1: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
2: %\input{epsf}
3: \documentstyle[rotate,emulateapj,apjfonts]{article}
4:
5: %\textheight 23.8cm
6: %\topmargin=-1.5cm
7: %\textwidth=18cm
8: %\oddsidemargin=-1cm
9: %\evensidemargin=-1cm
10:
11: % \received{RECEIPT DATE}
12: % \revised{REVISION DATE}
13: % \accepted{ACCEPT DATE}
14: % \ccc{code}
15: % \cpright{type}{year}
16:
17: % \journalid{VOL}{JOURNAL DATE}
18: % \articleid{START PAGE}{END PAGE}
19: % \paperid{MANUSCRIPT ID}
20:
21: \slugcomment{Accepted by {\it The Astronomical Journal}}
22:
23: \lefthead{THE X-RAY PROPERTIES OF $Z>4$ QUASARS}
24: %\shorttitle{THE X-RAY PROPERTIES OF $Z>4$ QUASARS}
25:
26: \righthead{KASPI, BRANDT, \& SCHNEIDER}
27: %\shortauthors{KASPI, BRANDT, \& SCHNEIDER}
28:
29: \begin{document}
30:
31: \title{The X-ray Properties of $z>4$ Quasars}
32: \author{Shai Kaspi, W. N. Brandt, and Donald P. Schneider}
33: \affil{Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 525 Davey Laboratory,
34: Pennsylvania State University, \\ University Park, PA, 16802;
35: shai, niel, dps@astro.psu.edu}
36:
37: \begin{abstract}
38:
39: We report on a search for X-ray emission from quasars with redshifts
40: greater than four using the {\it ROSAT} public database. Our search has
41: doubled the number of $z>4$ quasars detected in X-rays from 6 to 12.
42: Most of those known prior to this work were radio-loud and X-ray
43: selected sources; our study increases the number of X-ray detected,
44: optically selected $z>4$ quasars from one to seven. We present their
45: basic X-ray properties and compare these to those of lower redshift
46: quasars. We do not find any evidence for strong broad-band spectral
47: differences between optically selected $z>4$ quasars and those at lower
48: redshifts.
49:
50: \end{abstract}
51:
52: \keywords{
53: galaxies: active ---
54: galaxies: nuclei ---
55: quasars: general ---
56: X-ray: galaxies}
57:
58: \section{Introduction}
59:
60: Quasars with redshifts larger than 4 were first discovered more than a
61: decade ago (Warren et~al. 1987). Recently many new $z>4$ quasars have
62: been discovered (e.g., Fan et~al. 1999, 2000) with expectations of an
63: even greater increase in the near future due to new surveys (e.g., the
64: Sloan Digital Sky Survey should identify $\approx 1000$ quasars with
65: $z>4.5$~-- Schneider 1999; York et~al. 2000). Currently there are 85
66: $z>4$ quasars that have appeared in journals, and an additional number
67: can be found on various World Wide Web pages. Quasars at $z>4$ provide
68: us with direct information about the first 10\% of cosmic time. They
69: are among the most luminous objects known, and from the Eddington limit
70: many require $\ga$~$10^8$--$10^9$~M$_\odot$ black holes. They have wide
71: cosmological importance since they must be associated with deep
72: potential wells in the earliest massive collapsed structures, and their
73: strong evolution provides clues about the process by which the
74: remarkably homogeneous $z\approx 1000$ Universe revealed by the cosmic
75: microwave background is transformed into the inhomogeneous Universe
76: seen today (e.g., Efstathiou \& Rees 1988; Turner 1991).
77:
78: To date $z>4$ quasars have been mainly studied at optical wavelengths
79: (e.g., in order to determine their redshifts). There has also been some
80: progress in studying their far-infrared and radio properties (e.g.,
81: Schmidt et~al. 1995; Omont et~al. 1996; McMahon et~al. 1999). However,
82: their properties as a whole at these and other wavelengths have not yet
83: been fully explored. X-ray emission appears to be a universal property
84: of quasars at $z\approx$~0--2, and X-rays have also been studied from
85: many $z\approx$~2--4 quasars. However, at $z>4$ the X-ray properties of
86: quasars are much less well understood; only six $z>4$ quasars have been
87: detected in X-ray. The luminous X-ray emission from quasars reveals the
88: physical conditions in the immediate vicinities of their black holes,
89: and X-ray studies of high-redshift quasars can in principle discover if
90: quasar central power sources and quasar environments evolve over cosmic
91: time (e.g., Bechtold et~al. 1994b; Blair et~al. 1998; Elvis et~al.
92: 1998; Fiore et~al. 1998).
93:
94: We list the $z>4$ quasars previously detected in the X-ray band in
95: Table~1. For each quasar we give, in the first seven columns,
96: its coordinates, redshift, absorption-corrected X-ray flux in the
97: detection band, and the reference to the paper where the X-ray
98: detection was made. While the most basic X-ray properties (e.g.,
99: $\alpha_{\rm ox}$, the slope of a nominal power law between
100: 2500~\AA\ and 2~keV) of these quasars appear to be generally consistent
101: with those of quasars at lower redshifts, the constraints are not tight
102: and require substantial improvement. Comparisons of these properties
103: with those of the majority of low-redshift quasars are difficult as
104: most of the X-ray detected $z>4$ quasars were selected in different
105: ways: three of them are X-ray selected objects, two are radio
106: selected, and only one is optically selected.
107:
108: All objects but one in Table~1 were detected using {\it
109: ROSAT}, demonstrating the ability of this satellite to detect $z>4$
110: quasars. Encouraged by this we have systematically searched for
111: detections of $z>4$ quasars in the {\it ROSAT} public database. In this
112: paper we present our results, which double the number of $z>4$ quasars
113: detected in X-rays. We increase the number of optically selected $z>4$
114: quasars from one to seven and provide limits for 15 others. In \S~2 we
115: present the database search and in \S~3 we discuss our results.
116:
117: Throughout this paper we use the cosmological parameters $H_0=70$
118: km~s$^{-1}$~Mpc$^{-1}$ and $q_0=0.5$. We define the energy index
119: $\alpha$ as $f_\nu \propto \nu^{-\alpha}$ and likewise the photon index
120: $\Gamma = \alpha +1$ with photon flux density $f(E) \propto
121: E^{-\Gamma}$ in photons~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$~keV$^{-1}$. Unless otherwise
122: noted, we use $\alpha{_{\rm o}}=0.5$ in the UV-optical range and
123: $\alpha{_{\rm x}}=1$ in the X-ray range. These are representative
124: values of these parameters for lower redshift quasars (e.g., Netzer
125: 1990; Reeves et~al. 1997).
126:
127: \section{Search and Analysis}
128:
129: We have searched the {\it ROSAT} public database\footnote{Via:
130: http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/W3Browse}
131: %
132: % http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/W3Browse/w3table.pl?Observatory=ROSAT
133: %
134: for all fields which include the optical positions of $z>4$ quasars in
135: the literature. We have found 27 quasars' positions (out of the total
136: 85 $z>4$ quasars) to lie in {\it ROSAT} fields. For ten quasars we
137: found only one observation, while for the others there were two or
138: more. We retrieved from the {\it ROSAT} public database up to four
139: observations (when available) for each quasar. We preferentially chose
140: long observations where the quasar was close to the field's center.
141: Twenty-six quasars were observed by the Position Sensitive Proportional
142: Counter (PSPC; Pfeffermann et~al. 1987) with several of them also
143: having High Resolution Imager (HRI; David et~al. 1999) observations,
144: and one quasar was observed only with the HRI. Out of the 27 quasars,
145: 12 were the observation's target and 15 were serendipitously in the
146: detector's field of view.
147:
148: All observations were processed using the PROS software in
149: IRAF.\footnote{IRAF (Image Reduction and Analysis Facility) is
150: distributed by the National \\ Optical Astronomy Observatories, which are
151: operated by AURA, Inc., under coo- \\ perative agreement with the National
152: Science Foundation.} We have manually inspected the images (and
153: smoothed versions thereof) and have measured the net counts around the
154: optical positions of the quasars. Typically PSPC positions are good to
155: $\approx$20--30\arcsec\ (e.g., Voges et~al. 1996), and indeed all our
156: detections but one are $\la 20$\arcsec\ from the optical position. The
157: aperture size for count extraction was scaled to take into account the
158: size of the point spread function (PSF) at the off-axis angle of the
159: quasar. We were able to detect, at above the 2.5$\sigma$ level, an
160: X-ray source and extract the X-ray count rate for nine quasars. For the
161: other 18 quasars we were only able to determine upper limits to their
162: X-ray count rates. We have also searched for X-ray detections of 86
163: quasars listed on World Wide Web pages but not in the literature, and we
164: find none.
165:
166: In the upper part of Table~\ref{properties} we present the quasars
167: detected. Their names, coordinates and redshifts are given in the first
168: four columns. The monochromatic AB$_{1450(1+z)}$ magnitude is listed in
169: column (5). The AB$_{1450(1+z)}$ magnitudes are from Schneider,
170: Schmidt, \& Gunn (1991), Henry et~al. (1994), Storrie-Lombardi et al.
171: (1996), and Hook \& McMahon (1998), with estimated errors of
172: $\approx\pm 0.1$ magnitudes. The Galactic column density, found using
173: the \ion{H}{1} map of Dickey \& Lockman (1990), is given in column (6).
174: We have used the AB$_{1450(1+z)}$ magnitude and a flux-density power
175: law with $\alpha_{\rm{0}} =0.5$ to compute the rest-frame 2500~\AA\ flux
176: density and luminosity which are listed in columns (7) and (8). The
177: absolute $B$ magnitude, given in column (9), was found using the
178: equation
179: \begin{equation}
180: M_B={\rm AB}_{1450(1+z)}-5\log(\sqrt{1+z}-1)-45.03
181: \end{equation}
182: which is equation~5 of Schneider, Schmidt, \& Gunn (1989) adapted for
183: $H_0=70$ km~s$^{-1}$~Mpc$^{-1}$.
184:
185: In columns (10)--(18) of Table~\ref{properties} we list the X-ray
186: observations and properties of the quasars. The sequence-ID and
187: observing date are listed in columns (10) and (11). The angular
188: distance of the quasar's position from the center of the field is
189: listed in column (12). The number of background-subtracted counts (in
190: the broad band 0.1--2 keV) is given in column (13), and the vignetting,
191: exposure-map and background corrected count-rate is listed in column
192: (14). We use the PIMMS software (Mukai 1997) to define a power law with
193: photon index $\Gamma =2$, which is then used in the XSPEC software
194: (Arnaud 1996) to evaluate the absorption-corrected 0.1--2 keV observed
195: flux, which is listed in column (15). From this power law we also
196: calculated the rest-frame 2-keV flux density and luminosity which are
197: listed in columns (16) and (17). (Using PROS to calculate these
198: quantities yields consistent results.) Finally, we list in column (18)
199: the effective optical-to-X-ray power-law slope, $\alpha_{\rm ox}$,
200: defined as:
201: \begin{equation}
202: \alpha_{\rm ox}=\frac{\log[(f_\nu (2\,{\rm keV})/f_\nu (2500\,{\mbox\AA})]}
203: {\log[\nu (2\,{\rm keV})/\nu (2500\,{\mbox\AA})]} \ \ ,
204: \end{equation}
205: where $f_\nu$'s are flux densities at the given wavelengths and $\nu$'s
206: are the corresponding frequencies. The uncertainties for the fluxes,
207: luminosities, and $\alpha_{\rm ox}$ values can be propagated from the
208: relative error on the number of counts, which has a mean value of
209: 30\%. Another uncertainty involves our assumption of $\Gamma =2$.
210:
211: % \begin{deluxetable}{lcclcccccccccccr}
212: % \rotate
213: % \tablecolumns{16}
214: % \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
215: % \tablewidth{0pt}
216: % \tablecaption{X-ray Detected Quasars at $z>4$ Known Prior to This Work}
217: %
218: \footnotesize
219: % \begin{table*}
220: % \tablenum{1}
221: \rotate[l]{\makebox[0.95\textheight][l]{\vbox{
222: \begin{center}
223: \centerline{\sc \hglue 6in Table~1}
224: \centerline{\sc \hglue 5.5in X-ray Detected Quasars at $z>4$ Known Prior to This Work}
225: \vglue 0.1in
226: \begin{tabular}{lcclcccccccccccr}\hline\hline
227: {Object} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{RA \ \ (2000.0) \ \ Dec} &
228: {$z$} & {Flux\tablenotemark{a}} & {Band [keV]} & {Ref.} &
229: {AB} & {$N_{\rm H}$\tablenotemark{b}} &
230: {$f_{\nu}$\tablenotemark{c}} & {$\log (\nu L_\nu )$} & {$M_B$} &
231: {$f_\nu$\tablenotemark{d}} & {$\log (\nu L_\nu )$} & {$\alpha{_{\rm
232: ox}}$} & {$R$} \\
233: {(1)} & {(2)} & {(3)} & {(4)} & {(5)} & {(6)} & {(7)} & {(8)} & {(9)} &
234: {(10)} & {(11)} & {(12)} & {(13)} & {(14)} & {(15)} & {(16)} \\
235: \hline
236: Q\,0000$-$2619 & 00 03 22.9 & $-$26 03 19 & 4.098 & 8.7$\times10^{-14}$\,\tablenotemark{e} & 0.1--2.4 & 1 &
237: 17.5 & 1.67 & 4.767 & 46.9 & $-$28.0 & 2.9 & 45.3 & $-$1.62 & $<$0.6 \\
238: RX\,J1028.6$-$0844 & 10 28 37.7 & $-$08 44 39 & 4.276 & 8.3$\times10^{-13}$ & 0.1--2.4 & 2 &
239: 20.6\tablenotemark{f}& 4.55 & 0.274 & 45.7 & $-$25.0 & 28.6& 46.3 & $-$0.76 & 7400 \\
240: RX\,J105225.9+571905 & 10 52 25.9 & +57 19 07 & 4.45 & 2.3$\times10^{-15}$ & 0.5--2.0 & 3 &
241: 22.6&0.56& 0.043 & 44.9 & $-$23.1 & 0.19& 44.2 & $-$1.29 & $<$190 \\
242: GB\,1428+4217 & 14 30 23.7 & +42 04 36 & 4.715 & $\sim1\times10^{-12}$ & 0.1--2.4 & 4 &
243: 19.4 & 1.40 & 0.829 & 46.2 & $-$26.4 & 37.2& 46.5 & $-$0.90 & 1900 \\
244: GB\,1508+5714 & 15 10 02.8 & +57 02 44 & 4.301 & $1\times10^{-12}$ & 0.3--3.5 & 5, 6 &
245: 19.8 & 1.47 & 0.573 & 46.0 & $-$25.8 & 44.7& 46.5 & $-$0.81 & 2700 \\
246: RX\,J1759.4+6638 & 17 59 27.9 & +66 38 53 & 4.320 & $\sim1.2\times10^{-14}$ & 0.5--2.0 & 7 &
247: 19.3 & 4.23 & 0.908 & 46.2 & $-$26.3 & 0.95& 44.8 & $-$1.53 & 30 \\
248: \hline
249: \end{tabular}
250: \end{center}
251: $^{\rm a}${In units of erg\,s$^{-1}$\,cm$^{-2}$.}\\
252: $^{\rm b}${In units of $10^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$.}\\
253: $^{\rm c}${At 2500~\AA\ in units of $10^{-27}$ ergs\,s$^{-1}$\,cm$^{-2}$\,Hz$^{-1}$.}\\
254: $^{\rm d}${At 2~keV in units of $10^{-31}$ ergs\,s$^{-1}$\,cm$^{-2}$\,Hz$^{-1}$.}\\
255: $^{\rm e}${Computed using Bechtold et al. (1994a) model \#~3.} \\
256: $^{\rm f}${Estimated from the 2500~\AA\ flux given in
257: Zickgraf et al. (1997).} \\
258: \vglue 0.01in
259: \centerline{ \hglue 4.75in {\sc References.---}
260: (1) Bechtold et al. 1994a; % {\it ROSAT} PSPC
261: (2) Zickgraf et al. 1997; % {\it ROSAT} PSPC
262: (3) Schneider et al. 1998; % {\it ROSAT} HRI
263: (4) Fabian et al. 1997; % {\it ROSAT} PSPC
264: (5) Mathur \& Elvis 1995; % Einstein IPC
265: (6) Moran et~al. 1996; % Einstein IPC
266: (7) Henry et al. 1994. } % {\it ROSAT} PSPC
267: }}}
268: %\label{known}
269: %\end{table*}
270: %\end{center}
271: \setcounter{table}{1}
272: \normalsize
273:
274: %\begin{deluxetable}{lcclccccccccccccccr}
275: %\rotate
276: %\tablecolumns{19}
277: %\tabletypesize{\tiny}
278: %\tablewidth{0pt}
279: %\tablecaption{Properties of Quasars at $z>4$ Observed by {\it ROSAT}
280: %
281: \scriptsize
282: \begin{table*}
283: \tablenum{2}
284: \rotate[l]{\makebox[0.95\textheight][l]{\vbox{
285: \begin{center}
286: {\sc Table~2 \\ Properties of Quasars at $z>4$ Observed by {\it ROSAT}}
287: \vglue 0.1in
288: \begin{tabular}{lcclccccccccccccccr}
289: \hline
290: \hline
291: {Object} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{RA \ \ (2000.0) \ \ Dec} &
292: {$z$} & {AB} & {$N_{\rm H}$\tablenotemark{a}} &
293: {$f_{\nu}$\tablenotemark{b}} & {$\log (\nu L_\nu )$} & {$M_B$} &
294: {Sequence-ID} & {Date} & {$\Delta$\tablenotemark{c}} &
295: {Counts} & {C-rate\tablenotemark{d}} &
296: {$f$\tablenotemark{e}} & {$f_\nu$\tablenotemark{f}} &
297: {$\log (\nu L_\nu )$} & {$\alpha_{\rm ox}$} & {$R$} \\ [0.1cm]
298: {(1)} & {(2)} & {(3)} & {(4)} & {(5)} & {(6)} & {(7)} & {(8)} & {(9)} &
299: {(10)} & {(11)} & {(12)} & {(13)} & {(14)} & {(15)} & {(16)} & {(17)} &
300: {(18)} & {(19)} \\ [0.1cm]
301: \hline
302: \multicolumn{19}{c}{Detected Quasars} \\ [0.1cm]
303: \hline
304: Q\,0000$-$2619 & 00 03 22.9 & $-$26 03 19 & 4.098 & 17.5 & 1.67 &
305: 4.767 & 46.9 & $-$28.0 &
306: rp700467n00 & 26/11/91 & 0.6 &
307: 177$\pm$24 & 4.97 & 6.5 & 2.4 & 45.2 & $-$1.65 & $<$0.6 \\ [0.1cm]
308: & & & & & &
309: & & &
310: rp700078n00 & 30/11/91 & 0.4 &
311: 30.0$\pm$9.3 & 7.29 & 9.5 & 3.5 & 45.4 & $-$1.59 & \\ [0.1cm]
312: BR\,0019$-$1522 & 00 22 08.0 & $-$15 05 39 & 4.528 & 18.8 & 2.09 &
313: 1.440 & 46.4 & $-$26.9 &
314: rp701207n00 & 23/06/92 & 0.1 &
315: 34$\pm$11 & 5.36 & 7.9 & 3.1 & 45.4 & $-$1.41 & $<$2.0 \\ [0.1cm]
316: & & & & & &
317: & & &
318: rp701207a01 & 08/12/92 & 0.1 &
319: 16.8$\pm$6.3 & 4.87 & 7.2 & 2.8 & 45.3 & $-$1.42 & \\ [0.1cm]
320: BR\,0351$-$1034 & 03 53 46.9 & $-$10 25 19 & 4.351 & 18.7\tablenotemark{g} & 4.08 &
321: 1.579 & 46.5 & $-$26.9 &
322: rp700531n00 & 27/01/92 & 0.4 &
323: 54$\pm$13 & 5.92 & 12.4 & 4.7 & 45.5 & $-$1.35 & $<$3.1 \\ [0.1cm]
324: BR\,0951$-$0450 & 09 53 55.7 & $-$05 04 19 & 4.369 & 19.2 & 3.78 &
325: 0.996 & 46.3 & $-$26.4 &
326: rp700379n00 & 18/05/92 & 0.0 &
327: 35$\pm$10 & 4.25 & 8.6 & 3.3 & 45.4 & $-$1.34 & $<$3.4 \\ [0.1cm]
328: BRI\,0952$-$0115 & 09 55 00.1 & $-$01 30 07 & 4.426 & 18.7 & 3.96 &
329: 1.579 & 46.5 & $-$27.0 &
330: rp700380n00 & 29/05/92 & 0.1 &
331: 18.9$\pm$7.7 & 5.63 & 11.6 & 4.5 & 45.5 & $-$1.36 & $<$2.1 \\ [0.1cm]
332: BR\,1202$-$0725 & 12 05 23.1 & $-$07 42 32 & 4.695 & 18.0 & 3.46 &
333: 3.008 & 46.8 & $-$27.7 &
334: rp700530n00 & 13/12/91 & 0.4 &
335: 34$\pm$13 & 3.56 & 6.8 & 2.8 & 45.4 & $-$1.55 & $<$2.0 \\ [0.1cm]
336: GB\,1428+4217 & 14 30 23.7 & $+$42 04 36 & 4.715 & 19.4 & 1.40 &
337: 0.829 & 46.2 & $-$26.4 &
338: rh704036n00 & 11/12/97 & 0.2 &
339: 75$\pm$13 & 15.4 & 74.1 & 27.5 & 46.4 & $-$0.95 & 1900 \\ [0.1cm]
340: & & & & & &
341: & & &
342: rh704007n00 & 09/01/98 & 0.2 &
343: 125$\pm$17 & 21.5 & 102.9 & 38.3 & 46.5 & $-$0.90 & \\ [0.1cm]
344: & & & & & &
345: & & &
346: rh704008n00 & 22/01/98 & 0.2 &
347: 223$\pm$20 & 36.1 & 173.3 & 64.4 & 46.7 & $-$0.81 & \\ [0.1cm]
348: RX\,J1759.4+6638 & 17 59 27.9 & +66 38 53 & 4.320 & 19.3 & 4.23 &
349: 0.908 & 46.2 & $-$26.3 &
350: rp000026n00 & 21/02/92 & 6.3 &
351: 82$\pm$29 & 1.94 & 4.1 & 1.6 & 45.1 & $-$1.45 & 30 \\ [0.1cm]
352: BR\,2237$-$0607 & 22 39 53.6 & $-$05 52 19 & 4.558 & 18.3\tablenotemark{g} & 3.84 &
353: 2.282 & 46.7 & $-$27.4 &
354: rp701206n00 & 20/05/93 & 0.1 &
355: 56$\pm$13 & 6.17 & 12.5 & 4.9 & 45.6 & $-$1.41 & $<$3.6 \\ [0.1cm]
356: & & & & & &
357: & & &
358: rh800789n00 & 26/05/96 & 9.1 &
359: 30$\pm$17 & 1.30 & 8.4 & 3.0 & 45.4 & $-$1.45 & \\ [0.1cm]
360: \hline
361: \multicolumn{19}{c}{Undetected Quasars -- X-ray Upper Limits} \\ [0.1cm]
362: \hline
363: PC\,0027+0525 & 00 29 49.9 & +05 42 04 & 4.099 & 21.4 & 3.42 &
364: 0.131 & 45.3 & $-$24.1 &
365: rp201077n00 & 09/07/92 & 50.1 &
366: 66.2 & 15.13 & 28.9 & 10.5 & 45.8 & $-$0.81 & 280 \\ [0.1cm]
367: PC\,0027+0521 & 00 30 04.6 & +05 38 13 & 4.210 & 22.3 & 3.43 &
368: 0.057 & 45.0 & $-$23.3 &
369: rp201077n00 & 09/07/92 & 49.8 &
370: 80.7 & 18.41 & 35.2 & 13.0 & 46.0 & $-$0.63 & $<$220 \\ [0.1cm]
371: Q\,0046$-$293 & 00 48 29.6 & $-$29 03 21 & 4.014 & 19.3 & 1.75 &
372: 0.908 & 46.2 & $-$26.2 &
373: rp700275n00 & 01/06/92 & 47.2 &
374: 134.0 & 10.00 & 13.4 & 4.8 & 45.5 & $-$1.26 & $<$10 \\ [0.1cm]
375: Q\,0051$-$279 & 00 54 15.4 & $-$27 42 08 & 4.395 & 19.2 & 1.72 &
376: 0.996 & 46.3 & $-$26.4 &
377: rp701223n00 & 03/07/92 & 43.1 &
378: 133.8 & 4.38 & 5.8 & 2.2 & 45.2 & $-$1.40 & $<$4.9 \\ [0.1cm]
379: Q\,0101$-$304 & 01 03 37.3 & $-$30 08 59 & 4.072 & 20.0 & 2.03 &
380: 0.477 & 45.9 & $-$25.5 &
381: rp701194n00 & 06/07/92 & 0.4 &
382: 18.5 & 1.38 & 2.0 & 0.7 & 44.7 & $-$1.47 & $<$14 \\ [0.1cm]
383: BRI\,0103+0032 & 01 06 19.2 & +00 48 23 & 4.433 & 18.8 & 3.19 &
384: 1.440 & 46.4 & $-$26.7 &
385: rh703871n00 & 22/12/97 & 17.1 &
386: 111.4 & 8.89 & 54.2 & 19.2 & 46.2 & $-$1.10 & $<$3.7 \\ [0.1cm]
387: SDSS033829.31+002156.3 & 03 38 29.3 & +00 21 56 & 5.000 & 20.0 & 8.11 &
388: 0.477 & 46.0 & $-$25.8 &
389: rp200844n00 & 26/01/92 & 28.5 &
390: 26.2 & 12.70 & 35.6 & 15.2 & 46.1 & $-$0.96 & $<$9.6 \\ [0.1cm]
391: PC\,0953+4749\tablenotemark{h} & 09 56 25.2 & +47 34 44 & 4.457 & 19.1 & 0.98 &
392: 1.092 & 46.3 & $-$26.6 &
393: rp700450n00 & 12/05/92 & 13.5 &
394: 21.4 & 6.53 & 6.6 & 2.5 & 45.3 & $-$1.39 & $<$4.1 \\ [0.1cm]
395: RX\,J105225.9+571905\tablenotemark{i} & 10 52 25.9 & +57 19 07 & 4.450 & 22.6 & 0.56 &
396: 0.043 & 44.9 & $-$23.1 &
397: rp900029a00 & 16/04/91 & 4.0 &
398: 60.5 & 0.97 & 0.8 & 0.3 & 44.4 & $-$1.21 & $<$190 \\ [0.1cm]
399: BRI\,1050$-$0000 & 10 53 20.4 & $-$00 16 49 & 4.291 & 19.4 & 3.95 &
400: 0.828 & 46.2 & $-$26.2 &
401: rp700381n00 & 26/05/92 & 0.4 &
402: 18.2 & 4.00 & 8.2 & 3.1 & 45.3 & $-$1.32 & 88 \\ [0.1cm]
403: BR\,1144$-$0723 & 11 46 35.6 & $-$07 40 05 & 4.147 & 18.8 & 3.75 &
404: 1.440 & 46.4 & $-$26.7 &
405: rp700382n00 & 05/06/92 & 0.3 &
406: 13.4 & 2.94 & 5.9 & 2.2 & 45.2 & $-$1.47 & $<$8.8 \\ [0.1cm]
407: SDSS122600.68+005923.6 & 12 26 00.7 & +00 59 24 & 4.250 & 19.1 & 1.89 &
408: 1.092 & 46.3 & $-$26.5 &
409: rp600242a01 & 24/12/92 & 44.7 &
410: 131.6 & 12.61 & 17.6 & 6.5 & 45.7 & $-$1.24 & $<$3.4 \\ [0.1cm]
411: PC\,1233+4752 & 12 35 31.1 & +47 36 06 & 4.447 & 20.1 & 1.18 &
412: 0.435 & 45.9 & $-$25.6 &
413: rp200578n00 & 14/11/91 & 22.8 &
414: 33.7 & 21.07 & 23.1 & 8.9 & 45.8 & $-$1.03 & $<$21 \\ [0.1cm]
415: PKS\,1251$-$407 & 12 53 59.5 & $-$40 59 31 & 4.458 & 19.6\tablenotemark{j} & 7.97 &
416: 0.689 & 46.1 & $-$26.1 &
417: rp800321a01 & 18/01/93 & 36.4 &
418: 59.6 & 9.27 & 25.8 & 10.0 & 45.9 & $-$1.09 & 2800\tablenotemark{j} \\ [0.1cm]
419: SDSS131052.52$-$005533.4 & 13 10 52.5 & $-$00 55 33 & 4.140 & 18.9 & 1.77 &
420: 1.313 & 46.3 & $-$26.6 &
421: rp800248n00 & 18/07/92 & 26.8 &
422: 49.6 & 6.51 & 8.8 & 3.2 & 45.3 & $-$1.39 & $<$0.7 \\ [0.1cm]
423: Q\,2133$-$4311 & 21 36 23.7 & $-$42 58 18 & 4.200 & 20.9\tablenotemark{g,k} & 2.84 &
424: 0.208 & 45.6 & $-$24.7 &
425: rp800336a01 & 06/05/93 & 30.8 &
426: 43.6 & 5.35 & 9.3 & 3.5 & 45.4 & $-$1.06 & \nodata \\ [0.1cm]
427: Q\,2139$-$4324 & 21 42 58.2 & $-$43 10 59 & 4.460 & 20.7\tablenotemark{g,k} & 2.45 &
428: 0.250 & 45.7 & $-$25.0 &
429: rp300274n00 & 28/04/93 & 29.7 &
430: 65.3 & 11.69 & 18.7 & 7.3 & 45.7 & $-$0.97 & \nodata \\ [0.1cm]
431: PC\,2331+0216 & 23 34 31.9 & +02 33 22 & 4.093 & 19.8 & 4.81 &
432: 0.573 & 46.0 & $-$25.7 &
433: rh701901n00 & 24/12/94 & 0.2 &
434: 30.1 & 1.93 & 13.4 & 4.4 & 45.5 & $-$1.19 & 35 \\ [0.1cm]
435: \hline
436: \end{tabular}
437: \end{center}
438: $^{\rm a}${In units of $10^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$.} \\
439: $^{\rm b}${At 2500~\AA\ in units of $10^{-27}$ ergs\,s$^{-1}$\,cm$^{-2}$\,Hz$^{-1}$.} \\
440: $^{\rm c}${Offset from the field center in units of arcmin.} \\
441: $^{\rm d}${In units of $10^{-3}$ counts\,s$^{-1}$.}\\
442: $^{\rm e}${Flux at the 0.1--2 keV band in units of $10^{-14}$ ergs\,s$^{-1}$\,cm$^{-2}$.} \\
443: $^{\rm f}${At 2~keV in units of $10^{-31}$ ergs\,s$^{-1}$\,cm$^{-2}$\,Hz$^{-1}$.} \\
444: $^{\rm g}${Estimated using an empirical linear relation between
445: [APM\,$R - {\rm AB}_{1450(1+z)}$] and [$z$] for all objects in
446: Storrie-Lombardi (1996) and deriving the missing AB$_{1450(1+z)}$
447: from that relation.} \\
448: $^{\rm h}${For better upper-limit determination see Molthagen,
449: Wendker, \& Briel (1995).} \\
450: $^{\rm i}${Can be only detected by careful co-adding of many
451: observations (see Table~1 and Schneider et al. 1998).} \\
452: $^{\rm j}${From Shaver et~al. (1996); using the $m_i$ magnitude
453: to estimate AB and the 1.4 GHz flux density to estimate $R$.} \\
454: $^{\rm k}${Estimated using $m_R$ magnitudes from and Hawkins \&
455: V\'{e}ron (1996).}
456: }}}
457: \label{properties}
458: \end{table*}
459: \normalsize
460:
461: \begin{figure*}
462: \vspace{-4cm}
463: \centerline{\epsfxsize=20.0cm\epsfbox{fig1.ps}}
464: \vspace{-6cm}
465: \caption{{\it ROSAT} images of the nine detected $z>4$ quasars from
466: 0.1--2.4 keV. North is up and East is to the left. The horizontal axis
467: shows the Right-Ascension, and the vertical axis shows the Declination
468: in J2000 coordinates. The box in each image is centered on the optical
469: coordinates of the quasar, and its size is substantially larger than
470: the positions uncertainty. Each image is
471: $\approx$18\arcmin$\times$18\arcmin . All images are from the PSPC
472: except for GB\,1428+4217 which is from the HRI.}
473: \label{image}
474: \end{figure*}
475:
476: \noindent As radio-quiet quasars typically have $\Gamma$\,=\,1.7--2.3, our
477: assumption of $\Gamma =2$ might introduce an additional uncertainty of
478: $\sim$15\% in the flux estimates. As the true $\Gamma$ for each quasar
479: is unknown (other than GB\,1428+4217 and GB\,1508+5714), we do not
480: quote an error on the latter quantities. We estimate the total
481: fractional uncertainties for the fluxes to be in the range of
482: 30--50\%.
483:
484: \vglue 0.06cm
485: X-ray images of all nine detected quasars are presented in
486: Fig.~\ref{image} which was created using the adaptive smoothing method
487: of Ebeling, White, \& Rangarajan (2000) applied to the full-band
488: images. For most of the images we used a 2.5$\sigma$ level of
489: smoothing; for three low-$\sigma$ detected objects (BR\,0951$-$0450,
490: BRI0952$-$0115, and BR\,1202$-$0725) we used a 2.0$\sigma$ level of
491: smoothing.
492:
493: \vglue 0.06cm
494: For each of the PSPC observations listed in the upper part of
495: Table~\ref{properties} we also calculated the X-ray counts in the soft
496: band (0.1--0.5 keV) and the hard band (0.5--2.0 keV). We used these to
497: calculate the rest-frame 2-keV flux density, luminosity, and
498: $\alpha_{\rm ox}$, in the same way as described above. The results were
499: similar to the broad-band results. However, as the statistical
500: uncertainties in the soft and hard bands were large due the small
501: number of counts (note the small number of counts in the broad band --
502: column [13] of Table~\ref{properties}), we do not include these results
503: in our analysis.
504:
505: \vglue 0.06cm
506: In the lower part of Table~\ref{properties} we list the $z>4$ quasars
507: which we were unable to detect in the X-ray observations. For these
508: quasars we give 3$\sigma$ upper limits (listed in column [13]), where
509: $\sigma$ is the square root of the counts in an aperture of size
510: appropriate to the quasar's off-axis angle and centered at the quasar's
511: optical position. For each quasar we list the one observation which
512: gave the faintest upper limit.
513:
514: \vglue 0.06cm
515: For 27 objects the number of expected detections which are merely
516: statistical fluctuations at the 2.5$\sigma$ level is 0.17; this
517: suggests that none of our detections is likely to be a background
518: fluctuation. We also estimated the probability that our X-ray quasar
519: detections are merely of unrelated X-ray sources that happen to be
520: coincident with the $z>4$ quasars' optical positions. We shifted the 27
521: quasars' positions by eight arcmin in eight different directions
522: and looked again for X-ray detections (in the same manner as was done
523: for the real optical positions). At the new positions we found seven
524: X-ray sources which met our detection criteria regarding significant
525: level and positional coincidence. This test shows that among our nine
526: X-ray detections there might be one source which is not the counterpart
527: of the quasar but an X-ray source which happened to be in that position
528: by chance. Additional suggestive evidence that the number of false
529: detections is small is that we have detected only the brighter quasars
530: out of the total 27 (see Fig.~\ref{his} and \S~\ref{Discussion}); if our
531: detections had random contamination by foreground sources then
532: their distribution would not be correlated with quasar luminosity.
533:
534: \vglue 0.06cm
535: For comparison purposes we present some properties of the X-ray
536: detected $z>4$ quasars known prior to this work in Table~1.
537: We list the AB$_{1450(1+z)}$ magnitudes in column (8) and the Galactic
538: column densities in column (9). Based on the AB$_{1450(1+z)}$
539: magnitudes we calculate the rest-frame 2500~\AA\ flux densities and
540: luminosities which are listed in columns (10) and (11), and the
541: absolute $B$ magnitudes in column (12). We used the X-ray fluxes and
542: bands from columns (5) and (6) and the PIMMS software to define a
543: simple power law with $\Gamma =2$. This power law was used to estimate
544: the rest-frame 2-keV flux den-
545: %
546: %\begin{figure*}
547: \centerline{\epsfxsize=8.5cm\epsfbox{fig2.eps}}
548: \figcaption{$M_B$ distribution of the 27 $z>4$ quasars observed by {\it
549: ROSAT}. The shaded area represents the quasars which were X-ray
550: detected. \label{his} }
551: \centerline{}
552: \centerline{}
553: %\end{figure*}
554:
555: \noindent sity and luminosity which are listed in
556: columns (13) and (14). We list the resulting $\alpha_{\rm ox}$ in column (15).
557:
558: \section{Discussion}
559: \label{Discussion}
560:
561: In most cases where we detect X-ray sources at the quasars' optical
562: positions they are very close to the detection limit. Comparing the
563: data for the quasars which are X-ray detected to those which are not,
564: we notice several trends. The detected quasars are among the brighter
565: in the optical band (see Fig.~\ref{his} for the $M_B$ distribution). If
566: the undetected quasars have comparable X-ray luminosities to the
567: detected ones, we suggest that they were mainly not detected since they
568: were observed at the edges of the PSPC field where the PSF and
569: vignetting are larger. In the two cases where high luminosity
570: quasars were observed close to the PSPC field center (BRI\,1050$-$0000,
571: BR\,1144$-$0723), we attribute the non-detections to short exposure
572: times.
573:
574: Three objects which we detected had already been reported as X-ray
575: emitters in the past (Q\,0000$-$2619, GB\,1428+4217, and
576: RX\,J1759.4+6638). The X-ray properties we have measured for them are
577: in agreement with the previous reported properties (see
578: Table~1). We have not detected the other three quasars in
579: Table~1 since the data for RX\,J1028.6$-$0844 are not public
580: (it was detected in the {\it ROSAT} All-Sky Survey), GB\,1508+5714 was
581: not observed by {\it ROSAT}, and RX\,J105225.9+571905 could be detected
582: only in the ``ultradeep'' HRI survey (see Schneider et~al. 1998 and
583: references therein).
584:
585: At present only a few radio-loud $z>4$ quasars are known. These include
586: GB\,1428+4217, GB\,1508+5714, and RX\,J1028.6$-$0844 which have had
587: their X-ray data published prior to this work (Table~1),
588: PKS\,1251$-$407, for which we present an X-ray upper limit, and
589: GB\,1713+2148, whose {\it ROSAT} observation is not yet public. Out of
590: these objects, GB\,1428+4217 and GB\,1508+5714 show evidence for
591: relativistic beaming (e.g., Moran \& Helfand 1997; Fabian et~al.
592: 1999). We used the NRAO\footnote{The National Radio Astronomy
593: Observatory\,is\,a\,facility\,of\,the National Science Foundation operated
594: under cooperative agreement\,by\,Associated Universities,\,Inc.} VLA Sky
595: Survey (NVSS; Condon et~al. 1998) catalog and images at 1.4~GHz to
596: estimate the quasars' radio loudnesses, $R$, defined as the ratio of
597: the radio flux (extra-
598:
599: %\begin{figure*}
600: \centerline{\epsfxsize=8.5cm\epsfbox{fig3.eps}}
601: \vglue 0.37cm
602: \figcaption{$\alpha_{\rm ox}$ distribution of X-ray detected $z>4$ quasars
603: (shaded areas) compared with the $\alpha_{\rm ox}$ distribution of the 87
604: $z<0.5$ PG quasars (black bars) from Brandt et~al. (2000; including
605: four upper limits). We distinguish between $z>4$ quasars which are
606: optically selected and those which are selected from X-ray and radio
607: samples. The distribution of $z>4$ X-ray upper-limits is also shown
608: (white bars with arrows).
609: \label{aoxhis}}
610: \centerline{}
611: \centerline{}
612: %\end{figure*}
613:
614: \noindent cted from the NVSS) to the optical flux at
615: 4400~\AA\ (estimated using the AB magnitude and a flux-density power
616: law with $\alpha_{\rm{o}}=0.5$). Radio-loud quasars typically have
617: $R>100$ and radio-quiet quasars have $R<10$ (e.g., Kellermann et~al.
618: 1989). We list $R$ in Table~1 column (16) and
619: Table~\ref{properties} column (19). Most of the quasars in this study
620: are undetected by the NVSS, and thus we provide only upper
621: limits\footnote{The results reported here from the NVSS are consistent
622: with those from the Faint Images of the Radio Sky at Twenty-cm (FIRST;
623: Becker, White, \& Helfand 1995) which currently covers only a third of
624: our objects.}. In addition to the above mentioned radio-loud quasars
625: we detect PC\,0027+0525 to be radio-loud and BRI\,1050-0000,
626: RX\,J1759.4+6638, and PC\,2331+0216 to be intermediate between the two
627: radio classes (see also McMahon et~al. 1994). All other quasars (but
628: two) have $R$ upper limits which designate them as being radio-quiet.
629: This result is in agreement with other radio and far-IR studies of
630: these $z>4$ quasars which find them to be radio-quiet (e.g., Schneider
631: et~al. 1992; Omont et~al. 1996; McMahon et~al. 1999). Our results are
632: also consistent with the Schmidt et~al. (1995) conclusion that only
633: 5--10\% of optically selected $z>4$ quasars are radio-loud.
634:
635: In Fig.~\ref{aoxhis} we compare the $\alpha_{\rm ox}$ distribution of
636: all the X-ray detected $z>4$ quasars with the $\alpha_{\rm ox}$
637: distribution of a sample of all 87 Palomar-Green (PG) quasars at
638: $z<0.5$ from Brandt, Laor, \& Wills (2000). We have translated the
639: $\alpha_{\rm ox}$ given in Brandt et~al. (2000) for a flux density at
640: 3000~\AA\ to that for a flux density at 2500~\AA . To carry out this
641: comparison we consider only the optically selected $z>4$
642: quasars\footnote{The only objects which are not optically selected in
643: our study are the five last objects listed in Table~1.} since
644: the PG sample is an optically selected sample. The $\alpha_{\rm ox}$
645: distribution for the seven optically-selected objects is consistent
646: with the $\alpha_{\rm ox}$ distribution of the PG quasars and with the
647: $\alpha_{\rm ox}$ distribution usually found for quasars (e.g., Wilkes
648: et al. 1994; Green et~al. 1995). We also use all optically selected
649: objects in this study, including the ones with upper limits on their
650: X-ray properties, to derive the mean $\alpha_{\rm ox}$. To that
651: purpose we have used the ASURV software package Rev 1.2 (LaValley,
652: Isobe \& Feigelson 1992), which implements the survival analysis
653: methods presented in Feigelson \& Nelson (1985) and Isobe, Feigelson,
654: \& Nelson (1986).
655: %
656: % \begin{figure*}
657: \centerline{\epsfxsize=8.5cm\epsfbox{fig4.eps}}
658: \figcaption{Rest-frame 2~keV versus 2500~\AA\ luminosities. Filled circles
659: are data from this study, squares are data from previous studies, and
660: empty triangles are upper limits determined in this study. Radio-loud
661: quasars are circled. The separation between the three blazar-type
662: (highest points) from the other objects is clearly visible.
663: \label{lxvslo}}
664: \centerline{}
665: \centerline{}
666: % \end{figure*}
667:
668: \noindent We find the mean $\alpha_{\rm ox}$ to be $-1.49\pm
669: 0.04$ which is in agreement with past studies.
670:
671: Three of the detected quasars have $\alpha_{\rm ox} < -1$
672: (Fig.~\ref{aoxhis}). This is not consistent with the PG quasars'
673: $\alpha_{\rm ox}$ distribution, and indeed these three quasars are the
674: ones known to be radio-loud with two of them being blazar-type objects,
675: while the PG quasars are mainly radio-quiet with no blazars among them.
676:
677: The separation between the blazar-type and radio-quiet quasars can also
678: be seen in Fig.~\ref{lxvslo}, where we plot the rest-frame 2~keV versus
679: 2500~\AA\ luminosities. The X-ray fluxes for the three radio-loud
680: quasars are about an order of magnitude higher than those of the
681: radio-quiet ones. A line fit to the radio-quiet quasars' data using
682: ASURV yields
683: %
684: % \begin{equation}
685: % \frac{f_\nu (2\,{\rm keV})}
686: % {10^{-31}\,{\rm ergs\,s}^{-1}\,{\rm cm}^{-2}\,{\mbox\AA}^{-1}}= {10^{-31}}=
687: % \left(1.73^{+0.25}_{-0.22}\right) \left[\frac{f_\nu (2500\,{\mbox\AA})}
688: % {10^{-27}\,{\rm ergs\,s}^{-1}\,{\rm cm}^{-2}\,{\mbox\AA}^{-1}}
689: % {10^{-27}}\right]^{0.70\pm 0.12}
690: % \end{equation}
691: % where $f_\nu$ is measured in ergs\,s$^{-1}$\,cm$^{-2}$\AA$^{-1}$, and
692: %
693: \begin{equation}
694: \frac{\nu L_\nu (2\,{\rm keV})}{10^{45}\,{\rm ergs\,s}^{-1}}=
695: \left(0.175^{+0.070}_{-0.050}\right)
696: \left[\frac{\nu L_\nu (2500\,{\mbox\AA})}{10^{45}\,{\rm ergs\,s}^{-1}}
697: \right]^{0.69\pm 0.10} \ \ .
698: \end{equation}
699: This relation is in agreement with the one found for lower-redshift
700: quasars (e.g., Wilkes et al. 1994; Green et~al. 1995), albeit within
701: relatively large uncertainty owing to the small number of points and
702: their distribution.
703:
704: Three of our detected quasars have two {\it ROSAT} observations
705: (Table~\ref{properties}). In all cases the fluxes from different
706: observations agree to within the measurement uncertainty of $\sim$30\%,
707: and no flux variations over time are detected. The quasar
708: GB\,1428+4217 has six {\it ROSAT} observations and was found to vary by
709: a factor of two over a timescale of two weeks (or less), which
710: corresponds to less than 2.5 days in the source's rest-frame, a result
711: not unexpected in that this quasar is a flat-spectrum radio-loud blazar
712: (Fabian et~al. 1998, 1999).
713:
714: The observed 0.1--2 keV band corresponds to a rest-frame band of
715: 0.5--10 keV at $z=4$. Emission at the low end of this bandpass can
716: originate from an accretion disk, but is mainly thought to arise from
717: the surrounding corona (e.g., Fabian 1994). Detecting X-ray emission in
718: this band from $z>4$ quasars suggests that similar processes are taking
719: place in low-redshift and the highest-redshift quasars.
720:
721: We have established that in almost all cases where $z>4$ quasars were
722: observed at the center of the PSPC field and the exposure times were
723: sufficiently long (as anticipated from their optical luminosities), an
724: X-ray source was found at the optical position of the quasar. As two,
725: and possibly three, of the objects detected before our paper are
726: ``peculiar'' blazar-type objects, we have more than doubled the number
727: of optically selected $z>4$ quasars detected in the X-ray band and
728: determined that $\alpha_{\rm ox}$ in these quasars is similar to that
729: of lower $z$ quasars. At present we have only been able to study in
730: X-rays the most luminous $z>4$ quasars. New X-ray missions such as {\it
731: Chandra}, {\it XMM}, {\it Constellation-X}, and {\it XEUS} should allow
732: the study of the X-ray properties of considerably less luminous $z>4$
733: quasars. With thousands of $z>4$ quasars expected to be found in the
734: next few years (e.g., by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey), there should be
735: ample targets.
736:
737: \acknowledgments
738:
739: We are grateful for several valuable suggestions by David J.
740: Helfand. We acknowledge the support of NASA LTSA grant NAG5-8107 (SK,
741: WNB), the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (WNB), and NSF grant 99-00703
742: (DPS). We thank Harald Ebeling for the use of his IDL software.
743:
744: \begin{thebibliography}{}
745: \bibitem{dum1} Arnaud, K. A. 1996, in Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems,
746: ASP Conference Series 101, ed. G. Jacoby, \& J. Barnes,
747: (San Francisco: ASP), 17
748: \bibitem{dum2} Bechtold, J., et al. 1994a, AJ, 108, 374
749: \bibitem{dum3} Bechtold, J., et al. 1994b, AJ, 108, 759
750: \bibitem{dum4} Becker, R. H., White, R. L., \& Helfand, D. J. 1995, AJ, 450, 559
751: \bibitem{dum5} Blair, A. J., Stewart, G. C., Georgantopoulos, I., Boyle, B. J., Almaini,
752: O., Shanks, T., Gunn, K. F., \& Griffiths, R. E. 1998, Astr. Nach.,
753: 319, 25
754: \bibitem{dum6} Brandt, W. N., Laor, A., \& Wills, B. J. 2000, ApJ, in press
755: (astro-ph/9908016)
756: \bibitem{dum7} Condon, J. J., Cotton, W. D., Greisen, E. W., Yin, Q. F., Perley,
757: R. A., Taylor, G. B., \& Broderick, J. J. 1998, AJ, 115, 1693
758: \bibitem{dum8} David, L. P., Harnden, F. R., Kearns, K. E., \& Zombeck, M. V. 1999,
759: The {\it ROSAT} High Resolution Imager Calibration Report.
760: U.S. {\it ROSAT} Science Data Center, Cambridge
761: \bibitem{dum9} Dickey, J. M., \& Lockman, F. J. 1990, ARA\&A, 28, 215
762: \bibitem{dumq} Ebeling, H., White, D. A., \& Rangarajan, F. V. N. 2000, MNRAS, submitted
763: \bibitem{dumw} Efstathiou G., \& Rees M. J. 1988, MNRAS, 230, L5
764: \bibitem{dume} Elvis, M., Fiore, F., Giommi P., \& Padovani P. 1998, ApJ, 492, 91
765: \bibitem{dumr} Fabian, A.C. 1994, ApJS, 92, 555
766: \bibitem{dumt} Fabian, A. C., Brandt, W. N., McMahon, R. G., \& Hook, I. M.
767: 1997, MNRAS, 291, L5
768: \bibitem{dumy} Fabian, A. C., Iwasawa, K., Celotti, A., Brandt, W. N.,
769: McMahon, R. G., \& Hook, I. M. 1998, MNRAS, 295, L25
770: \bibitem{dumu} Fabian, A. C., Celotti, A., Pooley, G., Iwasawa, K., Brandt, W. N.,
771: McMahon, R. G., \& Hoenig, M. D. 1999, MNRAS, 1999, 308, L6
772: \bibitem{dumi} Fan, X., et al. 1999, AJ, 118, 1
773: \bibitem{dumo} Fan, X., et al. 2000, AJ, 119, in press
774: \bibitem{dump} Feigelson, E. D., \& Nelson, P. I. 1985, AJ, 293, 192
775: \bibitem{duma} Fiore, F., Elvis, M., Giommi, P., \& Padovani, P. 1998, ApJ, 492, 79
776: \bibitem{dums} Green, P. J., et al. 1995, ApJ, 450, 51
777: \bibitem{dumd} Hawkins, M. R. S., \& V\'{e}ron, P. 1996, MNRAS, 281, 348
778: \bibitem{dumf} Henry, J. P., et al. 1994, AJ, 107, 1270
779: \bibitem{dumg} Hook, I. M., \& McMahon, R. G. 1998, MNRAS, 294, L7
780: \bibitem{dumh} Isobe, T., Feigelson, E. D., \& Nelson P. I. 1986, AJ, 306, 490
781: \bibitem{dumj} Kellermann, K. I., Sramek, R., Schmidt, M., Shaffer D. B., Green, R. F.
782: 1989, AJ, 98, 1195
783: \bibitem{dumk} LaValley, M., Isobe, T., \& Feigelson, E. D. 1992, in Astronomical
784: Data Analysis Software and Systems, ASP conference series 25,
785: ed. D. M. Worrall, C. Biemesderfer, \& J. Barnes,
786: (San Francisco: ASP), 245
787: \bibitem{duml} Mathur, S., \& Elvis, M. 1995, AJ, 110, 1551
788: \bibitem{dumz} McMahon, R. G., Omont, A., Bergeron, J., Kreysa, E., Haslam, C. G. T.
789: 1994, MNRAS, 267, L9
790: \bibitem{dumx} McMahon, R. G., Priddey, S. R., Omont, A., Snellen, I., \&
791: Withington, S. 1999, MNRAS, 309, L1
792: \bibitem{dumc} Molthagen, K., Wendker, H. J., \& Briel, U. G. 1995, A\&A, 295, 43
793: \bibitem{dumv} Moran, E. C., \& Helfand, D. J. 1997, ApJ, 484, L95
794: \bibitem{dumb} Moran, E. C., Helfand, D. J., Becker, R. H., \& White, R. L.
795: 1996, ApJ, 461, 127
796: \bibitem{dumn} Mukai, K. 1997, The {\sc pimms} Users' Guide (Greenbelt: NASA/GSFC)
797: \bibitem{dumm} Netzer, H. 1990, in Active Galactic Nuclei, ed., T. J. -L. Courvoisier,
798: \& M. Mayor (Berlin: Springer-Verlag), 57
799: \bibitem{dumqq} Omont, A., McMahon, R. G., Cox, P., Kreysa, E., Bergeron, J.,
800: Pajot, F., \& Storrie-Lombardi, L. J. 1996, A\&A, 315, 1
801: \bibitem{dumww} Pfeffermann, E., et~al., 1987, Proc. SPIE, 733, 519
802: \bibitem{dum} Reeves, J. N., Turner, M. J. L., Ohashi, T., \& Kii, T. 1997, MNRAS,
803: 292, 468
804: \bibitem{dumee} Schmidt M., van Gorkom J. G., Schneider D. P., Gunn J. E. 1995, AJ,
805: 109, 473
806: \bibitem{dumrr} Schneider, D. P. 1999, in After the Dark Ages: When Galaxies were Young,
807: ed. S. Holt, \& E. Smith, (American Institute of Physics Press), 233
808: \bibitem{dumtt} Schneider, D. P., Schmidt, M., \& Gunn J. E. 1989, AJ, 98, 1507
809: \bibitem{dumyy} Schneider, D. P., Schmidt, M., \& Gunn J. E. 1991, AJ, 101, 2004
810: \bibitem{dumuu} Schneider, D. P., van Gorkom, J. H., Schmidt, M., \& Gunn, J. E. 1992,
811: AJ, 103, 1451
812: \bibitem{dumii} Schneider, D. P., Schmidt, M., Hasinger, G. Lehmann, I., Gunn, J. E.,
813: Giacconi, R., Tr\"{u}mper, J., \& Zamorani, G. 1998, AJ, 115, 1230
814: \bibitem{dumoo} Shaver, P. A., Wall, J. V., \& Kellermann, K. I. 1996, MNRAS, 278, L11
815: \bibitem{dumpp} Storrie-Lombardi, L. J., McMahon, R. G., Irwin, M. J., \& Hazard, C.
816: 1996, ApJ, 468, 121
817: \bibitem{dumaa} Turner, E. L. 1991, AJ, 101, 5
818: \bibitem{dumss} Voges, W., et~al. 1996, in R\"{o}ntgenstrahlung from the Universe,
819: ed. H. U. Zimmermann, J. Tr\"{u}mper, \& H. Yorke, MPE Report 263, 637
820: \bibitem{dumdd} Warren, S. J., Hewett, P. C., Irwin, M. J., McMahon, R. G., \&
821: Bridgeland, M. T. 1987, Nature, 325, 131
822: \bibitem{dumff} Wilkes, B. J, Tananbaum, H., Worrall, D. M., Avni, Y., Oey, M. S., \&
823: Flanagan, J. 1994, ApJS, 92, 53
824: \bibitem{dumgg} York, D. G., et al. 2000, AJ, submitted
825: \bibitem{dumhh} Zickgraf, F. -J., Voges, W., Krautter, J., Thiering, I.,
826: Appenzeller, I., Mujica, R., \& Serrano, A. 1997, A\&A, 323, L21
827: % \end{description}
828: % \end{references}
829: \end{thebibliography}
830:
831: \end{document}
832: