1: %\documentstyle[12pt,aasms4]{article}
2: \documentstyle[emulateapj]{article}
3: %\documentstyle[aaspp4]{article}
4: %\documentstyle[aas2pp4]{article}
5:
6: \submitted{accepted ApJS, Aug 2000, in press}
7:
8: \begin{document}
9: \title{Magellanic-Cloud-Type Interstellar Dust Along Low Density Sightlines
10: in the Galaxy}
11:
12: \author{Geoffrey C. Clayton$^1$, Karl D. Gordon$^2$, and Michael J. Wolff$^3$}
13:
14: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Physics \& Astronomy, Louisiana State
15: University \\
16: Baton Rouge, LA 70803 \\ Email: gclayton@fenway.phys.lsu.edu}
17: \altaffiltext{2}{Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721 \\
18: Email: kgordon@as.arizona.edu}
19: \altaffiltext{3}{Space Science Institute, 1540 30th Street, Suite 23
20: Boulder, CO 80303-1012 \\ Email: wolff@colorado.edu}
21:
22: \begin{abstract}
23: We have studied the UV extinction properties along 30 Galactic
24: sightlines using data from the {\it International Ultraviolet
25: Explorer} (IUE) archive that have never been previously examined.
26: These distant (d $>$ 1 kpc) sightlines were selected to investigate
27: the distribution and physical conditions of gas located in low density
28: regions of the Galactic disk and halo. The average densities along
29: these sightlines are extremely low. It is likely that they are
30: dominated by the warm intercloud medium and have little contribution
31: from the cold cloud medium. We find that a subsample of these
32: sightlines has extinction curves with weak bumps and very steep far-UV
33: extinction reminiscent of the Magellanic clouds. These sightlines all
34: lie in the region bounded by 325$^o \leq l \leq 0^o$ and -5$^o \geq b
35: \geq -11^o$. The gas along these sightlines shows forbidden
36: velocities which may indicate that the dust has been subject to
37: shocks. This type of low density sightline may mimic the environments
38: found in the Magellanic Clouds. Large values of N(Ca II)/N(Na I)
39: indicating low depletion are associated with steep far-UV extinction.
40: A possible correlation exists between decreasing bump strength and
41: increasing far-UV steepness for extinction curves in the Galaxy and
42: the Magellanic Clouds.
43: \end{abstract}
44:
45: \section{Introduction}
46:
47: There is an average Milky Way extinction relation, A($\lambda$)/A(V),
48: over the wavelength range 0.125 $\mu$m to 3.5 $\mu$m, which is
49: applicable to a wide range of interstellar dust environments,
50: including lines of sight through diffuse dust, and dark cloud dust, as
51: well as dust associated with star formation (Cardelli, Clayton, \&
52: Mathis 1989 (CCM); Cardelli \& Clayton 1991; Mathis \& Cardelli 1992;
53: Fitzpatrick 1999). The existence of this relation, valid over a large
54: wavelength interval, suggests that the environmental processes which
55: modify the grains are efficient and affect all grains. The CCM
56: relation depends on only one parameter, the ratio of
57: total-to-selective extinction, R$_V$ which is a crude measure of the
58: size distribution of interstellar dust grains.
59:
60: However, the CCM relation does not appear to apply beyond the Milky
61: Way. It does not always fit the observed extinction along sightlines
62: observed in the Magellanic Clouds and M31 (e.g., Clayton \& Martin
63: 1985; Fitzpatrick 1985, 1986; Clayton et al. 1996; Bianchi et al.
64: 1996; Gordon \& Clayton 1998; Misselt, Clayton, \& Gordon 1999). The
65: 2175 \AA~bump is weaker and the far-UV extinction is steeper in many
66: of the Magellanic cloud sightlines but there are also sightlines in
67: both the LMC and SMC where the dust extinction does follow CCM. The
68: few lines of sight studied in M31 seem to show a CCM-like far-UV
69: extinction and a weak 2175 \AA~bump (Bianchi et al. 1996). On the
70: other hand, the starburst nucleus of M33 appears to be associated with
71: Milky-Way-type dust (Gordon et al. 1999). The variations in
72: extinction properties seen in the Magellanic Clouds and M31 may be due
73: to several factors. Different environments, such as star formation
74: regions where large amounts of UV radiation and shocks are present,
75: may play a large role in processing dust. Evidence for this can be
76: seen in the LMC where two distinct wavelength dependences of UV
77: extinction have been found for dust inside and outside the supergiant
78: shell, LMC 2, which lies on the southeast side of 30 Dor. This
79: structure was formed by the combined stellar winds and supernovae
80: explosions from the stellar association at its center (Misselt et al.
81: 1999). In the SMC, the dust properties are even more extreme, showing
82: extinction curves for three of four sightlines which have virtually no
83: bump and are very steep in the far-UV (Gordon \& Clayton 1998).
84: Although the dust responsible for these curves is located near regions
85: of star formation in the SMC, the environment is likely to be less
86: severe than for the LMC 2 dust. The 30 Dor region, where LMC 2 is
87: located, is a much larger star forming region than any in the SMC.
88: The dust environments in starburst galaxies and QSOs, which also show
89: SMC-like extinction, are much more extreme than 30 Dor (e.g., Gordon,
90: Calzetti, \& Witt 1997; Pitman, Clayton \& Gordon 2000; Gordon, Smith
91: \& Clayton 2000). The SMC has star formation occurring at only 1\%
92: the rate of a starburst galaxy so other factors such as the known
93: differences in metallicity between galaxies may be important
94: (Fitzpatrick 1986; Gordon \& Clayton 1998; Misselt et al. 1999).
95:
96: Setting aside global metallicity differences, are there sightlines in the Galaxy
97: where the dust environment is similar to those seen in the Magellanic clouds? Real
98: deviations from CCM are seen in the Galaxy but deviations of the kind seen in the
99: Magellanic clouds have been seen only rarely (Cardelli \& Clayton 1991; Mathis \&
100: Cardelli 1992). A few sightlines (e.g., 62542, 204827, and 210121) show
101: weak bumps and anomalously strong far-UV extinction for their measured values of
102: $R_V$. Their extinction curves are plotted in Figure 1. These deviant sightlines
103: represent a variety of dust environments. The Galactic sightline toward HD
104: 62542 is somewhat similar to LMC 2. Its dust was swept up by bubbles blown by two
105: nearby O stars (Cardelli \& Savage 1988). HD 204827 is also in a star formation
106: region where the dust has been subject to shocks (Clayton \& Fitzpatrick 1987).
107: HD 210121 lies
108: behind a single cloud in the halo. There is no present activity near this cloud
109: although it was ejected into the halo at some time in the past. There are
110: some important differences between these Galactic extinction curves
111: and those in the
112: Magellanic clouds. The bump seen for HD 62542 is not just weak but
113: it is very broad and shifted to the blue (Cardelli \& Savage 1988).
114: Mantles on the bump grains has been suggested as the reason for the weak,
115: broad, and shifted Galactic bumps (Mathis \& Cardelli 1992; Mathis 1994). These
116: sightlines show that dust in a variety of environments with a range of
117: $R_V$ values can have extinction curves similar to those in the LMC. However, none
118: of the anomalous Galactic sightlines, seen in Figure 1, approach the SMC extinction
119: properties. The SMC dust has weaker bumps and steeper far-UV extinction than any
120: known Galactic or LMC sightline.
121:
122: \vspace*{0.05in}
123: %\epsscale{0.45}
124: \begin{center}
125: \plotone{f1.eps}
126: \end{center}
127: \figurenum{1}
128: \figcaption{Sightlines in the Galaxy showing anomalous extinction. CCM curves for
129: $R_V$ values of 2.5 and 3.1 are plotted for comparison.}
130: \vspace*{0.2in}
131:
132: Most of the Galactic sightlines, that have been studied previously,
133: differ in one respect from the LMC and SMC
134: sightlines. They are significantly more reddened than the Magellanic cloud
135: sightlines. In particular, those sightlines showing the greatest deviations from
136: CCM, those near the supershell LMC 2 and those in the SMC, all have E(B-V) $<$
137: 0.25. Of the twenty-nine CCM sightlines only two have E(B-V) $<$ 0.30. The others
138: range up to E(B-V) = 1.2. Similarly, the Fitzpatrick \& Massa sample of eighty
139: stars includes only seven with E(B-V) $<$ 0.30 (Fitzpatrick \& Massa 1990;
140: Fitzpatrick 1999). Therefore, the dust along the Magellanic cloud sightlines is
141: more diffuse and more representative of the warm intercloud medium than the cold
142: cloud medium which is better represented in the Galactic samples.
143:
144: Kiszkurno-Koziej \& Lequeux (1987) suggest from ANS extinction measurements of 1200
145: stars in the Galaxy that there may be a correlation between UV extinction
146: parameters and distance from the Galactic plane. As $\vert z \vert$ increases, the bump becomes
147: weaker and the far-UV extinction stronger. These sightlines have low reddenings and
148: long sightlines so they are also more diffuse and therefore more like those in
149: the Magellanic
150: clouds. To investigate whether the extinction properties observed in the
151: Magellanic clouds are related to the diffuse nature of the sightlines, a sample of
152: long sightlines with low reddenings
153: in the Galaxy was chosen and UV data were obtained with the
154: {\it International Ultraviolet Explorer} (IUE) so that
155: extinction curves could be constructed.
156:
157: \section{The Sample}
158:
159: Sembach, Danks, \& Savage (1993) obtained high resolution Na I D and Ca II K
160: spectra for a sample of distant (d $>$ 1 kpc) stars. These sightlines were
161: selected to investigate the distribution and physical conditions of gas located in
162: low density regions of the Galactic disk and halo. The sightlines listed in Table
163: 1 were selected from the Sembach et al. sample for a complementary study of the UV
164: extinction properties of interstellar dust in low density conditions. The Sembach
165: et al. sample is limited to stars with spectral types between O8 and B3 which
166: makes them ideal for extinction studies. Following the definitions of Sembach et
167: al. the sightlines in Table 1 lie outside the Sagittarius spiral arm (IA1),
168: between the Sagittarius and Scutum-Crux spiral arms (IA2), beyond the Scutum-Crux
169: arm toward the Galactic center (GC), and the inner 4 kpc of the Galaxy
170: (IGC). The stars lie at distances ranging from 1.5 to 9.5 kpc and have heights
171: above or below the plane of 0 to 1.5 kpc. Twelve of the sightlines extend
172: into the Galactic halo, defined as $\vert z \vert$ $>$ 500 pc . The locations of
173: these stars in the Galaxy are plotted in Figure 1 of Sembach et al. (1993).
174:
175: \begin{deluxetable}{llllllllllc}
176: \tablewidth{0pt}
177: %\small
178: \footnotesize
179: %\scriptsize
180: \tablecaption{Low Density Interstellar Sightlines in the Galaxy
181: \label{obsdat}}
182: \tablehead{
183: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$HD$} &
184: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$SpT$} &
185: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$V$} &
186: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$E_{B-V}$} &
187: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$l$} &
188: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$b$}&
189: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$d$}&
190: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$z$}&
191: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$Type$}&
192: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$n_o(H I)$}&
193: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$N(Ca II)/N(Na I)$}
194: }
195: \startdata
196: HD 64219&B2.5 III&9.72&0.17&241.99&0.94&3.46&0.06&IA1&0.098&0.49\nl
197: HD 69106&B0.5 IVnn&7.13&0.18&254.52&-1.33&1.49&-0.03&IA1&0.235&0.21\nl
198: HD 93827&B1 Ibn&9.31&0.23&288.55&-1.54&8.31&-0.22&IA2&0.064&0.45\nl
199: HD 94493&B1 Ib&7.23&0.20&289.01&-1.18&3.33&-0.07&IA1&0.121&0.66\nl
200: HD 97848&O8 V&8.68&0.30&290.74&1.53&2.69&0.09&IA2&0.225&0.50\nl
201: HD 100276&B0.5 Ib&7.16&0.26&293.31&0.77&2.96&0.04&IA2&0.172&0.38\nl
202: HD 103779&B0.5 Iab&7.20&0.21&296.85&-1.02&4.02&-0.07&IA2&0.104&0.54\nl
203: HD 104683&B1 Ib&7.92&0.19&297.74&-1.97&4.64&-0.16&IA2&0.090&0.79\nl
204: HD 104705&B0 Ib&7.76&0.26&297.45&-0.34&3.90&-0.02&IA2&0.128&0.67\nl
205: HD 113012&B0.2 Ib&8.12&0.34&304.21&2.77&4.11&0.20&IA2&0.188&0.50\nl
206: %HD 116852&O9 III&8.47&0.22&304.88&-16.13&4.76&-1.32&IA2&0.247&1.06\nl
207: HD 148422&B1 Ia&8.60&0.28&329.92&-5.60&8.84&-0.86&GC&0.125&0.72\nl
208: HD 151805&B1 Ib&8.91&0.32&343.20&1.59&5.94&0.16&IGC&0.119&0.34\nl
209: HD 151990&O9 IV&9.46&0.39&334.99&-5.54&4.47&-0.43&GC&0.244&0.69\nl
210: %HD 156359&O9.7 Ib-II&9.67&0.14&328.68&-14.52&11.1&-2.78&GC&0.132&2.67\nl
211: HD 158243&B1 Iab:&8.15&0.19&337.59&-10.64&6.49&-1.20&IGC&0.145&0.63\nl
212: HD 160993&B1 Iab:&7.73&0.21&345.61&-8.56&5.20&-0.77&IGC&0.149&0.63\nl
213: HD 161653&B1 II&7.11&0.26&352.42&-5.26&1.82&-0.17&IA2&0.315&\nodata\nl
214: HD 163522&B1 Ia&8.46&0.19&349.57&-9.09&9.42&-1.49&IGC&0.119&1.11\nl
215: HD 164019&O9.5 III&9.26&0.53&1.91&-2.62&3.83&-0.28&GC&0.308&\nodata\nl
216: HD 164340&B0.2 III&9.25&0.15&352.06&-8.60&5.46&-0.82&IGC&0.105&0.95\nl
217: HD 165582&B1 II&9.33&0.24&357.49&-6.96&5.21&-0.63&IGC&0.152&0.85\nl
218: HD 167402&B0 Ib&8.95&0.23&2.26&-6.39&7.04&-0.78&IGC&0.121&0.79\nl
219: HD 168941&O9.5 II-III&9.34&0.37&5.82&-6.31&5.79&-0.64&IGC&0.212&$<$0.38\nl
220: HD 172140&B0.5 III&9.96&0.22&5.28&-10.61&6.85&-1.26&IGC&0.165&0.82\nl
221: HD 177989&B0 III&9.33&0.25&17.81&-11.88&4.91&-1.01&GC&0.223&$<$0.25\nl
222: HD 178487&B0 Ia&8.66&0.40&25.78&-8.56&7.66&-1.14&IGC&0.249&$<$0.31\nl
223: HD 179407&B0.5 Ib&9.41&0.31&24.02&-10.40&7.76&-1.40&IGC&0.224&$<$0.39\nl
224: \enddata
225: \end {deluxetable}
226:
227: \section{Extinction Curves}
228:
229: Low dispersion short and long wavelength IUE spectra
230: were obtained between 1991 and 1994 by Jason Cardelli. The spectra listed in Table
231: 2 were downloaded from the IUE archive. The archive spectra were reduced using
232: NEWSIPS and then were recalibrated using the method developed by Massa \&
233: Fitzpatrick (2000). The short and long wavelength spectra for each star were
234: co-added, binned to the instrumental resolution ($\sim$ 5 \AA) and merged at the
235: maximum wavelength of the short wavelength spectrum.
236:
237: \begin{deluxetable}{lllcll}
238: \tablewidth{0pt}
239: \small
240: \tablecaption{Observations}
241: \tablehead{\colhead{Star} & \colhead{Standard} & \colhead{SpT} &
242: \colhead{$\Delta$(B-V)} & \colhead{SWP spectra} &
243: \colhead{LWR/LWP spectra}}
244: \startdata
245: HD 64219 & HD 31726 & B1V & 0.20 & SWP 47546 & LWP 25410/25412 \nl
246: HD 69106 & HD 63922 & B0III & 0.21 & SWP 11114/47547 & LWR 8825 \nl
247: HD 93827 & HD 62747 & B1.5III & 0.29 & SWP 48392/48400 & LWP 26160 \nl
248: HD 94493 & HD 119159 & B0.5III & 0.29 & SWP 47548/47571 &
249: LWP 25413/25420 \nl
250: HD 97848 & HD 47839 & O7V & 0.29 & SWP 39231 & LWP 18380 \nl
251: HD 100276 & HD 64760 & B0.5Ib & 0.25 & SWP 39256 & LWP 18397 \nl
252: HD 103779 & HD 64760 & B0.5Ib & 0.22 & SWP 48391/48399 & LWP 26159/26170 \nl
253: HD 104683 & HD 119159 & B0.5III & 0.28 & SWP 47560 &
254: LWP 25414/25424 \nl
255: HD 104705 & HD 63922 & B0III & 0.28 & SWP 39257 & LWP 18398 \nl
256: HD 113012 & HD 63922 & B0III & 0.41 & SWP 47559 & LWP 25423 \nl
257: %HD 116852 & HD 63922 & B0III & 0.22 & SWP 47561 &
258: % LWR 8091,LWP 24425/25443 \nl
259: HD 148422 & HD 64760 & B0.5Ib & 0.30 & SWP 48329 & LWP 26100 \nl
260: HD 151805 & HD 40111 & B1Ib & 0.34 & SWP 39267 & LWP 18408 \nl
261: HD 151990 & HD 188209 & O9.5Ia & 0.34 & SWP 47555/47570 & LWP 25419 \nl
262: %HD 156359 & HD 167756 & B0Ia & 0.08 & SWP 9325/30358/47554 &
263: % LWR 8086,LWP 25418/25442 \nl
264: HD 158243 & HD 91316 & B1Iab & 0.19 & SWP 48328 & LWP 26099 \nl
265: HD 160993 & HD 40111 & B1Ib & 0.21 & SWP 48334 &
266: LWP 26105/26109 \nl
267: HD 161653 & HD 62747 & B1.5III & 0.25 & SWP 47542 & LWP 25406 \nl
268: HD 163522 & HD 91316 & B1Iab & 0.19 & SWP 48335 & LWP 26106 \nl
269: HD 164019 & HD 167756 & B0Ia & 0.45 & SWP 33407/47543 &
270: LWP 13140/13141/25416/25417 \nl
271: HD 164340 & HD 119159 & B0.5III & 0.14 & SWP 47541/47552 & LWP 25441 \nl
272: HD 165582 & HD 119159 & B0.5III & 0.28 & SWP 48336 & LWP 26107 \nl
273: HD 167402 & HD 167756 & B0Ia & 0.20 & SWP 42336 & LWP 21095 \nl
274: HD 168941 & HD 63922 & B0III & 0.34 & SWP 33409/47540 &
275: LWP 13142/25404 \nl
276: HD 172140 & HD 119159 & B0.5III & 0.24 & SWP 48341 & LWP 26110/26172 \nl
277: HD 177989 & HD 119159 & B0.5III & 0.23 & SWP 42342 & LWP 21110 \nl
278: HD 178487 & HD 167756 & B0Ia & 0.38 & SWP 48413/48415 & LWP 26186 \nl
279: HD 179407 & HD 150168 & B1Ia & 0.28 & SWP 42334 & LWP 21093/21096 \nl
280: \enddata
281: \end{deluxetable}
282:
283: \begin{figure*}[tbp]
284: \figurenum{2}
285: \plottwo{f2a.eps}{f2b.eps} \\
286: \plottwo{f2c.eps}{f2d.eps} \\
287: \plottwo{f2e.eps}{f2f.eps}
288: \caption{Extinction curves for the stars in the sample. Each panel
289: shows the calculated extinction curve (solid line), smoothed curve
290: (small open circles, offset two units for clarity), FM fit (dashed
291: line), CCM relation for $R_V$=3.1 (dotted line), and extinction in the
292: U and B bands (large open circles). One sigma error bars for the
293: unsmoothed extinction curve are plotted at four representative
294: wavelengths. The value of $\Delta (B-V)$ between the reddened and
295: comparison stars is listed.}
296: \end{figure*}
297:
298: \begin{figure*}
299: \figurenum{2 (cont.)}
300: \plottwo{f2g.eps}{f2h.eps}\\
301: \plottwo{f2i.eps}{f2j.eps} \\
302: \plottwo{f2k.eps}{f2l.eps}
303: \caption{Extinction curves for the stars in the sample.}
304: \end{figure*}
305:
306: \begin{figure*}
307: \figurenum{2 (cont.)}
308: \plottwo{f2m.eps}{f2n.eps} \\
309: \plottwo{f2o.eps}{f2p.eps}\\
310: \plottwo{f2q.eps}{f2r.eps}
311: \caption{Extinction curves for the stars in the sample.}
312: \end{figure*}
313:
314: \begin{figure*}
315: \figurenum{2 (cont.)}
316: \plottwo{f2s.eps}{f2t.eps} \\
317: \plottwo{f2u.eps}{f2v.eps} \\
318: \plottwo{f2w.eps}{f2x.eps}\\
319: \plottwo{f2y.eps}{f2z.eps}
320: \caption{Extinction curves for the stars in the sample.}
321: \end{figure*}
322:
323:
324: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccc}
325: \tablewidth{0pt}
326: \small
327: \tablecaption{FM Parameters}
328: \tablehead{\colhead{Star} & \colhead{$c_1$} & \colhead{$c_2$} &
329: \colhead{$c_3$} & \colhead{$c_4$} &
330: \colhead{$x_o$} & \colhead{$\gamma$} }
331: \startdata
332: \multicolumn{7}{c}{Low Density Sample} \nl
333: \tableline
334: HD 64219 & $-0.83 \pm 0.22$ & $ 0.98 \pm 0.10$ & $ 4.36 \pm 0.33$ & $ 0.93 \pm 0.14$ & $ 4.61 \pm 0.01$ & $ 1.01 \pm 0.03$ \nl
335: HD 69106 & $ 0.40 \pm 0.29$ & $ 0.58 \pm 0.06$ & $ 3.40 \pm 0.26$ & $ 0.55 \pm 0.06$ & $ 4.58 \pm 0.01$ & $ 1.01 \pm 0.03$ \nl
336: HD 93827 & $-0.54 \pm 0.15$ & $ 0.83 \pm 0.07$ & $ 4.18 \pm 0.14$ & $ 0.40 \pm 0.03$ & $ 4.59 \pm 0.01$ & $ 1.07 \pm 0.03$ \nl
337: HD 94493 & $-0.95 \pm 0.08$ & $ 0.97 \pm 0.08$ & $ 2.75 \pm 0.17$ & $ 0.26 \pm 0.02$ & $ 4.57 \pm 0.01$ & $ 0.95 \pm 0.01$ \nl
338: HD 97848 & $-0.32 \pm 0.17$ & $ 0.95 \pm 0.07$ & $ 2.57 \pm 0.15$ & $ 0.34 \pm 0.04$ & $ 4.58 \pm 0.01$ & $ 0.89 \pm 0.01$ \nl
339: HD 100276 & $-0.66 \pm 0.18$ & $ 0.81 \pm 0.07$ & $ 3.69 \pm 0.20$ & $ 0.55 \pm 0.07$ & $ 4.57 \pm 0.01$ & $ 0.93 \pm 0.02$ \nl
340: HD 103779 & $ 0.31 \pm 0.18$ & $ 0.63 \pm 0.08$ & $ 3.46 \pm 0.37$ & $ 0.57 \pm 0.04$ & $ 4.54 \pm 0.02$ & $ 0.93 \pm 0.00$ \nl
341: HD 104683 & $-0.75 \pm 0.12$ & $ 0.91 \pm 0.08$ & $ 3.62 \pm 0.14$ & $ 0.19 \pm 0.02$ & $ 4.59 \pm 0.01$ & $ 0.98 \pm 0.02$ \nl
342: HD 104705 & $-0.86 \pm 0.14$ & $ 0.92 \pm 0.07$ & $ 3.89 \pm 0.15$ & $ 0.30 \pm 0.03$ & $ 4.59 \pm 0.01$ & $ 1.13 \pm 0.03$ \nl
343: HD 113012 & $ 0.64 \pm 0.18$ & $ 0.54 \pm 0.03$ & $ 3.51 \pm 0.11$ & $ 0.49 \pm 0.03$ & $ 4.59 \pm 0.01$ & $ 1.00 \pm 0.02$ \nl
344: HD 151805 & $ 1.26 \pm 0.15$ & $ 0.35 \pm 0.04$ & $ 3.48 \pm 0.27$ & $ 0.71 \pm 0.03$ & $ 4.57 \pm 0.01$ & $ 0.94 \pm 0.01$ \nl
345: HD 161653 & $ 0.05 \pm 0.27$ & $ 0.57 \pm 0.04$ & $ 3.93 \pm 0.19$ & $ 0.55 \pm 0.06$ & $ 4.55 \pm 0.01$ & $ 0.93 \pm 0.02$ \nl
346: HD 164019 & $-0.00 \pm 0.13$ & $ 0.76 \pm 0.04$ & $ 2.84 \pm 0.08$ & $ 0.43 \pm 0.03$ & $ 4.58 \pm 0.01$ & $ 0.88 \pm 0.01$ \nl
347: HD 167402 & $-0.78 \pm 0.20$ & $ 1.00 \pm 0.11$ & $ 3.28 \pm 0.20$ & $ 0.63 \pm 0.10$ & $ 4.56 \pm 0.01$ & $ 0.94 \pm 0.03$ \nl
348: HD 168941 & $-0.12 \pm 0.18$ & $ 0.69 \pm 0.04$ & $ 3.35 \pm 0.11$ & $ 0.32 \pm 0.03$ & $ 4.53 \pm 0.01$ & $ 0.98 \pm 0.02$ \nl
349: HD 172140 & $ 0.39 \pm 0.29$ & $ 0.53 \pm 0.04$ & $ 2.80 \pm 0.15$ & $ 0.49 \pm 0.06$ & $ 4.58 \pm 0.01$ & $ 0.94 \pm 0.02$ \nl
350: HD 177989 & $-0.81 \pm 0.21$ & $ 0.85 \pm 0.07$ & $ 3.10 \pm 0.20$ & $ 0.49 \pm 0.07$ & $ 4.56 \pm 0.01$ & $ 0.99 \pm 0.02$ \nl
351: HD 178487 & $-0.32 \pm 0.15$ & $ 0.74 \pm 0.04$ & $ 4.78 \pm 0.19$ & $ 0.32 \pm 0.03$ & $ 4.58 \pm 0.01$ & $ 1.04 \pm 0.01$ \nl
352: HD 179407 & $-1.42 \pm 0.13$ & $ 1.03 \pm 0.07$ & $ 3.59 \pm 0.19$ & $ 0.49 \pm 0.06$ & $ 4.60 \pm 0.01$ & $ 1.03 \pm 0.02$ \nl
353: Average & $-0.47$ & $0.66$ & $3.38$ & $0.35$ & $4.58$ & $0.94$ \nl
354: \tableline
355: \multicolumn{7}{c}{Peculiar Velocity Sample (SD region - 2 curves)} \nl
356: \tableline
357: HD 148422 & $-2.13 \pm 0.07$ & $ 1.36 \pm 0.12$ & $ 3.01 \pm 0.23$ & $ 0.53 \pm 0.03$ & $ 4.58 \pm 0.02$ & $ 0.93 \pm 0.00$ \nl
358: HD 151990 & $-1.07 \pm 0.09$ & $ 1.04 \pm 0.07$ & $ 2.19 \pm 0.06$ & $ 0.68 \pm 0.06$ & $ 4.60 \pm 0.01$ & $ 0.81 \pm 0.02$ \nl
359: HD 158243 & $-2.20 \pm 0.16$ & $ 1.56 \pm 0.22$ & $ 4.26 \pm 0.52$ & $ 0.55 \pm 0.06$ & $ 4.61 \pm 0.02$ & $ 1.16 \pm 0.01$ \nl
360: HD 160993 & $-1.65 \pm 0.08$ & $ 1.43 \pm 0.19$ & $ 3.42 \pm 0.31$ & $ 0.74 \pm 0.07$ & $ 4.72 \pm 0.02$ & $ 1.07 \pm 0.01$ \nl
361: HD 163522 & $-3.70 \pm 0.20$ & $ 1.86 \pm 0.23$ & $ 1.18 \pm 0.07$ & $ 0.51 \pm 0.10$ & $ 4.59 \pm 0.01$ & $ 0.74 \pm 0.03$ \nl
362: HD 164340 & $-2.96 \pm 0.13$ & $ 1.67 \pm 0.28$ & $ 0.79 \pm 0.06$ & $ 0.76 \pm 0.18$ & $ 4.44 \pm 0.02$ & $ 0.79 \pm 0.03$ \nl
363: HD 165582 & $-0.87 \pm 0.12$ & $ 1.10 \pm 0.09$ & $ 2.31 \pm 0.14$ & $ 0.57 \pm 0.06$ & $ 4.61 \pm 0.01$ & $ 0.84 \pm 0.01$ \nl
364: Average & $-1.83$ & $1.19$ & $1.52$ & $0.58$ & $4.60$ & $0.93$ \nl
365: \enddata
366: \end{deluxetable}
367:
368: Extinction curves were constructed using the standard pair method
369: (e.g., Massa, Savage \& Fitzpatrick 1983). Uncertainties in the
370: extinction curves contain terms that depend both on the broadband
371: photometric uncertainties as well as those in the IUE fluxes, which
372: are calculated directly in NEWSIPS. Our error analysis is described
373: in detail in Gordon \& Clayton (1998). The sample includes early type
374: supergiants which may be used with the same accuracy as main sequence
375: stars in calculating extinction (Cardelli, Sembach, \& Mathis 1992).
376: We required $\Delta (B-V) \ge 0.14$ between the reddened and
377: comparison stars to minimize the uncertainties. The comparison stars
378: have been dereddened as described by Cardelli et al. (1992). Table 1
379: lists a value of E(B-V) for each star from Sembach et
380: al. (1993). Table 2 lists the $\Delta (B-V)$ between the measured
381: (B-V) of the reddened star and the $(B-V)_o$ of the best-match
382: dereddened comparison star. The extinction curves for the sample
383: stars are shown in Figure 2.
384:
385: The extinction curves have been fitted using the Fitzpatrick \& Massa
386: (1990, hereafter FM) parameterization. They have developed an
387: analytical representation of the shape of the extinction curves using
388: a small number of parameters. This was done using linear combinations
389: of a Drude bump profile, $D(x;\gamma,x_o)$, a linear background and a
390: far-UV curvature function, $F(x)$, where $x = \lambda^{-1}$. There
391: are 6 parameters determined in the fit: The strength, central
392: wavelength, and width of the bump, $c_3$, $x_o$, and $\gamma$, the
393: slope and intercept of the linear background, $c_1$ and $c_2$, and the
394: strength of the far-UV curvature, $c_4$. The FM fits to individual
395: extinction curves are plotted in Figure 2 and the best fit parameters
396: for each curve are given in Table 3.
397:
398: Near-infrared photometry exists for a few of the reddened stars in our
399: sample. For these stars, using JHK photometry, we calculated values
400: of R$_V$. Due the small values of E(B-V) for our sample stars, the
401: uncertainties in R$_V$ are relatively large. Within these
402: uncertainties, most are consistent with the typical diffuse dust value
403: of 3.1. There is no trend with position on the sky discernible with
404: the small number of sightlines having measured $R_V$ values.
405:
406: \section{Discussion}
407:
408: The sightlines in our sample cover very long distances and have
409: relatively low reddenings so the average densities are amongst the
410: lowest known (Sembach et al. 1993). The measured values for
411: $n_o$(H~I) (= N(H~I)sin$\vert b \vert$/h(H~I) where h(H~I) is the
412: scale height of H~I) are listed in Table 1. The parameter, $n_o$(H~I),
413: is a measure of average density along a sightline (Sembach et
414: al. 1993). Typically, when $n_o$(H I) $<$ 0.42 $cm^{-3}$, no large
415: cold clouds are present along the line of sight (Sembach et al.
416: 1993). All the stars in Table 1 satisfy this criterion. In addition,
417: the warm intercloud medium dominates over the diffuse cold cloud
418: medium if $n_o$(H I) $<$ 0.2 $cm^{-3}$. Most of the stars in Table 1
419: satisfy this criterion or come close to it. The ratio of the column
420: density of Ca II to Na I, also listed in Table 1, is another measure
421: of the relative contributions of cloud and intercloud medium. Na I is
422: relatively stronger in clouds while Ca II is relatively strong in the
423: diffuse ISM. This is due to the strong variation in the calcium
424: depletion from the gas phase into dust grains (Sembach \& Danks 1994;
425: Crinklaw, Federman, \& Joseph 1994). The depletion is higher inside
426: clouds and lower outside where the harsher environment including
427: sputtering and grain collisions will return calcium to the gas phase.
428: The wide range in N(Ca II)/N(Na I) indicates that the
429: cloud/inter-cloud fraction varies strongly from one sightline to
430: another. The absorption features along these lines of sight show
431: multiple components indicating that the distribution of gas is patchy.
432: The average number of components or clouds is 1.5 kpc$^{-1}$ for Na I
433: and 2.0 kpc$^{-1}$ for Ca II (Sembach \& Danks 1994). Using these
434: values and the measured reddening, the average E(B-V) per cloud is
435: 0.05 mag which is typical for standard diffuse clouds (Spitzer 1978).
436: Similarly, the average H I column density per cloud is 2.3 x 10$^{20}$
437: cm $^{-2}$. It is likely that most of these sightlines are dominated
438: by warm intercloud medium and have little contribution from the cold
439: cloud medium.
440:
441: \vspace*{0.05in}
442: \figurenum{3}
443: \begin{center}
444: \plotfiddle{f3.eps}{2.5in}{0}{70}{70}{-220}{-130}
445: \end{center}
446: \figcaption{The steepness of the far-UV extinction ($c_2$) plotted
447: against bump strength ($\pi c_3/ 2 \gamma$) for the stars in the SD
448: region lying between l=325$^o$ to 0$^o$ (filled circles) and those of
449: the rest of the sample (open circles). Also, plotted from upper left
450: to lower right are average points for the Galaxy, the LMC (outside LMC
451: 2), LMC 2 and SMC (Misselt et al. 1999; Gordon \& Clayton 1998)
452: (filled squares). }
453: \vspace*{0.2in}
454:
455: Figure 2 shows that even for extremely diffuse sightlines such as
456: those in our sample, most extinction curves still follow CCM with
457: $R_V$ = 3.1. However, there is a subsample of these sightlines whose
458: extinction curves show weak bumps and very steep far-UV extinction
459: similar to the Magellanic clouds. These sightlines all lie in one
460: region of the sky in the direction of the Galactic center. This
461: region (Sembach \& Danks 1994 (hereafter the SD region)) coincides
462: with an area of Galactic longitude, l=325$^o$ to 0$^o$, where large
463: forbidden velocities have been observed in the gas. Figure 3 shows
464: bump strength plotted against far-UV steepness for our sample
465: extinction curves. The bump strength can be quantified as the area
466: under the bump using the FM parameters to be $\pi c_3/2 \gamma$
467: (Fitzpatrick \& Massa 1986). The steepness of the far-UV extinction
468: can be characterized using the FM parameter, $c_2$, which represents
469: the slope of the linear background. Seven of the nine sightlines
470: lying in the SD region have the largest values of $c_2$ in our sample.
471: Six of these sightlines also have bump strengths below the Galactic
472: average. The sightlines in our sample outside the SD region have
473: values of bump strength and $c_2$ grouped around the Galactic average.
474: As can be seen in Figure 3, the SD region extinction parameters fall
475: roughly along a line running from the average Galactic values through
476: the LMC and LMC 2 averages to the those seen in the SMC. This is a
477: promising result as it indicates that whatever factors are affecting
478: the dust properties in the Magellanic clouds may also be affecting the
479: low density dust in the Milky Way. As discussed below, the two
480: SD-region stars which appear in the upper left-hand corner of Figure 3
481: do not share the extinction properties of the rest of the SD region
482: sample.
483:
484: \vspace*{0.05in}
485: \figurenum{4}
486: \begin{center}
487: \plotfiddle{f4.eps}{2.7in}{0}{65}{65}{-200}{-110}
488: \end{center}
489: \figcaption{The sightlines marked with circles have weak bumps and steep far-UV
490: extinction. The sightlines marked with squares have stronger bumps and less
491: extreme far-UV extinction. Filled circles have N(Ca II)/N(Na I) $>$ 0.62 and
492: $c_2 >$ 1.0, open circles have N(Ca II)/N(Na I) $<$ 0.63 and $c_2 >$ 1.0,
493: filled squares have N(Ca II)/N(Na I) $>$ 0.62 and $c_2 <$ 1.0, open squares
494: have N(Ca II)/N(Na I) $<$ 0.63 and $c_2 <$ 1.0, The wedge represents the
495: SD region where forbidden gas velocities were measured by Sembach \& Danks
496: (1994).}
497: \vspace*{0.2in}
498:
499: \vspace*{0.05in}
500: \figurenum{5}
501: \begin{center}
502: \plotfiddle{f5.eps}{2.7in}{0}{65}{65}{-200}{-110}
503: \end{center}
504: \figcaption{Height above or below the Galactic plane plotted against
505: distance in the plane for the stars in the SD region in Figure 4. The
506: symbols are the same as for Figure 4. See text.}
507: \vspace*{0.2in}
508:
509: The locations of the stars in our sample are plotted in Figure 4. We
510: have separated sightlines according to the steepness of the far-UV
511: extinction as measured by $c_2$ and also the ratio, N(Ca II)/N(Na I),
512: which measures the relative fraction of cloud and intercloud medium
513: along a sightline. A high value indicates a high fraction of
514: intercloud medium. All of the sightlines in Table 1 with both N(Ca
515: II)/N(Na I) $>$ 0.62 and $c_2 >$ 1.02 lie in the SD region. Figure 5
516: shows height above or below the Galactic plane plotted against
517: distance in the plane for the stars in the SD region. Figures 4 and 5
518: clearly show the anomalous extinction is seen only for stars in one
519: particular direction. The two stars in the SD region, that do not
520: share the anomalous extinction of the other sightlines, provide
521: information on the location of this dust. HD 151805 has b= 1.59$^o$
522: so its sightline does not go below the Galactic plane as do the other
523: stars in the sample. HD 161653 lies at a distance of 1.8 kpc and is,
524: by far, the closest star in the l=325$^o$ to 0$^o$ region. So the
525: dust responsible for the Magellanic-cloud-like extinction lies further
526: than about 2 kpc and in a direction defined by 325$^o \leq l \leq 0^o$
527: and -5$^o \geq b \geq -11^o$. In fact, the four sightlines with the
528: steepest extinction, HD 158243, 160993, 163522, and 164340, most
529: resembling the SMC extinction, lie in an even smaller region bounded
530: by 337$^o \leq l \leq 352^o$ and -8$^o \geq b \geq -11^o$. These four
531: stars also have the lowest reddenings. So the remaining three
532: less-extreme sightlines are likely a combination of clouds including
533: more CCM-like dust as well. Kennedy, Bates, \& Kemp (1998) give a
534: nice analysis of the absorption components in this direction of the
535: sky including the sightline to HD 163522 (l = 349.6, b = -9.1, d= 9.4
536: kpc). In their picture, nearby clouds at 50 pc, 100 pc to 1 kpc, the
537: Sagittarius (1.5-2 kpc) and Scutum-Crux (3 kpc) spiral arms all
538: provide absorption components with negative or small positive
539: velocities. They identify peculiar velocity gas corresponding to the
540: forbidden velocities of +10-50 km s$^{-1}$ found by Sembach \& Danks
541: (1994). These forbidden velocities differ significantly from those
542: expected purely from Galactic rotation. The origin and distance of
543: this gas is not well known. Higher ionization ions are associated
544: with this gas indicating that it may be associated with a Galactic
545: fountain or worm (Savage, Massa, \& Sembach 1990; Savage, Sembach, \&
546: Cardelli 1994).
547:
548: \begin{figure*}
549: \figurenum{6}
550: \plottwo{f6a.eps}{f6b.eps}
551: \caption{The extinction curves for the stars in the SD region (left) and
552: in the rest of the sample (right) are plotted.}
553: \end{figure*}
554:
555:
556: The extinction curves for the sightlines inside and outside of the SD
557: region are plotted together in Figure 6. Two sightlines, toward HD
558: 151805 and 161653, in the SD region show normal CCM ($R_V$ = 3.1)
559: extinction. As discussed above, the dust along those sightlines is
560: not located in the same volume of space with the SD type dust so they
561: are plotted with the non-SD-region sample in Figure 6. The average
562: SD-region curve (again not including HD 151805 and 161653) is plotted
563: in Figure 7 along with the average Milky Way and Magellanic cloud
564: curves for comparison. The average SD-region curve most resembles the
565: HD 62542 and 210121 curves, seen in Figure 1, as well as the LMC 2
566: curve. The four steepest SD-region curves resemble the SMC Bar curve
567: in the far-UV but still have stronger bump strengths. These curves
568: show little or no slope change from the near to the far-UV while most
569: other curves seen in Figures 1 and 7 tend to turn up steeply to the
570: blue of the bump.
571:
572: The environments of the LMC 2 and HD 62542 dust may be quite similar
573: to the SD region dust. All are in diffuse regions subject to shocks
574: and strong UV radiation fields. The sightline to HD 210121 contains
575: one quiescent cloud with E(B-V) =0.40. However, this cloud is located
576: in the halo and shows UV extinction quite similar to the that seen in
577: the SD region. Calcium is heavily depleted indicating that grain
578: destruction has not been an important mechanism in producing the
579: unusual extinction (Welty \& Fowler 1992). The low optical depth of
580: the Magellanic sightlines implies that the dust is not well shielded
581: from these environmental pressures. The typical molecular cloud in
582: the Magellanic clouds is bigger but more diffuse than in the Galaxy
583: (Pak et al. 1998). Then, the small size of the dust grains in a
584: cloud could be the result of the lack of a very dense environment
585: necessary for the grains to grow through coagulation. This has been
586: suggested as the cause of the anomalous extinction seen along the HD
587: 210121 sightline (Larson et al. 1996; 2000). This kind of low
588: density sightline may mimic the conditions in the SMC where extinction
589: properties have been measured over long sightlines with low values of
590: E(B-V) = 0.15-0.24 (Gordon \& Clayton 1998). The value of N(Ca
591: II)/N(Na I) is not known for the SMC sightlines but the Ca II
592: abundance in the gas phase is much higher than in the Galaxy for a
593: given reddening (Cohen 1984). The gas-to-dust ratio in general in the
594: SMC is ten times that of the Galaxy (Koornneef 1983). The gas-to-dust
595: ratio in our low density Galactic sample is not significantly
596: different from the average Galactic value (Sembach \& Danks 1994).
597: This implies that the gas-to-dust ratio is not well correlated with
598: dust extinction properties.
599:
600: \vspace*{0.05in}
601: \figurenum{7}
602: \begin{center}
603: \plotone{f7.eps}
604: \end{center}
605: \figcaption{Comparison of the average SD region and non-SD region curves with
606: curves for the average MW (R$_V$ = 3.1), LMC Average, LMC 2 Shell, SMC
607: Bar, and SMC AzV 456.}
608: \vspace*{0.2in}
609:
610: The forbidden velocities seen in our sample are associated with warm
611: intercloud material and the turbulent ISM (Sembach \& Danks 1994) and
612: may indicate that the dust may have been subject to shocks. Sembach
613: \& Savage (1996) investigated the gas and dust abundances in the halo,
614: finding that they are consistent with progressively more severe
615: processing of grains from the disk into the halo. In addition, they
616: find that while some material is returned to the gas phase, the grain
617: cores seem resistant to destruction. Dust models indicate that the
618: far-UV rise in the extinction curve becomes steeper with increased
619: frequency of exposure to shocks which produces more small dust grains
620: (O'Donnell \& Mathis 1997). However, the frequently shocked dust
621: models that produce steeper far-UV extinction also result in stronger
622: bumps. So, producing an SMC-like extinction curve is not as simple as
623: placing dust in a diffuse environment and waiting for a supernova
624: shock.
625:
626: The next logical step is to attempt to directly connect grain
627: properties to their respective sightline environments. Consequently,
628: we have included the average SD region extinction curve in a
629: comprehensive study of dust in the Local Group where our goal is to
630: explicitly examine the correlation of grain size distributions to
631: sightline characteristics such as depletion patterns, and radiation
632: environment (Wolff et al. 2000).
633:
634: \section{Conclusions}
635:
636: \noindent
637: $\bullet$ Magellanic-cloud-like extinction has now been found in the Milky Way.\\
638: $\bullet$ Large values of N(Ca II)/N(Na I) indicating low depletion are associated
639: with steep far-UV extinction as measured by $c_2$.\\
640: $\bullet$ Global metallicity seems not to be a direct factor. Local
641: environmental conditions seem to be the most important factor in determining
642: dust properties.\\
643: $\bullet$ Similar UV dust extinction properties have now been seen in the
644: Milky Way, the Magellanic clouds, starburst galaxies and in high redshift
645: star-forming galaxies.\\
646: $\bullet$ There may be at least two ways to achieve similar extinction
647: properties. A lack of dust coagulation has been
648: suggested for HD 210121 to explain the observed extinction
649: (Larson et al. 1996). The Galactic SD-region
650: properties are closely tied to forbidden velocities indicating that processing of
651: the grains in the diffuse ISM resulted in their observed properties. \\
652: $\bullet$ There seems to be a correlation between decreasing bump strength and
653: far-UV steepness that includes the Galaxy and the Magellanic Clouds. \\
654: $\bullet$ All the sightlines contained in CCM lie within 1 kpc of the Sun. As
655: this study shows, dust properties are not well mapped even in our own Galaxy.
656: There are a larger range of UV extinction parameters seen in the Milky Way than
657: implied by CCM.\\
658:
659: Thanks to Ed Fitzpatrick for providing his IUE IDL procedure. This project was
660: originally envisioned by the late Jason Cardelli.
661:
662: \begin{references}
663:
664: \reference{} Bianchi, L., Clayton, G.\ C., Bohlin, R.\ C., Hutchings, J.\ B., \& Massey, P.\ 1996, \apj, 471, 203
665:
666: \reference{} Cardelli, J.A., \& Savage, B.S. 1988, \apj, 235, 864
667:
668: \reference{} Cardelli, J.A., Clayton, G.C., \& Mathis, J.S. 1989, \apj, 345,
669: 245
670:
671: \reference{} Cardelli, J.A., \& Clayton, G.C. 1991, AJ, 101, 1021
672:
673: \reference{} Cardelli, J.A., Sembach, K.R., \& Mathis, J.S. 1992, AJ, 104, 1916
674:
675: \reference{} Clayton, G.C., \& Martin, P.G. 1985, ApJ, 288, 558
676:
677: \reference{} Clayton, G.C., and Fitzpatrick, E.L. 1987, A.J., 93, 157
678:
679: \reference{} Clayton, G.C., Green, J., Wolff, M.J., Zellner, N.E.B., Code, A.D., \& Davidsen, A.F. 1996, ApJ, 460, 313
680:
681: \reference{} Cohen, J.G. 1984, AJ, 89, 1779
682:
683: \reference{} Crinklaw, G., Federman, S.R., \& Joseph, C.L. 1994, ApJ, 424, 748
684:
685: \reference{} Fitzpatrick, E.\ L.\ 1985, \apj, 299, 219
686:
687: \reference{} Fitzpatrick, E.\ L.\ 1986, \aj, 92, 1068
688:
689: \reference{} Fitzpatrick, E. L. \& Massa, D. 1986, ApJ, 307, 286
690:
691: \reference{} Fitzpatrick, E. L. \& Massa, D. 1990, \apjsupp, 72, 163
692:
693: \reference{} Fitzpatrick, E.L. 1999, PASP, 111, 63
694:
695: \reference{} Gordon, K.\ D., Calzetti, D., \& Witt, A.\ N.\ 1997, \apj, 487, 625
696:
697: \reference{} Gordon, K. D. \& Clayton, G. C. 1998, \apj, 500, 816
698:
699: \reference{} Gordon, K.D., Hanson, M.M., Clayton, G.C., Rieke, G.H., \&
700: Misselt, K.A. 1999, ApJ, 519, 165
701:
702: \reference{} Gordon, K.D., Smith, T.L., \& Clayton, G.C. 2000,
703: in ``The Hy-Redshift Universe: Galaxy Formation and Evolution at High Redshift",
704: (ASP Conf.
705: Proceed.), eds. A. J. Bunker \& W. J. M. van Breugel, (ASP: San Francisco),
706: in press
707:
708: \reference{} Kennedy, D.C., Bates, B., \& Kemp, S.N. 1998, A\&A, 336, 328
709:
710: \reference{} Kiszkurno-Koziej, E., \& Lequeux, J. 1987, A\&A, ,185, 291
711:
712: \reference{} Koornneef, J. 1983, A\&A, 128, 84
713:
714: \reference{} Larson, K.A., Whittet, D.C.B., \& Hough, J.H. 1996, ApJ, 472, 755
715:
716: \reference{} Larson, K.A., Wolff, M.J., Roberge, W.G., Whittet, D.C.B., \& He. L. 2000, ApJ, in press
717:
718: \reference{} Massa, D., Savage, B. D., \& Fitzpatrick, E. L. 1983, \apj, 266, 662
719:
720: \reference{} Massa, D., \& Fitzpatrick, E. L. 2000, ApJS, in press
721:
722: \reference{} Mathis, J. S., \& Cardelli 1992, ApJ, 398, 610
723:
724: \reference{} Mathis, J. S. 1994, ApJ, 422, 176
725:
726: \reference{} Misselt, K., Clayton, G.C.,\& Gordon, K.D. 1999, ApJ, 515, 128
727:
728: \reference{} O'Donnell, J.E., \& Mathis, J.S. 1997, ApJ, 479, 806
729:
730: \reference{} Pak, S., Jaffe, D.T., Van Dishoeck, E.F., Johansson, L.E.B., \& Booth, R.S. 1998, ApJ, 498, 735
731:
732: \reference{} Pitman, K.M., Clayton, G.C. \& Gordon, K.D. 2000, PASP, in press
733:
734: \reference{} Savage, B.D., Massa, D., \& Sembach, K. 1990, ApJ, 355, 114
735:
736: \reference{} Savage, B.D., Sembach, K., \& Cardelli, J.A. 1994, ApJ, 420, 183
737:
738: \reference{} Sembach, K.R., Danks, A.C., \& Savage, B.D. 1993, A\&AS,
739: 100, 107
740:
741:
742: \reference{} Sembach, K.R., \& Danks, A.C. 1994, A\&A, 289, 539
743:
744: \reference{} Sembach, K.R., \& Savage, B.D. 1996, ApJ, 457, 211
745:
746: \reference{} Spitzer, L. 1978, Physical Processes in the Interstellar Medium,
747: (Wiley \& Sons: New York)
748:
749: \reference{} Welty, D.E., \& Fowler, J.R. 1992, ApJ, 393, 193
750:
751: \reference{} Wolff, M.J., Clayton, G.C., \& Gordon, K.D. 2000, in preparation
752:
753:
754:
755: \end{references}
756:
757: \end{document}
758:
759: