1: % Demo file
2: % (c) Springer-Verlag HD
3: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------
4: \documentclass{aa}
5: %\documentclass[referee]{aa}
6: \usepackage{psfig}
7:
8:
9: \begin{document}
10:
11: \thesaurus{06 % A&A Section 6: Form. struct. and evolut. of stars
12: (08.02.3; % Stars:binaries:close,
13: 08.14.2; % Stars:neutron,
14: 08.09.02 4U~1812--12; % Stars:individual,
15: 13.25.1; % X-rays:bursts,
16: 13.25.5)} % X-rays:stars
17: %
18: \title{Observations of Eddington-limited type-I X-ray bursts from 4U~1812--12}
19: % \subtitle{}
20:
21:
22: \author{ M. Cocchi \inst{1}, A. Bazzano \inst{1}, L.Natalucci \inst{1}, P. Ubertini \inst{1},
23: J. Heise \inst{2}, E. Kuulkers \inst{2,3}, J.M. Muller \inst{2,4} and J.J.M. in 't Zand \inst{2}
24: }
25: \offprints{M. Cocchi, wood@ias.rm.cnr.it}
26:
27: \institute{$^{1}$ Istituto di Astrofisica Spaziale ({\em IAS/CNR}), via Fosso del Cavaliere 100, 00133 Roma, Italy \\
28: $^{2}$ Space Research Organization Netherlands {\em (SRON)}, Sorbonnelaan 2, 3584 TA, Utrecht, The Netherlands \\
29: $^{3}$ Astronomical Institute, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80000, 3507 TA, Utrecht, The Netherlands \\
30: $^{4}$ {\em BeppoSAX} Science Data Centre, Nuova Telespazio, via Corcolle 19, 00131 Roma, Italy
31: }
32:
33:
34: \date{Received ?; accepted ?}
35:
36: \authorrunning{Cocchi et al.}
37: \maketitle
38:
39: \begin{abstract}
40: During more than 3 years (August 1996--October 1999) monitoring of a $40\degr \times 40\degr$
41: sky region around the Galactic Centre by the Wide Field Cameras
42: on board {\em BeppoSAX}, a total of 8 type-I bursts have been detected from a sky position
43: consistent with that of 4U~1812$-$12, a likely neutron-star low-mass X-ray
44: binary. We present the results of a detailed study of the bursts of 4U~1812$-$12, about 15
45: years after the last reported observations of X-ray bursts from this source (\cite{Mura83}).
46: Clear evidence for photospheric radius expansion due to Eddington-limited burst
47: luminosity is present in most of the observed events, allowing an accurate
48: estimate of the source distance ($\sim 4$ kpc) and its burst parameters.
49:
50: \keywords{binaries:close -- stars: neutron, individual (4U~1812$-$12) -- X-rays: bursts}
51: \end{abstract}
52:
53: %--------------------------------------
54:
55: \section{Introduction}
56:
57: Since its first {\em Uhuru} detections (\cite{Form76,Form78}), 4U~1812$-$12 was observed by several
58: satellite X-ray experiments: {\em OSO~7} (1M~1812-121, \cite{Mark79}),
59: {\em Ariel~V} (3A~1812-121, \cite{Warw81}), {\em HEAO}~1 (1H~1815$-$121, \cite{Wood84}),
60: and {\em EXOSAT} (GPS~1812-120, \cite{Warw88}).
61: From these observations, it is clear that 4U~1812$-$12 is a persistent, though
62: variable, source. {\em Uhuru} found a 2--10 keV maximum intensity of
63: $\sim 5\times 10^{-10}~{\rm erg~cm}^{-2}{\rm s}^{-1}$ and a variability of a factor of at least 2
64: (\cite{Form78}). Similar variability characteristics were observed by {\em Ariel~V}, as the source
65: varied in the range $\sim 3-6\times 10^{-10}~{\rm erg~cm}^{-2}{\rm s}^{-1}$ in the same energy band
66: (\cite{Warw81}), while lower intensities of $\sim 2\times 10^{-10}~{\rm erg~cm}^{-2}{\rm s}^{-1}$
67: and $\sim 3\times 10^{-10}~{\rm erg~cm}^{-2}{\rm s}^{-1}$ were measured by {\em HEAO}~1
68: (2--10 keV, \cite{Wood84}) and {\em EXOSAT} (2--6 keV, \cite{Warw88}).
69: The 3--10 keV source spectrum as obtained by the {\em EXOSAT} GSPC was best fitted by a power law
70: (\cite{Gott95}).
71: % HIGH ENERGY ?
72: 4U~1812$-$12 is being monitored by {\em RXTE}-ASM since February 1996
73: \footnote{the ASM measurements are publicly available at URL {\tt http://www.space.mit.edu/XTE}},
74: confirming its previously reported characteristics.
75: The source is always detected, with an average 2--10 keV flux of $\sim 3.8\times 10^{-10}~{\rm erg~cm}^{-2}{\rm s}^{-1}$
76: ($\sim 20$ mCrab) and a variability of a factor $\la 3$ on $\sim 1$ week time scale.
77: % No evidence for periodicities in the 1d-1year ?? time scales was found.
78:
79: Three X-ray bursts were detected from this source in 1982 by {\em Hakucho} (\cite{Mura83}).
80: Two of the events showed clear evidence for photospheric radius expansion, and
81: reached a maximum 1--22 keV intensity of $\sim 1.7\times 10^{-7}~{\rm erg~cm}^{-2}{\rm s}^{-1}$.
82: The burst spectra were consistent with a $\sim 2.5$ keV blackbody emission, and showed evidence for softening
83: during the exponential decay ({\em e}-folding time $\tau \sim 20$ s).
84: This indicated the bursts to be type-I, i.e. thermonuclear flashes
85: originating on the hot surface of a neutron star, and the source to be likely located in a
86: low-mass X-ray binary.
87: During the observation no persistent emission was detected above 20 Uhuru flux units
88: ($\sim 5\times 10^{-10}~{\rm erg~cm}^{-2}{\rm s}^{-1}$ in 2-10 keV). Anyway this is not
89: in disagreement with the identification of the {\em Hakucho} burster with the persistent source 4U~1812$-$12.
90: \cite{Mura83} also proposed the association of the burst source with the transient Ser~X-2, observed
91: once in 1965 (\cite{Frie67}).
92: More recently, a single-peaked burst from 4U~1812$-$12 was observed by the {\em BeppoSAX}-WFC
93: instrument on 1997 Mar 12.2209 UT (\cite{Burd97}). The event had a peak intensity of 1.2 and 0.6 Crab in the
94: 1.5--10 keV and 10$-$26 keV band respectively, and a decay time of $\sim 20$ s.
95:
96: 4U~1812$-$12 is classified as an atoll source, which is
97: common among the type-I X-ray bursters, and shows band-limited noise and a $\sim 0.8$ Hz QPO (\cite{Wijn99}).
98:
99: In this paper we investigate the burst characteristics of 4U~1812$-$12, about 15 years after the
100: {\em Hakucho} observations of its type-I bursts. The event observed by Burderi et al. (1997) is also re-analysed.
101: Through a homogeneus sample of Eddington-limited type-I X-ray bursts, we accurately estimate the source
102: distance and test the reliabilty of near-Eddington bursts as a standard candle.
103: In the next section we briefly introduce the Wide Field Cameras telescopes and report on the observations
104: of 4U~1812$-$12. Time-resolved spectroscopy
105: of the bursts is presented in Section 3, while the scientific implications of our results are
106: discussed in Section 4.
107:
108:
109: %----------------------------------------------------------- Figure 1
110: \begin{figure}[hbt]
111: \psfig{figure=4u_fig2.ps,width=8.3cm,clip=t}
112: \caption{
113: Time profiles of burst C in three energy bands.
114: The double-peaked structure becomes more evident at higher energies.
115: }
116: \label{Fig1}
117: \end{figure}
118: %______________________________________________________________
119:
120: %------------------------------------------------------------------- Table 1
121: \begin{table*}[hbt]
122: \caption{Summary of the characteristics of the observed bursts. Average spectral parameters are
123: calculated for the first 30 s of burst data.
124: }
125: \protect\label{t:ae}
126: \begin{flushleft}
127: \begin{tabular}{lcccccccc}
128: \hline
129: \hline \noalign{\smallskip}
130: & burst A & burst B & burst C & burst D & burst E & burst F & burst G & burst H \\
131: \hline \noalign{\smallskip}
132: date & 1996 Aug.22 & 1996 Aug.29 & 1996 Sep.11 & 1997 Mar.12 &
133: 1997 Mar.30 & 1998 Sep.30 & 1998 Oct.7 & 1999 Sep.22 \\
134: UT (h) & 16.9158 & 5.6625 & 7.3972 & 5.3021 & 21.2650 & 21.9400 & 1.8097 & 7.7229 \\
135: \noalign{\smallskip}
136: $\tau_{2-28~{\rm keV}}$ & $15.0\pm 1.3$ & $14.5\pm 1.2$ & $15.1\pm 0.5$ & $14.1\pm 0.6$ &
137: $13.9\pm 1.0$ & $14.2\pm 1.2$ & $10.6\pm 1.1$ & $12.1\pm 1.0$ \\
138: $\tau_{2-8~{\rm keV}}$ & $16.8\pm 1.7$ & $18.0\pm 1.4$ & $20.1\pm 0.6$ & $16.4\pm 0.8$ &
139: $17.9\pm 1.6$ & $18.0\pm 1.7$ & $15.1\pm 1.8$ & $19.0\pm 2.1$ \\
140: $\tau_{8-28~{\rm keV}}$ & $ 7.3\pm 1.2$ & $ 5.8\pm 0.9$ & $ 6.9\pm 0.4$ & $ 6.3\pm 0.7$ &
141: $ 4.1\pm 0.6$ & $ 4.4\pm 0.7$ & $ 6.8\pm 1.1$ & $ 6.1\pm 0.7$ \\
142: \noalign{\smallskip}
143: {\em k}T (keV) & $1.98^{+0.07}_{-0.06}$ & $1.85^{+0.04}_{-0.05}$ & $1.98^{+0.03}_{-0.02}$ & $1.96^{+0.03}_{-0.04}$ &
144: $2.10\pm 0.06$ & $1.99^{+0.06}_{-0.05}$ & $2.26\pm 0.07$ & $2.33^{+0.08}_{-0.07}$ \\
145: %$R_{\rm km}/d_{10~{\rm kpc}}$
146: ${\rm R}_{bb}^{(a)}$ & $20.1^{+1.4}_{-1.3}$ & $21.8^{+1.3}_{-1.1}$ & $20.2^{+0.5}_{-0.4}$ & $20.9^{+0.8}_{-0.7}$ &
147: $15.6\pm 0.9$ & $19.5^{+1.1}_{-1.0}$ & $15.0^{+1.0}_{-0.9}$ & $13.6^{+0.9}_{-0.8}$ \\
148: $\chi^{2}_{r}$ & 1.57 & 0.89 & 1.53 & 1.13 & 1.69 & 1.36 & 1.18 & 0.75 \\
149: \noalign{\smallskip}
150: $I_{peak}^{(b)}$ & $4.69\pm 0.32$ & $4.21\pm 0.27$ & $4.36\pm 0.14$ & $4.87\pm 0.21$ &
151: $4.66\pm 0.28$ & $4.81\pm 0.33$ & $4.32\pm 0.37$ & $4.68\pm 0.33$ \\
152: fluence$^{(c)}$
153: & $2.91\pm 0.17$ & $2.81\pm 0.14$ & $3.14\pm 0.10$ & $2.93\pm 0.12$ &
154: $2.26\pm 0.12$ & $3.02\pm 0.16$ & $2.37\pm 0.15$ & $2.25\pm 0.13$ \\
155: %steady emission $^{(c)}$ & 3 & 3 & 10 & & &\\
156: \noalign{\smallskip}
157: \hline\noalign{\smallskip}
158: \noalign{$^{(a)}$ blackbody radius, for a 10 kpc distance; $^{(b)}$ peak intensity, in Crab units, 2-28 keV band;
159: $^{(c)}$ bolometric, in $10^{-6}~{\rm erg~cm}^{-2}$. The bursts {\em e}-folding times $\tau$ are given in s.}
160: % $^{(d)}$ $3\sigma$ upper limits, in mCrab, 2-10 keV.}
161: \end{tabular}
162: \end{flushleft}
163: \end{table*}
164: %_______________________________________________________________________
165:
166:
167:
168:
169:
170: \section{Observations}
171:
172: The Wide Field Cameras (WFC) on board the {\em BeppoSAX} satellite consist of two identical
173: coded aperture multi-wire proportional counters (\cite{Jage97}) pointing in opposite directions.
174: Each camera covers a $40\degr \times 40\degr$ full width to zero-response field of view, the
175: largest ever flown for an arcminute resolution X-ray telescope.
176: With their source location accuracy in the range $1\arcmin$--$3\arcmin$ (99\% confidence),
177: a time resolution of 0.488 ms, and an energy resolution of 18\% at 6 keV, the
178: WFCs are effective in studying X-ray transient phenomena in the
179: 2--28 keV bandpass. The imaging capability and the good instrument sensitivity
180: (5-10 mCrab on-axis in $10^{4}$ s, depending on the number of sources in the field) allow an accurate
181: monitoring of complex sky regions, like the Galactic centre.
182:
183: One of the main scientific objectives of the WFCs is the study of the timing and spectral
184: behaviour of both transient and persistent sources of the Galactic Bulge region on time scales
185: ranging from seconds to years.
186: To this end, an observation program of systematic wide field monitoring of the Sgr~A
187: sky region is being carried out since August 1996 (see e.g. \cite{Heis98,Heis99,Uber99}).
188: This program consists of a series of observations, each lasting $\sim 60$ ks,
189: nearly weekly spaced throughout the two visibility periods (August-October and
190: February-April) of the Galactic Centre region.
191:
192: The WFC Galactic Bulge monitoring program is significantly contributing in the study of
193: X-ray bursting sources. Up to now, a total of 15 new objects were discovered in $\sim 3.2$ years
194: observing time, thus enlarging the population of the bursters by $\sim 35\%$ (\cite{Heis99,Uber99}).
195: The data of the two cameras are systematically searched for bursts and flares by
196: analyzing the time profiles of the detectors in the 2--11 keV
197: energy range with a time resolution down to 1 s. Reconstructed sky images are
198: generated for any statistically meaningful event and the accuracy of the reconstructed
199: position, which of course depends on the burst intensity, is typically better than $5\arcmin$.
200: This analysis procedure has led to the identification of
201: $\sim 950$ X-ray bursts (156 of which from the {\em Bursting Pulsar} GRO J1744$-$28) in
202: a total of about $4\times10^{6}$ s net observing time (e.g. \cite{Cocc98a}).
203:
204: Whenever the WFCs point at the Galactic Centre region, 4U~1812$-$12 is in the field of view,
205: though at a rather offset position, being $\sim 18\degr$ away from Sgr~A ($l_{{\rm II}}=18.0\degr,
206: b_{{\rm II}}=2.4\degr$).
207: Due to the source's relatively low intensity and to the unfavourable pointing, the WFC data is not
208: sensitive enough to study the persistent emission with sufficient accuracy.
209: A total of 8 X-ray bursts were detected at a position consistent with that of 4U~1812$-$12
210: during all the time spent on the source by the WFCs both in primary and in secondary
211: observing mode ($\sim 4$ Ms net time in 3.2 years).
212: %Due to the {\em BeppoSAX} orbit characteristics, the source covering efficiency during an
213: %observation is on average $\sim 53\%$, so other bursts could have been missed.
214: None of the observed bursts can be associated with other known sources.
215:
216: We analysed all the observed bursts, including the one already investigated by Burderi et al. (1997).
217: The main characteristics of the observed bursts (hereafter burst A,B,...,H, chronologically) are
218: summarised in Table 1.
219: One of the bursts, namely burst C, was observed with much better statistics than the
220: others, as it was in a more favourable position ($\sim 10\degr$ offset).
221: For this reason, burst C was analysed with a higher time resolution than the others.
222:
223:
224:
225: %----------------------------------------------------------- Figure 2
226: \begin{figure}[hbt]
227: \psfig{figure=4u_fig1.ps,width=8.3cm,clip=t}
228: \caption{
229: Time histories of the A,B,D,E,F,G,H (starting from top) bursts in the
230: 8-28 keV energy band. Eddington-luminosity effects are observed in all the
231: profiles.
232: }
233: \label{Fig2}
234: \end{figure}
235: %______________________________________________________________
236:
237:
238: %----------------------------------------------------------------------- Table2
239: \begin{table}[hbt]
240: \caption{ Time resolved spectral analysis of bursts A,B,D,E,F.
241: }
242: \protect\label{t:hc}
243: \begin{flushleft}
244: \begin{tabular}{llcl}
245: \hline
246: \hline\noalign{\smallskip}
247: time range$^{(a)}$ & {\em k}T (keV) & $R_{\rm km}/d_{10~{\rm kpc}}$ & $\chi_{r}^{(b)}$ \\
248: \noalign{\smallskip} \hline\noalign{\smallskip}
249: \multicolumn{4}{c}{{\bf mjd 50317 burst (A)}} \\
250: $ 0s- 4s$ & $2.42^{+0.21}_{-0.18}$ & $15.2^{+2.8}_{-2.1}$ & $0.78^{(c)}$ \\
251: $ 4s- 9s$ & $1.60 \pm 0.10$ & $35.3^{+5.1}_{-4.0}$ & $0.95^{(c)}$ \\
252: $ 9s-14s$ & $2.36^{+0.14}_{-0.13}$ & $17.5^{+2.3}_{-1.8}$ & $1.22$ \\
253: $14s-35s$ & $1.81^{+0.12}_{-0.10}$ & $18.0^{+2.6}_{-2.1}$ & $0.87$ \\
254: \noalign{\smallskip}
255: \multicolumn{4}{c}{{\bf mjd 50324 burst (B)}} \\
256: $ 0s- 4s$ & $2.15 \pm 0.14$ & $16.7^{+2.5}_{-2.0}$ & $0.75$ \\
257: $ 4s-10s$ & $1.54^{+0.07}_{-0.06}$ & $37.2^{+3.7}_{-3.1}$ & $0.47$ \\
258: $10s-15s$ & $2.16^{+0.10}_{-0.09}$ & $20.2^{+2.0}_{-1.7}$ & $0.79$ \\
259: $15s-35s$ & $1.76 \pm 0.14$ & $17.7^{+2.2}_{-1.8}$ & $0.76$ \\
260: \noalign{\smallskip}
261: \multicolumn{4}{c}{{\bf mjd 50519 burst (D)}} \\
262: $ 0s- 4s$ & $2.68 \pm 0.16$ & $20.9^{+0.8}_{-0.7}$ & $1.68$ \\
263: $ 4s-10s$ & $1.80^{+0.05}_{-0.04}$ & $30.7^{+1.7}_{-1.6}$ & $1.15$ \\
264: $10s-15s$ & $2.24^{+0.08}_{-0.07}$ & $19.7^{+1.4}_{-1.2}$ & $1.39$ \\
265: $15s-36s$ & $1.65 \pm 0.06$ & $20.8^{+1.6}_{-1.4}$ & $1.10$ \\
266: \noalign{\smallskip}
267: \multicolumn{4}{c}{{\bf mjd 50537 burst (E)}} \\
268: $ 0s- 4s$ & $2.34 \pm 0.15$ & $15.6^{+2.2}_{-1.8}$ & $1.30$ \\
269: $ 4s-10s$ & $2.15 \pm 0.08$ & $20.3^{+1.7}_{-1.5}$ & $1.39$ \\
270: $10s-15s$ & $2.61^{+0.15}_{-0.14}$ & $13.0^{+1.6}_{-1.3}$ & $0.96$ \\
271: $15s-32s$ & $1.33^{+0.10}_{-0.08}$ & $27.6^{+4.5}_{-3.5}$ & $1.09$ \\
272: \noalign{\smallskip}
273: \multicolumn{4}{c}{{\bf mjd 51086 burst (F)}} \\
274: $ 0s- 5s$ & $2.48^{+0.18}_{-0.17}$ & $12.4^{+2.0}_{-1.6}$ & $0.72$ \\
275: $ 5s-12s$ & $1.70 \pm 0.07$ & $31.7^{+3.0}_{-2.5}$ & $0.76$ \\
276: $12s-17s$ & $2.51 \pm 0.12$ & $15.7^{+1.7}_{-1.4}$ & $0.84$ \\
277: $17s-37s$ & $1.68 \pm 0.09$ & $18.9^{+2.5}_{-2.0}$ & $0.85$ \\
278: \noalign{\smallskip}
279: \multicolumn{4}{c}{{\bf mjd 51093 burst (G)}} \\
280: $ 0s- 4s$ & $2.76 \pm 0.16$ & $11.7^{+1.6}_{-1.2}$ & $1.46$ \\
281: $ 4s-10s$ & $2.10^{+0.09}_{-0.10}$ & $22.1^{+2.2}_{-1.9}$ & $0.57$ \\
282: $10s-14s$ & $2.60^{+0.19}_{-0.17}$ & $12.9^{+2.0}_{-1.6}$ & $1.37$ \\
283: $14s-34s$ & $1.91^{+0.14}_{-0.12}$ & $14.2^{+2.2}_{-1.8}$ & $1.23$ \\
284: \noalign{\smallskip}
285: \multicolumn{4}{c}{{\bf mjd 51443 burst (H)}} \\
286: $ 0s- 4s$ & $2.40^{+0.16}_{-0.14}$ & $15.5^{+2.2}_{-1.8}$ & $0.81$ \\
287: $ 4s- 9s$ & $2.50 \pm 0.10$ & $15.8^{+1.4}_{-1.3}$ & $1.35$ \\
288: $ 9s-14s$ & $2.58 \pm 0.15$ & $13.6^{+1.8}_{-1.5}$ & $1.01$ \\
289: $14s-34s$ & $1.54^{+0.16}_{-0.15}$ & $17.8^{+4.7}_{-3.1}$ & $0.78$ \\
290: \noalign{\smallskip} \hline\noalign{\smallskip}
291: \noalign{ $^{(a)}$ The zero is the burst time (see Table 1);
292: $^{(b)}$ 27 d.o.f.; $^{(c)}$ 26 d.o.f.}
293: \end{tabular}
294: \end{flushleft}
295: \end{table}
296: %_____________________________________________________________________________________
297:
298: %----------------------------------------------------------------------- Table3
299: %\begin{table}[hbt]
300: %\caption{ As in Table 2, for the mjd 50368 burst (C).
301: %}
302: %\protect\label{t:hc}
303: %\begin{flushleft}
304: %\begin{tabular}{llcl}
305: %\hline
306: %\hline\noalign{\smallskip}
307: %time range$^{(a)}$ & {\em k}T (keV) & $R_{\rm km}/d_{10~{\rm kpc}}$ & $\chi_{r}^{(b)}$ \\
308: %\noalign{\smallskip} \hline\noalign{\smallskip}
309: % $ 0s- 2s$ & $2.83 \pm 0.14$ & $ 9.6^{+1.0}_{-0.8}$ & $0.68$ \\
310: % $ 2s- 3s$ & $2.54 \pm 0.11$ & $14.3^{+1.4}_{-1.1}$ & $1.02$ \\
311: % $ 3s- 4s$ & $1.92 \pm 0.08$ & $25.6^{+2.3}_{-2.0}$ & $0.70$ \\
312: % $ 4s- 5s$ & $1.48^{+0.06}_{-0.07}$ & $39.8^{+4.0}_{-3.4}$ & $1.21^{(c)}$ \\
313: % $ 5s- 6s$ & $1.31 \pm 0.06$ & $52.2^{+6.1}_{-4.8}$ & $0.92^{(c)}$ \\
314: % $ 6s- 7s$ & $1.26 \pm 0.07$ & $54.6^{+7.6}_{-5.8}$ & $1.11$ \\
315: % $ 7s- 8s$ & $1.55 \pm 0.09$ & $34.7^{+4.6}_{-3.7}$ & $0.41^{(d)}$ \\
316: % $ 8s- 9s$ & $1.84^{+0.10}_{-0.09}$ & $26.1^{+3.0}_{-2.5}$ & $1.40$ \\
317: % $ 9s-10s$ & $1.58^{+0.08}_{-0.07}$ & $34.3^{+3.7}_{-3.1}$ & $1.21$ \\
318: % $10s-11s$ & $1.76^{+0.07}_{-0.08}$ & $30.4^{+2.9}_{-2.5}$ & $1.13$ \\
319: % $11s-12s$ & $2.22^{+0.11}_{-0.10}$ & $19.4^{+2.0}_{-1.7}$ & $1.31^{(d)}$ \\
320: % $12s-13s$ & $2.14^{+0.09}_{-0.08}$ & $22.1^{+1.9}_{-1.6}$ & $0.74^{(d)}$ \\
321: % $13s-14s$ & $2.55^{+0.12}_{-0.11}$ & $15.1^{+1.4}_{-1.2}$ & $1.13$ \\
322: % $14s-15s$ & $2.89^{+0.16}_{-0.14}$ & $11.3^{+1.2}_{-1.0}$ & $0.63$ \\
323: % $15s-17s$ & $2.56 \pm 0.09$ & $13.5^{+1.0}_{-0.9}$ & $1.37$ \\
324: % $17s-19s$ & $2.05^{+0.10}_{-0.09}$ & $18.0^{+1.8}_{-1.5}$ & $1.23$ \\
325: % $19s-21s$ & $1.78 \pm 0.09$ & $22.4^{+2.5}_{-2.1}$ & $1.18$ \\
326: % $21s-24s$ & $1.75 \pm 0.07$ & $20.6^{+1.8}_{-1.6}$ & $1.03$ \\
327: % $24s-28s$ & $1.78 \pm 0.09$ & $17.2^{+2.1}_{-1.7}$ & $1.41$ \\
328: % $28s-33s$ & $1.57^{+0.07}_{-0.08}$ & $20.4^{+2.3}_{-1.9}$ & $0.67$ \\
329: % $33s-40s$ & $1.53^{+0.10}_{-0.09}$ & $18.1^{+2.7}_{-2.1}$ & $1.63$ \\
330: % $40s-50s$ & $1.36^{+0.10}_{-0.09}$ & $17.8^{+3.0}_{-2.2}$ & $1.02$ \\
331: % $50s-70s$ & $1.24^{+0.09}_{-0.08}$ & $17.9^{+3.0}_{-2.3}$ & $0.70$ \\
332: %\noalign{\smallskip} \hline\noalign{\smallskip}
333: %\noalign{ $^{(a)}$ The zero is the burst time (see Table 1);
334: % $^{(b)}$ 27 d.o.f.; $^{(c)}$ 25 d.o.f.; $^{(d)}$ 26 d.o.f.}
335: %\end{tabular}
336: %\end{flushleft}
337: %\end{table}
338: %_____________________________________________________________________________________
339:
340:
341:
342: \section{Data Analysis and Results}
343:
344: % Energy resolved time analysis of the bursts was performed to study the spectral
345: % evolution of the observed events.
346: Energy-resolved time histories of the bursts were constructed by accumulating
347: the detector counts associated with the shadowgram obtained for the
348: sky position of the analysed source, thus improving the signal-to-noise ratio of the profile.
349: For a given source, the background is the sum of (part of) the diffuse X-ray background, the particles
350: background and the contamination of other sources in the field of view.
351: Source contamination is the dominating background component for crowded sky fields like
352: the Galactic Bulge. Nevertheless, the probability of source confusion during a short
353: time-scale event (10--100 s) like an X-ray burst is negligible.
354: The time profiles of burst C were accumulated in three different energy bands
355: (2--5, 5--10, and 10--28 keV, see Fig. 1). The time histories of the other bursts, due
356: to their limited counting statistics, were obtained for the bands 2-8 and 8-28 keV only (Fig.2).
357: The 2-28 keV time profiles of all the bursts are characterized by fast rise times (within a few seconds)
358: and longer exponential decay with {\em e}-folding times of $\sim 15$ s.
359: The high energy time histories of almost all the bursts show clear evidence for double-peaked profiles
360: (see Fig.1 and Fig.2) and their {\em e}-folding times are significantly shorter ($\sim 4-7$ s)
361: than the ones of the low energy profiles ($\sim 15-20$ s), as reported in Table 1.
362:
363: %Energy spectra were accumulated for the six bursts, rebinning when needed in order to accumulate
364: %at least 20 photons per bin to ensure the applicability of the $\chi^{2}$ fitting procedures.
365: The integrated spectra of the eight bursts are all consistent with absorbed blackbody radiation with
366: average colour temperatures of $\sim 2$ keV and an average blackbody radius of the emitting sphere of
367: $\sim 20$ km assuming a standard 10 kpc source distance (Table 1). The spectra were subtracted for the
368: source persistent emission, which accounts for only $\sim 0.5\%$ of the burst peak intensity.
369: The $N_{\rm H}$ parameter could not be satisfactorily constrained for any of the bursts, so we kept
370: its value fixed according to the interpolated value computed at the source position, namely
371: $N_{\rm H} = 7.3\times 10^{21}~{\rm cm}^{-2}$ (\cite{Dick90}).
372:
373: Time-resolved spectra were accumulated for all the bursts, in order to study the time
374: evolution of their spectral parameters. Thanks to the good counting statistics, the spectral
375: analysis of burst C could be performed with a time resolution of 1 s.
376: Conversely, for each of the other bursts only four time resolved spectra could be obtained with a
377: poorer time resolution (4 s). The time intervals of the four spectra were chosen to match
378: the first-peak, interpeak, second-peak and decay phases in the corresponding 8-28 keV burst time
379: profiles (Fig.2).
380: Since all the obtained spectra are consistent with absorbed blackbody emission, the time
381: histories of the colour temperature and the emitting sphere radius can be determined
382: (Table 2 and Fig.3).
383: The blackbody radii were calculated assuming isotropic emission at a source distance of 10 kpc and
384: not correcting for gravitational redshift and conversion to effective blackbody temperature from color
385: temperature (see \cite{Lewi93} for details).
386: A radius expansion by a factor of $\sim 5$ is observed in burst C while, probably due to the larger time
387: bins used, a lower expansion factor ($\sim 2$) is obtained for all the other bursts but burst H,
388: which does not show evidence for radius variations.
389:
390:
391:
392: %----------------------------------------------------------- Figure 3
393: \begin{figure}[htb]
394: \psfig{figure=4u_fig3.ps,width=8.3cm,clip=t}
395: \caption{
396: Time histories of the 2-28 keV count rate (upper panel),
397: of the blackbody colour temperature (central panel), and
398: of the blackbody radius (lower panel), as observed for
399: burst C.
400: }
401: \label{Fig3}
402: \end{figure}
403: %______________________________________________________________
404:
405:
406:
407:
408: \section{Discussion}
409:
410: Following the classification proposed by \cite{Hoff78}, X-ray bursts are classified in two
411: main types ({\em type-I}, {\em type-II}, see Lewin, van Paradijs \& Taam (1993) for a
412: comprehensive review).
413:
414: %While type-II bursts have been observed only in two peculiar cases, namely the
415: %{\em Rapid Burster} MXB 1730-335 (\cite{Lewi76}) and the {\em Bursting Pulsar}
416: %GRO J1744-28 (\cite{Kouv96}),
417: %type-I bursts are much more common and likely originate from thermonuclear flashes onto a
418: %neutron star surface (\cite{Woos76,Joss78,Taam79}).
419: %All the type-I bursting sources are associated with low mass binary systems (LMXBs), following
420: %the identification of their optical counterparts or, indirectly, from spectral and/or
421: %stellar population (e.g. globular cluster sources) characteristics (\cite{vanP95}).
422: %The spectra of the type-I bursts are typically well fitted by thermal blackbody emission models
423: %having temperatures $k{\rm}T \la 3$ keV (\cite{Swan77}), while their time profiles
424: %have fast rise times, ranging from less than 1~s up to 10~s, and longer exponential decays with
425: %{\em e}-folding times, ranging from seconds to minutes.
426: %The profiles strongly depend on photon energy, decays being shorter at higher energies, so that
427: %burst emission softens during the decay. This softening is usually explained as a result of the
428: %cooling of the neutron star photosphere (e.g. \cite{Lewi95}).
429: %Type-II bursts have been observed only in two peculiar cases, namely the
430: %{\em Rapid Burster} {\em MXB 1730-335} (\cite{Lewi76}) and the {\em Bursting Pulsar}
431: %{\em GRO J1744-28} (\cite{Kouv96}).
432: %They show no spectral softening and are frequently repeated in time, intervals ranging from a few
433: %seconds to hours. Blackbody fits to the type-II bursts are unacceptably poor.
434: %Comptonized models for {\em MXB 1730-335} (\cite{Stel88}) and a power law function
435: %model for {\em GRO J1744-28} (\cite{Gile96}) fit the data better. Moreover,
436: %the {\em Bursting Pulsar} spectra of the steady emission and the bursts are very similar.
437: %Type-II bursts are thought to originate from accretion instabilities
438: %(\cite{Lewi95}).
439:
440: On the basis of the spectral and timing properties of the eight bursts observed by the WFCs,
441: it is apparent that 4U~1812$-$12 is a type-I burster.
442: In fact, the blackbody emission and the measured colour temperatures of $\sim 2$ keV are consistent
443: with type-I bursting. Moreover, spectral softening is observed in the time resolved spectra of the
444: bursts (Table 2 and Figure 3), and the bursts time profiles can be fitted with exponential decays
445: whose characteristic times are significantly shorter at higher energies (see e.g. Table 1).
446: These results confirm the measurements obtained 15 years earlier by {\em Hakucho} (\cite{Mura83}),
447: indicating 4U~1812$-$12 is a neutron-star low-mass X-ray binary.
448:
449: The photospheric radius expansion derived from the time resolved spectral analysis of most of the
450: observed bursts can be interpreted as adiabatic expansion during a high luminosity (Eddington-limit)
451: type-I burst. Actually, the double-peaked profiles observed in the high energy (above 8 keV) time
452: histories of the bursts (with the only exception of burst H) are typical of super-Eddington events
453: (e.g. \cite{Lewi95}).
454: Even though burst H is not double-peaked, its peak luminosity is consistent with those of the other
455: observed events. Moreover, its 8--28 keV time profile could be associated with the flat-top profiles
456: of some observed Eddington-limited type-I bursts (\cite{Lewi95}), so burst H too can be regarded as
457: an event with peak luminosity close to the Eddington limit.
458: We also notice that the two bursts which show less clear evidence for photospheric radius expansion,
459: namely bursts E and H, are the less energetic ones, their fluences being the lowest observed (Table 1).
460: We can regard their total energy release ($\sim 5\times 10^{39}$ erg assuming a 4 kpc distance, see later)
461: as the minimum needed to drive the expansion of the photosphere of the neutron star in 4U~1812$-$12.
462:
463: Eddington-luminosity X-ray bursts can lead to an estimate of the source distance, assuming the burst
464: emission to be isotropic and the peak flux to be very close to the Eddington luminosity.
465: Actually, the peak intensities observed for the eight events are all consistent with a constant
466: value of $4.53 \pm 0.09$ Crab (2--28 keV); the associated reduced $\chi^2$ is 1.03
467: for 7 d.o.f..
468: This average peak intensity extrapolates to an unabsorbed bolometric flux of
469: $(15.03 \pm 0.29)\times 10^{-8}~{\rm erg~cm}^{-2}~{\rm s}^{-1}$.
470: The consistency of the peak luminosities of all the bursts with a constant value supports the
471: adoption of the peak bolometric intensities of super-Eddington bursts as a standard candle.
472: An average luminosity of Eddington-limited bursts was empirically calculated by Lewin, van Paradijs and
473: Taam (1995) on a sample of bursters whose distance was estimated with other methods:
474: a luminosity value of ($3.0\pm 0.6\times 10^{38}~{\rm erg~s}^{-1}$) was obtained.
475: The adoption of this standard luminosity leads to a distance value $d = 4.1\pm 0.5$ kpc for 4U~1812$-$12.
476: On the other hand, assuming the theoretical Eddington luminosity for a typical
477: $1.4~{\rm M}_{\sun}$ neutron star ($\sim 2\times 10^{38}~{\rm erg~s}^{-1}$) we obtain $d \sim 3.3$ kpc.
478: For the calculated distance of $\sim 4$ kpc, and with the simple assumptions on the burst emission made
479: in Section 3, an average radius of $8\pm 1$ km for the blackbody emitting region during the bursts is
480: obtained.
481: This value, which supports the neutron-star nature of the collapsed object, should indeed be regarded as
482: a lower limit for the actual neutron star radius, according to Ebisuzaki, Hanawa \& Sugimoto (1984).
483:
484: Assuming the source's persistent spectrum to be consistent with the one suggested by Barret
485: et al. (2000) for the X-ray bursters in low state, i.e. a Comptonized spectrum with electron temperature
486: $k{\rm T}_{e} \sim 25$~keV and $\tau \sim 3$, the bolometric luminosity of 4U~1812$-$12 can be
487: extrapolated.
488: For a distance of $\sim 4$ kpc and an average 2--10 keV persistent intensity of
489: $\sim 4\times10^{-10}~{\rm erg~cm}^{-2}{\rm s}^{-1}$, we obtain
490: $L_{bol} \sim 5.6\times 10^{36}~{\rm erg~s}^{-1}$.
491: We also derive, for a canonical $1.4~{\rm M}_{\odot}$ neutron star with a radius of 10 km, an average
492: accretion rate of $\sim 5\times10^{-10}~{\rm M}_{\odot}{\rm y}^{-1}$.
493: These values are common among low-mass X-ray binaries.
494:
495: Due to the non-continuous WFCs coverage of the Galactic Centre region and to the {\em BeppoSAX}
496: orbit characteristics, we cannot accurately establish the burst occurrence rate of 4U~1812$-$12.
497: Anyway the minimum observed intervals are 6.53 d and 6.16 d for bursts A-B (August 1996) and F-G
498: (October 1998) respectively, and such intervals are of the same order of magnitude than the one
499: measured by {\em Hakucho} in 1982 (4.61 d). Under the hypothesis that the above values are the
500: actual wait times for bursts B and G, we can calculate the ratio $\alpha = E_{p}/E_{b}$, where
501: $E_{b}$ and $E_{p}$ are the bolometric fluences of the burst and of the persistent emission between
502: two contiguous bursts, respectively.
503: Average 2--10 keV intensities of $(4.4\pm 0.4) \times 10^{-10}~{\rm erg~cm}^{-2}{\rm s}^{-1}$ and
504: $(3.5 \pm 0.9) \times 10^{-10}~{\rm erg~cm}^{-2}{\rm s}^{-1}$ were measured by {\em RXTE}-ASM
505: between bursts A-B and F-G respectively. Again, with the former assumptions on the spectrum of the
506: persistent emission, we determine $\alpha = (6.4\pm 1.0)\times 10^{2}$ and
507: $\alpha = (5.8\pm 1.9)\times 10^{2}$ for the two events.
508: These values are consistent with each other and are within the observed range ($10-10^{3}$,
509: distribution peaking at $\sim 10^{2}$) for the $\alpha$ parameter of known X-ray bursters, even if
510: on the higher side. This is suggestive of helium-burning with no spare fuel left for the next burst,
511: and possibly of steady burning of part of the accreted matter ({\cite{Lewi93, vanP88}).
512:
513: As pointed out above, the eight bursts we analysed show very similar features. Moreover,
514: their characteristics are also consistent with those of the bursts detected by {\em Hakucho}
515: (\cite{Mura83}). For the {\em Hakucho} bursts, 1--22 keV peak intensities of $\sim 4.6$ Crab were
516: measured.
517: Also the event Burderi et al. (1997) reported to have very different burst parameters, i.e. single
518: peak profile and much lower luminosity (1.2 Crab in 1.5--10 keV), is actually very similar to the
519: others, according to the results of our re-analysis (burst D).
520: The above consistencies, together with the $\sim 5-6$ d burst wait times observed by both {\em Hakucho}
521: and {\em BeppoSAX}, suggest the burst characteristics of the binary 4U~1812$-$12 to be remarkably stable
522: in observations spanning $\sim 15$ years apart.
523:
524:
525:
526:
527:
528: \begin{acknowledgements}
529: We thank the staff of the {\em BeppoSAX Science Operation Centre} and {\em Science
530: Data Centre} for their help in carrying out and processing the WFC Galactic Centre
531: observations. The {\em BeppoSAX} satellite is a joint Italian and Dutch program.
532: M.C., A.B., L.N. and P.U. thank Agenzia Spaziale Nazionale ({\em ASI}) for grant support.
533: M.C. also thanks M. Federici (IAS) for technical support.
534: \end{acknowledgements}
535:
536:
537:
538: \begin{thebibliography}{}
539:
540: \bibitem[Barret et al. 2000]{Barr00}
541: Barret, D., Olive, J.F., Boirin, L., Done, C., Skinner, G.K., Grindlay, J.E. 2000, ApJ, in press
542: \bibitem[Burderi et al. 1997]{Burd97}
543: Burderi, L., et al. 1997, IAUC 6603
544: \bibitem[Cocchi et al. 1998a]{Cocc98a}
545: Cocchi, M., et al. 1998a, Nucl.Phys. B 69/1-3, 232
546: \bibitem[Dickey \& Lockman 1990]{Dick90}
547: Dickey, J.M., \& Lockman, F.J. 1990, A\&A Rev., 28, 215
548: \bibitem[Ebisuzaki, Hanawa \& Sugimoto 1984]{Ebis84}
549: Ebisuzaki, T., Hanawa T., \& Sugimoto, D. 1984, PASJ, 36, 551
550: \bibitem[Forman, Jones, \& Tananbaum 1976]{Form76}
551: Forman, W., Jones, C., \& Tananbaum, H. 1976, ApJ, 206, L29
552: \bibitem[Forman et al. 1978]{Form78}
553: Forman, W., et al. 1978, ApJ Suppl., 38, 357
554: \bibitem[Friedman, Byram \& Chubb 1967]{Frie67}
555: Friedman, H., Byram, E.T., \& Chubb, T.A. 1967, Science, 156, 374
556: \bibitem[Gottwald et al. 1995]{Gott95}
557: Gottwald, M., Parmar, A.N., Reynolds, A.P., White, N.E., Peacock, A., Taylor, B.G. 1995, A\&A Suppl., 109, 9G.
558: \bibitem[Heise 1998]{Heis98}
559: Heise, J. 1998, Nucl.Phys. B 69/1-3, 186
560: \bibitem[Heise et al. 1999]{Heis99}
561: Heise, J., et al. 1999, Astrophysical Letters and Communications, 38 1-6, 297
562: \bibitem[Hoffman, Marshall, \& Lewin 1978]{Hoff78}
563: Hoffman, J.A., Marshall, H.L., \& Lewin, W.H.G. 1978, Nature, 271, 630
564: \bibitem[Jager et al. 1997]{Jage97}
565: Jager, R., et al. 1997, A\&A, 125, 557
566: \bibitem[Lewin, van Paradijs, \& Taam 1993]{Lewi93}
567: Lewin, W.H.G., van Paradijs, J., \& Taam, R.E. 1993, Space Sci. Rev., 62, 223
568: \bibitem[Lewin, van Paradijs, \& Taam 1995]{Lewi95}
569: Lewin, W.H.G., van Paradijs, J., \& Taam, R.E. 1995, in {\em "X-ray Binaries"},
570: ed. W. Lewin, J. van Paradijs, \& E. van den Heuvel,
571: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 175
572: \bibitem[Markert et al. 1979]{Mark79}
573: Markert, T.H., et al. 1979, ApJ Suppl., 39, 573
574: \bibitem[Murakami et al. 1983]{Mura83}
575: Murakami, T., et al. 1983, PASJ, 35, 531
576: \bibitem[Ubertini et al. 1999]{Uber99}
577: Ubertini P., et al., 1999, Astrophysical Letters and Communications, 38 1-6, 301
578: \bibitem[van Paradijs et al. 1988]{vanP88}
579: van Paradijs, J., Pennix, W., Lewin, W.H.G., Sztajno, M., Tr\"umper, J. 1988, A\&A, 192, 147
580: \bibitem[Warwick et al. 1981]{Warw81}
581: Warwick, R.S., et al. 1981, MNRAS, 197, 865
582: \bibitem[Warwick et al. 1988]{Warw88}
583: Warwick, R.S., Norton, A.J., Turner, M.J.L., Watson, M.G., Willingale, R. 1988, MNRAS, 232, 551
584: \bibitem[Wijnands \& van der Klis 1999]{Wijn99}
585: Wijnands, R., \& van der Klis, M. 1999, ApJ, 514, 939
586: \bibitem[Wood et al. 1984]{Wood84}
587: Wood, K.S., et al. 1984, ApJ Suppl., 56, 507
588:
589:
590: % \bibitem[Bazzano et al. 1997]{Bazz97}
591: % Bazzano, A., et al. 1997, proc. $4^{th}$ Compton Symp., CP410, 729
592: % \bibitem[Chen, Shrader, \& Livio 1997]{Chen97}
593: % Chen, W., Shrader, C.R., \& Livio, M. 1997, ApJ, 491, 312.
594: % \bibitem[Churazov et al. 1993]{Chur93}
595: % Churazov, E., et al. 1993, A\&AS, 97, 173.
596: % \bibitem[Cocchi et al. 1998b]{Cocc98b}
597: % Cocchi, M., et al. 1998b, ApJ, 508, L163
598: % \bibitem[Cocchi et al. 1999]{Cocc99}
599: % Cocchi, M., et al. 1999, Proc. $3^{{\rm rd}}$ {\em INTEGRAL} Workshop, Taormina, in press
600: % \bibitem[Giles et al. 1996]{Gile96}
601: % Giles, A.B., et al. 1996, ApJ, 469, L25.
602: % \bibitem[in 't Zand et al. 1998a]{Zand98a}
603: % in 't Zand, J.J.M., et al. 1998a, Nucl.Phys. B 69/1-3, 228
604: % \bibitem[in 't Zand et al. 1998b]{Zand98b}
605: % in 't Zand, J.J.M., et al. 1998b, A\&A, 331, L25
606: %% \bibitem[Joss 1978]{Joss78}
607: %% Joss, P.C. 1978, ApJ, 225, L123.
608: %% \bibitem[Kouveliotou et al. 1996]{Kouv96}
609: %% Kouveliotou, C., et al. 1996, Nature, 379, 799.
610: % \bibitem[Lapidus, Nobili, \& Turolla 1994]{Lapi94}
611: % Lapidus, I., Nobili, L., \& Turolla, R. 1994, ApJ, 433, 287.
612: %% \bibitem[Lewin et al. 1976]{Lewi76}
613: %% Lewin, W.H.G., et al. 1976, ApJ, 207, L95.
614: % \bibitem[Mandrou 1990]{Mand90}
615: % Mandrou, P. 1990, IAUC 5032.
616: % \bibitem[Mitsuda et al. 1990]{Mits90}
617: % Mitsuda, K., Takeshima T., Kii T., and Kawai N. 1990, ApJ, 353, 480.
618: % \bibitem[Nobili, Turolla \& Lapidus 1994]{Nobi94}
619: % Nobili, L., Turolla, R., \& Lapidus, I. 1994, ApJ, 433, 276.
620: % \bibitem[Stella et al. 1988]{Stel88}
621: % Stella, L., Haberl, F., Lewin, W.H.G., Parmar, A.N., van Paradijs, J., \&
622: % White, N.E. 1988, ApJ, 324, 379.
623: %% \bibitem[Swank et al. 1977]{Swan77}
624: %% Swank, J.H., Becker R.H., Boldt, E.A., Holt, S.S., Pravdo, S.H., \&
625: %% Serlemitsos, P.J. 1977, ApJ, 212, L73.
626: %% \bibitem[Taam \& Picklum 1979]{Taam79}
627: %% Taam, R.E., \& Picklum, R.E. 1979, ApJ, 233, 327.
628: % \bibitem[Pavlinsky et al. 1994]{Pavl94}
629: % Pavlinsky, M.N., Grebenev, S.A., and Sunyaev, R.A. 1994, ApJ, 425, 110.
630: % \bibitem[Predehl \& Tr\"{u}mper 1994]{Pred94}
631: % Predehl, P., and Tr\"{u}mper, J. 1994, A\&A, 290, L29.
632: % \bibitem[Skinner et al. 1987]{Skin87}
633: % Skinner, G.K., et al. 1987, Nat, 330, 544
634: % \bibitem[Sunyaev 1990]{Suny90}
635: % Sunyaev, R.A. 1990, IAUC 5104.
636: % \bibitem[Sunyaev et al. 1991]{Suny91}
637: % Sunyaev, R.A., et al. 1991, SvA, 17(1), L42.
638: % \bibitem[Tanaka \& Shibazaki 1996]{Tana96}
639: % Tanaka, Y., \& Shibazaki, N. 1996, ARA\&A, 34, 607.
640: % \bibitem[van Paradijs 1995]{vanP95}
641: % van Paradijs, J. 1995, in {\em "X-ray Binaries"},
642: % ed. W. Lewin, J. van Paradijs, \& E. van den Heuvel,
643: % Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 536
644: % \bibitem[Vargas et al. 1997]{Varg97}
645: % Vargas, M., et al. 1997, proc. 2nd {\em INTEGRAL} Workshop, ESA SP-382, 129.
646: % \bibitem[Watson et al. 1981]{Wats81}
647: % Watson, M.G., Willingale, R., Grindlay, J.E., and Hertz, P. 1981, ApJ, 250, 142
648: %% \bibitem[van Paradijs 1995]{vanP95}
649: %% van Paradijs, J. 1995, in {\em "X-ray Binaries"},
650: %% ed. W. Lewin, J. van Paradijs, \& E. van den Heuvel,
651: %% Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 536
652: %% \bibitem[Woosley \& Taam 1976]{Woos76}
653: %% Woosley, S.E., \& Taam, R.E. 1976, Nature, 263, 101.
654:
655: \end{thebibliography}
656:
657:
658: \end{document}
659: