1: \documentstyle[11pt,fleqn,psfig]{article}
2: % A4 size definitions
3: \if@twoside \oddsidemargin 44pt \evensidemargin 82pt \marginparwidth 107pt
4: \else \oddsidemargin -5pt \evensidemargin -5pt
5: \marginparwidth 90pt
6: \fi
7: \topmargin -25pt \headheight 12pt \headsep 25pt \footheight 12pt
8: \footskip 30pt
9: \textheight 630pt \textwidth 450pt \columnsep 10pt \columnseprule 0pt
10: % option for double-spacing
11: % \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.7}
12: \def\etal{{\it et\thinspace al.}\ }
13: \begin{document}
14: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}
15: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}
16: \begin{center}
17: {\bf \Large THE IRON PROJECT}\\[5mm]
18: {\large Anil K. Pradhan\\Department of Astronomy, The Ohio State
19: University,\\ Columbus, Ohio, USA 43210}
20: \end{center}
21: \begin{quotation}
22: \noindent {\bf Abstract}. Recent advances in theoretical atomic physics
23: have enabled large-scale calculation of atomic parameters for a variety
24: of atomic processes with high degree of precision. The development and
25: application of these methods is the aim of the Iron Project. At present
26: the primary focus is on collisional processes for all ions of iron, Fe~I~--~FeXXVI, and other iron-peak elements; new work on radiative processes has also
27: been initiated.
28: Varied applications of the Iron Project work to X-ray astronomy are discussed,
29: and more general applications to other spectral ranges are pointed out. The
30: IP work forms the basis for more specialized projects such as the RMaX Project,
31: and the work on photoionization/recombination, and aims to provide a
32: comprehensive and self-consistent set of accurate collsional and radiative
33: cross sections, and transition probabilities, within the framework of
34: relativistic close coupling formulation using the Breit-Pauli R-Matrix method.
35: An illustrative example is presented of how the IP data may be utilised
36: in the formation of X-ray spectra of the K$\alpha$ complex at 6.7 keV
37: from He-like Fe~XXV.
38:
39: \end{quotation}
40: %\clearpage
41:
42: \section{Introduction}
43:
44: The main purpose of the Iron Project (IP; Hummer \etal 1993) is the continuing development
45: of relativistic methods for the calculations of atomic data for
46: electron impact excitation and radiative transitions in iron and
47: iron-peak elements. Its forerunner, the Opacity Project (OP; Seaton
48: \etal 1994; The Opacity Project Team 1995), was concerned with the calculation of radiative parameters for
49: astrophysically abundant elements,
50: oscillator strengths and photoionization cross sections,
51: leading to a re-calculation of new stellar opacities (Seaton \etal
52: 1994). The OP work, based on the non-relativistic formulation of
53: the close coupling approximation using the R-matrix method (Seaton 1987,
54: Berrington \etal 1987), was carried out in LS coupling, neglecting
55: relativistic fine structure that is not crucial in the calculation
56: of mean plasma opacities. Also, collisional processes were not
57: considered under the OP. The IP collaboration seeks to address both of
58: these factors, and with particular reference to iron and iron-peak elements.
59: The collaboration involves members from six countries: Canada, France,
60: Germany, UK, US, and Venezuela.
61:
62: The relativistic extension of the R-matrix method is
63: based on the Breit-Pauli approximation (Berrington \etal 1995). Collisional and radiative processes may both be
64: considered. However, the computational requirements for the Breit-Pauli
65: R-matrix (hereafter BPRM) calculations can be orders of magnitude more
66: intensive than non-relativistic calculations. Nonetheless, a large body
67: of atomic data has been obtained and published in a continuing series
68: under the title {\bf Atomic Data from the Iron Project} in {\it Astronomy
69: and Astrophysics Supplement Series}, with 43 publications at present.
70: A list of the IP publications and related information may be
71: obtained from the author's Website: www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~pradhan.
72:
73: The earlier phases of
74: the Iron Project dealt with (A) fine structure transitions among low-lying
75: levels of the ground configuration of interest in Infrared (IR) astronomy,
76: particularly the observations from the Infrared Space Observatory,
77: and (B) excitation of the large number of levels in multiply ionized
78: iron ions (with n = 2,3 open shell electrons, i.e. Fe~VII -- Fe~XXIV)
79: of interest in the UV and EUV, particularly for the Solar and Heliospheric
80: Observatory (SOHO), the Extreme Ultraviolet Explorer (EUVE), and Far Ultraviolet
81: Spectroscopic Explorer (FUSE). In addition, the IP data for the low ionization
82: stages of iron (Fe~I -- Fe~VI) is of particular interest in the analysis
83: of optical and IR observations from ground based observatories.
84: In the present review, we describe the IP work within the context of
85: applications to X-ray spectroscopy, where ongoing calculations on
86: collisional and radiative data for H-like Fe~XXVI, He-like Fe~XXV, and
87: Ne-like Fe~XVII are of special interest.
88:
89: The sections of this review are organised as follows: 1. Theoretical, 2. collisional,
90: 3. radiative, 4. collisional-radiative modeling of X-ray spectra, 5.
91: atomic data, and 6. Discussion and conclusion.
92:
93: \section{The Close Coupling approximation and the Breit-Pauli R-matrix Method}
94:
95: In the close coupling (CC) approximation
96: the total electron {+} ion wave function may be represented as
97: \begin{equation}
98: \Psi = A \sum_{i=1}^{NF} \psi_{i}\theta_{i} + \sum_{j=1} C_{j} \Phi_{J},
99: \end{equation}
100: where $\psi_{i}$ is a target ion wave function in a specific state
101: $S_{i}$
102: $L_{i}$ and $\theta_{i}$ is the wave function for the free electron in a
103: channel labeled as $S_{i}L_{i}k_{i}^{2}\ell_{i}(SL\pi)$, $k_{i}^{2}$
104: being its
105: incident kinetic energy relative to $E(S_{i}L_{i})$ and $\ell_{i}$ its
106: orbital
107: angular momentum. The total number of free channels is $NF$ (``open''
108: or
109: ``closed'' according to whether $k_{i}^{2}$ $<$ or $>$ $E(S_{i}L_{i})$.
110: $A$ is
111: the antisymmetrization operator for all $N+1$ electron bound states,
112: with
113: $C_{j}$ as variational coefficients. The second sum in Eq. (1)
114: represents
115: short-range correlation effects and orthogonality constraints between
116: the
117: continuum electron and the one-electron orbitals in the target.
118:
119: The target levels included in the first sum on the RHS of Eq.
120: (1) are coupled; their number limits the scope of the CC calculations.
121: Resonances arise naturally when the incident electron energies excite
122: some levels, but not higher ones, resulting in a coupling between ``closed" and
123: ``open" channels, i.e. between free and (quasi)bound wavefunctions.
124: The R-matrix method is the most efficient means of solving the CC
125: equations and resolution of resonance profiles (see reviews by K.A.
126: Berrington and M.A. Bautista). The relativistic CC approximation may be
127: implemented using the Breit-Pauli Hamiltonian.
128:
129: Both the continumm wavefunctions at E $>$ 0 for the (e +ion)
130: system, and bound state wavefunctions may be calculated. Collision
131: strengths are obtained from the continuum (scattering) wavefunctions,
132: and radiative transition matrix elements from the continuum and the bound
133: wavefunctions that yield transition probabilities
134: and photoionization and (e~+~ion) photo-recombination cross sections
135: (see the review by S.N. Nahar).
136:
137:
138: Recent IP calculations for the n~=~3 open shell ions include up to
139: 100 or more coupled fine structure levels. Computational requirements are
140: for such radiative and collisional calculations may be of the order of
141: 1000 CPU hours even on the most powerful supercomputers.
142:
143:
144: \section{Electron Impact Excitation}
145:
146: Collision strengths and maxwellian averaged rate coefficients
147: have been or are being calculated for all ions of iron. While some of
148: the most
149: difficult cases, with up to 100 coupled fine strcture levels from n = 3
150: open shell configurations in Fe~VII -- Fe~XVII, are still in progress,
151: most other ionization stages have been completed. In particular fine
152: structure collision strengths and rates have been computes for thousands
153: of transitions in Fe~II -- Fe~VI. For a list of papers see ``Iron Project"
154: on www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~pradhan.
155:
156: Work on K-shell and L-shell collisional excitations, begining
157: with the H-like and the He-like ions will be continued under the new RMaX
158: project, which is part of the IP and is focused on X-ray spectroscopy.
159: Work is in progress on He-like Fe~XXV (Mendoza \etal) and Ne-like
160: Fe~XVII. Fig. 1 presents the collision strength for
161: a transition in Fe~XVII from the new 89-level BPRM calculation
162: including the n = 4 complex (Chen and Pradhan 2000). The extensive
163: resonance structure is due to the large number of coupled thresholds
164: following L-shell excitation.
165:
166: \begin{figure}
167: \centering
168: \psfig{figure=fig1.eps,height=10.0cm,width=18.0cm}
169: \caption{The BPRM collision strength $\Omega (2p^6 \ ^1S_0
170: \longrightarrow 2p^5 \ 3s \ ^3P_2)$ (Chen and Pradhan 2000);
171: the relativistic distorted wave
172: values are denoted as filled circles (H.L. Zhang, in Pradhan and Zhang
173: 2000)}
174: \end{figure}
175:
176:
177:
178: \section{Radiative transition probabilities}
179:
180: There are two sets of IP calculations: (i) with atomic structure
181: codes CIV3 (Hibbert 1973) and SUPERSTRUCTURE (Eissner \etal 1974), and
182: (ii) BPRM calculations. Of particular interest to X-ray work are the
183: recent BPRM calcultions for 2,579 dipole (E1) oscillator strengths for
184: Fe~XXV , and 802 transitions in Fe~XXIV (Nahar and Pradhan 1999),
185: extending the available datasets for these ions by more than an order of
186: magnitude. Also, these data are shown to be highly accurate, 1 -- 10\%.
187:
188: \section{Collisional-Radiative model for He-like ions: X-ray emission
189: from Fe~XXV}
190:
191: Emission from He-like ions provides the most valuable X-ray spectral
192: diagnostics for the temperature, density, ionization state, and other
193: conditions in the source (Gabriel 1972, Mewe and Schrijver
194: 1981, Pradhan 1982).
195: The K$\alpha$ complex of He-like ions consists of the principal
196: lines from the allowed (w), intersystem (x,y), and
197: the forbidden (z) transitions $1^1S \longleftarrow 2(^1P^o, \ ^3P^o_2,
198: \ ^3P^o_1, \ ^3S_1$ respectively. (These are also referred as the R,I,F
199: lines, where the I is the sum (x+y); we employ the former notation).
200: Two main line ratios are particularly useful, i.e.
201:
202: \be \ R = \frac{z}{x+y} \ , \ee and
203: \be \ G = \frac{x+y+z}{w} \ . \ee
204:
205: R is the ratio of forbidden to intersystem lines and is sensitive to
206: electron density N$_e$ since the forbidden
207: line z may be collisionally quenched at high densities. G is
208: the ratio of the triplet-multiplicity lines to the `resonance' line, and
209: is sensitive to (i) electron temperature, and (ii) ionization balance.
210: Condition (ii) results because recombination-cascades from
211: H-like ions preferentially populate the triplet levels, enhancing the z
212: line intensity in particular (the level $2(^3S_1)$ is like the `ground'
213: level for the triplet levels). Inner-shell ionization of Li-like
214: ions may also populate the $2(^3S_1)$ level ($1s^2
215: \ 2s \longrightarrow 1s2s + e)$ enhancing the z line.
216: The line ratio G is therefore a sensitive indicator of the
217: ionization state and the temperature of the plasma during ionization,
218: recombination, or in coronal equilibrium.
219:
220: For Fe~XXV the X-ray lines {w,x,y,z} are at $\lambda\lambda$ 1.8505,
221: 1.8554, 1.8595, 1.8682 $\AA$, or 6.700, 6.682, 6.668, 6.637 keV, respectively.
222: A collisional-radiative model (Oelgoetz and Pradhan, in progress)
223: including electron impact ionization,
224: recombination, excitation, and radiative cascades is used to compute
225: these line intensties using rates given by Mewe and Schrijver (1978),
226: Bely-Dubau \etal (1982), and Pradhan (1985a). New unified electron-ion
227: recombination rates (total and
228: level-specific) are being calculated by S.N. Nahar and
229: collaborators, and electron excitation rates are being recalculated
230: by C. Mendoza and collaborators; these will be employed in a more
231: accurate model of X-ray emission from He-like ions.
232:
233: Fig. 2 shows illustrative results for doppler broadened line
234: profiles under different plasma conditions (normalized to I(w) = 1).
235: All are at $N_e = 10^{10} \ cm^{-3} << N_c$, so that the R dependence is
236: only on T$_e$. Figs. 2(a) and 2(b) are in coronal equilibrium, but
237: differing widely in T$_e$, $10^7 -- 10^8$K, as reflected in the broader
238: profiles for the latter case. The ratios R and G show a significant
239: (though not large) temperature
240: dependence in this range. The
241: ionization fractions Fe~XXIV/FeXXV and Fe~XXVI/FeXXV for the two cases
242: are such that the Li-like iron dominates at $10^7$K and the H-like at
243: $10^8$K. Figs. 2(a) and (b) illustrate a general property of the He-like
244: line ratios: {\it G $\approx 1$ in cororal equilibrium} (for other
245: He-like ions it may vary by 10-20\%).
246:
247: On the other hand, the situation is quite different when the plasma is
248: out of equilibrium. In particular, it is known that
249: the forbidden line z is extremely sensitive to
250: the ionization state since it is predominantly populated via
251: recombination-cascades (Pradhan 1985b). Fig. 2(c) illustrates a case where
252: recombinations are suppressed, and the plasma is at $T_e = 10^8$ K. The
253: total G value is now only a third of its coronal value, with the z/w
254: ratio being considerably lower. Although the new recombination and
255: excitation rates may change the number somewhat, it is seen that
256: {\it G $\approx 0.37$ is a lower limit on an ionization dominated plasma}.
257:
258: A reverse situation occurs in a recombination dominated plasma. It is
259: known from tomakak studies (Kallne \etal 1984, Pradhan 1985b) that the z/w ratio, and
260: hence G, increases practically without limit, as $T_e$ decreases much below the
261: coronal temperature of maximum abundance. {\it $G >> 1$ observed values
262: imply a recombination dominated source}. However, the z/w ratio may also
263: be enhanced by inner-shell ionization through the Li-like state. More
264: detailed calculations are needed to distinguish precisely between the
265: two cases, and to constrain the temperature and ionization fractions.
266:
267: Di-electronic satellite intensities (Gabriel 1972)
268: may also be computed using BPRM data for the autoionization and
269: radiative rates of the satellite levels from recombination of e~+~FeXXV
270: $\longrightarrow$ Fe~XXIV (Pradhan and Zhang 1997). This work is in
271: progress.
272:
273: \begin{figure}
274: \centering
275: \psfig{figure=fig2.eps,height=20.0cm,width=18.0cm}
276: \caption{X-ray spectra of Fe~XXV (Oelgoetz and Pradhan 2000).
277: The principal lines w,x,y,z and the line ratios R and G are computed at plasma
278: electron temperatues shown.
279: The lines are Doppler broadened. I(w) is normalized to unity.}
280: \end{figure}
281:
282:
283: \section{Atomic Data}
284:
285: The atomic data from the OP/IP is available from the Astronomy and
286: Astrophysics library at CDS, France (Cunto \etal 1993). The data is also
287: available from a Website at NASA GSFC linked to the author's Website
288: (www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~pradhan).
289:
290: A general review of the methods and data,
291: (``Electron Collisions with Atomic Ions - Excitation",
292: Pradhan and Zhang 2000) is available from the author's website. The
293: review contains an evaluated compilation of theoretical data sources
294: for the period 1992-1999, as a follow-up of a similar review of all data
295: sources up to 1992 by Pradhan and Gallagher (1992) -- a total of over
296: 1,500 data sources with accuracy assessment. Also contained are
297: data tables for many Fe ions, and a recommended data table of effective
298: collision strengths and A-values for radiative-collisional models for
299: ions of interest in nebular plasmas.
300:
301: The collisional data from the IP is being archived in a new database
302: called TIPBASE, complementary to the radiative database from the OP,
303: TOPBASE (see the review by C. Mendoza).
304:
305: \section{Discussion and Conclusion}
306:
307: An overview of the work under the Iron Project collaboration was
308: presented. Its special relevance to X-ray astronomy was pointed out since the
309: IP, and related work, primarily aims to study the dominant atomic processes
310: in plasmas, and to compute extensive and accurate set of atomic
311: data for electron impact excitation, photoionization, recombination, and
312: transition probabilities of iron and iron-peak elements.
313: The importance of coupled-channel calculations was emphasized, in
314: particular the role of autoionizing resonances in atomic phenomena.
315: (A new project RMaX, a part of IP focused on X-ray spectroscopy, is
316: described by K.A. Berrington in this review).
317:
318: During the discussion, a question was raised regarding the resonances
319: in Fe~XVII collision strengths (e.g. Fig. 1), and it was mentioned that new
320: experimental measurments appear not to show the expected rapid variations in
321: cross sections. A possible explanation may be that there are numerous
322: narrow resonances in the entire near-threshold region, without a clearly
323: discernible background or energy gap. The measured cross sections are
324: averages over the resonances corresponding to the experimental beam-width.
325: These averaged cross sections themselves may not exhibit sharp variations,
326: unlike more highly charged He-like ions where the
327: the non-resonant background and the resonance complexes are well
328: separated in energy (e.g. He-like Ti~XXI, Zhang and Pradhan 1993).
329:
330: %%%%%%%
331: %-----------------------%
332:
333: \def\amp{{\it Adv. At. Molec. Phys.}\ }
334: \def\apj{{\it Astrophys. J.}\ }
335: \def\apjs{{\it Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.}\ }
336: \def\apjl{{\it Astrophys. J. (Letters)}\ }
337: \def\aj{{\it Astron. J.}\ }
338: \def\aa{{\it Astron. Astrophys.}\ }
339: \def\aasup{{\it Astron. Astrophys. Suppl.}\ }
340: \def\adndt{{\it At. Data Nucl. Data Tables}\ }
341: \def\cpc{{\it Comput. Phys. Commun.}\ }
342: \def\jqsrt{{\it J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer}\ }
343: \def\jpb{{\it Journal Of Physics B}\ }
344: \def\pasp{{\it Pub. Astron. Soc. Pacific}\ }
345: \def\mn{{\it Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc.}\ }
346: \def\pra{{\it Physical Review A}\ }
347: \def\prl{{\it Physical Review Letters}\ }
348: \def\zpds{{\it Z. Phys. D Suppl.}\ }
349: \def\adndt{Atomic Data And Nuclear Data Tables}
350:
351: %\pagebreak
352: \section{References}
353: \parindent=0pt
354:
355: Bely-Dubau, F. Dubau, J., Faucher, P. and Gabriel, A.H. 1982, \mn,
356: 198 239\\
357: Berrington, K.A., Burke, P.G., Butler, K., Seaton, M.J.,
358: Storey, P.J., Taylor, K.T., \& Yan, Yu. 1987, \jpb 20, 6379\\
359: Berrington K.A., Eissner W.B., Norrington P.H.,
360: 1995, \cpc 92, 290\\
361: Cunto,W.C., Mendoza,C., Ochsenbein,F. and Zeippen, C.J., 1993, \aa
362: 275, L5\\
363: Eissner W, Jones M and Nussbaumer H 1974 \cpc 8 270
364: Gabriel, A.H., \mn 1972, 160, 99\\
365: Hibbert A., 1975, \cpc 9, 141\\
366: Hummer, D.G., Berrington, K.A., Eissner, W., Pradhan,
367: A.K., Saraph, H.E., \& Tully, J.A. 1993, Astron. Astrophys. 279, 298\\
368: Kallne, E, Kallne, J., Dalgarno, A., Marmar, E.S., Rice, J.E. and
369: Pradhan, A.K. 1984, \prl 52, 2245\\
370: Mewe, R. and Schrijver, J. 1978, \aa, 65, 99\\
371: Nahar, S.N. and Pradhan, A.K. 1999, \aasup 135, 347\\
372: Pradhan, A.K. 1982 \apj, 263, 477\\
373: Pradhan, A.K. 1985a \apjs, 59, 183\\
374: Pradhan, A.K. 1985b \apj, 288, 824\\
375: Pradhan, A.K. and Gallagher, J.W. 1992, \adndt, 52, 227\\
376: Pradhan, A.K. and Zhang, H.L. 1997, \jpb, 30, L571\\
377: Pradhan, A.K. and Zhang, H.L. 2000, {\it ``Electron Collisions with
378: Atomic Ions"}, In LAND\"{O}LT-BORNSTEIN Volume {\it ``Atomic Collisions"},
379: Ed. Y. Itikawa, Springer-Verlag (in press).\\
380: The Opacity Project Team, {\it The Opacity Project}, Vol.1, 1995,
381: Institute of Physics Publishing, U.K.\\
382: Seaton, M.J. 1987, \jpb 20, 6363\\
383: Seaton, M.J., Yu, Y., Mihalas, D. and Pradhan, A.K. 1994, \mn, 266, 805\\
384: Zhang H.L. and Pradhan A.K. 1995, \pra, 52, 3366
385:
386:
387: \end{document}
388:
389:
390:
391:
392:
393:
394: