1: % \documentclass{aastex}
2: \documentclass[preprint]{aastex}
3: % \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
4:
5: \received{2000 February 1}
6: \accepted{2000 March 1}
7:
8: \slugcomment{To appear in the {\em Astrophysical Journal Letters.}}
9:
10: \shorttitle{Accretion Rates onto Black Holes in Quiescent Ellipticals}
11: \shortauthors{Wrobel \& Herrnstein}
12:
13: \begin{document}
14:
15: \title{Accretion Rates onto Massive Black Holes\\
16: in Four Quiescent Elliptical Galaxies}
17:
18: \author{J.~M. Wrobel and J.~R. Herrnstein\altaffilmark{1}}
19: \affil{National Radio Astronomy Observatory,
20: P.O. Box O, Socorro, New Mexico 87801}
21: \email{jwrobel@nrao.edu, jherrnst@nrao.edu}
22:
23: \altaffiltext{1}{Current address: Renaissance Technologies
24: Corporation, 600 Route 25A, East Setauket, NY 11733-1249}
25:
26: \begin{abstract}
27:
28: Four quiescent elliptical galaxies were imaged with the NRAO VLA at
29: 8.5~GHz. Within the context of canonical advection-dominated
30: accretion flows (ADAFs), these VLA images plus published black hole
31: masses constrain the accretion rates to be
32: $ <1.6\times10^{-4}$,
33: $ <3.6\times10^{-4}$,
34: $\le7.8\times10^{-4}$, and
35: $\le7.4\times10^{-4}$
36: of the Eddington rates. These ADAF accretion rates derived at 8.5~GHz
37: have important implications for the levels of soft and hard X-rays
38: expected from these quiescent galaxies.
39:
40: \end{abstract}
41:
42: \keywords{accretion, accretion disks - galaxies: individual
43: (NGC\,4291, NGC\,4564, NGC\,4621, NGC\,4660) -
44: galaxies: nuclei - radio continuum: galaxies -
45: X-rays: galaxies}
46:
47: \section{MOTIVATION}
48:
49: Evidence is accumulating that nearby galactic nuclei commonly harbour
50: massive dark objects \citep{mag98}. These objects are probably black
51: holes, because such remnants from the QSO era should be common
52: \citep{fab95} and because some nuclear star clusters with the
53: requisite mass and size would be improbably younger that their host
54: galaxies \citep{mao98}. Given a black hole mass, $M_{\rm BH}$, a next
55: important step is to constrain the rate, $\dot{M}$, at which material
56: is being accreted onto the black hole. Associated with any black hole
57: is its Eddington accretion rate, $\dot{M}_{\rm E}$, which is the rate
58: necessary to sustain the Eddington luminosity. For a 10\% radiative
59: efficiency and $M_{\rm BH} = 10^8 m_8~M_{\sun}$, $\dot{M}_{\rm E} =
60: 2.2 m_8~M_{\sun}~{\rm yr}^{-1}$. For giant elliptical galaxies
61: hosting black holes, accretion-rate estimates have long been available
62: for comparison with Eddington rates \citep{fab88,mah97}. These
63: estimates are based on \citet{bon52} accretion from an interstellar
64: medium with temperature $T = 10^7 T_7$~K and pressure $P = 10^6
65: P_6$~cm$^{-3}$~K, with the accretion being characterized by a Bondi
66: radius $r_{\rm B} \sim 4.3 m_8 T_7$~pc and a Bondi rate $\dot{M}_{\rm
67: B} \sim 1.9\times10^{-4} m_8 P_6 T_7 ~M_{\sun}~{\rm yr}^{-1}$. Then a
68: black hole with $m_8 = 1$ in a medium with $P_6 =1$ and $T_7 = 1$ will
69: accrete at a Bondi rate $\dot{M}_{\rm B} \sim
70: 1.9\times10^{-4}~M_{\sun}$~yr$^{-1}$, which is almost four orders of
71: magnitude less than the associated Eddington rate of $\dot{M}_{\rm E}
72: = 2.2~M_{\sun}$~yr$^{-1}$. The Bondi rate estimates are therefore
73: extremely sub-Eddington. Still, such low rates could be pervasive
74: among nearby ellipticals and, moreover, could define a minimum level
75: of activity for ellipticals hosting massive black holes
76:
77: This Letter examines the consequences, in the radio and X-ray regimes,
78: of such low accretion rates in nearby elliptical galaxies. The
79: approach is to obtain deep radio continuum images of four ellipticals
80: studied by \citet{mag98} and then interpret those images within the
81: context of canonical advection-dominated accretion flows (ADAFs),
82: reviewed recently by \citet{nar98}. The radio continuum from an ADAF
83: is thermal synchrotron emission from a magnetized plasma, and the
84: conversion between the ADAF radio power, $P_\nu$, and the ADAF
85: accretion rate, $\dot{M}_{\rm A}$, is relatively straightforward if
86: the black hole mass is known \citep{mah97,yi98}. Recent efforts along
87: these lines have focused on galaxies with significant radio emission
88: from nonthermal synchrotron jets \citep{dim00}. In constrast, this
89: study examines four quiescent elliptical galaxies previously
90: undetected at radio wavelengths \citep{wro91a,wro91b}, thereby
91: minimizing one of the largest potential complications in an ADAF
92: analysis - the role of jet outflows. Further evidence for the
93: quiesence of these four galaxies comes from their use as
94: absorption-line templates in optical spectroscopic studies
95: \citep{ho97}, plus their weak or undetected X-ray emission
96: \citep{beu99}. For these four quiescent ellipticals, the new radio
97: imaging constrains the ADAF accretion rates to be
98: $ <1.6\times10^{-4}$,
99: $ <3.6\times10^{-4}$,
100: $\le7.8\times10^{-4}$, and
101: $\le7.4\times10^{-4}$
102: of the Eddington rates. These ADAF accretion rates derived at 8.5~GHz
103: have important implications for the levels of X-ray emission expected
104: from these quiescent galaxies.
105:
106: \section{OBSERVATIONS AND IMAGING}
107:
108: The Very Large Array (VLA), described by \citet{tho80}, was used 1999
109: May 6-7 UT in its 1-km configuration to observe NGC\,4291, NGC\,4564,
110: NGC\,4621, and NGC\,4660. Data were acquired in dual circular
111: polarizations and at a center frequency 8.4601~GHz with bandwidth
112: 100~MHz. Observations were made assuming a coordinate equinox of
113: 2000. The phase calibrator J1153+8058 was used for NGC\,4291, while
114: J1239+0730 was used for the other three galaxies. Scheduled on-source
115: integration times were 105-120~minutes. The galaxies were observed at
116: {\em a priori\/} positions from the Digitized Sky Survey (DSS) web
117: site. Improved DSS positions with 1-D error estimates, $\sigma_{\rm
118: DSS}$, have since become available \citep{cot99} and will be used
119: below. $\sigma_{\rm DSS}$ depends in part on the galaxy major axis,
120: $\theta_{\rm M}$, and values for both terms appear in Table~1.
121: Observations of 3C\,286 were used to set the amplitude scale to an
122: accuracy of about 3\%. The data were calibrated using the 1999
123: October 15 release of the NRAO AIPS software. No self-calibrations
124: were performed.
125:
126: \placetable{tab1}
127:
128: The AIPS task IMAGR was used to form and deconvolve images of the
129: Stokes $IQU\/$ emission from each galaxy. All images were made with
130: natural weighting to optimize sensitivity. The Stokes $I\/$ images
131: appear in Figure~1, with crosses indicating the the DSS positions and
132: their errors. The large ellipses shown in three panels outline the
133: galaxies' major and minor diameters and elongation position angles
134: \citep{wro91a}. The corresponding ellipse for NGC\,4621 falls beyond
135: the panel boundaries. For each panel the table gives the image
136: resolution, $R_{\rm 8.5GHz}$, expressed as the FWHM dimensions and
137: elongation orientation of the elliptical-Gaussian restoring beam; the
138: image rms value, $\sigma_{\rm 8.5GHz}$, in units of microjanskys per
139: beam area ($\mu$Jy~ba$^{-1}$); and the image scale, $s$, based on the
140: distance, $D$, from Magorrian et al.\ (1998) for
141: H$_0=80$~km~s$^{-1}$~Mpc$^{-1}$. Each galaxy image was searched for
142: an emission peak $S_{\rm 8.5GHz} > 4 \sigma_{\rm 8.5GHz}$ within a
143: circular region of radius 4 $\sigma_{\rm DSS}$. The resulting peak
144: strengths appear in the table. For the two detected galaxies,
145: quadratic fits in the image plane yielded the peak flux densities
146: tabulated, along with their errors that are quadratic sums of a 3\%
147: scale error and $\sigma_{\rm 8.5GHz}$. Those fits also yielded the
148: following radio positions, along with their 1-D errors, $\sigma_{\rm
149: VLA}$, which are dominated by the peak signal-to-noise ratio
150: \citep{bal75}: for NGC\,4621,
151: $\alpha(J2000) = 12^{h} 42^{m} 02^{s}.50$,
152: $\delta(J2000) = 11^{\circ} 38' 48''.6$, and
153: $\sigma_{\rm VLA} = 0''.4$;
154: for NGC\,4660,
155: $\alpha(J2000) = 12^{h} 44^{m} 32^{s}.35$,
156: $\delta(J2000) = 11^{\circ} 11' 26''.6$, and
157: $\sigma_{\rm VLA} = 0''.7$.
158: \noindent Each detected galaxy is less than 40\% linearly polarized.
159:
160: \placefigure{fig1}
161:
162: \section{IMPLICATIONS}
163:
164: Radio continuum can be due to thermal synchrotron emission from an
165: ADAF onto a black hole, nonthermal synchrotron jets emerging from an
166: ADAF, or nonthermal synchrotron jets emerging from a standard
167: accretion disk which itself emits no radio photons. In the radio
168: regime, this Letter analyzes only thermal synchrotron emission from an
169: ADAF. The distances, $D$, from \citet{mag98} are used to convert the
170: new 8.5-GHz detections or limits to the observed powers, $P_{\rm
171: 8.5GHz}$, given in the table. These rank among the the most sensitive
172: radio powers, or power limits, available in the literature for
173: elliptical galaxies \citep{wro91b}. Because emission from nonthermal
174: synchrotron jets could account for some unknown fraction of the radio
175: detections, the observed peak flux densities will in general impose
176: upper limits to any ADAF powers, $P_{\rm 8.5GHz}$.
177:
178: The radio power, $P_\nu$, predicted for an ADAF at a frequency, $\nu$,
179: depends upon: $\alpha$, the standard Shakura-Sunyaev parametrization
180: of the kinematic viscosity in the accretion flow; $\beta$, the ratio
181: of gas pressure to total pressure; $m_8$, the black hole mass in units
182: of $10^8~M_{\sun}$; $\dot{m}_{\rm A}$, the ADAF accretion rate
183: normalized to the Eddington rate; and $T_e$, the equilibrium
184: temperature of the electrons \citep{mah97,yi98}. Canonical ADAFs
185: adopt $\alpha=0.3$ and an equipartition $\beta=0.5$. Moreover, for
186: most cases of interest $T_e$ is fairly insensitive to the other model
187: parameters, so an intermediate value of $2.5\times10^9$~K is adopted.
188: These values for $\alpha$, $\beta$, and $T_e$ then predict that, at
189: frequency $\nu = 8.5$~GHz,
190: \begin{equation}
191: P_{\rm 8.5GHz} = 6.7\times10^{21}
192: m_8^{6\over5}
193: \dot{m}_{\rm A}^{6\over5}
194: ~{\rm W~Hz}^{-1} .
195: \end{equation}
196: The values for $P_{\rm 8.5GHz}$ from this work and for $m_8$ from
197: \citet{mag98}, when inserted into Equation~(1), result in the
198: normalized ADAF accretion rates, $\dot{m}_{\rm A}$, given in the
199: table. These normalized ADAF rates are highly sub-Eddington, being
200: $ <1.6\times10^{-4}$,
201: $ <3.6\times10^{-4}$,
202: $\le7.8\times10^{-4}$, and
203: $\le7.4\times10^{-4}$
204: of the Eddington rates. The latter two cases correspond to the
205: galaxies with radio continuum detections. Canonical ADAFs exisit only
206: at normalized accretion rates below a critical rate, $\dot{m}_{\rm
207: crit} \sim 0.3\alpha^2 = 0.027$ \citep{esi97}. The normalized rates,
208: $\dot{m}_{\rm A}$, in the table easily meet this consistency check for
209: canonical, and other reasonable, values of $\alpha$. For the four
210: quiescent ellipticals in this study, the black hole masses from
211: \citet{mag98} yield the tabulated Eddington accretion rates,
212: $\dot{M}_{\rm E}$. Those rates are used to convert the normalized
213: ADAF rates, $\dot{m}_{\rm A}$, in the table into the absolute ADAF
214: rates, $\dot{M}_{\rm A}$, also entered in the table.
215:
216: The ADAF accretion rates derived at 8.5~GHz, in both normalized
217: ($\dot{m}_{\rm A}$) and absolute ($\dot{M}_{\rm A}$) form, have
218: consequences for the predicted levels of X-ray emission from these
219: quiescent elliptical galaxies, and these predicted levels must not
220: violate the observed levels. Only one galaxy, NGC\,4291, is a weak
221: X-ray emitter and the other three remain undetected in the ROSAT All
222: Sky Survey \citep{beu99}. That survey was conducted with the Position
223: Sensitive Proportional Counter at soft X-rays (0.5-2 keV) and at an
224: angular resolution of $\sim 0.5\arcmin$. The table gives values for,
225: or upper limits to, the observed soft X-ray luminosities, $L_{\rm
226: RASS}$, scaled to the \citet{mag98} distances. No deprojection
227: analysis has yet been attempted for NGC\,4291, since no ROSAT data
228: from the High Resolution Imager are available. Data at hard X-rays
229: (2-10 keV) are also lacking.
230:
231: An elliptical galaxy harboring an ADAF will be a source of X-rays from
232: the ADAF itself and from the galaxy's interstellar medium. Each
233: photon source will be discussed in turn. The normalized ADAF
234: accretion rates derived at 8.5~GHz are so low that bremsstrahlung
235: emission, not inverse Compton scattering, will dominate the ADAF's
236: X-rays \citep{mah97,yi98}. The latter authors provide an expression
237: for the bremsstrahlung luminosity of a canonical ADAF that, at the
238: $T_e$ adopted for Equation~(1), reduces to
239: \begin{equation}
240: L_{\rm A,1keV} = 1.2\times10^{45} m_8 \dot{m}_{\rm A}^2
241: ~{\rm erg~s}^{-1}
242: \end{equation}
243: at a fiducial soft X-ray frequency of $\nu = 2.42\times10^{17}$~Hz;
244: and reduces to
245: \begin{equation}
246: L_{\rm A,6keV} = 7.2\times10^{45} m_8 \dot{m}_{\rm A}^2
247: ~{\rm erg~s}^{-1}
248: \end{equation}
249: at a fiducial hard X-ray frequency of $\nu = 1.45\times10^{18}$~Hz.
250: Applying the tabulated values for $m_8$ and $\dot{m}_{\rm A}$ to
251: Equations~(2) and (3) yields the tabulated predictions for the soft
252: and hard X-ray luminosities of the ADAFs. The predicted luminosities
253: at 1~keV are consistent with the published ROSAT limits for NGC\,4564,
254: NGC\,4621, and NGC\,4660, as well as for the ROSAT detection of
255: NGC\,4291 but only if that detection is dominated by the galaxy's
256: interstellar medium rather than by its ADAF \citep{beu99}. Note
257: further that the ADAFs are expected to be six times more luminous at
258: hard than at soft X-rays, so these galaxies must must be considered
259: prime targets for observations in the 2-10~keV region with the
260: Advanced Satellite for Cosmology and Astrophysics \citep{tan94}.
261:
262: Soft X-rays can also arise from an elliptical's general interstellar
263: medium \citep{fab88,mah97,dim00}. For the galaxies in this study, a
264: Bondi analysis of that medium can produce an estimate for the Bondi
265: accretion rate, $\dot{M}_{\rm B}$, which can then be compared with the
266: absolute ADAF accretion rate, $\dot{M}_{\rm A}$, derived at 8.5~GHz.
267: The black hole masses from \citet{mag98}, in combination with $T_7 =
268: 1$ being typical for elliptical galaxies \citep{dim00}, results in the
269: Bondi radii listed in the table. Assuming further that the pressure,
270: $P = 10^6 P_6$~cm$^{-3}$~K, at the Bondi radius satisfies $P_6 = 1-10$
271: \citep{dim00}, then the table gives the corresponding range in Bondi
272: accretion rates, $\dot{M}_{\rm B}$. The Bondi rate estimates for $P_6
273: = 1$ are generally consistent with the limits on the absolute ADAF
274: rates, $\dot{M}_{\rm A}$, imposed at 8.5~GHz, although there is an
275: order-of-magnitude discrepancy in the case of NGC\,4291. In
276: constrast, for $P_6 = 10$ the Bondi rates exceed the ADAF rates for
277: all four galaxies. Meaningful comparions between $\dot{M}_{\rm B}$
278: and $\dot{M}_{\rm A}$ must clearly await a reliable pressure profile
279: for ellipticals in general or, better still, for the galaxies in this
280: study. Futhermore, integration over any adopted pressure profile
281: should not violate $L_{\rm RASS}$ listed in the table.
282:
283: Further radio observations to quantify any jet contamination in
284: NGC\,4621 and NGC\,4660 are also needed, for two reasons. First,
285: removal of jet contamination leads to reduced ADAF emission, which in
286: turn implies even lower ADAF accretion rates. Second, the presence of
287: jet emission could signify the importance of physical processes
288: ignored in canonical ADAF models and explored by \citet{dim00}.
289: Follow-up VLA imaging at other frequencies, $\nu$, but at matched
290: angular resolutions would help assess jet contamination: the flux
291: density from an ADAF-dominated source is expected to rise as
292: $\nu^{{1\over3} - {2\over5}}$ \citep{mah97,yi98}, whereas the flux
293: density from a jet-dominated source is expected to exhibit a flatter
294: spectral slope. Although the 500-$\mu$Jy~ba$^{-1}$ upper limits at
295: 5~GHz from \citet{wro91b} do have similar resolutions, they are too
296: insensitive to impose useful constraints on spectral slopes between 5
297: and 8.5~GHz. Moreover, higher-resolution imaging with the NRAO VLBA
298: could provide morphological evidence for nonthermal synchrotron jets
299: and spatially separate jet from ADAF emission, as was successfully
300: done for the spiral galaxy NGC\,4258 \citep{her98}. Finally, the
301: image rms values, $\sigma_{\rm 8.5GHz}$, achieved in this study
302: required 2 hours of integration time. Similar values for $\sigma_{\rm
303: 8.5GHz}$ will be achieved after a 2-minute integration with the
304: expanded VLA \citep{nra00}. This will make it feasible, for the first
305: time, to target all radio-quiescent ellipticals studied by
306: \citet{mag98}, which should significantly advance our understanding of
307: advection-dominated accretion flows as a new class of extragalactic
308: radio emitters.
309:
310: \acknowledgments The authors thank Dr.\ R.\ Mahadevan for discussions.
311: This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database
312: (NED) which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Caltech,
313: under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
314: The Digitized Sky Surveys were produced at the Space Telescope Science
315: Institute under U.S. Government grant NAG W-2166. The National
316: Geographic Society - Palomar Observatory Sky Atlas (POSS-I) was made
317: by the California Institute of Technology with grants from the
318: National Geographic Society. The Second Palomar Observatory Sky
319: Survey (POSS-II) was made by the California Institute of Technology
320: with funds from the National Science Foundation, the National
321: Geographic Society, the Sloan Foundation, the Samuel Oschin
322: Foundation, and the Eastman Kodak Corporation. NRAO is a facility of
323: the National Science Foundation operated under cooperative agreement
324: by Associated Universities, Inc.
325: \clearpage
326:
327: \begin{thebibliography}{}
328: \bibitem[Ball(1975)]{bal75}
329: Ball, J.~A. 1975, in Methods in Computational Physics,
330: Volume 14, eds.\ B. Alder, S. Fernbach, \& M. Rotenberg
331: (New York: Academic Press), 177
332: \bibitem[Beuing et al.(1999)]{beu99}
333: Beuing, J, Dobereiner, S., Bohringer, H., \& Bender, R.
334: 1999, \mnras, 302, 209
335: \bibitem[Bondi(1952)]{bon52}
336: Bondi, H. 1952, \mnras, 112, 195
337: \bibitem[Cotton, Condon, \& Arbizzani(1999)]{cot99}
338: Cotton, W.~D., Condon, J.~J., \& Arbizzani, E. 1999, \apjs, 125, 409
339: \bibitem[Di Matteo et al.(2000)]{dim00}
340: Di Matteo, T., Quataert, E., Allen, S.~W., Narayan, R., \& Fabian,
341: A.~C. 2000, \mnras, 311, 507
342: \bibitem[Esin, McClintock, \& Narayan(1997)]{esi97}
343: Esin, A.~A., McClintock, J.~E., \&
344: Narayan, R. 1997, \apj, 489, 865
345: \bibitem[Fabian \& Canizares(1988)]{fab88}
346: Fabian, A.~C., \& Canizares, C.~R. 1988, \nat, 333, 829
347: \bibitem[Fabian \& Rees(1995)]{fab95}
348: Fabian, A.~C., \& Rees, M.~J. 1995, \mnras, 277, L55
349: \bibitem[Herrnstein et al.(1998)]{her98}
350: Herrnstein, J.~R., Greenhill, L.~J., Moran, J.~M., Diamond,
351: P.~J., Inoue, M., Nakai, N., \& Miyoshi, M. 1998, \apj, 497, L69
352: \bibitem[Ho, Filippenko, \& Sargent(1997)]{ho97}
353: Ho, L.~C., Filippenko, A.~V., \& Sargent, W.~L.~W. 1997,
354: \apjs, 112, 315
355: \bibitem[Magorrian et al.(1998)]{mag98}
356: Magorrian, J., et al. 1998, \aj, 115, 2285
357: \bibitem[Mahadevan(1997)]{mah97}
358: Mahadevan, R. 1997, \apj, 477, 585
359: \bibitem[Maoz(1998)]{mao98}
360: Maoz, E. 1998, \apj, 494, L181
361: \bibitem[Narayan, Mahadevan, \& Quataert(1998)]{nar98}
362: Narayan, R., Mahadevan, R., \& Quataert, E. 1998, in {\em Theory of
363: Black Hole Accretion Disks\/}, eds.\ M.~A. Abramowicz, G.\
364: Bj\"ornsson, \& J.~E. Pringle (Cambridge: Cambridge University
365: Press), 148
366: \bibitem[NRAO(2000)]{nra00}
367: NRAO, 2000, VLA Expansion Project:
368: Phase I - The Ultrasensitive Array
369: \bibitem[Tanaka, Inoue, \& Holt(1994)]{tan94}
370: Tanaka, Y., Inoue, H., \& Holt, S.~S. 1994, \pasj, 46, L37
371: \bibitem[Thompson et al.(1980)]{tho80}
372: Thompson, A.~R., Clark, B.~G., Wade, C.~M., Napier, P.~J., 1980,
373: \apjs, 44, 151
374: \bibitem[Wrobel(1991)]{wro91a}
375: Wrobel, J.~M. 1991, \aj, 101, 127
376: \bibitem[Wrobel \& Heeschen(1991)]{wro91b}
377: Wrobel, J.~M., \& Heeschen, D.~S. 1991, \aj, 101, 148
378: \bibitem[Yi \& Boughn(1998)]{yi98}
379: Yi, I., \& Boughn, S.~P. 1998, \apj, 499, 198
380: \end{thebibliography}
381: \clearpage
382:
383: \begin{deluxetable}{llrrrrl}
384: \footnotesize
385: \tablecaption{Quiescent Elliptical Galaxies at 8.5~GHz\label{tab1}}
386: \tablewidth{0pc}
387: \tablehead{ \colhead{Symbol} &
388: \colhead{Units} &
389: \colhead{NGC\,4291}&
390: \colhead{NGC\,4564}&
391: \colhead{NGC\,4621}&
392: \colhead{NGC\,4660}&
393: \colhead{Reference}}
394: \startdata
395: $\theta_{\rm M}$ & $\arcmin$ &
396: 2.0& 2.6& 4.5& 2.4& 1\\
397: $\sigma_{\rm DSS}$ & $\arcsec$ &
398: 1.7& 2.0& 3.0& 1.8& 2\\
399: $R_{\rm 8.5GHz}$ & $\arcsec,\arcsec,\arcdeg$ &
400: 15.4,8.4,+56& 10.5,9.0,-22& 10.2,9.0,+19& 14.7,9.1,+54& 3\\
401: $\sigma_{\rm 8.5GHz}$ & $\mu$Jy~ba$^{-1}$ &
402: 16& 13& 13& 14& 3\\
403: $S_{\rm 8.5GHz}$ & $\mu$Jy~ba$^{-1}$ &
404: $<$ 64& $<$ 52& 153$\pm$14& 143$\pm$15& 3\\
405: $D$ & Mpc&
406: 28.6& 15.3& 15.3& 15.3& 4\\
407: $s$ & pc/$\arcsec$&
408: 139& 74& 74& 74& 4\\
409:
410: $P_{\rm 8.5GHz}$ & W~Hz$^{-1}$ &
411: $ <6.3\times10^{18}$& $ <1.5\times10^{18}$&
412: $\le4.3\times10^{18}$& $\le4.0\times10^{18}$& 3\\
413:
414: $m_8$ & $10^8M_{\sun}$&
415: 19& 2.5& 2.8& 2.8& 4\\
416:
417: $\dot{m}_{\rm A}$ & &
418: $ <1.6\times10^{-4}$& $<3.6\times10^{-4}$&
419: $\le7.8\times10^{-4}$& $\le7.4\times10^{-4}$& 3\\
420:
421: $\dot{M}_{\rm E}$ & $M_{\sun}$~yr$^{-1}$ &
422: 42.& 5.5& 6.2& 6.2& 4\\
423: $\dot{M}_{\rm A}$ & $M_{\sun}$~yr$^{-1}$ &
424: $<0.007$& $<0.002$& $\le0.005$& $\le0.005$& 3\\
425:
426: $L_{\rm RASS}$ & erg~s$^{-1}$ &
427: $ 8.0\times10^{40}$& $<4.2\times10^{39}$&
428: $<4.6\times10^{39}$& $<3.9\times10^{39}$& 5\\
429:
430: $L_{\rm A,1keV}$ & erg~s$^{-1}$ &
431: $ <5.9\times10^{38}$& $ <4.0\times10^{38}$&
432: $\le2.1\times10^{39}$& $\le1.9\times10^{39}$& 3\\
433:
434: $L_{\rm A,6keV}$ & erg~s$^{-1}$ &
435: $ <3.5\times10^{39}$& $ <2.3\times10^{39}$&
436: $\le1.2\times10^{40}$& $\le1.1\times10^{40}$& 3\\
437:
438: $r_{\rm B}$ & pc &
439: 82& 11& 12& 12& 4,6\\
440: $\dot{M}_{\rm B}$ & $M_{\sun}$~yr$^{-1}$ &
441: $0.07-0.7$& $0.001-0.01$& $0.001-0.01$& $0.001-0.01$& 4,6\\
442: \enddata
443: \tablerefs{(1) Wrobel 1991; (2) Cotton et al.\ 1999; (3) This work;
444: (4) Magorrian et al.\ 1998; (5) Beuing et al.\ 1999; (6) Di Matteo et
445: al.\ 2000.}
446: \end{deluxetable}
447:
448: \clearpage
449:
450: \figcaption[f1.eps]{VLA images of Stokes $I\/$ emission from the inner
451: $\pm1\arcmin$ of four elliptical galaxies at a frequency of 8.5~GHz.
452: Contour levels are at multiples of the bottom contour level, which is
453: twice the image rms value, $\sigma_{\rm 8.5GHz}$. Hatched ellipses
454: show the restoring beam areas at FWHM. Negative contours are dashed
455: and positive ones are solid.
456: {\em Upper left:} NGC\,4291.
457: {\em Upper right:} NGC\,4564.
458: {\em Lower left:} NGC\,4621.
459: {\em Lower right:} NGC\,4660.
460: \label{fig1}}
461:
462: % Note1 - pgplot files must be edited to move the bounding box to
463: % the front from the end. Otherwise there are lots of problems
464: % in plotone. Same for kntr with grey scale, it seems.
465: % Note2 - Montages must be built with divps -E and then bounding
466: % boxes aadjusted by hand based on gv to avoid 72 72 72 72.
467: %
468: \newpage
469: \epsscale{1.0}
470: \plotone{f1.eps}
471:
472: \centerline{Figure~1}
473:
474: \end{document}
475: