1: %\documentstyle[12pt,aasms4]{article}
2: \documentclass{aastex}
3:
4: \begin{document}
5:
6: \title{Interplanetary Network Localization of GRB991208 and the
7: Discovery of its Afterglow}
8: \author{K. Hurley}
9: \affil{University of California, Berkeley, Space Sciences Laboratory,
10: Berkeley, CA 94720-7450}
11: \email{khurley@sunspot.ssl.berkeley.edu}
12: \author{T. Cline}
13: \affil{NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 661, Greenbelt, MD 20771}
14: \author{E. Mazets, R. Aptekar, S. Golenetskii, D. Frederiks}
15: \affil{Ioffe Physico-Technical Institute, St. Petersburg, 194021 Russia}
16: \author{D. Frail}
17: \affil{National Radio Astronomy Observatory, PO Box O, Socorro NM 87801}
18: \author{S. Kulkarni}
19: \affil{Palomar Observatory, 105-24, Caltech, Pasadena, CA 91125}
20: \author{J. Trombka, T. McClanahan}
21: \affil{NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 691, Greenbelt, MD 20771}
22: \author{R. Starr}
23: \affil{The Catholic University of America, Department of Physics, Washington
24: DC 20064}
25: \author{J. Goldsten}
26: \affil{The Johns Hopkins University, Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD 20723}
27:
28:
29: \begin{abstract}
30: The extremely energetic ($\rm \sim 10^{-4} erg/cm^2$) gamma--ray burst (GRB) of
31: 1999 December 8 was
32: triangulated to a $\sim$ 14 sq. arcmin.
33: error box $\sim$ 1.8 d after its arrival at Earth
34: with the 3rd interplanetary network (IPN), consisting of the \it Ulysses,
35: Near Earth Asteroid Rendezvous \rm (NEAR),
36: and \it Wind \rm spacecraft. Radio observations with the Very Large Array
37: $\sim$ 2.7 d after the burst revealed a bright fading counterpart whose
38: position is consistent
39: with that of an optical transient source whose redshift is z=0.707.
40: We present
41: the time history, peak flux, fluence, and refined 1.3 sq. arcmin. error box of this event, and discuss
42: its energetics. This is the first time that a counterpart has been found
43: for a GRB localized only by the IPN.
44:
45: \end{abstract}
46:
47: \keywords{gamma rays: bursts}
48:
49: \section{Introduction}
50:
51: Many gamma-ray burst counterparts have
52: now been identified using the rapid, precise localizations available from
53: the BeppoSAX spacecraft ,
54: as well as from the \it Rossi X-Ray Timing Explorer \rm, starting with
55: GRB970228 (Costa et al. 1997; van Paradijs et al. 1997).
56: Such detections occur at a low rate ($\sim 8 \, y^{-1}$), and they have been
57: limited to the long--duration events so far,
58: but they have confirmed the
59: cosmological origin of at least this class of bursts.
60: Since 1977, interplanetary networks of omnidirectional GRB detectors have
61: provided precise triangulations of both short and long bursts at rates up to
62: $\sim$ 1/week, but often
63: the networks have been incomplete, or the data return from the interplanetary
64: spacecraft has been slow. The present, 3rd IPN is now complete with \it Ulysses \rm
65: and NEAR as its distant points (Cline et al. 1999)
66: and, in conjunction with numerous near-Earth
67: spacecraft, can produce precise GRB error boxes within $\sim$ 1 d, making
68: them useful for multi-wavelength follow-up observations. Here we present
69: the observations of GRB991208, which was rapidly localized to a small
70: error box, leading to the identification of its radio and optical afterglow, and
71: eventually to the measurement of its redshift.
72:
73: \section{IPN Observations}
74:
75: GRB 991208 was observed by the \it Ulysses \rm GRB (Hurley et al. 1992), KONUS-\it Wind \rm
76: (Aptekar et al. 1995), and NEAR X-ray/Gamma-ray Spectrometer (XGRS: Goldsten et al.
77: 1997) experiments. \it Ulysses \rm, in heliocentric orbit, NEAR, approaching rendezvous
78: with the asteroid Eros, and \it Wind \rm, were 2176, 937, and 1.5 light-seconds
79: from Earth, respectively.
80:
81: We focus here on the \it Ulysses \rm and NEAR data; KONUS data
82: will be presented elsewhere.
83: The \it Ulysses \rm and XGRS light curves are shown in figure 1.
84: Although \it Ulysses \rm recorded the first 57 s of the burst with
85: 0.03125 s resolution in the triggered mode, the peak of the event occurred slightly later,
86: and we have shown the 0.5 s resolution real-time data in the figure.
87: The XGRS
88: BGO anticoincidence shield is employed as the NEAR burst monitor, and the only
89: time history data available from it are 1 s resolution count rates for the 100 - 1000 keV energy
90: range. The burst
91: can be characterized by a T$_{90}$ duration of 68 s, placing
92: it firmly in the ``long'' class of bursts (Hurley 1992; Kouveliotou et al.
93: 1993). The event-integrated \it Ulysses \rm spectrum is well fit between 25 and 150 keV
94: by a power law, thermal bremsstrahlung, or blackbody spectrum. For the following
95: analysis, we adopt the power law, which has a photon index 1.68 $\pm$ 0.19,
96: and a $\chi^2$ of 4.3 for 11 degrees of freedom (figure 2).
97: The 25 - 100 keV fluence is $\rm 4.9 \times 10^{-5} \,erg \,cm^{-2}$, with an
98: uncertainty of $\sim \rm \pm 10\% $ due to count rate statistics and systematics. Since
99: the XGRS shield provides only very low resolution (40 minutes) spectral data, we can
100: only estimate the fluence in the XGRS energy range from its light curve to be about the
101: equivalent of that observed by \it Ulysses \rm. Thus the total fluence above 25 keV
102: is $\sim \rm 10^{-4}\, erg\, cm^{-2}$. Bursts with this intensity or
103: greater occur at a rate $\rm \lesssim 10 \,y^{-1}$. Since the peak of the event occurs when
104: only the 0.5 s \it Ulysses \rm data are available, we can estimate the peak
105: flux only over this time interval; it is $\rm \sim 5.1 \times 10^{-6}\, erg\, cm^{-2}\, s^{-1}$,
106: 25 - 100 keV ($\sim \pm \rm 10\% $), with a contribution in the 100 - 1000 keV energy range which is
107: again probably equivalent.
108:
109: A preliminary $\sim$ 14
110: sq. arcmin. IPN error box was circulated $\sim$ 44 h after the earth-crossing time
111: of the event (04:36:53 UT: Hurley et al. 1999). The final error box
112: is shown in figure 3, and nests within the preliminary one; it has an area of
113: $\sim$ 1.3 sq. arcmin. Its coordinates are given in Table 1.
114: Also shown in figure 3 is the position of the radio counterpart to the
115: burst detected by Frail (1999). We note that this is the first
116: time that a GRB position determined by the 3rd IPN alone (i.e., no \it
117: Compton Gamma-Ray Observatory \rm BATSE or \it BeppoSAX \rm observations)
118: has been successfully
119: used for multiwavelength counterpart searches.
120:
121: \section{Observations with NRAO Very Large Array}
122:
123:
124: Very Large Array (VLA)\footnotemark\footnotetext{The NRAO is a facility of the National
125: Science Foundation operated under cooperative agreement by Associated
126: Universities, Inc.} observations were begun on 1999 December 10.92 UT, 2.73 days
127: after the gamma-ray burst. In order to image the entire 14 sq. arcmin. initial
128: IPN error box (Hurley et al. 1999) with the VLA at 8.46 GHz two
129: pointings were required, each with a field-of-view at half power
130: response of 5.3\arcmin. The full 100 MHz bandwidth was used in two
131: adjacent 50-MHz bands centered at 8.46 GHz. A single pointing was also
132: made at 4.86 GHz, but the bandwidth was halved in order to image the full
133: 9\arcmin \,field-of-view without distortion. The flux
134: density scale was tied to the extragalactic sources 3C\thinspace{48}
135: (J0137+331), while the array phase was monitored by switching between
136: the GRB and the phase calibrators J1637+462 (at 8.46 GHz) and J1658+476
137: (at 4.86 GHz).
138:
139: There were three radio sources inside the initial IPN error box (figure 3). Of these, two
140: were previously known from an earlier survey of this part of the sky
141: (Becker, White \& Helfand 1995). The third source, located at located at
142: (epoch J2000) $\alpha$\ =\ $16^h33^m53.50^s$ ($\pm{0.01^s}$) $\delta$\
143: =\ $+46^\circ27^\prime20.9^{\prime\prime}$ ($\pm{0.1}^{\prime\prime}$)
144: was near the center of the initial IPN error box. On the basis of its position,
145: compactness ($<0.8^{\prime\prime}$), and a rising flux density between
146: 4.86 GHz and 8.46 GHz (327 $\pm$ 45 $\mu$J and 707 $\pm$ 39 $\mu$J respectively)
147: , Frail (1999) proposed that it was the afterglow
148: of GRB\thinspace{991208}. Despite the proximity of this location to the Sun
149: ($\rm \sim 70 \arcdeg$), numerous optical observations were carried out,
150: and this suggestion was quickly confirmed by the
151: independent detection of a coincident optical source, not visible on the
152: Digital Sky Survey (Castro-Tirado et al. 1999).
153:
154: In the week following the afterglow discovery, it was determined that
155: the optical flux faded as a power-law with a rather steep temporal decay
156: index $\alpha\simeq 2.15$ (where $F_\nu\propto t^\alpha$) (Jensen et al.
157: 1999; Garnavich and Noriega-Crespo 1999; Masetti et al.
158: 1999). Optical spectroscopy emission lines from a presumed
159: host galaxy, if identified with [OII] and [OIII] features, place
160: GRB\thinspace{991208} at a redshift $z=0.707 \pm 0.002$ (Dodonov et al
161: 1999), making this the third closest GRB with a spectroscopically-measured
162: redshift. GRB\thinspace{991208} has been no less interesting at
163: radio wavelengths. It has the brightest radio afterglow detected to
164: date and consequently it has been detected and is well-studied between 1
165: GHz and 350 GHz (Pooley 1999; Shepherd et al. 1999; Bremer et al. 1999).
166:
167: \section{Discussion}
168:
169: For a 25 -- 1000 keV fluence of $\rm 10^{-4}\, erg\, cm^{-2}$ and
170: a redshift z=0.707, the isotropic energy of this burst would have
171: been $\rm 1.3 \times 10^{53} erg$; for a peak flux of $\rm \sim 10^{-5}\, erg\, cm^{-2}\, s^{-1}$
172: in the same energy range, the isotropic peak luminosity would have been
173: $\rm 1.3 \times 10^{52} erg\, s^{-1}$. These estimates assume $\rm \Omega=0.2,
174: \Lambda=0, and \, H_0=65 \, km\, s^{-1}\, Mpc^{-1}$. Rhoads (1997) has
175: pointed out that one signature of beaming is a steep decay in the
176: afterglow light curve, $\propto t^{-2}$. As the initial optical light
177: curve for GRB991208 indeed appears to decay this steeply, the emission
178: may well be beamed, reducing these estimates.
179:
180: The current IPN now consists of \it Ulysses \rm and NEAR in interplanetary
181: space, and numerous near-Earth spacecraft such as \it Wind \rm, \it BeppoSAX \rm, and the
182: \it Compton Gamma-Ray Observatory \rm. The \it Mars Surveyor 2001 Orbiter \rm will
183: join the network in mid-2001. The IPN currently observes $\sim$ 1 -- 2 GRBs per
184: week and is localizing many of them rapidly to small error boxes. These
185: events tend to be the brighter ones, but apart from this, there is no
186: bias towards any particular event duration; indeed, the IPN generally
187: obtains its smallest error boxes for the short bursts. Neither is there
188: any sun-angle restriction for the event locations, which means that bursts
189: will be detected whose locations are close to the Sun, as this one was,
190: making prompt radio
191: observations of these positions important. The other advantages of
192: radio observations over optical are the longer lifetime of the radio afterglow,
193: the immunity from weather, and the freedom to operate at any part of the
194: diurnal cycle.
195: This should increase the rate of counterpart detections substantially over the next
196: several years.
197:
198:
199: KH acknowledges support for Ulysses operations under JPL Contract 958056,
200: for IPN operations under NASA LTSA grant NAG5-3500, and for NEAR operations
201: under the NEAR Participating Scientist program. On the
202: Russian side, this work was partially supported by RFBR grant \# 99-02-17031.
203: We are grateful to R. Gold and R. McNutt for their
204: assistance with the NEAR spacecraft. RS is supported by NASA grant
205: NCC5-380. We are indebted to T. Sheets for her excellent work on NEAR
206: data reduction. Special thanks also go to the NEAR project office for its support of
207: post-launch changes to XGRS software that made these measurements possible. In
208: particular, we are grateful to John R. Hayes and Susan E. Schneider for writing
209: the GRB software for the XGRS instrument and to Stanley B. Cooper and David S. Tillman
210: for making it possible to get accurate universal time for the NEAR GRB detections.
211:
212: \begin{references}
213: \reference{} Aptekar, R., et al. 1995, Space Sci. Rev. 71, 265
214: \reference{} Becker, R. H., White, R. L., and Helfand, D. J. 1995, \apj \, 450, 559
215: \reference{} Bremer, M., Bertoldi, F., Lisenfeld, U., Castro-Tirado, A., Galama, T.,
216: Kreysa, E. 1999, GCN Circ. 459
217: \reference{} Castro-Tirado, A. et al. 1999, GCN Circ. 452
218: \reference{} Cline, T. et al. 1999, Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 138(3), 557
219: \reference{} Costa, E., et al. 1997, \nat \, 387, 783
220: \reference{} Dodonov, S., Afanasiev, V., Sokolov, V., Moiseev, A.,
221: and Castro-Tirado, A. 1999, GCN Circ. 475
222: \reference{} Frail, D. 1999, GCN Circ. 451
223: \reference{} Garnavich, P., and Noriega-Crespo, A. 1999, GCN Circ. 456
224: \reference{} Goldsten, J. et al. 1997, Space Sci. Rev. 82(1/2), 169
225: \reference{} Hurley, K., et al. 1992, Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 92, 401
226: \reference{} Hurley, K., in Gamma-Ray Bursts, Eds. W. Paciesas and G. Fishman,
227: AIP Conf. Proc. 265 (AIP Press, New York), p. 3, 1992
228: \reference{} Hurley, K. et al. 1999, GCN Circ. 450
229: \reference{} Jensen, B., Hjorth, J., Pedersen, H., Kristen, H., Tomassi,
230: L., Pian, E., and Hurley, K. 1999, GCN Circ. 454.
231: \reference{} Kouveliotou, C., Meegan, C., Fishman, G., Bhat, N., Briggs, M., Koshut, T., Paciesas, W., and Pendleton, G. 1993, \apj \, 413, L101
232: \reference{} Masetti, N., Palazzi, E., Pian, E., Frontera F., Benetti, S.,
233: Magazzu, A., Castro-Tirado, A., and Masetti, B. 1999, GCN Circ. 462
234: \reference{} Pooley, G. 1999, GCN Circ. 457
235: \reference{} Rhoads, J. 1997, \apj \, 487, L1
236: \reference{} Shepherd, D., Jogee, S., Kulkarni, S., and Frail, D. 1999, GCN Circ. 455
237: \reference{} van Paradijs, J., et al. 1997, \nat \, 386, 686
238: \end{references}
239:
240: \clearpage
241:
242: \begin{figure}
243: \figurenum{1}
244: \epsscale{.75}
245: \plotone{figure1.ps}
246: \caption{Time histories of GRB991208 as observed by \it Ulysses \rm GRB (22-150 keV, thick line) and
247: NEAR XGRS (100-1000 keV, thin line). The \it Ulysses \rm data are compressed onboard
248: the spacecraft and decompressed on the ground, leading to discrete count rate levels.}
249: \end{figure}
250:
251: \begin{figure}
252: \figurenum{2}
253: \epsscale{.75}
254: \plotone{figure2.eps}
255: \caption{Energy spectrum of GRB991208 as observed by Ulysses GRB (crosses) and
256: the fitted power law spectrum (solid line).}
257: \end{figure}
258:
259: \begin{figure}
260: \figurenum{3}
261: \epsscale{}
262: \plotone{figure3.eps}
263: \caption{Original and final IPN error boxes for GRB991208 (3 $\sigma$ confidence).
264: The original error box (Hurley et al. 1999) is drawn with dashed lines. The final
265: error box is defined by the intersection of the 30 \arcsec \it Ulysses \rm-KONUS annulus
266: and the 52 \arcsec \it Ulysses \rm-NEAR annulus, and has an area of 1.3 sq. arcmin.
267: Three sources are indicated. Two field sources in the upper right-hand corner are
268: marked VLA 2 and VLA 3; their flux densities are 3.4 and 0.4 mJy respectively. VLA
269: 1 is the counterpart. It lies at roughly at the 96 \% confidence contour. }
270: \end{figure}
271:
272: \clearpage
273:
274: \begin{deluxetable}{ccc}
275: \tablecaption{IPN error box for GRB991208 (3 $\sigma$ confidence).}
276: \tablehead{
277: \colhead{} & \colhead{$\rm \alpha (2000)$, degrees} & \colhead{$\rm \delta(2000)$, degrees}
278: }
279: \startdata
280: Center: & 248.4848 & 46.4413 \\
281: Corners: & 248.4727 & 46.4487 \\
282: & 248.5021 & 46.4078 \\
283: & 248.4674 & 46.4747 \\
284: & 248.4969 & 46.4338 \\
285:
286:
287: \enddata
288:
289: \end{deluxetable}
290:
291: \end{document}