1: \documentclass[preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: \newcommand{\h}{H\scriptsize II \normalsize}
4: \newcommand{\etal}{et al.}
5: \newcommand{\3}{[O III]~$\lambda$5007}
6: \newcommand{\1}{[O I]~$\lambda$6300}
7:
8: \begin{document}
9:
10: \title{THE PRIMORDIAL HELIUM ABUNDANCE: TOWARDS UNDERSTANDING AND
11: REMOVING THE COSMIC SCATTER IN THE $dY/dZ$ RELATION}
12:
13: \author{D. R. Ballantyne\altaffilmark{1}, G. J. Ferland\altaffilmark{2}
14: and P. G. Martin}
15: \affil{Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics, University of
16: Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada~M5S~3H8; ballanty, ferland and
17: pgmartin@cita.utoronto.ca}
18:
19: \altaffiltext{1}{Current address: Institute of Astronomy,
20: Madingley Road, Cambridge, United Kingdom CB3 0HA}
21:
22: \altaffiltext{2}{Also: Department of Physics and Astronomy,
23: University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0055 USA}
24:
25: \begin{abstract}
26: We present results from photoionization models of low-metallicity \h
27: regions. These nebulae form the basis for measuring the primordial helium abundance.
28: Our models show that the helium ionization correction factor (ICF) can be non-negligible
29: for nebulae excited by stars with effective temperatures larger than 40,000~K.
30: Furthermore, we find that when the effective temperature rises to above 45,000~K, the
31: ICF can be significantly negative. This result is independent of the choice of stellar
32: atmosphere. However, if an \h region has an \3/\1 ratio greater than 300, then our
33: models show that, regardless of its metallicity, it will have a negligibly small ICF.
34: A similar, but metallicity dependent, result was found using the \3/H$\beta$ ratio. These
35: two results can be used as selection criteria to remove nebulae with potentially
36: non-negligible ICFs. Using our metallicity independent criterion on the data of
37: \citet{izo98} results in a 20\% reduction of the rms scatter about the best fit
38: $Y-Z$ line. A fit to the selected data results in a slight increase of the value
39: of the primordial helium abundance.
40:
41: \end{abstract}
42:
43: \keywords{galaxies: abundances --- galaxies: ISM --- \h regions --- ISM: abundances}
44:
45: \section{INTRODUCTION}
46: \label{sec:intro}
47:
48: An accurate measurement of the primordial helium abundance would be
49: an important test of standard big bang nucleosynthesis \citep{oli97}, and
50: would also constrain the values of the photon-to-baryon ratio and $\Omega_b$
51: \citep{oli99}. The traditional procedure to measure the primordial helium
52: abundance is to make use of the correlation between the helium mass fraction
53: ($Y$) and metal abundance ($Z$). This correlation is then extrapolated
54: to zero metallicity to estimate the primordial mass fraction of helium,
55: $Y_p$. Spectroscopic observations of bright, low-metallicity extragalactic
56: \h regions provide the data for these studies \cite[e.g.,][]{oli95,oli97,
57: izo94,izo97,izo98,tor89,skil98}.
58:
59: To be cosmologically useful the value of $Y_p$ has to be determined to better
60: than 5\%. Fortunately, abundance determinations from measurements of line ratios
61: is relatively straightforward \citep{pei75,ben99}, and can, {\it in theory},
62: give the desired accuracy. However, to reach the needed level of precision, any
63: systematic errors involved with target selection, observations, and data
64: analysis must be identified and corrected. Many such systematic
65: errors have already been identified
66: \citep{dav85,din86,pag92,skil94,pei96,izo97,ste97,skil98}, but any errors resulting
67: from the so-called ``ionization correction factor'' (ICF) have so far been
68: assumed to be small. The ICF corrects for the fact that some amount of atomic
69: (i.e., unseen) helium might be present in ionized regions of hydrogen
70: \citep{ost89,pei75}. This correction traditionally has been assumed to be
71: zero because measurements of the primordial helium abundance employ
72: observations of bright extragalactic \h regions. These regions are excited by
73: clusters of young stars with effective temperatures greater than
74: 40,000~K. Calculations by \citet{sta90} and \citet{pag92} showed that the
75: helium ICF should be negligibly small for these \h regions. As a result,
76: recent determinations of $Y_p$ have assumed that the helium ICF is small.
77:
78: Very recently, \citet{arm99} presented calculations that showed that
79: \h regions excited by stars with temperatures greater than 40,000~K can
80: have non-negligible ICFs. \citet{arm99} found that the ICFs were often negative
81: (i.e., the helium ionized zone is {\bf larger} than the hydrogen one;
82: \citet{sta80,sta82}, \citet{pen86}) for the hardest
83: stellar continua. These results were confirmed by \citet{vie99}.
84: In this paper, we follow up on the work of \citet{arm99}, and develop observational
85: diagnostics of when the He ICF is important and when it can be ignored. We then
86: apply these diagnostics to the data of \cite{izo98} to illustrate how our technique
87: can improve the precision of the measurement of $Y_p$.
88:
89: We describe our calculations in \S~\ref{sec:calc}, and our results in
90: \S~\ref{sec:results}. The main results are summarized in \S~\ref{sec:concl}.
91:
92: \section{DESCRIPTION OF CALCULATIONS}
93: \label{sec:calc}
94:
95: In order to investigate the effects of a non-negligible ICF on the determination of the
96: primordial helium abundance, we ran photoionization models of \h regions and extracted
97: the ICF for each nebula. These calculations are very similar to ones presented by
98: \citet{arm99} and \citet{bot98}, and were made with the development version
99: of Cloudy, last described by \citet{fer98}.
100:
101: Since we are modeling \h regions, our models use the ISM abundances and grain model that
102: were used and described by \citet{arm99}. However, we scaled both the metal
103: and grain abundances to lower values because, in this case, we are most interested in
104: lower metallicity nebulae. The scaling was implemented so that all metals and grains
105: were varied together relative to hydrogen and helium, but the He/H ratio was held
106: constant. We modeled nebulae at three different metallicities: O/H=32, 64, and 128
107: parts per million [ppm] ($Z=Z_{\odot}/23, Z_{\odot}/12$, and $Z_{\odot}/6$ respectively).
108: For each metallicity, 1936 models were computed for each
109: of the following spectral energy distributions: the LTE plane-parallel
110: atmospheres of \citet{kur91}, the non-LTE, wind-blanketed, solar
111: abundance CoStar atmospheres of \citet{sc96a,sc96b}, the earlier NLTE
112: atmospheres of \citet{mih72}, and for completeness blackbodies. We also
113: ran models using the subsolar-abundance CoStar atmospheres which are
114: spectrally slightly harder than the solar abundance ones. These models
115: resulted in slightly more negative ICFs, but the values of the line
116: ratio cutoffs (\S~\ref{sub:zdep} \& \S~\ref{sub:zindep}) were not
117: changed from the ones calculated with a solar abundance atmosphere.
118:
119: For each atmosphere we computed models with 10~cm$^{-3} \leq n_H \leq 10^6$~cm$^{-3}$,
120: 10$^{-4} \leq U \leq 10^{-0.25}$, and 40,000~K$ \leq T_{eff} \leq 50,000$~K, where
121: $U$ is the ionization parameter defined as in Eq.~4 of \citet{arm99}. Giant
122: extragalactic \h regions that are observed are generally excited by large clusters, so this
123: range of parameters should cover all such nebulae. We modeled the nebulae as
124: plane-parallel constant density slabs, a simple way to characterize blister \h regions.
125: Our proposed diagnostic indicators are the \3 and \1 lines (\S~\ref{sub:zdep} \&
126: \S~\ref{sub:zindep}), and these should be fairly independent of the
127: assumed geometry (sphere, sheet, or evaporating blister). The \3/H$\beta$
128: ratio represents the cooling per recombination (the Stoy ratio) and so is
129: primarily sensitive to the stellar temperature \citep{sto33,kal78}
130: rather than geometry. Similarly, the \1/H$\beta$ intensity ratio mostly
131: measures the "softness" of the hydrogen ionization front (where the line
132: forms - Netzer \& Davidson 1979).
133:
134: \section{RESULTS}
135: \label{sec:results}
136: \subsection{Temperature Dependence}
137: \label{sub:temp}
138:
139: Figure~\ref{fig:temp-icf} plots the ICF calculated from the Kurucz and CoStar models
140: versus the stellar temperature. Note that we define the ICF such that an ICF of zero
141: corresponds to zero correction:
142: \begin{equation}
143: \label{eq:ICF}
144: \mathrm{ICF}={\left < \mathrm{H^{+}}\!/\,\mathrm{H} \right > \over \left <
145: \mathrm{He^{+}}\!/\,\mathrm{He} \right > } - 1,
146: \label{eq:icf}
147: \end{equation}
148: where the angle brackets denote the volume mean ionization fraction. This definition
149: takes into account the presence of any He$^{+2}$ in the nebula.
150: Figure~\ref{fig:temp-icf} clearly
151: shows that one can obtain a non-negligible ICF for stars with temperatures greater
152: than 40,000~K. The harder CoStar atmospheres give preferentially negative ICFs, which,
153: if not taken into account, would result in a overestimate of the helium abundance. The
154: same is true of the Mihalas atmospheres (not shown). These results agree with the
155: calculations of \citet{arm99} and \citet{vie99}. The softer Kurucz atmospheres result in
156: preferentially positive ICFs (i.e., the helium ionized zone is smaller than the hydrogen one),
157: although, at temperatures greater than 45,000~K, they can
158: also give negative ICFs. The blackbody atmospheres, the least realistic, are softer still,
159: but even they can produce negative ICFs in some models at the highest temperatures.
160: Therefore, negative ICFs seem to be found at high stellar temperatures {\it independent
161: of the type of stellar atmosphere}.
162:
163: \subsection{Metallicity Dependent Cutoff Criterion}
164: \label{sub:zdep}
165:
166: A negative ICF occurs as the results of penetrating high-energy photons
167: preferentially ionizing helium, due to its large photoionization cross section.
168: This tends to be important for lower ionization parameter models, since these have
169: significant regions where H and He are partially ionized. We expect these nebula to be
170: characterized by lower \3/H$\beta$ ratios (a measure of excitation) and larger
171: \1/H$\beta$ ratios (since \1 is formed in warm atomic regions).
172:
173: The results presented in \S~\ref{sub:temp} show that it is not appropriate to simply
174: assume that the ICF is zero when a nebula is excited by a star with a temperature
175: greater than 40,000~K. However, it would be important to develop observational
176: diagnostics for when the ICF is important and when it is not. Figure~\ref{fig:o3-icf}
177: shows such a diagnostic. A plot of ICF versus \3/H$\beta$ shows that beyond a line
178: ratio of about 3--4 the ICF is negligible (for clarity results are shown for Kurucz
179: and CoStar atmospheres only; a plot for blackbody and Mihalas atmospheres is very
180: similar). However, the value of the cutoff will depend on metallicity. We found very
181: small ICFs for line ratios greater than the following cutoff:
182: \begin{equation}
183: \label{eq:zcutoff}
184: \left (\mathrm{[O\ III]}\ \lambda 5007/\mathrm{H}\beta \right )_{\mathrm{Cutoff}} =
185: (0.025 \pm 0.004)\mathrm{O/H}+(1.139 \pm 0.306),
186: \end{equation}
187: where O/H is measured in parts per million. \h regions which have an \3/H$\beta$
188: ratio less than the cutoff for their metallicity might be subject to an ICF
189: correction. Unless this correction can be made (and, in general, it cannot) these
190: \h regions should be removed from the abundance analysis, as they will increase the
191: scatter in the $dY/dZ$ relation used to determine the primordial helium abundance.
192:
193: \subsection{Metallicity Independent Cutoff Criterion}
194: \label{sub:zindep}
195:
196: One can improve the above result by finding emission line ratios that should be
197: independent of metallicity. Figure~\ref{fig:o3o1-icf} plots the helium ICF versus
198: the \3/\1 ratio. The figure shows that the ICF is negligible for a line ratio greater
199: than about 300. Not surprisingly, this result is {\it independent of metallicity}.
200:
201: There are some Kurucz and blackbody models which result in a non-negligible ICF at line
202: ratios larger than this cutoff. These models had low stellar temperatures
203: (40,000--42,000~K), and were found over a narrow range in both $\log U$ ($-1.5$ to $-2.25$)
204: and $\log n_H$ (1.0--3.0). Their positive ICF is a result of combining the low stellar
205: temperatures and the softness of their atmospheres; their large \3/\1 ratio is a result
206: of combining the fairly high ionization parameter with the low density. CoStar and Mihalas
207: models, which are considered more ``realistic'', result in only very small ICFs in this
208: region.
209:
210: Therefore, we find that any \h region, regardless of its metallicity, that has an
211: \3/\1 ratio less than about 300 might be subject to an ICF correction and should not
212: be used to determine the primordial helium abundance.
213:
214: \subsection{Application to Real Data}
215: \label{sub:apply}
216:
217: To see how these new results affect the determination of $Y_p$, we applied the
218: metallicity independent rejection criteria to the data of \citet{izo98}, and the
219: results are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:o3o1-y}. There are a number of points to note
220: from this Figure:
221: \begin{enumerate}
222:
223: \item Our criterion rejects points over the entire range of metallicity, so there is
224: no metallicity bias. The rejected points also fall evenly over the range of $Y$ values,
225: which implies that there is no correlation between $Y$ and the \3/\1 ratio.
226:
227: \item At an \3/\1 cutoff of 300 there is a 20\% reduction in the weighted rms scatter
228: about the best fit line. This is encouraging evidence that part of the scatter was
229: due to the ICF, and the situation has indeed improved by the implementation of the
230: cutoff.
231:
232: \item The negative slopes predicted by using a
233: cutoff$\ \geq$ 300 result from weighted fits to the small number of data
234: that remain after applying the cutoff, and are probably not
235: realistic. Given the current data, a cutoff value greater than 300 is
236: too severe (not practical).
237:
238: \item Despite the increased errors in the slope and the intercept, we find that
239: implementing our cutoff will result in a larger value of $Y_p$. Specifically, we
240: find $Y_p = 0.2489 \pm 0.0030$ when the cutoff is taken at a \3/\1 ratio of 300.
241: \cite{izo98} find $0.2443 \pm 0.0015$ (our fit gives $0.2443 \pm 0.0013$ with no cutoff),
242: so the two results are barely consistent at the 1$\sigma$ level. This result is
243: in the opposite direction of the shift predicted by the Monte Carlo simulations of
244: \citet{vie99}, but moves the value of $Y_p$ closer to the theoretically predicted
245: values \citep{oli95}.
246:
247: \end{enumerate}
248:
249: There is always the possibility that systematic errors are introduced whenever data
250: are rejected by a certain criterion. The above selection criterion preferentially
251: selects \h regions that have large \3/\1 ratios. This ratio is generally large
252: whenever the \3 line is strong (this is consistent with our metallicity dependent
253: criterion). The \3 line is a major source of cooling in a nebula, and so by selecting
254: \h regions with strong \3 lines we are selecting regions ionized by hotter stars. Since
255: these large extragalactic \h regions are generally ionized by clusters, ones with
256: strong \3 lines are preferentially younger. However, this is unlikely to introduce a
257: systematic error in the primordial helium abundance determination, as young clusters
258: can form at any metallicity. Indeed, Figure~\ref{fig:o3o1-y} shows that the points
259: rejected by applying the cutoff span the entire range of metallicity.
260:
261: There is also the possibility that physical conditions within the \h regions
262: may bias our results. For example, in some nebulae the intensity of the \1 line
263: could be enhanced due to shock heating. This would lower the measured \3/\1 ratio,
264: and could move it below our selection criterion. However, shock heating would not
265: change the ICF of the nebula, so even though application of our criterion might
266: reject such a \h region, it will not bias the determination of $Y_p$.
267:
268: Another potential situation in \h regions is that the nebula may be matter
269: bounded (i.e., optically thin to the Lyman continuum) in certain solid
270: angles or sectors. Because there will be no hydrogen ionization front in such
271: sectors, and therefore no \1 line emission, the presence of such sectors
272: will increase the measured \3/\1 ratio, possibly pushing it above our selection
273: criterion. However, these sectors will also have little or no neutral helium
274: within them, and so will have no ICF. Therefore, although the
275: other, ionization bounded, sectors of the \h region could have a
276: non-negligible ICF, this will be diluted by the matter bounded sectors.
277: We anticipate that even if such an \h region were shifted into our
278: selected data, there ought not be a large effect on determining $Y_p$. According
279: to Fig.~\ref{fig:o3o1-icf}, to severely bias the results a number of points would have
280: to shift rightward in \3/\1 by a factor larger than ten; but such a large shift in
281: the line ratio would probably result in a large dilution in the ICF. More modeling
282: would be needed to quantify how little an impact matter bounded sectors would have on
283: the \3/\1 ratio and ICFs.
284:
285: \section{CONCLUSIONS}
286: \label{sec:concl}
287: In this paper we have shown the following:
288: \begin{enumerate}
289:
290: \item There can be a non-negligible ICF correction for \h regions excited by stars with
291: temperatures greater than 40,000~K. At temperatures higher than 45,000~K, the ICF is
292: preferentially negative. This result is independent of the atmosphere of the O star.
293:
294: \item There is a simple procedure to determine if an ICF correction needs to be made for
295: a given \h region. If the \3/\1 ratio is greater than 300, then no correction is needed.
296: This criterion is independent of metallicity. If the \1 line cannot be measured, then
297: there is a metallicity dependent cutoff (Eq.~\ref{eq:zcutoff}) that can be used
298: with the \3 line.
299:
300: \item Applying the metallicity independent criterion to the data of \citet{izo98}
301: results in reducing the rms scatter about the best fit $Y-Z$ line by 20\%.
302: This will help remove systematic errors relating to unrecognized ICF effects, and ought to
303: improve the reliability of the $Y_p$ determination. Furthermore, an analysis of the
304: selected data gives a larger value of $Y_p$ than was originally measured, which is
305: closer to the theoretically expected value.
306: \end{enumerate}
307:
308: \acknowledgements
309:
310: G.J.F.\ thanks CITA for its hospitality during a sabbatical year and acknowledges
311: support from the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada through
312: CITA. D.R.B.\ also acknowledges financial support from NSERC. We acknowledge useful
313: comments from an anonymous referee.
314:
315: \clearpage
316:
317: \begin{thebibliography}{}
318: \bibitem[Armour \etal (1999)]{arm99} Armour, M-H., Ballantyne, D. R.,
319: Ferland, G. J., Karr, J. \& Martin, P. G. 1999, \pasp, 111, 1251.
320: \bibitem[Benjamin, Skillman \& Smits(1999)]{ben99} Benjamin, R. A., Skillman, E. D.
321: \& Smits, D. P. 1999, \apj, 514, 307.
322: \bibitem[Bottorff \etal (1998)]{bot98} Bottorf, M., Lamothe, J., Momjian, E.,
323: Verner, E., Vinkovic, D. \& Ferland, G. J. 1998, \pasp, 110, 1040.
324: \bibitem[Davidson \& Kinman(1985)]{dav85} Davidson, K. \& Kinman, T. D. 1985,
325: \apjs, 58, 321.
326: \bibitem[Dinerstein \& Shields(1986)]{din86} Dinerstein, H. L. \& Shields, G. A. 1986,
327: \apj, 311, 45.
328: \bibitem[Ferland \etal (1998)]{fer98} Ferland, G. J., Korista, K. T.,
329: Verner, D. A., Ferguson, J. W., Kingdon, J. B., \& Verner, E. W. 1998,
330: \pasp, 110, 761.
331: \bibitem[Izotov, Thuan \& Lipovetsky(1994)]{izo94} Izotov, Y. I., Thuan, T. X. \&
332: Lipovetsky, V. A. 1994, \apj, 435, 647.
333: \bibitem[Izotov, Thuan \& Lipovetsky(1997)]{izo97} Izotov, Y. I., Thuan, T. X. \&
334: Lipovetsky, V. A. 1997, \apjs, 108, 1.
335: \bibitem[Izotov \& Thuan(1998)]{izo98} Izotov, Y. I. \& Thuan, T. X. 1998,
336: \apj, 500, 188.
337: \bibitem[Kaler(1978)]{kal78} Kaler, J. B. 1978, \apj, 220, 887.
338: \bibitem[Kurucz(1991)]{kur91} Kurucz, R. L. 1991, in Proceedings of the
339: Workshop on Precision Photometry: Astrophysics of the Galaxy, eds. Davis
340: Philip, A. C., Upgren, A. R., \& James, K. A. (Schenectady: Davis), p. 27.
341: \bibitem[Mihalas(1972)]{mih72} Mihalas, D. 1972, Non-LTE Atmospheres for B and O Stars,
342: NCAR-TN/STR-76.
343: \bibitem[Netzer \& Davidson(1979)]{net79} Netzer, H. \& Davidson, K. 1979, \mnras,
344: 187, 871.
345: \bibitem[Olive \& Steigman(1995)]{oli95} Olive, K. A. \& Steigman, G. 1995, \apjs,
346: 97, 490.
347: \bibitem[Olive, Steigman \& Skillman(1997)]{oli97} Olive, K. A., Steigman,
348: G. \& Skillman, E. D. 1997, \apj, 483, 788.
349: \bibitem[Olive, Steigman \& Walker(1999)]{oli99} Olive, K. A., Steigman, G. \&
350: Walker, T. P. 1999, \physrep, in press (astro-ph/9905320)
351: \bibitem[Osterbrock(1989)]{ost89} Osterbrock, D. E. 1989, Astrophysics of Gaseous
352: Nebulae and Active Galactic Nuclei (Mill Valley: University Science Books).
353: \bibitem[Pagel \etal (1992)]{pag92} Pagel, B. E. J., Simonson, E. A., Terlevich, R. J.
354: \& Edmunds, M. 1992, \mnras, 255, 325.
355: \bibitem[Peimbert(1975)]{pei75} Peimbert, M. 1975, \araa, 13, 11.
356: \bibitem[Peimbert(1996)]{pei96} Peimbert, M. 1996, Rev. Mex. Astr. Astrofis.,
357: Serie de Conferencias, 4, 55.
358: \bibitem[Pe\~{n}a(1986)]{pen86} Pe\~{n}a, M. 1986, \pasp, 98, 1061.
359: \bibitem[Schaerer \etal (1996a)]{sc96a} Schaerer, D., de Koter, A., Schmutz, W.
360: \& Maeder, A. 1996a, \aap, 310, 837.
361: \bibitem[Schaerer \etal (1996b)]{sc96b} Schaerer, D., de Koter, A., Schmutz, W.
362: \& Maeder, A. 1996b, \aap, 312, 475.
363: \bibitem[Skillman \etal (1994)]{skil94} Skillman, E. D., Terlevich, R. J.,
364: Kennicutt, R. C., Garnett, D. R. \& Terlevich, E. 1994, \apj, 431, 172.
365: \bibitem[Skillman, Terlevich \& Terlevich(1998)]{skil98} Skillman, E. D.,
366: Terlevich, E. \& Terlevich, R. 1998, Space Sci. Rev., 84, 105.
367: \bibitem[Stasinska(1980)]{sta80} Stasinska, G. 1980, \aap, 84, 320.
368: \bibitem[Stasinska(1982)]{sta82} Stasinska, G. 1982, \aaps, 41, 513.
369: \bibitem[Stasinska(1990)]{sta90} Stasinska, G. 1990, \aaps, 83, 501.
370: \bibitem[Steigman, Viegas \& Gruenwald(1997)]{ste97} Steigman, G., Viegas, S. M. \&
371: Gruenwald, R. 1997, \apj, 490, 187.
372: \bibitem[Stoy(1933)]{sto33} Stoy, R. H. 1933, \mnras, 93, 588.
373: \bibitem[Torres-Peimbert, Peimbert \& Fierro(1989)]{tor89} Torres-Peimbert, S.,
374: Peimbert, M. \& Fierro, J. 1989, \apj, 345, 186.
375: \bibitem[Viegas, Gruenwald \& Steigman(2000)]{vie99} Viegas, S. M., Gruenwald, R. \&
376: Steigman, G. 2000, \apj, in press (astro-ph/9909213).
377:
378: \end{thebibliography}
379:
380: \clearpage
381:
382: % Figure Captions - actual figure files are separate from MS
383:
384: \figcaption{A plot of the He ICF values obtained from the CoStar and Kurucz
385: photoionization models versus stellar temperature of the atmospheres. Only points
386: with ICF between $\pm$10\% are plotted. There are non-negligible ICFs at all values
387: of stellar temperature. The CoStar atmospheres generally result in negative ICFs,
388: while the softer Kurucz atmospheres give positive ICFs for temperatures less than about
389: 45,000~K. These models were run with a metallicity of (O/H)=64 ppm. \label{fig:temp-icf}}
390:
391: \figcaption{A plot of He ICF vs. \3/H$\beta$ using data from the CoStar and
392: Kurucz grids run at (O/H)=64 ppm. Only points with ICF between $\pm$10\% were
393: plotted. At this metallicity the ICF-related cutoff is at a relative line strength of
394: about 3--4. See the text for discussion on how cutoff varies with metallicity.
395: \label{fig:o3-icf}}
396:
397: \figcaption{ a) A plot of He ICF vs. \3/\1 with data obtained from the
398: CoStar and Kurucz model grids run at (O/H)=64 ppm. The ideal ICF-related
399: cutoff here is at a line ratio of 300. This cutoff is {\it independent}
400: of metallicity. The Kurucz models that have positive ICFs in the allowed
401: zone are models with a particular combination of parameters (see text).
402: b) Like a) but for Mihalas and blackbody atmospheres.
403: \label{fig:o3o1-icf}}
404:
405: \figcaption{This figure shows the effects of applying the metallicity independent
406: rejection criterion to the data of Izotov \& Thuan (1998). The solid line is a
407: weighted least-squares fit to the selected data points shown by the solid symbols.
408: The open symbols are the rejected points. For reference, the dashed line is the fit
409: with no cutoff applied. Note that as the \3/\1 cutoff becomes larger, the scatter of
410: the points about the best-fit line becomes smaller (there is a 20\% reduction in
411: the rms scatter when the cutoff is 300). This procedure also shows that the value of
412: $Y_p$ determined by Izotov \& Thuan (1998) might be an underestimate.
413: \label{fig:o3o1-y}}
414:
415: \clearpage
416:
417:
418: \end{document}
419: