1: %\documentstyle[12pt,aasms4]{article}
2: \documentstyle[aas2pp4,psbox]{article}
3: \setlength{\topmargin}{-2cm}
4: \setlength{\textheight}{25cm}
5:
6:
7: \slugcomment{To appear in ApJ}
8: \lefthead{J. Yokogawa et al.}
9: \righthead{New Transient X-ray Pulsar in the SMC}
10:
11:
12: \begin{document}
13:
14: \title{{\it ASCA} Observation of the New Transient X-ray Pulsar
15: XTE~J0111.2--7317 in the Small Magellanic Cloud}
16:
17: \author{Jun~Yokogawa\altaffilmark{1},
18: Biswajit~Paul\altaffilmark{2,}\altaffilmark{3},
19: Masanobu~Ozaki\altaffilmark{2},
20: Fumiaki~Nagase\altaffilmark{2},
21: Deepto~Chakrabarty\altaffilmark{4}, and
22: Toshiaki~Takeshima\altaffilmark{5,}\altaffilmark{6}}
23:
24:
25:
26: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Physics, Graduate School of Science,
27: Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan;
28: jun@cr.scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp}
29:
30: \altaffiltext{2}{Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, 3-1-1 Yoshinodai,
31: Sagamihara, Kanagawa 229-8510, Japan;
32: bpaul@astro.isas.ac.jp, ozaki@astro.isas.ac.jp, nagase@astro.isas.ac.jp}
33:
34: \altaffiltext{3}{On leave from the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research,
35: Homi Bhabha Road, Mumbai, 400005, India}
36:
37: \altaffiltext{4}{Department of Physics and Center for Space Research,
38: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA;
39: deepto@space.mit.edu}
40:
41: \altaffiltext{5}{Laboratory for High Energy Astrophysics, NASA,
42: Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA;
43: takeshim@ginpo.gsfc.nasa.gov}
44:
45: \altaffiltext{6}{Universities Space Research Association, Seabrook,
46: MD 20706, USA}
47:
48:
49: \begin{abstract}
50: The new transient X-ray pulsar XTE~J0111.2--7317 was observed with
51: {\it Advanced Satellite for Cosmology and Astrophysics} ({\it ASCA})
52: on 1998 November 18, a few days after its discovery with the Proportional
53: Counter Array onboard the {\it Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer}.
54: The source was detected at a flux level of
55: $3.6\times10^{-10}$~erg~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$ in the 0.7--10.0~keV band,
56: which corresponds to the X-ray luminosity of
57: $1.8\times10^{38}$~erg~s$^{-1}$,
58: if a distance of 65 kpc for this pulsar in the Small Magellanic Cloud is assumed.
59: Nearly sinusoidal pulsations with a
60: period of $30.9497 \pm 0.0004$~s were unambiguously detected during the {\it
61: ASCA} observation. The pulsed fraction is low and slightly energy dependent with average
62: value of $\sim27$\%.
63: The energy spectrum shows a large soft excess below $\sim 2$~keV
64: when fitted to a simple power-law type model.
65: The soft excess is eliminated if the spectrum is fitted to
66: an ``inversely broken power-law'' model,
67: in which photon indices below and above a break energy of 1.5~keV
68: are 2.3 and 0.8, respectively.
69: The soft excess can also be described by a blackbody or a thermal bremsstrahlung
70: when the spectrum above $\sim 2$~keV is modeled by a power-law.
71: In these models, however,
72: the thermal soft component requires a very large emission zone,
73: and hence it is difficult to explain the observed
74: pulsations at energies below 2~keV.
75: A bright state of the source enables
76: us to identify a weak iron line feature at 6.4~keV with an equivalent width of
77: $50\pm14$~eV.
78: Pulse phase resolved spectroscopy revealed
79: a slight hardening of the spectrum
80: and marginal indication of an increase
81: in the iron line strength during the pulse maximum.
82: \end{abstract}
83:
84: \keywords{binaries: general --- Magellanic Clouds ---
85: pulsars: individual (XTE~J0111.2--7317) --- X-rays: stars}
86:
87: \section{Introduction}
88:
89: The transient X-ray pulsar XTE~J0111.2--7317 was discovered with the
90: Proportional Counter Array (PCA) of the {\it Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer}
91: ({\it RXTE}) in 1998 November (Chakrabarty et al. 1998a\markcite{Chakrabarty1998a})
92: and was simultaneously detected in hard X-rays
93: (Wilson \& Finger 1998\markcite{Wilson1998}) with
94: the Burst and Transient
95: Source Experiment (BATSE) onboard the {\it Compton Gamma-Ray Observatory}
96: ({\it CGRO}).
97: Public data of {\it CGRO}/BATSE and {\it RXTE}/ASM (All Sky Monitor)
98: revealed that
99: both the hard and the soft X-ray intensities of the source showed two outbursts
100: as shown in Figure \ref{fig:initial}.
101: Initial BATSE measurements also found the pulsar to
102: be spinning-up with a very short time scale of
103: $P/\dot{P} \sim 20$~yr,
104: which is also a confirmation that the compact object is a neutron star.
105: The spin-up rate shows a positive correlation with
106: the flux, which is similar to other transient X-ray pulsars.
107:
108: Following its discovery, a {\it Target of Opportunity} observation was made
109: with the {\it Advanced Satellite for Cosmology and Astrophysics} ({\it ASCA})
110: and the position of the X-ray source was determined precisely
111: (Chakrabarty et al. 1998b\markcite{Chakrabarty1998b}).
112: Previous observations of the field with {\it EINSTEIN} and
113: {\it ROSAT} did not detect any source at the position determined
114: with {\it ASCA} (Wang \& Wu 1992\markcite{Wang1992};
115: Kahabka \& Pietsch 1996\markcite{Kahabka1996};
116: Cowley et al. 1997\markcite{Cowley1997};
117: Kahabka et al. 1999\markcite{Kahabka1999};
118: Schmidtke et al. 1999\markcite{Schmidtke1999}),
119: confirming its true transient nature.
120: Since transient pulsars in our Galaxy are located in the Galactic plane
121: whereas XTE~J0111.2--7317 is located
122: in the direction of the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC),
123: i.e. at high Galactic lattitude ($\sim -43^\circ$),
124: it is very likely that XTE~J0111.2--7317 lies in the SMC.
125: A candidate for the optical counterpart was detected in the
126: {\it ASCA} error circle, and was found to be
127: emitting strong H$\alpha$ and H$\beta$ lines
128: (Israel et al. 1999\markcite{Israel1999};
129: Coe et al. 1999\markcite{Coe1999}).
130: Coe et al. (1999\markcite{Coe1999}) also determined
131: the velocity shift of optical emission lines to be
132: $166 \pm 15$~km~s$^{-1}$, which indicates that
133: this object is in the SMC.
134: Therefore the distance would be large (65~kpc is assumed in this paper),
135: which indicates a very high luminosity, in excess of
136: 10$^{38}$~erg~s$^{-1}$ in the 2.0--10.0~keV band during the transient phase.
137:
138:
139: The {\it ASCA} observation of the source was made to study the
140: pulsations and the soft X-ray spectrum extending upto 10~keV.
141: Though the {\it ASCA} observation happened to coincide with the quiescent
142: period between the two outbursts (Figure \ref{fig:initial}),
143: the source was bright enough for
144: us to make a detailed study of its energy spectrum. We present here
145: results of
146: our temporal and spectral study
147: of this source made with the {\it ASCA} data. The principal
148: result from this study is discovery of a soft excess in the spectrum
149: which is modeled as an ``inversely broken power-law model.''
150: In the following sections, we present the details
151: of the observation and the temporal and spectral analysis, and discuss
152: the results suggesting that this source is a Be/X-ray binary.
153:
154: \section{Observation and Analysis}
155:
156: The observation of the new transient X-ray pulsar XTE~J0111.2--7317
157: in the SMC region
158: was made between 1998 November 18.73 UT and November 19.65 UT with
159: two Solid-state Imaging Spectrometers (SIS) and two Gas Imaging
160: Spectrometers (GIS) of {\it ASCA}. The SIS CCDs were operated in 1-CCD
161: Faint/Bright mode with time resolution of 4~s,
162: and the GIS detectors were operated in normal PH mode
163: which has higher time resolution of 62.5 ms. For details about
164: {\it ASCA} itself,
165: its X-ray Telescope (XRT), and the focal plane instruments SIS and GIS,
166: please refer to Tanaka, Inoue, \& Holt (1994)\markcite{Tanaka1994},
167: Serlemitsos et al. (1995)\markcite{Serlemitsos1995},
168: Burke et al. (1994)\markcite{Burke1994}, and
169: Ohashi et al. (1996)\markcite{Ohashi1996}.
170: The observation resulted in 19.8 ks and
171: 25.7 ks of useful exposures with the SIS and GIS detectors respectively.
172: Average source count rates in the four {\it ASCA} detectors are 3.5 (SIS0), 2.7
173: (SIS1), 1.7 (GIS2), and 2.3 (GIS3) per second. The differences in the
174: count rates between the two identical SIS or GIS detectors are due to
175: different mirror efficiencies for the nominal positions.
176: The source coordinates obtained from the SIS data are,
177: R.A. = $01^{\rm h} 11^{\rm m} 14\fs 5$,
178: Dec = $-73^\circ 16' 50''$ (epoch 2000),
179: with an uncertainty radius of $30''$ at 90\% confidence level
180: (Chakrabarty et al. 1998b\markcite{Chakrabarty1998b}).
181:
182: All data were collected when the satellite was outside
183: the South Atlantic Anomaly region and
184: deviation from nominal pointing was less than 0\fdg 01.
185: We have used the standard data reduction criteria of the {\it ASCA} guest
186: observer facility by applying
187: minimum cut-off rigidity of 6/4 GeV/$c$
188: and minimum elevation angle of 10$^\circ$/5$^\circ$
189: for SIS/GIS, respectively.
190: Minimum angle from the bright earth's limb of 20$^\circ$ was also applied
191: for the SIS data.
192: Data from the hot and flickering pixels
193: of the SIS detectors were removed. Charged particle events were removed
194: from the GIS data
195: based on the rise time discrimination method. The count rates and spectra
196: of the source were obtained from circular regions of $6'$ diameter for
197: the GIS detectors and $4'$ diameter for the SIS detectors, and the
198: background data were obtained from sections of the rest of the field of view.
199:
200:
201:
202: \subsection{Timing analysis}
203:
204: To study the temporal properties, we have produced light curves from the
205: two GIS detectors with 0.5~s time resolution. Arrival times of the
206: photons were corrected to the solar system barycenter. Data from the two
207: detectors were added and a power spectrum was generated. Pulsations were
208: detected unambiguously with a barycentric period of 30.9497 $\pm$ 0.0004~s.
209: The pulse profile is predominantly sinusoidal with indication of one
210: additional peak. We also have generated pulse profiles in three different
211: energy bands of 0.7--2.0, 2.0--5.0, and 5.0--10.0~keV. The pulse
212: profiles in these energy bands plotted in Figure \ref{fig:pp}
213: show slight differences
214: in shape and larger modulation at higher energy. The pulsed fraction, defined
215: as the ratio of the pulsed intensity to the total intensity in the entire
216: energy band of 0.7--10.0~keV, is found to be 25\% and 29\% with the SIS and GIS,
217: respectively.
218: The pulsed fractions in different smaller energy bands with
219: the SIS and GIS are 17\% and 24\% in 0.7--2.0~keV range, 27\% and 30\% in
220: 2.0--5.0~keV range, and 28\% and 31\% in 5.0--10.0~keV range, respectively.
221: The error of the pulsed fraction is estimated to be $\sim 1$--2\% in each band.
222: The difference in the pulsed fraction between SIS and GIS
223: would be mainly due to the fact that
224: the pulsed fraction is larger at higher energy and the relative detection
225: efficiency of GIS to SIS increases with energy.
226: The poorer time resolution of SIS may also be responsible for
227: the difference of pulsed fraction.
228: The smaller pulsed fraction at lower energy suggests
229: spectral hardening during the pulse peak.
230:
231:
232: We also searched for variation of a time scale
233: from $\sim {\rm minute}$ to $\sim {\rm hour}$ in the light curve,
234: but no significant variation was found.
235:
236: \placefigure{fig:pp}
237:
238: \subsection{Spectral analysis}
239: \subsubsection{Phase-averaged spectra}
240: After appropriate background subtraction, spectra from the two pairs of
241: SIS and GIS detectors were combined and the two resultant spectra were
242: fitted simultaneously with slightly different normalizations for the SIS and GIS.
243: The energy ranges chosen for spectral fitting are 0.55--10.0~keV for the
244: SIS and 0.7--10.0~keV for the GIS.
245: We first applied several conventional single-component models,
246: such as a simple power-law, a broken power-law, and
247: a power-law with exponential cutoff, with a neutral absorber.
248: We found that these models were inadequate to represent the spectra well:
249: reduced $\chi^2$ was $\sim 2.77$ for $\sim 840$ degrees of freedom,
250: because the residuals to the model fit showed presence of a soft excess
251: below $\sim 2$~keV
252: and indication of an emission line around 6.4~keV.
253: We also found that the {\it ASCA} bandpass does not extend
254: high enough (20--30~keV) to detect the type of spectral break
255: observed in most X-ray pulsars.
256:
257:
258: The emission-line feature was well described by a narrow gaussian centered at 6.4~keV.
259: The continuum shape including the soft excess could be
260: represented by an ``inversely broken power-law,''
261: which is a broken power-law with a larger/smaller photon index
262: ($\Gamma_1/\Gamma_2$)
263: below/above a break energy $E_{\rm b}$.
264: Thus the model of incident photons $f(E)$ follows these equations:
265: \begin{eqnarray*}
266: f(E) &=& e^{-\sigma(E) N_{\rm H}}
267: \left(f_{\rm P}(E) + f_{\rm Fe}(E)\right) \\
268: & & {\rm \ \ \ \ \ [photons\ s^{-1}\ cm^{-2}\ keV^{-1}]}, \\
269: f_{\rm P}(E) &=& \left\{
270: \begin{array}{@{\,}l@{\,}}
271: I_{\rm P} E^{-\Gamma_1} \ (E < E_{\rm b}) \\
272: I_{\rm P} E_{\rm b}^{(\Gamma_2 - \Gamma_1)}E^{-\Gamma_2} \
273: (E \geq E_{\rm b};\ \Gamma_2 < \Gamma_1) \\
274: \end{array}
275: \right\},\\
276: f_{\rm Fe}(E) &=& \frac{I_{\rm Fe}}{\sqrt{2 \pi \sigma_{\rm Fe}^2}}
277: \exp{[-\frac{(E-E_{\rm Fe})^2}{2\sigma_{\rm Fe}^2}]},
278: \end{eqnarray*}
279: where $E$ and $\sigma(E)$ are the incident photon energy
280: and a photoelectric absorption cross-section
281: (Morrison \& McCammon 1983\markcite{Morrison1983}), respectively.
282: We treated $N_{\rm H}$, $I_{\rm P}$, $\Gamma_1$, $\Gamma_2$,
283: $E_{\rm b}$, and $I_{\rm Fe}$ as free parameters,
284: while $\sigma_{\rm Fe}$ and $E_{\rm Fe}$ were fixed to be
285: zero and 6.4~keV, respectively.
286: Best-fit parameters for this model are listed in Table 1.
287: Figure \ref{fig:sp} shows the observed spectra together with the best-fit model,
288: while the deconvolved model spectrum is shown in Figure \ref{fig:model}.
289:
290: \placefigure{fig:sp}
291: \placefigure{fig:model}
292: \placetable{tbl-1}
293:
294:
295: We found that
296: two-component models constructed with a hard power-law ($\Gamma \sim 0.77$)
297: and a soft component such as a blackbody or a bremsstrahlung,
298: which is dominant only below 2~keV,
299: could give almost the same fit for the spectra.
300: However, these models require a very large emission region
301: for the soft component.
302: If, in the power-law plus blackbody model,
303: the soft component is assumed to be isotropic blackbody emission from a spherical
304: surface, the corresponding radius is estimated to be $>800$ km, which is
305: much larger than the neutron star surface area.
306: In the power-law plus bremsstrahlung model, on the other hand,
307: the emission measure is very high ($>10^{62}$~cm$^{-3}$).
308: Taking account of the pulsed fraction below and above 2~keV
309: ($\sim 20$\% and 30\% respectively),
310: and the fact that the soft component in these models is responsible for
311: $\sim 70$\% of emission below 2~keV,
312: we conclude that the soft component should be pulsating.
313: In fact, we extracted on-pulse and off-pulse spectra
314: from phase 0--0.5 and 0.5--1, respectively, and
315: fitted them with the two-component models mentioned above.
316: The fitting result indicated that the pulsed fraction of the soft compoent
317: in 0.7--2.0~keV band is at least 10--15\%.
318: The large emission region of the soft component could not
319: explain the pulsation, thus we rejected these two-component models.
320:
321: Another two-component model constructed with two power-laws
322: and a common absorption also gave a statistically identical fit.
323: In this model, however, the soft power-law is very steep
324: ($\Gamma \sim 6$) and hence the absorption column density
325: became large ($\sim 7\times 10^{21}$~H~cm$^{-2}$).
326: This requires a deep absorption edge at around 0.6~keV which is
327: inconsistent with the SIS spectrum, thus we rejected this model.
328:
329:
330:
331: \subsubsection{Phase-resolved spectra}
332: The multiband pulse profiles as shown in Figure \ref{fig:pp} indicate
333: a slight energy dependence in their amplitude and shape.
334: To investigate this in detail,
335: we have carried out pulse phase resolved spectroscopy.
336: We divided the entire pulse phase into four smaller
337: phases describing the minimum, rising, maximum, and decaying part of the
338: profile, respectively, as shown in the bottom panel of Figure \ref{fig:pp}.
339: We fitted the phase-resolved spectra with the same model, and a summary
340: of the result is given in Table 1.
341: The photon indices are marginally smaller during the pulse maximum, in accordance
342: with the energy dependence of the pulsed fraction and the pulse shape in Figure \ref{fig:pp}.
343: The iron line equivalent width does not indicate a strong pulse phase dependence.
344: On the other hand, the iron line normalization
345: probably indicates an increase during the pulse maximum.
346: The break energy and the column density of neutral absorber
347: does not indicate a phase dependence.
348:
349:
350: \section{Discussion}
351:
352: \subsection{Recent pulsar discoveries}
353: Recently there has been a significant increase in the discovery of
354: different types of X-ray pulsars owing to good sky coverage of the
355: {\it CGRO}/BATSE and {\it RXTE}/ASM for transient sources,
356: {\it ASCA} survey of the Galactic ridge,
357: and extensive observations with the {\it ROSAT} and {\it BeppoSAX}.
358: The first millisecond pulsar SAX J1808.4--3658 showing type-I bursts
359: has been the most remarkable discovery
360: (Wijnands \& Van Der Klis 1998\markcite{Wijnands1998};
361: Chakrabarty \& Morgan 1998\markcite{Chakrabarty1998c}).
362: The other newly discovered pulsars include
363: a pulsar with type-II bursts,
364: pulsars in SGRs (magnetars), pulsars in SNRs,
365: anomalous 6-s pulsars and many transient pulsars,
366: most of which include a high mass companion. This has improved
367: the sample of X-ray pulsars by about 40\% in the last 2--3 years
368: (Nagase 1999\markcite{Nagase1999}). The present source XTE~J0111.2--7317 is one in a
369: series of new X-ray pulsars discovered in the Magellanic Clouds
370: (summarized in Yokogawa et al. 2000)\markcite{Yokogawa2000}.
371:
372:
373:
374:
375: \subsection{Possible origin of the soft excess}
376:
377: The X-ray continuum spectra of accreting pulsars are often phenomenologically
378: described to be a broken power-law type or a power-law type with exponential
379: cutoff (White et al. 1995\markcite{White1995}).
380: The break in the spectrum
381: for most sources is in the range of 10--20~keV and the power-law
382: photon index below the break energy is in the range of 1--2.
383: However, binary X-ray pulsars which are away from the Galactic plane
384: and therefore experience less interstellar absorption, show the presence of a
385: soft component in the spectrum which has been often described as a blackbody
386: and/or thermal bremsstrahlung emission
387: (SMC X-1, Woo et al. 1995\markcite{Woo1995},
388: Wojdowski et al. 1998\markcite{Wojdowski1998};
389: LMC X-4, Woo et al. 1996\markcite{Woo1996};
390: RX~J0059.2--7138, Kohno, Yokogawa, \& Koyama 2000\markcite{Kohno2000};
391: 4U 1626--67, Orlandini et al. 1998\markcite{Orlandini1998}).
392: A thermal soft component in 4U 1626--67
393: requires the size of emission region to be comparable to that of the
394: neutron star, because the intrinsic luminosity of this source is of the
395: order of 10$^{35}$ erg s$^{-1}$. But for the pulsars in the Magellanic
396: Clouds for which the distance is of the order of 50--60 kpc (and the luminosity
397: is close to the Eddington value), a soft component
398: will require an emission region which is a few
399: orders of magnitude larger than the size of the neutron star. The
400: bremsstrahlung component in LMC X-4, which is dominant in the intermediate
401: energy range of 0.5--1.5~keV, is also found to be pulsating
402: (Woo et al. 1996\markcite{Woo1996}).
403: The pulsating nature of the soft component at least in XTE~J0111.2--7317,
404: LMC X-4, and SMC X-1
405: is difficult to explain if a thermal
406: origin is assumed for the low energy part of the spectrum.
407:
408: The inversely broken power-law model that we have proposed for
409: XTE~J0111.2--7317 can possibly explain the pulsations in the
410: soft X-ray band. If X-rays are emitted from different heights of
411: an accretion column above the polar cap, then harder X-rays would
412: be generated in a lower part of the accretion column, because
413: larger gravitational energy is released there.
414: In this situation, larger pulsed fraction could be naturally
415: expected in the harder X-ray band, due to the proximity of the emission region
416: to the neutron star surface.
417: This explanation is qualitatively consistent with
418: the observed properties, such as
419: the smaller pulsed fraction and the broader peak
420: in the lower energy (see Figure \ref{fig:pp}).
421:
422:
423: {\it ASCA}
424: observations have also revealed the presence of a soft excess
425: dominated by several emission lines near 1~keV,
426: in some high-mass X-ray binary pulsars
427: (Vela X-1, Nagase et al. 1994\markcite{Nagase1994};
428: Cen X-3, Ebisawa et al. 1996\markcite{Ebisawa1996};
429: GX 301--2, Saraswat et al. 1995\markcite{Saraswat1995}).
430: In these sources, pulsation is nearly absent in the low energy band
431: leading to the conclusion that the soft component is originated at a large
432: distance from the neutron star, probably due to scattering of the power-law
433: component by circumstellar material (Nagase et al. 1994\markcite{Nagase1994}).
434: The absence of low energy spectral lines in XTE~J0111.2--7317 and the presence of
435: pulsations at low energy make it different from the pulsars mentioned above.
436:
437:
438:
439:
440:
441: \subsection{Pulse phase dependence of the spectral shape}
442: The fluorescent iron emission line has been detected in many pulsars, and
443: the equivalent width of the line is found to be upto a few hundred eV in
444: some cases (White, Swank, \& Holt 1983\markcite{White1983}).
445: The iron line detected with an equivalent width of 50 eV in
446: XTE~J0111.2--7317 is only modest.
447:
448: In the pulse phase resolved spectra, we
449: have found indication of an increase in the iron line strength during the
450: pulse maximum. Pulse phase resolved spectroscopy of many pulsars indicates
451: an anti correlation between the iron line equivalent width and the intensity
452: (White et al. 1983\markcite{White1983}),
453: which is consistent with the iron line strength
454: being constant. {\it GINGA} observations have indicated a pulse phase
455: dependence of the iron line strength in accretion powered binary pulsars
456: Cen X-3 (Day et al. 1993\markcite{Day1993}),
457: Vela X-1 (Choi et al. 1996\markcite{Choi1996}), and LMC X-4
458: (Woo et al. 1996\markcite{Woo1996}). {\it GINGA} and
459: {\it ASCA} observations of GX 1+4 suggest a constant intensity iron line
460: which shows a large increase in the equivalent width during the pulse
461: minimum (Dotani et al. 1989\markcite{Dotani1989};
462: Kotani et al. 1999\markcite{Kotani1999}). However, a detailed
463: study of the pulse phase dependence of an iron line equivalent width in the
464: X-ray pulsars observed with {\it ASCA} has not been done.
465:
466: The slight
467: hardening of the spectrum observed in XTE~J0111.2--7317 during the pulse
468: maximum is common to many accreting X-ray pulsars
469: (White et al. 1983\markcite{White1983}).
470:
471:
472:
473: \subsection{Energy dependence of the pulse shape}
474: In Figure \ref{fig:pp} we see that the main pulse which arrives at a phase 0.45
475: earlier than the minimum contributes to most of the observed pulsed
476: emission. The secondary peak is at a phase 0.17 after the minimum.
477: The pulse profiles of X-ray pulsars depend on the beaming pattern
478: (fan or pencil), angles between the magnetic axis and the spin axis
479: ($\theta_m$), and that between the observer line of sight and the spin
480: axis ($\theta_r$). If $\theta_m + \theta_r > \pi/2$, a multi-peak
481: profile will be observed because in a pencil beam geometry, emission
482: from both the polar regions will reach the observer during one revolution
483: of the neutron star, and in a fan beam geometry, the line of sight will cross
484: the magnetic equator twice in one revolution
485: (Wang \& Welter 1981\markcite{Wang1981}).
486: However, for such simple explanation to be valid,
487: in pencil beam geometry, the two pulse peaks need to be separated by
488: 0.5 in phase and the two minima should have same intensity level, while
489: in fan beam geometry, the two peaks should have identical strength.
490: Absence of such symmetric features in the pulse profile indicates that
491: the emission pattern is complex and also the two magnetic poles may
492: not be positioned diametrically opposite to each other. A model of pulse
493: profiles, which includes gravitational light bending and a polar cap or
494: a ring type emission zone (Leahy \& Li 1995\markcite{Leahy1995})
495: also does not explain the
496: pulse profiles which are sufficiently complex in structure and show time
497: variation.
498:
499:
500:
501: \subsection{Is XTE~J0111.2--7317 a Be/X-ray system in the SMC?}
502: Although the exact distance to this pulsar has not been measured,
503: a possible optical counterpart,
504: which has been identified as a Be-type star,
505: is likely to be located at the distance of the SMC
506: (Coe et al. 1999\markcite{Coe1999}).
507: In addition, the absorption column density deduced from the spectral analyses
508: ($\sim 2 \times 10^{21}$~H~cm$^{-2}$; Table \ref{tbl-1}) is
509: comparable to the total HI column density in this direction (Luks 1994),
510: which also supports that this object is beyond our Galaxy
511: and possibly in the SMC.
512:
513:
514: The characteristics of this pulsar, like its transient nature, hard X-ray
515: spectrum, high X-ray luminosity, and the rapid
516: spin-up property during the transient phase,
517: are analogous to the pulsars in binary
518: systems with high mass companion (Bildsten et al. 1997\markcite{Bildsten1997}).
519: A pulse period of 31~s is also much
520: larger than the period of X-ray pulsars in low mass binaries.
521: The present outburst is analogous to the giant outbursts
522: seen in Be/X-ray pulsars characterized by high luminosity and high spin-up
523: rates.
524: Considering all these properties in the X-ray band
525: and the existence of a Be star counterpart,
526: we suggest that XTE~J0111.2--7317 is very likely to be
527: a Be/X-ray binary system.
528:
529: The empirical relation between pulse and orbital periods known to
530: exist among the pulsars in Be/X-ray binaries (Corbet 1984\markcite{Corbet1984}),
531: suggesting an orbital
532: period of 30--50 days, is in agreement with the observed light
533: curve during the first 70 days after the transient outburst
534: (Figure \ref{fig:initial}).
535: In the public data of {\it CGRO}/BATSE, the pulse period history shows
536: deviation from a linear trend which can be due to a changing mass-accretion
537: rate or an orbital Doppler shift or a combination of both. If we simply fit
538: the pulse period history with a linear plus sinusoidal function, we
539: obtain a binary period of $\sim 48$~day.
540: This result is consistent with the predicted value mentioned above,
541: hence also supports that this pulsar is a Be/X-ray binary system.
542:
543:
544: However, two anomalies could be noted.
545: One is the photon index of 0.8 above $\sim 2$~keV
546: obtained from this {\it ASCA} observation,
547: which is lower than the typical
548: value of $\sim 1.5$ for the Be/X-ray pulsars (White et al. 1983\markcite{White1983}).
549: The other is the presence of a soft excess with strong pulsations,
550: which is rarely seen in binary pulsars in our Galaxy.
551: However, even if a pulsar in our Galaxy had the soft excess
552: like XTE~J0111.2$-$7317,
553: it could not be observable in most cases
554: due to the strong absorption of the order of $10^{22}$~H~cm$^{-2}$.
555: The Magellanic Cloud pulsars therefore would be very suitable
556: for a systematic study of soft X-rays from binary pulsars.
557:
558:
559:
560:
561: \section{Conclusions}
562:
563: We have presented the {\it ASCA} observation of the newly discovered X-ray
564: pulsar XTE~J0111.2--7317 in its bright transient phase. Pulsations at 30.95~s
565: were unambiguously detected, and the pulse shape and the pulsed fraction
566: are found to have a slight energy dependence.
567: The energy spectrum in the 0.7--10.0~keV band has a soft excess above
568: a simple power-law type model, and can be described by
569: an ``inversely broken power-law'' model,
570: which is a broken power-law with a larger/smaller photon index below/above
571: a break energy.
572:
573:
574:
575:
576: \clearpage
577:
578: \begin{thebibliography}{}
579:
580:
581: \bibitem{Bildsten1997}
582: Bildsten, L., et al. 1997, \apjs, 113, 367
583:
584: \bibitem{Burke1994}
585: Burke, B. E., Mountain, R. W., Daniels, P. J., Dolat, V. S., \& Cooper, M. J.
586: 1994, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., 41, 375
587:
588: \bibitem{Chakrabarty1998a}
589: Chakrabarty, D., Levine, A. M., Clark, G. W., \& Takeshima, T. 1998a, \iaucirc, 7048
590:
591: \bibitem{Chakrabarty1998b}
592: Chakrabarty, D., Takeshima, T., Ozaki, M., Paul, B., \& Yokogawa, J. 1998b,
593: \iaucirc, 7062
594:
595: \bibitem{Chakrabarty1998c}
596: Chakrabarty, D., \& Morgan, E. H. 1998, \nat, 394, 346
597:
598: \bibitem{Choi1996}
599: Choi, C. S., Dotani, T., Day, C. S. R., \& Nagase, F. 1996, \apj, 471, 447
600:
601: \bibitem{Coe1999}
602: Coe, M. J., Haigh, N. J., \& Reig, P. 1999, astro-ph/9912233
603:
604: \bibitem{Corbet1984}
605: Corbet, R. H. D. 1984, \aap, 141, 91
606:
607: \bibitem{Cowley1997}
608: Cowley, A. P., Schmidtke, P. C., McGrath, T. K., Ponder, A. L., Fertig, M. R.,
609: Hutchings, J. B., \& Crampton, D. 1997, \pasp, 109, 21
610:
611:
612: \bibitem{Day1993}
613: Day, C. S. R., Nagase, F., Asai, K., \& Takeshima, T. 1993, \apj, 408, 656
614:
615: \bibitem{Dotani1989}
616: Dotani, T., et al. 1989, \pasj, 41, 427
617:
618: \bibitem{Ebisawa1996}
619: Ebisawa, K., et al. 1996, \pasj, 48, 425
620:
621:
622: \bibitem{Israel1999}
623: Israel, G. L., Stella, L., Covino, S., Campana, S. \& Mereghetti, S. 1999,
624: \iaucirc, 7101
625:
626: \bibitem{Kahabka1996}
627: Kahabka, P., \& Pietsch, W. 1996, \aap, 312, 919
628:
629: \bibitem{Kahabka1999}
630: Kahabka, P., Pietsch, W., Filipovic, M. D., \& Haberl, F. 1999, \aaps, 136, 81
631:
632: \bibitem{Kohno2000}
633: Kohno, M., Yokogawa, J., \& Koyama, K. 2000, \pasj, 52, in press
634:
635: \bibitem{Kotani1999}
636: Kotani, T., Dotani, T., Nagase, F., Greenhill, J. G., Pravdo, S. H., \&
637: Angelini, L. 1999, \apj, 510, 369
638:
639: \bibitem{Leahy1995}
640: Leahy, D. A., \& Li, L. 1995, \mnras, 277, 1177
641:
642: \bibitem{Luks1994}
643: Luks, T. 1994, Rev. Mod. Astr. 7, 171
644:
645: \bibitem{Morrison1983}
646: Morrison, R., \& McCammon, D. 1983, \apj, 270, 119
647:
648: \bibitem{Nagase1994}
649: Nagase, F., Zylstra, G., Sonobe, T., Kotani, T., Inoue, H., \& Woo, J.
650: 1994, \apj, 436, L1
651:
652: \bibitem{Nagase1999}
653: Nagase, F. 1999, Proceedings of the conference on ``Highlights in X-ray
654: Astronomy'' in honour of Joachim Truemper's 65th birthday (Garching, Germany,
655: 1998), in press.
656:
657:
658: \bibitem{Ohashi1996}
659: Ohashi, T., et al. 1996, \pasj, 48, 157
660:
661: \bibitem{Orlandini1998}
662: Orlandini, M., Fiume, D. D., Frontera, F., Del Sordo, S., Piraino, S.,
663: Santangelo, A., Segreto, A., Oosterbroek, T., \& Parmar, A. N.
664: 1998, \apj, 500, L163
665:
666:
667:
668: \bibitem{Saraswat1996}
669: Saraswat, P., et al. 1996, \apj, 463, 726
670:
671: \bibitem{Schmidtke1999}
672: Schmidtke, P. C., Cowley, A. P., Crane, J. D., Taylor, V. A., McGrath, T. T.,
673: Hutchings, J. B., \& Crampton, D. 1999, \aj, 117, 927
674:
675: \bibitem{Serlemitsos1995}
676: Serlemitsos, P. J., et al. 1995, \pasj, 47, 105
677:
678: \bibitem{Tanaka1994}
679: Tanaka, Y., Inoue, H., \& Holt, S. S. 1994, \pasj, 46, L37
680:
681: \bibitem{Wang1981}
682: Wang, Y. M., \& Welter, G. L. 1981, \aap, 102, 97
683:
684: \bibitem{Wang1992}
685: Wang, Q., \& Wu, X. 1992, \apjs, 78, 391
686:
687: \bibitem{Wijnands1998}
688: Wijnands, R., \& Van Der Klis, M. 1998, \nat, 394, 344
689:
690: \bibitem{Wilson1998}
691: Wilson, C. A., \& Finger, M. H. 1998, \iaucirc, 7048
692:
693:
694: \bibitem{White1983}
695: White, N. E., Swank, J. H., \& Holt, S. S. 1983, \apj, 270, 711
696:
697: \bibitem{White1995}
698: White, N. E., Nagase, F., \& Parmar, A. N. 1995, in ``X-ray Binaries'',
699: eds. W. H. G. Lewin, J. van Paradijs \& E. P. J. van den Heuvel
700: (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge), 1
701:
702: \bibitem{Wojdowski1998}
703: Wojdowski, P., Clark, G. W., Levine, A. M., Woo, J. W., \& Zhang, S. N.
704: 1998, \apj, 502, 253
705:
706: \bibitem{Woo1995}
707: Woo, J. W., Clark, G. W., Blondin, J. M., Kallman, T. R., \& Nagase, F.
708: 1995, \apj, 445, 896
709:
710: \bibitem{Woo1996}
711: Woo, J. W., Clark, G. W., Levine, A. M., Corbet, R. H. D., \& Nagase, F.
712: 1996, \apj, 467, 811
713:
714: \bibitem{Yokogawa2000}
715: Yokogawa, J., Imanishi, K., Tsujimoto, M., Nishiuchi, M., Koyama, K.,
716: Nagase, F., \& Corbet, R. H. D. 2000, \apjs, in press
717:
718: \end{thebibliography}
719:
720:
721: \begin{deluxetable}{p{4.0cm}lllll}
722: \small
723: \tablenum{1}
724: \tablecaption{Phase averaged and phase resolved spectral parameters.\label{tbl-1}}
725: \tablewidth{0pt}
726: \tablehead{
727: \colhead{}&\colhead{Average}&\colhead{Rising}&\colhead{Maximum}&\colhead{Decaying}&\colhead{Minimum}}
728:
729: \startdata
730: Source counts (s$^{-1}$) & 10.28 & 11.33 & 13.68 & 10.63 & 8.46 \nl
731: $\Gamma_1$ & $2.3^{+0.1}_{-0.2}$ & $2.3^{+0.4}_{-0.4}$ & $2.0^{+0.3}_{-0.4}$ & $2.2^{+0.3}_{-0.2}$ & $2.2^{+0.3}_{-0.2}$ \nl
732: $\Gamma_2$ & $0.76^{+0.01}_{-0.02}$ & $0.81^{+0.04}_{-0.04}$ & $0.71^{+0.03}_{-0.03}$ & $0.72^{+0.02}_{-0.03}$ & $0.78^{+0.03}_{-0.03}$ \nl
733: $E_{\rm b}$ (keV) & $1.53^{+0.02}_{-0.02}$ & $1.48^{+0.06}_{-0.04}$ & $1.50^{+0.05}_{-0.05}$ & $1.55^{+0.04}_{-0.04}$ & $1.57^{+0.05}_{-0.04}$ \nl
734: $N_{\rm H}$\tablenotemark{a} & $1.8^{+0.3}_{-0.2}$ & $1.9^{+0.7}_{-0.6}$ & $1.6^{+0.6}_{-0.6}$ & $1.7^{+0.4}_{-0.5}$ & $1.6^{+0.5}_{-0.4}$ \nl
735: $I_{\rm Fe}$\tablenotemark{b} & $2.1^{+0.6}_{-0.6}$ & $2.4^{+1.5}_{-1.6}$ & $3.7^{+1.7}_{-1.6}$ & $2.3^{+1.1}_{-1.3}$ & $0.9^{+0.9}_{-0.9}$ \nl
736: Fe-line eq. width (eV) & $50^{+14}_{-14}$ & $55^{+34}_{-37}$ & $67^{+31}_{-29}$ & $55^{+26}_{-31}$ & $28^{+28}_{-28}$ \nl
737: Flux (0.7--10.0~keV)\tablenotemark{c} & 3.6 & 3.8 & 5.0 & 3.8 & 2.9 \nl
738: Reduced $\chi^2$ (dof) & 1.393 (842) & 1.448 (207) & 1.277 (249) & 1.200 (291) & 1.297 (264) \nl
739:
740:
741: \tablenotetext{a}{10$^{21}$ atoms cm$^{-2}$}
742: \tablenotetext{b}{10$^{-4}$ photons cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$}
743: \tablenotetext{c}{10$^{-10}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$}
744: \tablecomments{Errors indicate 90\% confidence limits for a single parameter.}
745: \enddata
746: \end{deluxetable}
747:
748:
749: \begin{figure}
750: \psbox[xsize=0.47\textwidth]{f1.eps}
751: \caption{History of the pulse frequency and flux. (Top panel) pulse frequency
752: determined with {\it CGRO}/BATSE. (Middle panel) BATSE pulsed flux in 20--50 keV.
753: Duration of the ASCA observation is indicated by an ``H''-shaped sign.
754: (Bottom panel) {\it RXTE}/ASM count rate.
755: \label{fig:initial}
756: }
757: \end{figure}
758:
759: \begin{figure}
760: \psbox[xsize=0.47\textwidth]{f2.eps}
761: \caption{Background subtracted pulse profiles obtained with GIS.
762: (Top three panels) pulse profiles in small energy bands
763: 0.7--2.0~keV, 2.0--5.0~keV, and 5.0--10.0~keV.
764: A slight change in the shape and amplitude can be noticed.
765: (Bottom panel) overall pulse shape in 0.7--10.0~keV
766: together with the four pulse regions chosen for the phase
767: resolved spectroscopy.
768: \label{fig:pp}
769: }
770: \end{figure}
771:
772: \begin{figure}
773: \psbox[xsize=0.47\textwidth]{f3a.eps}
774: \psbox[xsize=0.47\textwidth]{f3b.eps}
775: \caption{Energy spectra of XTE~J0111.2--7317 (crosses) plotted with
776: the best fitted incident spectra (solid lines) folded through the detectors response
777: matrices of SIS (a) and GIS (b).
778: Spectra from the pairs of SIS and GIS detectors were added to
779: improve the statistics. The lower panels show the contribution of the
780: residuals towards the $\chi^2$ at each energy bin.
781: \label{fig:sp}
782: }
783: \end{figure}
784:
785:
786: \begin{figure}
787: \psbox[xsize=0.47\textwidth]{f4.eps}
788: \caption{Model spectrum with the best-fit parameters.
789: \label{fig:model}
790: }
791: \end{figure}
792:
793:
794:
795:
796:
797:
798: \end{document}
799: