peak, in some cases the second
185: harmonic was not required. Generally, the power spectra are characterized
186: by a flat power-law below the QPO frequency ($\alpha$=0.1--0.3) and a steep
187: power-law above the QPO ($\alpha$= 2.7--3.0). The slope of the
188: low-frequency power-law tends to increase with increasing QPO frequency.
189: While the QPO frequency increases with count rate, its amplitude (rms)
190: decreases (Fig~\ref{cs_qpo_rms}). Trudolyubov et al. (1999) found the
191: same trend during the 1996 November--1997 April low-flux period. The
192: results of the power spectral fitting are given in Table~\ref{observ}.
193:
194: \subsection{Phase lags}
195:
196: For each observation, we produced a phase-lag spectrum. We divided
197: the data into two energy bands (soft: 2--5 keV; hard: 5--13 keV) and
198: produced a cross spectrum for every 16 s. The cross spectrum is
199: defined as $C(j)=X_1^*(j) X_2(j)$, where $X_1$ and $X_2$ are the
200: complex Fourier coefficients for the two energy bands at a
201: frequency $\nu_j$, and $X_1^*(j)$ is the complex conjugate of
202: $X_1(j)$ (van der Klis et al. 1987). The phase lag between the
203: signals in the two bands at Fourier frequency $\nu_j$ is
204: $\phi_j=arg[C(j)]$ (the position angle of $C(j)$ in the complex plane)
205: and the corresponding time lag $\phi_j/2\pi \nu_j$. We calculated an
206: average cross vector $C$ by averaging the complex values over multiple
207: adjacent 16 s spectra, and then finding the final value of $\phi$ vs.
208: frequency. The error in $\phi$ is computed from the observed variance
209: of $C$ in the real and imaginary directions. We limited our phase lag
210: analysis to frequencies below 10 Hz, well below the region where
211: binning effects are important (Crary et al. 1998). In all phase
212: lag spectra, positive lag values mean that hard photons are lagging
213: soft photons. No correction for dead-time effects in the phase lag
214: spectra (cross-talk between energy channels) was done since this effect
215: was found to be negligible.
216:
217: In order to study the variability of the phase lags and its
218: relationship with the properties of the QPO we obtained the mean phase
219: lag spectrum by averaging the cross-correlation vectors in four
220: different QPO frequency ranges, $\nu_{QPO} < 1$ Hz, $1 \leq \nu_{QPO}
221: < 2$ Hz, $2 \leq \nu_{QPO} < 3$ Hz and $\nu_{QPO} \geq 3$ Hz.
222: Figure~\ref{pds_lag} shows these four phase lag spectra together with
223: a representative power spectrum of the group. One can see that both
224: the lag at the QPO frequency, and the characteristic shape of the lag
225: continuum vary drastically. A common feature of the lag spectra is the
226: presence of a broad dip at around the QPO frequency. As the QPO
227: frequency increases, its position relative to the dip changes. The
228: frequency of the dip also varies although not as fast: at low QPO
229: frequencies (below 2 Hz) the QPO occurs slightly before the dip minimum,
230: at QPO frequencies above 2 Hz it occurs at around the dip minimum. At
231: QPO frequencies $\simmore 3.5$ Hz a second dip at lower Fourier
232: frequency develops in the phase lag spectra.
233:
234: At low values of the QPO frequency, the continuum of the phase lag
235: spectrum is curved and positive whereas at high and intermediate QPO
236: frequencies the continuum is flatter and close to zero lag. Averaging
237: over the 0.06--0.6 Hz range, that is, below any of the QPOs, for the
238: four cases shown in Figure~\ref{pds_lag} we find the following
239: values of the phase lags: 0.215$\pm$0.004 rad for $\nu_{QPO}$ $<$ 1
240: Hz, 0.159$\pm$0.004 rad for 1 $\leq \nu_{QPO} <$ 2 Hz,
241: 0.071$\pm$0.004 rad for 2 $\leq \nu_{QPO} <$ 3 Hz and --0.024$\pm$0.003
242: rad for $\nu_{QPO} \geq$ 3 Hz.
243:
244: We also derived phase lags of the continuum and at the QPO frequency
245: for each observation, by measuring the average vector in the frequency
246: range 0.1--5 Hz and $\nu_{QPO} \pm \frac{1}{2} \Delta \nu$,
247: respectively. $\Delta \nu$ is the FWHM of the QPO peak. The results
248: were plotted as a function of QPO frequency and are shown in
249: Figure~\ref{freq_lag}. A tight correlation between these quantities
250: is found. As the QPO frequency (or count rate) increases the lag
251: decreases, changing sign at around 2 Hz. The opposite behavior was
252: reported for GX 399--4 by Nowak et al. (1999). These authors found the
253: shortest time delays at the lowest flux observation. The increase above 5
254: Hz observed in Figure~\ref{freq_lag} (bottom) is due to the dip moving
255: toward higher frequencies. This change in the sign of the lag means
256: that at a certain point soft photons lag hard photons. Similar results
257: were obtained for the lags measured at the theoretical harmonics of the
258: QPO frequency. The frequency at which the lags change from positive to
259: negative are consistent with 4, 6 and 8 Hz, that is, 2, 3 and 4 times that
260: of the QPO (2 Hz).
261:
262: In Figure~\ref{lag_ener}, the dependence of the phase lags (at the QPO
263: frequency) on energy is plotted. Different symbols correspond to three
264: different values of the QPO frequency: squares for $\nu_{QPO}$=0.999 Hz,
265: dots for $\nu_{QPO}$=2.316 Hz and stars for $\nu_{QPO}$=4.68 Hz. The
266: energy bands shown are 2.0--5.0, 5.4--6.9, 7.2--9.4 and 9.8--13.1 keV. The
267: phase lag was obtained by taking the softest band as the reference band and
268: by computing a cross-power spectrum between each of the energy bands and
269: the reference band. At low frequencies, the phase lags are positive and
270: increase with energy; at high frequencies the phase lags are negative and
271: decrease with energy; at intermediate frequencies the lags are zero and
272: roughly constant.
273:
274:
275: We also calculated background subtracted light curves corresponding to
276: the following bands in pulse-height channels: 0--13 (2.0-5.0 keV,
277: band A), 14--35 (5.0-13.0 keV, band B) and 36-100 (13.0-60.0 keV,
278: band C) and produced hard and soft colors as HR1 = B/A and HR2 = C/A,
279: respectively. In Figure~\ref{hr1_lag} we have plotted the phase lags of
280: the continuum (0.1--5 Hz) and the QPO frequency as a function of HR1. The
281: negative lags occur when the source is softer (HR1 $\simless$ 1.2),
282: whereas the hard lags are seen when the source spectrum is harder (HR1
283: $\simmore$ 1.3). A similar trend is obtained if the hard color HR2 is
284: used. The anti-correlation between the QPO frequency and HR1 is a
285: consequence of the anti-correlation of the colors with count rate.
286:
287: It is worth noting that no soft component is required to fit the energy
288: spectrum in the observations presented here with the possible exception of
289: the ones with the highest QPO frequency. During low-flux states in GRS
290: 1915+105 the X-ray spectra are dominated by the power-law component.
291: Therefore, variations in HR1 correspond to variation in the power-law
292: index. For a more detailed interpretation of X-ray colors in terms of
293: spectral models, see Belloni et al. (2000).
294:
295: \section{Discussion}
296:
297: We have analysed {\em RXTE} data of the superluminal source GRS~1915+105 during
298: two quiescent periods and measured lags of the 5--13 keV photons relative
299: to the 2--5 keV photons. We have found that both positive and negative
300: lags are present. Belloni et al. (1997a,b) have shown that the complex
301: spectral and temporal variability of GRS~1915+105 may be explained by
302: the rapid removal and subsequent refilling of the inner region of
303: the accretion disk. The quiescent state corresponds to the absence of
304: this inner region and it is characterized by a relatively low count rate
305: ($\simless$ 20000 {\em RXTE} PCA c/s), power-law dominated X-ray spectrum and
306: the presence of 0.5--10 Hz QPO.
307:
308: In this state both the timing (QPO frequency, lags) and spectral
309: parameters (hardness ratios, temperature of disk) correlate (or
310: anticorrelate) with count rate. Thus a selection according to QPO
311: frequency implicitly implies a selection on spectral hardness or count
312: rate. Of special interest here are the properties of the 0.5--10 Hz QPO
313: (centroid, amplitude), which are strongly correlated with the changes of
314: spectral and timing parameters and can be summarized as follows: as the
315: frequency of the QPO increases {\em i)} the flux of the soft
316: component (disk) increases (Markwardt et al. 1999), {\em ii)} the
317: temperature of the accretion disk increases (Muno et al. 1999), {\em
318: iii)} the fractional rms amplitude of the QPO decreases (Trudolyubov et
319: al. 1999). In this work we find that {\em iv)} as the frequency of the
320: QPO increases the lag between hard and soft photons decreases,
321: changing sign for $\nu_{QPO} \simmore 2$ Hz (Fig. ~\ref{freq_lag}), {\em
322: v)} negative lags occur when the power-law spectrum is soft and
323: positive lags when it is hard (Fig. \ref{hr1_lag}), {\em vi)} the
324: 0.5--10 Hz QPO disappears when the PCA intensity is high ($\simmore$
325: 20000 counts per second).
326:
327:
328: The X-ray spectra of black hole systems consist of a power-law
329: component, thought to be caused by Comptonization, plus a soft thermal
330: component, which is modeled as a multi-temperature blackbody coming from
331: an optically thick accretion disk. The relative strength of these
332: components varies with X-ray flux in the 1--10 keV band. In the standard
333: Comptonization model only hard, i.e. positive lags, are expected. The
334: initially low-frequency photons scatter off energetic electrons and gain
335: energy. The larger the number of scatterings the higher the energy of the
336: escaping photons and also the longer the time they spend in the
337: Comptonizing region.
338:
339: In what follows we discuss a simple scenario which might, at least {\em
340: qualitatively}, account for the soft, i.e negative lags. Let us consider
341: a Comptonizing region in which the Comptonization process becomes
342: more efficient closer to the black hole. One such situation could
343: be, for example, a disk consisting of cold electrons with a Keplerian
344: distribution of velocities (bulk Comptonization) or a hot corona with a
345: temperature gradient, the inner parts being hotter than the outer parts
346: (thermal Comptonization). Let us examine the Keplerian case. Near the
347: black hole, the rotational velocity of the electrons is close to the
348: speed of light and those photons that find themselves in this
349: region get up-scattered due to bulk-motion Comptonization. Note than in
350: this model the Comptonizing region is the accretion disk itself. The
351: source of soft photons can be inside (the disk itself) or outside the
352: disk. What is needed is that some photons find their way to the
353: high-velocity parts of the disk. Preliminary results of this type of
354: Comptonization have been reported by Kylafis \& Reig (1999).
355:
356: If the optical depth is small, the majority of the input photons escape
357: after a few scatterings. In this case the photons that undergo some
358: scatterings (hard photons) lag soft photons. But if the optical depth is
359: large, the soft input photons undergo a random-walk through the medium
360: prior to escape and gain energy. Some of these now hard photons find
361: themselves in the outer parts of the Comptonizing region where the
362: velocity of the electrons is low and they begin to give away energy by
363: means of the direct Compton effect. We expect then that soft photons lag
364: hard photons. In order for such downward scattering to occur the
365: optical depth must be large and the disk must be geometrically thick so
366: that the photons sample a large fraction of the Comptonizing medium.
367:
368: If we accept that the optical depth gives a measure of the mass accretion
369: rate and that, in turn, larger accretion rates imply higher count rates,
370: then this simple model may also explain the dependence of the lag sign on
371: intensity. Positive lags occur when the count rate is low, whereas
372: negative lags are detected for high count rates (this observational fact
373: can be inferred from Fig~\ref{cs_qpo_rms} and \ref{freq_lag}). Low
374: intensity, that is low mass accretion rate, implies low optical depth, hence
375: up-scattering only or equivalently, positive lags. High intensity implies
376: large accretion rates or large optical depths and therefore diffusion plus
377: down-scattering, opening up the posibility of negative lags.
378:
379: Given the relatively short time lags (of the order of a few milliseconds)
380: the Comptonizing region does not need to be very large (a few tens of
381: gravitational radii, $r_g=GM/c^2$). Note also, that the negative time lags
382: are typically an order of magnitude shorter than the positive lags.
383:
384:
385: \acknowledgements
386:
387: This work was supported by the Netherlands Foundation for research
388: in astronomy (ASTRON) under grant 781-76-017, by the Netherlands
389: Research School for Astronomy (NOVA), and the NWO Spinoza grant 08-0 to
390: E.P.J. van den Heuvel. One of us (PR) acknowledges support from the
391: European Union through the Training and Mobility of Researchers
392: Network Grant ERBFMRX/CT98/0195. This research has made use of data
393: obtained through the High Energy Astrophysics Science Archive
394: Research Center Online Service, provided by the NASA/Goddard Space
395: Flight Center.
396:
397: \clearpage
398:
399: \begin{thebibliography}{}
400:
401: \bibitem{} Belloni, T. \& Hasinger, G. 1990, A\&A, 230, 103
402: \bibitem{} Belloni, T., M\'endez, M., King, A.R., van der Klis, M. \& van
403: Paradijs, J. 1997a, \apj, 479, L145
404: \bibitem{} Belloni, T., M\'endez, M., King, A.R., van der Klis, M. \& van
405: Paradijs, J. 1997b, \apj, 488, L112
406: \bibitem{} Belloni, T., Klein-Wolt, M., M\'endez, M., van der Klis, M.
407: \& van Paradijs, J. 2000, A\&A, in press, astro-ph/0001103
408: \bibitem{} Bo\"er, M., Greiner, J. \& Motch, C. 1996, A\&A, 305, 835
409: \bibitem{} Castro-Tirado, A.J., Brandt, S. \& Lund, N. 1992, IAU Circ., 5590
410: \bibitem{} Crary, D. J., Finger, M. H., Kouveliotou, C., van der Hooft, F.,
411: van der Klis, M., Lewin, W. H. G. \& van Paradijs, J. 1998, \apj, 493, L71
412: \bibitem{} Cui W. 1999, \apj, 524, L59.
413: \bibitem{} Fender, R. P.; Garrington, S. T., McKay, D. J., Muxlow, T. W. B.,
414: Pooley, G. G., Spencer, R. E., Stirling, A. M. \& Waltman, E. B. 1999, MNRAS,
415: 304, 865
416: \bibitem{} Greiner, J., Morgan, E.H. \& Remillard, R.A. 1997, \apj, 473, L107
417: \bibitem{} Kylafis, N.D. \& Reig, P., 1999 in {\em The Neutron star--Black Hole
418: Connection}, NATO ASI, Elounda, Crete 7-18 June 1999, in press.
419: %\bibitem{} Liang, E.P., Physics Reports, 302, 67
420: \bibitem{} Morgan, E.H., Remillard, R.A. \& Greiner, J. 1997, \apj, 482, 993
421: \bibitem{} Markwardt, C.B., Swank, J.H. \& Taam, R.E. 1999, \apj, 513, L37
422: \bibitem{} Mirabel, I. F., Duc, P. A., Rodriguez, P. A., Teyssier, R., Paul, J.,
423: Claret, A., Auriere, M., Golombek, D. \& Marti, J. 1994, A\&A, 282, L17
424: \bibitem{} Mirabel F. \& Rodr\'{\i}guez L. 1994, Nature, 371, 46
425: %\bibitem{} Mirabel F. \& Rodr\'{\i}guez L., 1998, Nature, 392, 673
426: %\bibitem{} Mirabel F. \& Rodr\'{\i}guez L., 1999, ARA\&A, 37
427: \bibitem{} Mitsuda, K, Inoue, H., Koyama, K.,et al. 1984, PASJ, 36, 741
428: \bibitem{} Muno, M. P., Morgan, E. H. \& Remillard, R. A. 1999, \apj, 527, 321
429: \bibitem{} Nowak, M.A., Wilms, J. \& Dove, J.B. 1999, \apj, 517, 355
430: \bibitem{} Orosz, J.A. \& Bailyn, C.D. 1997, \apj, 477, 876
431: %\bibitem{} Reig, P., Kylafis, N. \& Spruit, H.C. 2000, in preparation
432: \bibitem{} Trudolyunov, S., Churazov, E. \& Gilfanov, M. 1999, Astro-ph/9811449
433: \bibitem{} van der Klis, M., Hasinger, G., Stella, L., Langmeier, A.,
434: van Paradijs, J. \& Lewin, W. H. G. 1987, \apj, 319, L13
435:
436: \end{thebibliography}
437:
438:
439: \clearpage
440: %----------------------------------------------------------------------------
441: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccccc}
442: \scriptsize
443: \tablecolumns{10}
444: \tablecaption{RXTE observations of GRS 1915+105 \label{observ}}
445: \tablewidth{0pt}
446: \tablehead{}
447: \startdata
448: OBI & MJD &PCA$^a$ &$\nu_{QPO}$ & rms$^b$ (\%) &rms$^b$ (\%) &lag (rad)
449: & lag (ms) \\
450: & &(c/s) &(Hz) &(0.01-20 Hz)&(QPO) &at $\nu_{QPO}$
451: & at $\nu_{QPO}$ \\
452: \hline
453: &&&&&&&\\
454: \multicolumn{8}{c}{1996 July 11 -- August 18} \\
455: &&&&&&&\\
456: \hline
457: 10408-01-22-00a &50275.0905 &9778.3 & 3.468$\pm$0.011 &9.58$\pm$0.15
458: &9.17$\pm$0.25 & -0.082$\pm$0.015 & -3.8$\pm$0.7 \\
459: 10408-01-22-00b &50275.1072 &9789.0 & 3.475$\pm$0.005
460: &11.09$\pm$0.07 &9.31 $\pm$0.15 & -0.096$\pm$0.009 & -4.4$\pm$0.4\\
461: 10408-01-22-01 &50275.2238 &9282.4 & 2.768$\pm$0.006
462: &10.45$\pm$0.10 &10.68 $\pm$0.13 & -0.045$\pm$0.006 & -2.6$\pm$0.3\\
463: 10408-01-22-02a &50275.3572 &9008.1 & 2.561$\pm$0.005
464: &10.45$\pm$0.09 &11.39$\pm$0.12 & -0.027$\pm$0.006 & -1.7$\pm$0.4\\
465: 10408-01-22-02b &50275.4238 &9175.3 & 2.840$\pm$0.023 &9.31$\pm$0.10
466: &9.96$\pm$0.87 & -0.032$\pm$0.034 & -1.8$\pm$1.9\\
467: 10408-01-23-00a &50278.4921 &9735.2 & 3.480$\pm$0.004 &9.87$\pm$0.08
468: &10.27$\pm$0.12 & -0.098$\pm$0.007 & -4.5$\pm$0.3\\
469: 10408-01-23-00b &50278.5585 &9709.6 & 3.614$\pm$0.005
470: &10.20$\pm$0.07 &9.90$\pm$0.11 & -0.103$\pm$0.006 & -4.6$\pm$0.3\\
471: 10408-01-23-00c &50278.6266 &10457.7 & 4.209$\pm$0.009 &9.65$\pm$0.08
472: &9.12$\pm$0.11 & -0.122$\pm$0.006 & -4.6$\pm$0.2\\
473: 10408-01-24-00a &50280.1702 & 8923.9 & 2.238$\pm$0.005
474: &11.45$\pm$0.10 &12.13$\pm$0.11 & -0.001$\pm$0.006 & -0.1$\pm$0.4\\
475: 10408-01-24-00b &50280.2266 &8900.8 & 2.316$\pm$0.005
476: &10.95$\pm$0.12 &12.00$\pm$0.16 & 0.001$\pm$0.005 & 0.1$\pm$0.4\\
477: 10408-01-24-00c &50280.2933 &8955.6 & 2.537$\pm$0.004
478: &11.62$\pm$0.15 &11.34$\pm$0.15 & -0.036$\pm$0.006 & -2.3$\pm$0.4\\
479: 10408-01-24-00d &50280.3599 &9011.1 & 2.598$\pm$0.008
480: &10.68$\pm$0.15 &10.95$\pm$0.28 & -0.055$\pm$0.011 & -3.3$\pm$0.7\\
481: 10408-01-25-00a &50283.4947 &8263.6 & 1.110$\pm$0.003
482: &12.92$\pm$0.11 &11.67$\pm$0.20 & 0.172$\pm$0.007 & 24.7$\pm$1.0\\
483: 10408-01-25-00b &50283.5620 &8154.0 & 1.077$\pm$0.003
484: &13.06$\pm$0.10 &11.24$\pm$0.21 & 0.185$\pm$0.007 & 27.3$\pm$1.0\\
485: 10408-01-25-00c &50283.6286 &8076.9 & 1.184$\pm$0.002
486: &12.28$\pm$0.14 &12.06$\pm$0.16 & 0.154$\pm$0.006 & 20.6$\pm$0.8\\
487: 10408-01-27-00a &50290.5774 &7887.2 & 0.644$\pm$0.002
488: &13.73$\pm$0.11 &9.74$\pm$0.28 & 0.247$\pm$0.014 & 72.7$\pm$4.1\\
489: 10408-01-27-00b &50290.6322 &7925.8 & 0.621$\pm$0.003
490: &13.12$\pm$0.12 &9.66$\pm$0.22 & 0.285$\pm$0.010 & 73.0$\pm$2.7\\
491: 10408-01-27-00c &50290.6988 &7826.5 & 0.629$\pm$0.003
492: &13.04$\pm$0.20 &10.28$\pm$0.19 & 0.272$\pm$0.008 & 68.9$\pm$2.1\\
493: 10408-01-28-00a &50298.5696 &7751.1 & 0.999$\pm$0.003
494: &12.33$\pm$0.11 &11.36$\pm$0.18 & 0.189$\pm$0.006 & 30.0$\pm$1.0\\
495: 10408-01-28-00b &50298.6362 &7755.6 & 0.962$\pm$0.003
496: &13.49$\pm$0.12 &11.21$\pm$0.21 & 0.201$\pm$0.007 & 33.3$\pm$1.2\\
497: 10408-01-28-00c &50298.7029 &7533.5 & 0.928$\pm$0.003
498: &13.16$\pm$0.13 &11.55$\pm$0.19 & 0.221$\pm$0.007 & 38.0$\pm$1.2\\
499: 10408-01-29-00a &50305.3736 &7951.5 & 1.673$\pm$0.004
500: &12.51$\pm$0.13 &11.98$\pm$0.17 & 0.085$\pm$0.007 & 8.1$\pm$0.6\\
501: 10408-01-29-00b &50305.4398 &8070.8 & 1.858$\pm$0.004
502: &12.15$\pm$0.11 &11.97$\pm$0.16 & 0.049$\pm$0.005 & 4.2$\pm$0.5\\
503: 10408-01-29-00c &50305.5064 &8078.7 & 1.962$\pm$0.003
504: &12.16$\pm$0.11 &11.95$\pm$0.15 & 0.036$\pm$0.005 & 3.0$\pm$0.4\\
505: 10408-01-30-00a &50313.3135 &11560.3 & 4.551$\pm$0.009 &8.75$\pm$0.10
506: &8.95$\pm$0.08 & -0.140$\pm$0.006 & -4.9$\pm$0.2\\
507: 10408-01-30-00b &50313.3801 &12979.6 & 5.030$\pm$0.008
508: &10.85$\pm$0.08 &7.26$\pm$0.22 & -0.171$\pm$0.006 & -5.4$\pm$0.2\\
509: 10408-01-30-00c &50313.4468 &14701.7 & 5.551$\pm$0.015
510: &13.21$\pm$0.13 &4.72$\pm$0.18 & -0.188$\pm$0.008 & -5.4$\pm$0.2\\
511: \hline
512: &&&&&&&\\
513: \multicolumn{8}{c}{1997 September 29 -- October 24} \\
514: &&&&&&&\\
515: \hline
516: 20402-01-48-00a &50720.5910 &21914.4 & 7.56 $\pm$0.03 &18.09$\pm$0.15
517: &2.50 $\pm$0.06 & -0.260$\pm$0.011 & -5.5$\pm$0.2\\
518: 20402-01-48-00b &50720.6572 &12618.6 & 4.68 $\pm$0.01 &11.83$\pm$0.06
519: &5.62 $\pm$0.09 & -0.147$\pm$0.008 & -5.0$\pm$0.3\\
520: 20402-01-48-00c &50720.6783 &11805.7 & 4.54$\pm$0.04 &11.45$\pm$0.20
521: &7.14$\pm$0.29 & -0.179$\pm$0.022 & -6.3$\pm$0.8\\
522: 20402-01-49-00a &50729.3275 & 8714.6 & 2.911$\pm$0.005 &10.18$\pm$0.07
523: &10.89$\pm$0.11 & -0.033$\pm$0.006 & -1.8$\pm$0.3\\
524: 20402-01-49-00b &50729.3940 & 8369.3 & 2.621$\pm$0.006 &10.60$\pm$0.10
525: &11.05$\pm$0.16 & -0.015$\pm$0.007 & -0.9$\pm$0.4\\
526: 20402-01-49-01 &50730.3949 & 8197.8 & 2.721$\pm$0.005 &10.76$\pm$0.07
527: &10.96$\pm$0.12 & -0.041$\pm$0.006 & -2.4$\pm$0.3\\
528: 20402-01-50-00 &50735.5474 & 6579.2 & 0.844$\pm$0.003 &13.51$\pm$0.18
529: &10.52$\pm$0.29 & 0.239$\pm$0.010 & 45.0$\pm$2.0\\
530: 20402-01-50-01a &50737.4047 & 6607.5 & 1.016$\pm$0.003 &13.76$\pm$0.11
531: &10.82$\pm$0.21 & 0.201$\pm$0.009 & 31.5$\pm$1.3\\
532: 20402-01-50-01b &50737.4766 & 6373.4 & 1.079$\pm$0.003 &13.60$\pm$0.14
533: &11.09$\pm$0.22 & 0.189$\pm$0.010 & 27.8$\pm$1.4\\
534: 20402-01-51-00a &50743.2947 & 6626.3 & 1.399$\pm$0.006 &13.92$\pm$0.17
535: &11.71$\pm$0.31 & 0.130$\pm$0.012 & 14.7$\pm$1.3\\
536: 20402-01-51-00b &50743.3377 & 6602.3 & 1.355$\pm$0.004 &13.73$\pm$0.12
537: &11.60$\pm$0.20 & 0.135$\pm$0.007 & 15.9$\pm$0.8\\
538: 20402-01-51-00c &50743.4092 & 6584.0 & 1.399$\pm$0.005 &13.84$\pm$0.13
539: &11.38$\pm$0.20 & 0.133$\pm$0.007 & 15.1$\pm$0.8\\
540: 20402-01-51-00d &50743.4801 & 6640.4 & 1.442$\pm$0.003 &13.55$\pm$0.14
541: &11.97$\pm$0.20 & 0.116$\pm$0.008 & 12.8$\pm$0.9\\
542: 20402-01-52-00a &50746.5509 & 6657.3 & 1.413$\pm$0.005 &13.77$\pm$0.12
543: &11.27$\pm$0.22 & 0.134$\pm$0.009 & 15.2$\pm$1.1\\
544: 20402-01-52-00b &50746.6190 & 6667.5 & 1.482$\pm$0.005 &13.86$\pm$0.14
545: &11.89$\pm$0.24 & 0.149$\pm$0.010 & 16.1$\pm$1.1\\
546: 20402-01-52-00c &50746.6898 & 6767.9 & 1.602$\pm$0.004 &12.90$\pm$0.18
547: &11.86$\pm$0.27 & 0.083$\pm$0.010 & 8.3$\pm$1.0\\
548: \tableline
549: \enddata
550: \tablenotetext{a}{In the range 2-60 keV and 5 PCU.}
551: \tablenotetext{b}{Normalization according to Belloni \& Hasinger (1990).}
552: \end{deluxetable}
553: %----------------------------------------------------------------------------
554:
555: \clearpage
556:
557: \figcaption[fig1.ps]{
558: Variation of the $rms$ amplitude and frequency of the QPO with count rate.
559: \label{cs_qpo_rms}
560: }
561:
562:
563: \figcaption[fig2.eps]{
564: Power and phase lag spectra versus Fourier frequency for four QPO frequency
565: ranges. The phase lag spectra are the average of all those included in the
566: frequency range shown. The power spectra are individual examples of a
567: representative member of the group. Positive lags mean that hard photons lag
568: soft photons.
569: \label{pds_lag}
570: }
571:
572: \figcaption[fig3.ps]{
573: Phase lag at the QPO frequency (top panel) and phase lag of the continuum
574: in the frequency range 0.1--5 Hz (bottom panel) versus QPO frequency.
575: Different symbols represent different observing runs as
576: follows: 1996 July 11 -- August 18 (circles), 1997 September 29
577: --October 24 (stars)
578: \label{freq_lag}
579: }
580:
581: \figcaption[fig4.ps]{
582: Dependence of the lag (at the QPO frequency) on energy. Different symbols
583: correspond to three different values of the QPO frequency: squares for
584: $\nu_{QPO}$=0.999 Hz, dots for $\nu_{QPO}$=2.316
585: Hz and stars for $\nu_{QPO}$=4.68 Hz. The lags were calculated for the
586: energy bands 5.4--6.9 keV, 7.2--9.4 kev and 9.8--13.1 keV with respect to
587: the soft band 2.0--5.0 keV.
588: \label{lag_ener}
589: }
590:
591: \figcaption[fig5.ps]{
592: Phase lag and QPO frequency as functions of the soft color HR1=5--13
593: keV/2--5 keV. Negative lags are seen only when the source is soft.
594: \label{hr1_lag}
595: }
596:
597:
598:
599: \end{document}
600:
601: