1: \def\scnot#1#2{#1 \times 10^{#2}}
2: \documentstyle[12pt,aaspp4]{article}
3: \topmargin = +0.2in
4: \textwidth = 6.0in
5: \textheight = 8.0in
6: \parskip = 0.10in
7: \oddsidemargin = 0.5in
8: \evensidemargin = 0.5in
9: \newcommand{\postscript}[2]
10: {\setlength{\epsfxsize}{#2\hsize}
11: \centerline{\epsfbox{#1}}}
12: %\def\ref#1{\par\noindent \hangindent=0.4in \hangafter=1 #1 \par}
13: %\def\eqalign#1{\null\,\vcenter{\openup\jot \m@th
14: % \ialign{\strut\hfill$\displaystyle{##}$&$
15: % \displaystyle{{}##}$\hfill \crcr#1\crcr}}\,}
16: \def\tempest%
17: {\begin{array}{ccc}
18: 1 & 1 & 1 \\
19: 1 & 1 & 1 \\
20: 4 & 3 & 8
21: \end{array}}
22: %\def\bfq{\bf}
23: \def\bfq{{}}
24: \def\gsim{{{}_>\atop{}^{{}^\sim}}}
25: \def\lsim{{{}_<\atop{}^{{}^\sim}}}
26: \def\cross{\rm cross}
27: \def\kms{{\rm km}\,{\rm s}^{-1}}
28: \def\kpc{{\rm kpc}}
29: \def\rel{{\rm rel}}
30: \def\te{{t_{\rm E}}}
31: \def\re{{r_{\rm E}}}
32: \def\e{{\rm E}}
33: \def\btheta{\hbox{$\theta\hskip-6.3pt\theta$}}
34: \def\bpi{\hbox{$\pi\hskip-6.6pt\pi$}}
35: \def\bmu{\hbox{$\mu\hskip-7.5pt\mu$}}
36:
37: \begin{document}
38:
39:
40: \title{The Ratio of Total to Selective Extinction Toward Baade's Window}
41: \author
42: {Andrew Gould, Amelia Stutz, and Jay A.\ Frogel}
43: \affil{Ohio State University, Department of Astronomy,
44: 140 W.\ 18th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA}
45: \authoremail{gould@astronomy.ohio-state.edu,stutz@astronomy.ohio-state.edu,
46: frogel@astronomy.ohio-state.edu}
47: \begin{abstract}
48:
49: We measure the ratio of total to selective extinction,
50: $R_{VI}\equiv A_V/E(V-I)$, toward Baade's Window by comparing the $VIK$
51: colors of 132 Baade's Window G and K giants from Tiede, Frogel, \& Terndrup
52: with the solar-neighborhood $(V-I),(V-K)$ relation from Bessell \& Brett.
53: We find $R_{VI}=2.283 \pm 0.016$, and show that our measurement has no
54: significant dependence on stellar type from G0 to K4.
55: Adjusting the Paczy\'nski et al.\
56: determination of the centroid of the dereddened Baade's Window clump for
57: this revised value of $R_{VI}$, we find $I_{0,\rm RC}=14.43$ and
58: $(V-I)_{0,\rm RC}=1.058$. This implies a distance to the Baade's Window
59: clump of $d_{BW} = 8.63\pm 0.16\,\kpc$, where the error bar takes account
60: of statistical but not systematic uncertainties.
61:
62: \keywords{distance scale -- dust, extinction -- Galaxy:center}
63:
64: \end{abstract}
65:
66: \section{Introduction}
67:
68: Paczy\'nski \& Stanek (1998) found that the $VIK$ colors of
69: clump giants in Baade's Window were anomalous in the sense that at
70: fixed $(V-K)_0$, they were redder in $(V-I)_0$ than clump giants in
71: the solar neighborhood by 0.2 mag. Stutz, Popowski, \& Gould (1999) found
72: a similar offset (0.17 mag) for RR Lyrae stars in Baade's Window
73: compared to those in the solar neighborhood. Popowski (2000) showed that
74: part of these offsets was simply due to errors in the original photometry
75: used by both groups. When he incorporated the revised OGLE photometry of
76: Paczy\'nski et al.\ (1999), he found that the offset in $(V-I)$
77: shrank to $\sim 0.11$ mag in both cases.
78:
79: Popowski (2000) then reviewed the various attempts
80: to explain such an offset in terms of a difference between the intrinsic
81: properties of stars in the two populations, an idea advanced by
82: Paczy\'nski (1998) and by Stutz et al.\ (1999). He argued that such an
83: explanation was not impossible, but unlikely, and that a more
84: plausible explanation is that the ratio of total to selective extinction
85: $R_{VI}\equiv A_V/E(V-I)=2.5$ adopted by both Paczy\'nski \& Stanek (1998)
86: and Stutz et al.\ (1999) from Stanek (1996) was incorrect. Both color
87: anomalies could be solved, he noted, by adopting $R_{VI}= 2.1$.
88: Popowski (2000) used this re-evaluation to draw various conclusions about
89: the extragalactic distance scale.
90:
91: In the course of calibrating a $K$-band clump-giant distance
92: indicator and applying it to measure the distance modulus of the Baade's Window
93: bulge field, Alves (2000) measured
94: $R_{VI}=2.26$. He did so by comparing the $VIK$ colors of his
95: 20-star sample of Baade's Window clump giants taken from
96: Tiede, Frogel, \& Terndrup (1995) with the $VIK$ colors of local clump
97: stars.
98:
99: Here we improve on the Alves (2000) measurement by incorporating
100: a factor $\sim 7$ more stars into the analysis, i.e.,
101: all 138 G0-K4 giants with $VIK$ photometry from Tiede et al.\
102: (1995). We determine $R_{VI}$ by comparing these $VIK$ colors
103: to the $VIK$ colors of nearby stars as determined by Bessell \& Brett (1988).
104: We find,
105: \begin{equation}
106: R_{VI}\equiv {A_V\over E(V-I)}=2.283 \pm 0.016.
107: \label{eqn:rvi}
108: \end{equation}
109: This reduces the color anomalies to $\sim 0.05\,$mag and so
110: qualitatively confirms Popowski's (2000) explanation of them.
111:
112:
113: \section{Measurement of $R_{VI}$}
114:
115: To measure $R_{VI}$, we assume that the $VIK$ colors of giant stars in
116: Baade's Window as measured by Tiede et al.\ (1995) are intrinsically the
117: same as those in solar neighborhood as determined by Bessell \& Brett (1988).
118: (We
119: will partially test this assumption below.)\ \ Bessel \& Brett (1988)
120: give $VIK$ colors from G0 to M5, that is, over the color range
121: $1.75\leq(V-K)_0 \leq 5.96$. However, there is considerable evidence that
122: the spectral energy distributions of M giants (at fixed spectral type)
123: differ significantly between Baade's Window and the solar neighborhood
124: (Frogel \& Whitford 1982, 1987; Tiede et al.\ 1995). This does not
125: necessarily mean that the $(V-I),(V-K)$ color-color relation is different,
126: and in fact we will
127: present evidence below that it is not. However, to be conservative,
128: we restrict consideration to $(V-K)_0\leq 3.5$, which eliminates all M giants
129: and K5 giants as well. That is,
130: \begin{equation}
131: 1.75\leq(V-K)_0 \leq 3.50.
132: \label{eqn:besrange}
133: \end{equation}
134: We begin with the sample of 509 stars with
135: optical and infrared photometry from the BW4b field of Tiede et al.\ (1995).
136: Note that the columns headed ``$V_0$'' and ``$(V-I)_0$''
137: in that paper actually
138: give $V$ and $(V-I)$. We recover the original $K$ magnitudes by adding
139: $K=K_{0,\rm Tiede}+0.14$, as indicated by Table 1 of Tiede et al.\ (1995).
140: We then obtain $(V-K)_0$ using visual extinctions, $A_V$, from Stanek's (1996)
141: extinction map together with the relation,
142: \begin{equation}
143: A_K = 0.11\,A_V.
144: \label{eqn:avk}
145: \end{equation}
146: Note that the Stanek (1996) map (available by anonymous ftp at
147: astro.princeton.edu, stanek/Extinction) has been corrected to the
148: zero point found by Gould, Popowski, \& Terndrup (1998) and
149: Alcock et al.\ (1998). These authors made their zero-point determinations
150: by comparing the $(V-K)$ colors of local K giants and RR Lyrae stars,
151: respectively, with the $(V-K)$ colors of similar stars
152: in Baade's Window, making use of the extinction ratio given by equation
153: (\ref{eqn:avk}). Hence, for consistency, we use the same ratio here.
154:
155: Of the original 509 Tiede et al.\ (1995) stars,
156: 185 lack $VI$ photometry.
157: Of the remainder, 86 lack $A_V$ measurements because they fall within $2'$
158: of NGC 6522 where Stanek (1996) found the $A_V$ determinations to be
159: unreliable. A further 96 stars are bluer than the color interval
160: (\ref{eqn:besrange}), and an additional 4 stars are redder.
161: This leaves a total of 138 stars.
162:
163: For each of these 138 stars, we use linear interpolation to
164: estimate the $(V-I)_{0,\rm Bessel}$ predicted from
165: their measured $(V-K)_0$ and the Bessell \& Brett (1988) $VIK$
166: color-color relation. We then fit the data to
167: a two-parameter model
168: \begin{equation}
169: (V-I)_{\rm Tiede} - (V-I)_{0,\rm Bessell}= \alpha A_V + \beta [(V-K)_0 -2.348],
170: \label{eqn:linfit}
171: \end{equation}
172: where the offset 2.348 is chosen to eliminate the correlation between
173: $\alpha$ and $\beta$.
174:
175: We remove outliers as follows. We do the fit using all the
176: data, and determine the ``errors'' by forcing $\chi^2$ per degree of freedom
177: to unity. We find the largest $\sigma$ outlier, eliminate it, and repeat
178: the process. We stop when the largest outlier is less than $3\,\sigma$.
179: This eliminates six outliers. We find,
180: \begin{equation}
181: \alpha = 0.4380\pm 0.0031,\qquad \beta = -0.0023\pm 0.0127
182: \qquad [1.75\leq (V-K)_0\leq 3.50].
183: \label{eqn:alphabeta}
184: \end{equation}
185: Since $R_{VI}=\alpha^{-1}$, we obtain equation (\ref{eqn:rvi}). From the
186: fact that $\beta$ is consistent with zero at the $1\,\sigma$ level, we conclude
187: that the shift from $(V-I)$ to $(V-I)_0$ depends only on $A_V$ and not
188: on the color of the star. We therefore set $\beta=0$ and show our resulting
189: fit in Figure \ref{fig:one}. Note that since $R_{VI}$ will in general be a
190: function of color or spectral type, our measurement should be taken as
191: applying to stars at the mean of our sample, $(V-K)_0=2.35$, i.e., K0 giants.
192: Our value, $R_{VI}=2.28$,
193: is in good agreement with the one found by Alves (2000),
194: $R_{VI}=2.26$, and the one adopted by Tiede et al.\ (1995), $R_{VI}=2.25$.
195:
196: Also plotted on Figure \ref{fig:one} are the four stars ({\it open
197: circles}) that were excluded from the fit because they were too red. Note
198: that they lie very close to the local $VIK$ curve of Bessell \& Brett (1988).
199: If we repeat the entire procedure including these four stars, we obtain
200: \begin{equation}
201: \alpha = 0.4384\pm 0.0033,\qquad \beta = 0.0073\pm 0.0092
202: \qquad [1.75\leq (V-K)_0\leq 5.96].
203: \label{eqn:alphabeta2}
204: \end{equation}
205: with four outliers excluded.
206: That is $R_{VI}=2.281\pm 0.017$, essentially identical to equation
207: (\ref{eqn:rvi}). In either case, the slope $\beta$ is consistent with zero,
208: indicating that our determination is not a signficant function of spectral
209: type.
210:
211: This non-dependence on $(V-K)_0$ color appears to be in strong
212: conflict with Figure 14 of Tiede et al.\ (1995) which shows a large number
213: of points in the range $4<(V-K)_0<6$ that lie $\sim 0.3\,$ mag below the
214: Bessell \& Brett (1988) relation. In fact, all the points with CCD
215: $VI$ photometry
216: from Tiede et al.\ (1995) lie close to the line (as they do in our Fig.\
217: \ref{fig:one}). The remaining points are from Frogel, Whitford \& Rich
218: (1984) and Frogel \& Whitford (1987) who obtained their own
219: single-channel infrared data, but relied on the earlier photographic data
220: of Whitford \& Blanco (1979) and Arp (1965) for the $VI$ photometry.
221: From the small overlap between these older photographic data
222: and the CCD photometry reported
223: in Tiede et al.\ (1995), we estimate that the earlier photographic photometry
224: may have a zero-point error of $\sim 0.3\,$ mag in $(V-I)$
225: in the sense of being too blue. If this zero-point error is
226: confirmed by future observations, it would mean that the $(V-I),(V-K)$
227: color-color relation is the same for Baade's Window and the solar neighborhood,
228: but not necessarily the correspondance between colors anad spectral type.
229: Nevertheless, to be conservative, we base our results only on the G0--K4
230: sample.
231:
232:
233: \section{Discussion}
234:
235: As with essentially all methods for determining total and selective
236: extinction, our measurement relies on the assumption that the colors of
237: stars in Baade's Window are the same as those in the solar neighborhood.
238: If the mean $(V-I)_0$ color at fixed $(V-K)_0$ differed between the two
239: populations by $\Delta(V-I)$, then our estimate of $\alpha$ would likewise
240: be in error by $\Delta \alpha = \Delta(V-I)/\langle A_V\rangle$ where
241: $\langle A_V\rangle=1.496$ is the mean value of $A_V$ over our final sample
242: of 132 stars. However, from the fact that $\beta$ is consistent with zero
243: (eq.\ [\ref{eqn:alphabeta}]), such an offset would have to be independent of
244: spectal type from G0 to K4 (and arguably to M5). This seems quite implausible.
245: In addition, approximately the same offset would have to apply to RR Lyrae
246: stars (Stutz et al.\ 1999). Most probably, the fault lies not in the stars,
247: but in the dust.
248:
249: Popowski (2000) reexamined the Wo\'zniak \& Stanek (1996)
250: method by which Stanek (1996) determined $R_{VI}=2.5$. Making use of
251: the original tests done by Wo\'zniak \& Stanek (1996), he found that this
252: determination depends in part on an initial assumption about $R_{VI}$ so
253: that values as low as $R_{VI}\sim 2.3$ would be consistent with the data.
254:
255: Our measurement of $R_{VI}$ removes most, but not all, of the anomalous
256: color problems found by Paczy\'nski \& Stanek (1998) and by Stutz et al.\
257: (1999). In the latter case, Popowski's (2000) revised offset
258: $0.11\pm 0.02$ mag is now reduced to $0.04\pm 0.02$, and so is only a
259: $2\,\sigma$ discrepancy. However, for the clump giant anomaly found by
260: Paczy\'nski \& Stanek (1998), the formal uncertainty is only
261: $\sim 0.003$ mag, so statistical fluctuations do not provide a
262: plausible explanation. Nevertheless, the remaining discrepancy is small
263: and may be due to a combination of small offsets between the
264: photometric zero points of the various measurement systems that are used
265: to make the comparison.
266:
267: Paczy\'nski et al.\ (1999) used $R_{VI}^{\rm Stanek}=2.50$ from
268: Stanek (1996) to deredden the
269: observed centroid of the clump in their $VI$ color-magnitude diagram of Baade's
270: Window. The zero point of their $V$-band extinctions is based on Gould et al.\
271: (1998) and Alcock et al.\ (1998) and is not affected by the present paper.
272: However, the $I$-band photometry should be adjusted fainter by
273: $\Delta I_0 = (1/R_{VI}^{\rm Stanek} - 1/R_{VI}^{\rm GSF})
274: \langle A_V\rangle = 0.056$, where $R_{VI}^{\rm GSF}=2.283$ is the value we
275: determine here and $\langle A_V\rangle=1.48$ is the mean extinction of
276: clump stars measured by Paczy\'nski et al.\ (1999). This adjustment yields
277: a clump centroid of $I_{0,\rm RC}=14.43$ and $(V-I)_{0,\rm RC}=1.058$.
278: The color is only 0.05 mag redward of the centroid of the Hipparcos clump
279: (Paczy\'nski et al.\ 1999). Inserting the magnitude into Udalski's
280: (2000) $I$-band calibration of the clump standard candle,
281: $M_I= (-0.26 \pm 0.02) + (0.13 \pm 0.07)(\rm [Fe/H] + 0.25)$,
282: we obtain a distance
283: modulus to Baade's Window
284: \begin{equation}
285: \mu_{BW} = 14.43 - M_I = 14.68\pm 0.04,
286: \label{eqn:mubw}
287: \end{equation}
288: where we have adopted [Fe/H]$_{BW}=-0.15\pm 0.10$. The error bar takes account
289: of all statistical uncertainties, 0.025 mag for $M_I$ (Udalski 2000),
290: $0.02$ mag for the observed brightness of the Baade's Window clump
291: (Paczy\'nski et al.\ 1999), $0.04\times (1-R_{VI})=0.022$ mag for the
292: zero-point uncertainty of the Stanek (1996) map (Alcock et al.\ 1998),
293: and $0.0033\times \langle A_V\rangle=0.005$ mag for the uncertainty in
294: $R_{VI}$ (this paper), but does not take account of systematic errors.
295: Equation (\ref{eqn:mubw}) is in good agreement with
296: Alves' (2000) determination using the $K$-band clump distance indicator,
297: $\mu_{BW}=14.58\pm 0.11$.
298:
299: {\bf Acknowledgements}:
300: We thank Piotr Popowski for his useful comments on the manuscript and
301: David Alves for pointing out the error in the column headings of Tiede et al.\
302: (1995). This work was supported in part by grant AST 97-27520 from the NSF.
303:
304:
305:
306: \begin{references}
307: \reference{} Alcock, C., et al. 1998, \apj, 492, 190
308: \reference{} Alves, D.R.\ 2000, \apj, in press (astro-ph/0003329)
309: \reference{} Arp, H.A.\ 1965, \apj, 141, 43
310: \reference{} Bessell, M.S., \& Brett, J.M.\ 1988, \pasp, 100, 1134
311: \reference{} Whitford, A.E., \& Blanco, V.M.\ 1979, BAAS, 11, 675
312: \reference{} Frogel, J.A., Whitford, A.E., \& Rich, R.M.\ 1984, \aj, 89, 1539
313: \reference{} Frogel, J.A., \& Whitford, A.E.\ 1982, \apj, 259, L7
314: \reference{} Frogel, J.A., \& Whitford, A.E.\ 1987, \apj, 320, 199
315: \reference{} Gould, A., Popowski, P., \& Terndrup, D. M. 1998, \apj, 492, 778
316: \reference{} Paczy\'nski, B.\ 1998, Acta Astron., 48, 405
317: \reference{} Paczy\'nski, B. \& Stanek, K.Z.\ 1998, \apj, 494, L219
318: \reference{} Paczy\'nski, B., Udalski, A., Szyma\'nski, M., Kubiak, M.,
319: Pietrzy\'nski, G., Soszy\'nski, I., Wo\'zniak, P., \& \.Zebru\'n, K.,
320: 1999, Acta Astron., 49, 319
321: \reference{} Popowski, P.\ 2000, \apj, 528, L9
322: \reference{} Stanek, K.Z. 1996, \apj, 460, L37
323: \reference{} Stutz, A., Popowski, P., \& Gould, A. 1999, \apj, 521, 206
324: \reference{} Tiede, G.P., Frogel, J.A., Terndrup, D.M.\ 1995, \aj, 110, 2788
325: \reference{} Wo\'zniak, P., \& Stanek, K. Z. 1996, \apj, 464, 233
326: \reference{} Udalski, A.\ 2000, \apj, 531, L25
327: \end{references}
328:
329: %\newpage
330: %\bigskip
331:
332: \begin{figure}
333: \caption[junk]{\label{fig:one}
334: Color-color $(V-K)_0$ vs.\ $(V-I)_0$ plot of 142 Baade's Window
335: giant stars ({\it points}) together with
336: the color-color relation ({\it solid curve}) of solar-neighborhood stars
337: taken from Bessell \& Brett (1988). The $(V-K)_0$ color is determined
338: from $VK$ photometry of Tiede et al.\ (1995) corrected for extinction
339: according to Stanek (1996), assuming $E(V-K)=0.89\,A_V$. The $(V-I)_0$
340: color is determined in this paper by fitting for $R_{VI}=A_V/E(V-I)$,
341: essentially by moving the points vertically until they straddle the curve.
342: Four red stars ({\it open circles}) were excluded from the fit because of
343: concerns that the spectral energy distributions of Baade's Window M giants
344: are different from those of M giants in the solar neighborhood.
345: Six outliers ({\it crosses}) were also excluded from the fit.
346: The arrow shows the effect
347: of 1 magnitude of $V$ band extinction. Since this arrow is parallel to
348: the color-color curve, even large errors in the extinction cannot affect
349: the results.
350: }
351: \end{figure}
352:
353:
354: \clearpage
355:
356:
357: \end{document}
358:
359: