1: \documentstyle[12pt,aaspp4]{article}
2:
3: \begin{document}
4:
5: \title{Spectroscopy of Giant Stars in the Pyxis Globular Cluster}
6:
7: \author{Christopher Palma}
8: \affil{Department of Astronomy, University of Virginia \\
9: Email: cp4v@virginia.edu}
10: \authoraddr{P. O. Box 3818, Charlottesville, VA 22903-0818}
11:
12: \author{William E. Kunkel\altaffilmark{1}}
13: \affil{The Observatories of the Carnegie Institute of Washington \\
14: Email: kunkel@jeito.lco.cl}
15: \authoraddr{813 Santa Barbara Street, Pasadena, CA 91101}
16: \altaffiltext{1}{Las Campanas Observatory, Casilla 601, La Serena, Chile}
17:
18: \and
19:
20: \author{Steven R. Majewski\altaffilmark{2}}
21: \affil{Department of Astronomy, University of Virginia \\
22: Email: srm4n@virginia.edu}
23: \authoraddr{P. O. Box 3818, Charlottesville, VA 22903-0818}
24: \altaffiltext{2}{David and Lucile Packard Foundation Fellow; Cottrell Scholar
25: of the Research Corporation; National Science Foundation CAREER Fellow;
26: Visiting Associate, The Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of Washington}
27:
28: \begin{abstract}
29:
30: The Pyxis globular cluster is a recently discovered globular cluster
31: that lies in the outer halo ($R_{gc} \sim 40$ kpc) of the Milky Way.
32: Pyxis lies along one of the proposed orbital planes of the Large
33: Magellanic Cloud (LMC), and it has been proposed to be a detached LMC
34: globular cluster captured by the Milky Way. We present the first
35: measurement of the radial velocity of the Pyxis globular cluster based
36: on spectra of six Pyxis giant stars. The mean heliocentric radial
37: velocity is $\sim\,$36 km/sec, and the corresponding velocity of Pyxis
38: with respect to a stationary observer at the position of the Sun is
39: $\sim-191$ km/sec. This radial velocity is a large enough fraction of
40: the cluster's expected total space velocity, assuming that it is bound
41: to the Milky Way, that it allows strict limits to be placed on the
42: range of permissible transverse velocities that Pyxis could have in the
43: case that it still shares or nearly shares an orbital pole with the
44: LMC. We can rule out that Pyxis is on a near circular orbit if it is
45: Magellanic debris, but we cannot rule out an eccentric orbit associated with
46: the LMC. We have calculated the range of allowed proper motions for
47: the Pyxis globular cluster that result in the cluster having an orbital
48: pole within $15^{\circ}$ of the present orbital pole of the LMC and
49: that are consistent with our measured radial velocity, but verification
50: of the tidal capture hypothesis must await proper motion measurement
51: from the Space Interferometry Mission or HST. A spectroscopic
52: metallicity estimate of $[$Fe/H$] = -1.4\pm0.1$ is determined for Pyxis
53: from several spectra of its brightest giant; this is consistent with
54: photometric determinations of the cluster metallicity from isochrone
55: fitting.
56:
57: \end{abstract}
58:
59: \keywords{globular clusters: individual (Pyxis)}
60:
61: \section{Introduction}
62:
63: Evidence continues to accumulate that the outermost Milky Way globular
64: clusters may not have originated in the same process that formed the
65: inner globular clusters. Based on the recognition that the second
66: parameter effect of horizontal branch morphology in globular clusters
67: is found predominantly among outer halo ($R_{gc} > 8$ kpc) clusters,
68: \cite{SZ} proposed that the outermost globular clusters may have formed
69: in chemically distinct ``fragments'' that later fell into the Milky Way
70: halo. Building on the suggestion by \cite{kd76} that several red
71: horizontal branch (second parameter) globular clusters were potentially
72: associated with the Magellanic Plane group of dwarf galaxies,
73: \cite{srm94} showed that there is a planar alignment between a
74: particular sample of second parameter globular clusters and the Milky
75: Way dwarfs. Recently, \cite{palma99} reaffirmed that there may be a
76: dynamical relationship between the second parameter globular clusters
77: and the Milky Way dwarf satellites.
78:
79: The Pyxis globular cluster (\cite{idk95}; \cite{d95}) at $R_{gc} = 41$
80: kpc (Sarajedini \& Geisler 1996) defines the inner edge of the
81: prominent gap in the globular cluster radial distribution between $40
82: \lesssim R_{gc} \lesssim 60$ kpc. The presence of this gap has been
83: used to argue that the primordial Galactic globular cluster system ends
84: at $\sim\,$40 kpc while the distant, $R_{gc} > 60$ kpc clusters
85: originated in Galactic satellite dwarf galaxies (e.g., \cite{zinn85}).
86: Although Pyxis lies among the ``inner group'' of globular clusters
87: (i.e., inside the gap in $R_{gc}$), Irwin et al.\ (1995) propose that
88: Pyxis may be a captured LMC globular cluster based on the young age
89: they infer for the globular cluster and on its proximity to the plane
90: of the LMC orbit derived from the \cite{jones} proper motion. Further
91: support for the tidal capture hypothesis comes from \cite{palma99},
92: where a statistical analysis of the likely orbital poles of the
93: Galactic satellite galaxies and the globular clusters identifies Pyxis,
94: NGC 6229, NGC 7006, and Pal 4 as the globular clusters most likely to
95: share a common orbital pole with either the Magellanic Plane galaxies
96: (the LMC, the SMC, Draco, and Ursa Minor) or the Fornax--Leo--Sculptor
97: Stream galaxies. However, these postulations on the origin of Pyxis
98: have been made without the benefit of any kinematical data on the
99: cluster.
100:
101: Although deep photometry of Pyxis exists (Sarajedini \& Geisler 1996),
102: no spectroscopic observations have been published. Indeed, Pyxis is
103: one of the last few known globular clusters lacking a radial velocity
104: (cf.\ Harris 1996). We report here on du~Pont 2.5-m Telescope
105: spectroscopic observations of Pyxis stars (\S 2). With our derived
106: radial velocity for the cluster, we re-address the stripped LMC
107: hypothesis for Pyxis' origin (\S 3), but point out that, in the end, we
108: can only make predictions on the proper motions expected under this
109: scenario. Unfortunately, the proper motion is required for a
110: definitive solution to the question of the cluster's origin.
111:
112: \section{Observations}
113:
114: On the nights of 17 January and 20 January 1997, the 2.5-m du Pont
115: Telescope at the Las Campanas Observatory was used to obtain spectra of
116: Pyxis giant stars with magnitudes of $R \sim 18$. A finding chart for
117: these stars made from the Digitized Sky Survey (\cite{dss}) is
118: presented as Figure 1. Observations of the Pyxis stars made use of the
119: modular spectrograph and the SITe2 detector with a 1200 lines/mm
120: grating. The selected wavelength region with this setup was
121: approximately 7700 -- 8750 \AA\ at $\sim\,$1.3 \AA\ per pixel
122: resolution. Typical exposure times were 900 seconds per observation,
123: which provided enough signal-to-noise to measure radial velocities.
124:
125: Radial velocities were measured for six Pyxis giant stars by
126: cross-correlating their spectra against those of bright radial velocity
127: standard stars. The cross-correlation peak yielded the adopted radial
128: velocity difference between the Pyxis stars and the standard. The star
129: HD80170, a K5 giant, was observed multiple times on both nights to
130: serve as the main standard. Two other HD stars and 11 LMC globular
131: cluster stars were also observed as radial velocity calibration
132: objects. All standards with known radial velocities were used to
133: remove any nightly zero point offsets in the radial velocities
134: determined by cross-correlating against the HD80170 template. The
135: Pyxis stars were observed multiple times, and the radial velocity for
136: each star was determined by taking the median of the values for a
137: particular star. In Table 1 we present the positions, magnitudes, and
138: velocities of the stars observed. We find a mean radial velocity for
139: the six stars of $34.3$ km/sec with $\sigma = 4.6$ km/sec. If we
140: ignore the one outlier, Pyxis D, the mean radial velocity for the five
141: remaining stars increases slightly, to $35.9$ km/sec with $\sigma =
142: 2.5$ km/sec.
143:
144: \subsection{\ion{Ca}{2} Triplet Metallicity Estimate}
145:
146: The wavelength range of our spectra includes the \ion{Ca}{2} triplet
147: lines at $\lambda\lambda$ 8498, 8542, and 8662 \AA. \cite{ra97} measured
148: \ion{Ca}{2} equivalent widths for a large sample of globular cluster
149: stars and in a companion paper (Rutledge et al.\ 1997b) derived a
150: conversion from \ion{Ca}{2} reduced equivalent width, $W^{\prime}$, to
151: metallicity. To determine a spectroscopic metallicity for Pyxis, we
152: attempted to measure the strengths of these lines in our spectra. Of
153: the six Pyxis stars observed, only the brightest, Pyxis A, produced
154: equivalent width measurements with errors small enough to give a
155: reliable estimate of the metallicity.
156: The technique used to determine
157: the equivalent widths for the Pyxis A \ion{Ca}{2} lines was nearly
158: identical to that used in \cite{ra97}.
159:
160: For each observation of Pyxis A, the continuum was determined by
161: linearly interpolating the average intensity in the \cite{ra97}
162: continuum bandpasses. The equivalent width was then calculated by
163: integrating the difference between the fit continuum and the line
164: feature over the line bandpass. The line feature was fit with a
165: Gaussian function, and the integral was performed using the fit rather
166: than numerically integrating the data since \cite{ra97} concluded that
167: this technique is preferable to direct numerical integration. The
168: three individual lines were combined into a single index, $\Sigma$Ca,
169: following the method of \cite{ra97}, where $\Sigma$Ca $=
170: 0.5\lambda_{8498} + \lambda_{8542} + 0.6\lambda_{8662}$. For Pyxis A,
171: the result is $\Sigma$Ca $= 4.5\pm0.2$ \AA.
172:
173: The \cite{ra97} method for converting $\Sigma$Ca to metallicity
174: requires the reduction of the equivalent width to the value for giants
175: at the level of the horizontal branch, $W^{\prime}$, so that a mean
176: value for all cluster stars can be obtained. This is done by adopting
177: a slope $\Delta(\Sigma{\rm Ca})/\Delta(V_{HB} - V)$ and extrapolating
178: the calculated width to the expected value at the magnitude of the horizontal
179: branch, $V_{HB}$. All of the
180: published photometry for Pyxis stars has used the $B$ and $R$ bands, so
181: we have had to approximate $\Delta(V_{HB} - V)$ using color-color
182: relations for giant stars. Adopting the photometry from \cite{sg96}, we find
183: that Pyxis A has $R = 17.08$ and that the horizontal branch of Pyxis is
184: at $R = 18.75$. \cite{saao} find an almost linear relationship between
185: $(B-V)$ and $(V-R)$ for giant stars, so we have determined rough $V$
186: magnitudes for Pyxis A and the Pyxis horizontal branch stars by estimating a $(V-R)$
187: color from the $(B-R)$ color given in \cite{sg96}. We estimate that
188: for Pyxis, $V_{HB} = 19.25$ and $V_{Pyxis A} = 17.77$, or
189: $\Delta(V_{HB} - V) = 1.48$. In the table of globular cluster
190: properties by \cite{mwgc}, the magnitude of the horizontal branch is
191: also given as $V_{HB} = 19.25$, so the adopted $(V-R)$ colors are most
192: likely a good approximation to the true colors.
193:
194: The reduced \ion{Ca}{2} equivalent width of Pyxis A is therefore
195: $W^{\prime} = 3.6$ if we follow \cite{ra97} and adopt a slope of
196: $\Delta(\Sigma{\rm Ca})/\Delta(V_{HB} - V) = 0.62$ \AA/magnitude. This
197: value is simply an estimate, since there is a dispersion of 0.2 \AA\ in
198: the values of $\Sigma$Ca from the four individual observations and
199: since there is some uncertainty in $\Delta(V_{HB} - V)$, probably of
200: order 0.1 magnitudes. However, we can use this determination to get an
201: estimate of the metallicity of Pyxis A for comparison with the
202: photometrically determined metallicity estimates of Irwin et
203: al.\ (1995) and \cite{sg96}. Using the \cite{rb97} calibration of
204: $W^{\prime}$ to Zinn-West metallicity, the reduced equivalent width
205: measured for Pyxis A implies a metallicity of $[$Fe/H$]_{ZW} = -1.4 \pm
206: 0.1$. This value for Pyxis A is more metal-poor than the
207: photometrically derived values of \cite{sg96} and Irwin et al.\ (1995),
208: who estimate $-1.2\pm0.15$ and $-1.1\pm0.3$ respectively, however it is
209: consistent within the overlap of the $1\sigma$ error bars. Any
210: systematic error that leads to an underestimated equivalent width for Pyxis A
211: results in a smaller determined metallicity. An error of 10\% in the
212: equivalent width measured for Pyxis A is enough to bring the
213: metallicity up to $-1.2$ and into better agreement with the photometric
214: values. If the equivalent width measurement is correct, then it is
215: unlikely that the metallicity is much higher than $[$Fe/H$]_{ZW} =
216: -1.4$, since an unlikely error in the $V$ magnitude of Pyxis A of 0.7
217: magnitudes is required to raise the metallicity of the star to
218: $-1.2$.
219:
220:
221: \section{Discussion}
222:
223: The observations presented here were partially motivated by the
224: possibility that the Pyxis globular cluster was captured from the LMC
225: by the Milky Way. This assertion was originally made by Irwin et
226: al.\ (1995), who noted that Pyxis, at $(l,b) = (261.3,7.0)^{\circ}$, lies
227: within a few degrees of the orbital plane of the LMC determined from
228: the \cite{jones} proper motion. Further support for this hypothesis is
229: provided by \cite{palma99}, who place Pyxis in a group with Pal 4, NGC
230: 6229, and NGC 7006 as the most likely globular clusters to share a
231: common orbital pole with the Magellanic Plane galaxies (the LMC, the
232: SMC, Ursa Minor, and Draco). Although full space motion information is
233: required to verify the Irwin et al.\ (1995) hypothesis, a radial
234: velocity can provide some constraints on the shapes of allowed orbits
235: for a cluster if the magnitude of the radial component is a significant
236: fraction of the expected magnitude of the space velocity.
237:
238: The essence of the argument given in Palma et al.\ (2000) to support a
239: capture origin for the Pyxis globular cluster is as follows: if it is
240: assumed that Pyxis was captured recently from the LMC by the Milky Way,
241: then the orbital pole of Pyxis is likely to be aligned with that of the
242: LMC (both the LMC and Pyxis are far enough from the Galactic Center
243: that precession will not significantly affect the positions of their
244: orbital poles over a Hubble time). If one assumes rotation about the
245: Galactic Center, the direction of the orbital pole of the LMC can be
246: determined by taking the cross product of the Galactocentric radius
247: vector to the LMC and its space motion vector. If one accounts for the
248: space velocity vector error, the position of the orbital pole of the
249: LMC can only be confined to a {\em family} of poles along an arc
250: segment in Galactocentric coordinates (cf.\ Figure 1 in Palma et
251: al.\ 2000). Since the space motion of Pyxis is currently unknown, its
252: orbital pole is not well constrained. However, the orbital pole can be
253: assumed to be perpendicular to its current Galactocentric position, so
254: the direction of Pyxis' orbital pole should lie on the great circle
255: that contains all possible normals to its current radius vector (cf.
256: \cite{lb295}). Figure 2 shows an Aitoff projection of the sky in
257: Galactocentric coordinates. The arc segment that defines the possible
258: locations of the LMC's orbital pole (based on the Jones et al.\ [1994]
259: proper motion, as adopted by Palma et al.\ [2000]) is shown as well as
260: the great circle along which lies all possible orbital poles of Pyxis.
261: That these two families of possible orbital poles for the LMC and for
262: Pyxis intersect (at Galactocentric $(l,b) = (163, -22)^{\circ}$)
263: indicates that it is possible for these two objects to share a coplanar
264: orbit with a common direction of angular momentum. It now remains to
265: be seen whether our derived radial velocity can clarify whether this is
266: likely, i.e., is the orbital pole of Pyxis likely to be near the
267: crossing point of the two orbital pole families?
268:
269: We start our analysis by adopting a simple strawman model wherein
270: Pyxis is following a circular orbit that is
271: nearly coplanar with the orbit of the LMC. Simulations of tidal
272: stripping of dwarf galaxies by the Milky Way (Johnston 1998) show that
273: the debris is distributed around the orbit of the parent satellite with
274: a spread in energy given by
275: \begin{equation}
276: \Delta E= r_{\rm tide} {d\Phi \over dR} \approx
277: \left( {m_{\rm sat} \over M_{\rm Gal}}\right)^{1/3} v_{\rm circ}^2
278: \equiv f v_{\rm circ}^2
279: \end{equation}
280: where $r_{\rm tide}$ is the tidal radius of the satellite, $\Phi$ is
281: the parent galaxy gravitational potential, $v_{\rm circ}$ is the
282: circular velocity of the Galactic halo, $m_{\rm sat}$ is the
283: satellite's mass, $M_{\rm Gal}$ is the mass of the parent galaxy
284: enclosed within the satellite's orbit, and the last equality defines
285: the {\it tidal scale} $f$. Thus, the spread in energy translates into
286: a characteristic angular width $f$ (in radians) to the debris. Taking
287: reasonable values for the mass of the LMC and the Milky Way, the value
288: of $f$ for any debris pulled from the LMC corresponds to roughly
289: $15^{\circ}$. In Figure 2, an arc segment along the great circle of
290: possible orbital poles for Pyxis is marked; this arc segment is defined
291: by a length within
292: $\pm15$ degrees of the intersection point with the possible orbital
293: pole of the LMC, and indicates expectations for the orbital poles of
294: LMC debris at the position of Pyxis on the sky.
295:
296: It is straightforward to derive the direction of the space motion
297: vector required for Pyxis to follow a circular orbit and have an
298: orbital pole along the arc segment in Figure 2, i.e.\ in the direction
299: of $\hat{P}$, or $(l,b) = (163,-22)^{\circ}$. The geometry is
300: illustrated in Figure 3. The Galactocentric, Cartesian radius vector
301: of Pyxis is $(X,Y,Z) = (-13.9,-38.6,4.8)$ kpc (assuming that the
302: distance from the Sun to the Galactic Center, $R_{0} = 8$ kpc, and
303: where $X_{\sun}\equiv-8.0$ kpc). The unit vector $\hat{P}$ from the
304: Galactic center in the direction of the orbital pole at Galactocentric
305: $(l,b) = (163,-22)^{\circ}$ is $(X,Y,Z) = (-0.89,0.27,-0.37)$. In
306: Figure 3, this vector has been translated to the location of Pyxis.
307: The vector that is mutually perpendicular to the Galactocentric radius
308: vector of Pyxis and to the orbital pole $\hat{P}$ gives the direction
309: of the space motion of the Pyxis globular cluster for a circular orbit
310: around the Galactic center. The unit vector direction of this space
311: motion is $\hat{V}_{circ} = (V_{X},V_{Y},V_{Z}) = (-0.32,0.23,0.92)$.
312: Since our line of sight to Pyxis is mostly in the $- Y$ direction and
313: since $\vec{V}_{circ}$ is mostly in the $+ Z$ direction, clearly any
314: component of $\vec{V}_{circ}$ along our line of sight will be small.
315: Adopting the basic solar motion of $(9,12,6)$ km/sec (\cite{mb81}) and
316: a rotational velocity of the local standard of rest (LSR) of 220
317: km/sec, then the component of the Sun's velocity along the line of
318: sight from the Sun to Pyxis is $v_{\sun LOS} \sim-227$ km/sec (the
319: negative sign here indicates that the component of the Sun's velocity
320: with respect to the Galactic Standard of Rest along the line of sight
321: to Pyxis is in the sense of receding from Pyxis; see the Appendix for a
322: discussion of the sign conventions used in reducing the radial velocity
323: to a $v_{GSR}$). Since the heliocentric radial velocity measured for
324: Pyxis is the difference between the intrinsic radial velocity of Pyxis
325: with respect to the position of the Sun, $v_{GSR}$, and the magnitude
326: of the Sun's velocity projected along the line of sight to Pyxis
327: ($v_{helio} = v_{GSR} - v_{\sun LOS}$), the globular cluster would have
328: a large, positive heliocentric radial velocity if it were following a
329: circular orbit in the plane defined by the pole at $\hat{P}$.
330:
331: It is the solar motion that dominates the radial velocity in the
332: circular orbit case. For example, if we assume that Pyxis has a
333: velocity that is approximately the circular velocity of the Galaxy at
334: 40 kpc, or $\sim\,$200 km/sec, its space motion would then be
335: $(V_{X},V_{Y},V_{Z}) = (-64,46,184)$ km/sec. Since the Galactic
336: Cartesian unit vector in the direction of Pyxis from the Sun (the line
337: of sight) is $(X,Y,Z) = (-0.15,-0.98,0.12)$, the component of this
338: space velocity along the line of sight\footnote[3]{Again the negative
339: sign is in the radial system of the Sun, and it indicates that this
340: velocity points towards the Sun. In the Galactic Cartesian system this
341: velocity is positive in the $X$, $Y$, and $Z$ directions.} would be
342: $(-64 \times -0.15)+(46 \times -0.98)+(184 \times 0.12)$ or $v_{GSR}=
343: -33$ km/sec (the direction and magnitude of this component of the
344: $v_{GSR}$ in the circular orbit case is shown as $V_{C}$ in Figure 3,
345: while the direction and magnitude of the {\em measured} $v_{GSR}$ for
346: Pyxis is shown as $V_{M}$). Including the component of the Sun's
347: velocity along the line of sight ($-227$ km/sec), the heliocentric
348: radial velocity ($V_{C helio}$ in Figure 3) for Pyxis in this case
349: would be $-33 -(-227)= 194$ km/sec. Since this is much larger than the
350: measured value (36 km/sec, $V_{M helio}$ in Figure 3), we conclude that
351: Pyxis is not in an orbit that gives rise to a present space velocity
352: near $\vec{V}_{circ}$ and, therefore, the strawman model of Pyxis being
353: on a {\em circular} orbit and sharing the LMC orbital pole grossly fails
354: expectations. Thus, one or both of the assumptions in the strawman
355: model must be invalid: either Pyxis is not on a circular orbit or/and
356: Pyxis' orbit does not share a pole with the LMC.
357:
358: Since the inferred radial velocity of the Pyxis globular cluster with
359: respect to a stationary observer at the location of the Sun has a large
360: magnitude, $v_{GSR}\sim-191$ km/sec, constraints can be placed on
361: non-circular orbits Pyxis may follow that also share the plane and
362: direction of rotation of the LMC's orbit. We have calculated the
363: orbital pole for the Pyxis globular cluster given all possible,
364: realistic proper motions and accounting for our derived radial
365: velocity. In Figure 4, we present the region in proper motion space
366: that produces an orbital pole for the Pyxis globular cluster that is
367: within $15^{\circ}$ of the pole of the LMC's orbit. We limit the
368: possible proper motions to those that yield a space velocity less than
369: the escape velocity from the Milky Way at the position of Pyxis
370: ($\sim\,$415 km/sec in the Galactic model of Kochanek [1996]) and obtain the
371: shaded region in Figure 4. This is a prediction for the magnitude and
372: direction of the proper motion of Pyxis with respect to the Sun
373: assuming that the Milky Way capture from the Magellanic Clouds
374: hypothesis is correct.
375:
376: The proper motions in the shaded region of Figure 4 are those that can
377: produce an orbital pole in the direction of $\hat{P}$ given a $v_{GSR}$
378: of $-191$ km/sec for Pyxis. We have calculated the shapes and energies
379: of the orbits allowed for Pyxis to determine if a pole in the direction
380: of $\hat{P}$ is only likely for a very restricted range of conditions.
381: For example, is the LMC capture origin for Pyxis only viable if Pyxis
382: is following an extremely eccentric orbit? In fact, a range of orbits
383: is possible for Pyxis given a proper motion in the shaded region in
384: Figure 4. For a given elliptical orbit, the angle between the
385: instantaneous velocity and radius vectors varies with position along
386: the ellipse and that angle has a well defined minimum value for a given
387: orbital eccentricity. For each space motion derived from our radial velocity
388: and a proper motion from Figure 4, we have determined the angle between
389: the velocity vector and the present Galactocentric radius vector for
390: Pyxis. Assuming a closed, elliptical orbit, we can determine the lower
391: limit for the eccentricity of the associated orbit having the given
392: angle between the velocity and radius vectors at the present position
393: of Pyxis. The orbits determined for Pyxis given our radial velocity
394: and a proper motion in the shaded region in Figure 4 have
395: eccentricities of $e > 0.70$, with the peak of the distribution of all
396: allowable eccentricities near $e \sim\,$0.8.
397:
398: We note here that few of the globular clusters with measured proper
399: motions are following nearly circular orbits. \cite{dd99} has compiled
400: all of the measured proper motions for a sample of 38 Galactic globular
401: clusters and integrated orbits for each cluster. Figure 5 presents a
402: histogram of the orbital eccentricities that \cite{dd99} calculated for
403: the globular clusters in their sample. The open histogram in Figure 5
404: represents the data on the whole sample, while the hatched histogram
405: represents the data on the 10 clusters with apoGalactica greater than
406: 20 kpc. Less than half of the entire sample have eccentricities of $e
407: < 0.5$, and, more importantly, for the outer halo globular clusters the
408: measured eccentricities are mostly found in the range $0.6 < e < 0.8$.
409: Therefore, one might conclude that it is more likely than not that
410: Pyxis is following an eccentric orbit and its space motion is {\em not}
411: perpendicular to its current position. However, such a conclusion must
412: be tempered with the acknowledgement of a potential selection bias for
413: the latter subsample. The majority of the globular clusters with
414: measured proper motions are those that are currently close to the Sun.
415: Therefore, the clusters with large apoGalactica that have measured
416: proper motions are, for the most part, currently near periGalacticon
417: and thus must be following eccentric orbits. Thus, the sample of
418: globular clusters that make up the hatched histogram in Figure 5 may be
419: selected preferentially from the sample of outer halo globular clusters
420: on eccentric orbits. Since few outer halo globular clusters near
421: apoGalacticon have measured proper motions, the true distribution of
422: eccentricities for outer halo globular clusters is unknown. However,
423: the fact remains that a non-negligible (and perhaps dominant) fraction
424: of the outer halo globular cluster population is orbiting the galaxy
425: with eccentricities near 0.8, and since the majority of the outer halo
426: globular clusters with orbits integrated by \cite{dd99} have
427: eccentricities near $e \sim\,$0.8, it is at least conceivable that the orbit of
428: Pyxis has a similar eccentricity.
429:
430: For our measured Pyxis radial velocity, we have integrated orbits for a
431: grid of $>1500$ proper motions found in the shaded region in Figure 4
432: in the potential of \cite{jsh95} for 10 Gyr each. The orbital energy
433: of Pyxis determined from the majority of the proper motions that
434: produce an orbital pole at $\hat{P}$ is within the $1-\sigma$ error
435: bars of the orbital energy of the LMC, although the error bar is large
436: ($E_{LMC} = -2.1\pm0.9 \times 10^{4}$ km$^{2}$/sec$^{2}$). However,
437: Johnston (1998) found that in simulations of tidal stripping, debris
438: was found within $\pm3\Delta E$ of the parent object (see eq. 1). {\em All}
439: of the orbits produced from our measured radial velocity and a proper
440: motion in the shaded region of Figure 4 are within $\pm3\Delta E$ of
441: the orbital energy of the LMC. Since the $\hat{P}$ orbits do not
442: require extremely unlikely constraints on the eccentricity and since
443: the orbital energies for these orbits are similar to expectations for
444: debris from the LMC, the LMC capture origin for Pyxis
445: remains viable.
446:
447:
448: \section{Conclusions}
449:
450: It has been proposed since its discovery that the Pyxis globular
451: cluster may have been captured by the Milky Way from the Magellanic
452: Clouds. If the space motion for Pyxis were known, a comparison of the
453: position of its orbital pole with respect to the LMC as well as a
454: comparison of its angular momentum and orbital energy to that of the
455: LMC would allow one to determine if the two objects share similar
456: orbits. Although only one component of the space motion of Pyxis is
457: now measured, some constraints can be placed on its possible orbit in
458: the tidal capture scenario. A circular orbit with an orbital pole at
459: $(l,b)=(163,-22)^{\circ}$ is completely ruled out by the measured
460: radial velocity. However, we have shown here that the large radial
461: velocity of Pyxis with respect to a stationary observer at the position
462: of the Sun does not rule out the possibility that the cluster was
463: captured from the LMC since a reasonable range of viable orbits with $e
464: \sim\,$0.8 exist for Pyxis that are also similar in energy and angular
465: momentum to that of the LMC. No suitable first epoch plate material is
466: known to exist for Pyxis, so an attempt to measure its proper motion to
467: better determine the likelihood that Pyxis may be a captured LMC
468: globular cluster will require precise observations with the HST or the
469: Space Interferometry Mission (SIM).
470:
471: Although proper motions are not available for the majority of the outer
472: halo globular clusters, their spatial distribution has been used to
473: argue that they are likely to have been accreted into the halo (e.g.,
474: Majewski 1994, Palma et al.\ 2000). Recently, Dinescu et al.\ (2000)
475: have measured a proper motion for the young globular cluster Pal 12 and
476: they find that its orbit is what one would expect if it had been
477: captured from the {\em Sagittarius} dwarf galaxy. An accretion origin
478: of the outer halo, second parameter horizontal branch globular clusters
479: is often invoked to explain the possible younger age of some of these
480: objects (where youth is inferred either from the second parameter
481: effect itself or from relative age estimates determined from
482: the cluster CMDs). The physical mechanism that causes the second parameter
483: effect in globular clusters is still unknown: Although it is now
484: generally agreed that there are indeed some globular clusters with
485: anomalously young ages, age differences alone may not be enough to
486: explain the second parameter effect. Whether or not the physical
487: mechanism that causes the effect is age, the possibility that
488: conditions somehow favor the formation of second parameter globular
489: clusters preferentially in Milky Way satellite galaxies (which
490: later get accreted by the Galaxy) may explain the source of the
491: differences between second parameter and non-second parameter globular
492: clusters.
493:
494: The age measurement for the Pyxis globular cluster by \cite{sg96},
495: $13.3\pm1.3$ Gyr, suggests that it is younger by $\sim\,$3 Gyr than the
496: oldest Milky Way globular clusters when measured on the same age
497: scale. Recently, age measurements for the oldest LMC globular clusters
498: have been made (\cite{olsen98}) using a different technique than that
499: used for Pyxis, but their average age of $15.3\pm1.5$ Gyr places them
500: similar in age to the oldest Milky Way globular clusters, when
501: calibrated onto the same absolute age scale. Another study of a
502: different sample of LMC clusters (\cite{johnson99}) also finds the
503: oldest LMC clusters to be as old as the old Milky Way clusters. Thus,
504: we may conclude that typical LMC clusters are older than Pyxis.
505: However, at least one of the clusters in the Olsen et al.\ (1998)
506: sample is $\sim\,$2 Gyr younger than the others (NGC 1898), which makes
507: it similar in age to Pyxis. Therefore, it is not impossible to place
508: Pyxis in the ``LMC family'' of clusters from age arguments, though it
509: does appear that Pyxis would be at the young end of the age range for
510: old LMC clusters.
511:
512: It may be noted, however, that the current orbital pole of the Small
513: Magellanic Cloud (SMC) is also very near the intersection point of the
514: poles of the LMC and Pyxis (see Figure 2). Since the SMC is more
515: fragile due to its weaker gravitational potential, perhaps a more
516: attractive origin for Pyxis is from stripping of the SMC rather than
517: the LMC. Recent studies of SMC globular clusters have found that the
518: SMC clusters show a range in ages (e.g., \cite{sfrz98}, \cite{msf98})
519: including at least one cluster with an age similar to Pyxis (NGC 121).
520: The orbital energy of the SMC has a larger magnitude and a smaller
521: error bar than that of the LMC, so not all of the orbits produced from
522: a proper motion in the shaded region in Figure 4 have orbital energies
523: similar to expectations of SMC debris. Only the orbits having proper
524: motions found in the inner part of the shaded region, with a total
525: magnitude of the proper motion of $\sim\,$0.75 mas/yr, have orbital
526: energies consistent with an SMC capture origin. Since the same orbital
527: energy and age arguments applied to support the LMC capture origin also
528: apply to the SMC, we consider it a possibility that Pyxis may have been
529: captured from either the LMC or the SMC.
530:
531:
532: \acknowledgements
533:
534: We would like to thank Ata Sarajedini for providing us with an
535: electronic version of his table of CCD photometry for Pyxis stars. We
536: also appreciate a helpful conversation with Knut Olsen. We wish to
537: thank the anonymous referee for useful comments that improved the
538: manuscript. CP and SRM acknowledge support for this research from NSF
539: CAREER Award grant AST-9702521, the David and Lucile Packard
540: Foundation, and The Research Corporation.
541:
542: \appendix
543:
544: \section{Definition and Sign Conventions for $V_{GSR}$}
545:
546: The conversion of velocities among various reference frames is treated
547: in the literature and in the standard texts, such as Mihalas \& Binney
548: (1981). Because we have found some confusing misuse of the standard
549: terminology in the literature, we provide this detailed explanation of
550: our sign and naming conventions.
551:
552: The radial velocity that one measures for a star is the
553: velocity of that object with respect to the Earth. Often, corrections
554: are made to this velocity to remove the motions of the Earth and Sun,
555: which reduces the measured radial velocity to a velocity with respect
556: to some standard of rest. For example, the measured heliocentric
557: radial velocity ($v_{helio}$) is reduced to the radial velocity with
558: respect to the Local Standard of Rest ($v_{LSR}$) by removing the Sun's
559: peculiar velocity with respect to the LSR:
560:
561: \begin{equation}
562: v_{LSR} = v_{helio} + [9 \cos (b) \cos (l) + 11 \cos (b) \sin (l) + 6 \sin (b)] km/sec.
563: \end{equation}
564:
565: \noindent This velocity can be further reduced to the Galactic Standard
566: of Rest (GSR) by removing the Sun's orbital velocity around the Galactic
567: Center. So,
568:
569: \begin{equation}
570: v_{GSR} = v_{LSR} + [220 \cos (b) \sin (l)] km/sec.
571: \end{equation}
572:
573: Referring to this velocity as ``$v_{GSR}$'' or a ``Galactocentric''
574: velocity apparently causes some confusion in the interpretation of
575: velocity data. When reduced using the above two equations, the
576: velocity referred to as $v_{GSR}$ is the velocity of the object as seen
577: by a stationary observer at the position of the Sun. The direction of
578: this velocity is along the line of sight between the object and the Sun
579: and not along the line of sight between the object and the Galactic
580: Center. The latter misinterpretation of ``Galactocentric'' velocity (as we
581: have found in some articles in the literature) can lead to misleading or
582: erroneous conclusions.
583:
584: There is an additional ambiguity in the definition of $v_{GSR}$, and
585: that is the sign convention. For a typical radial velocity, positive
586: refers to a velocity that is moving away from
587: the origin, and negative refers to a velocity that is approaching the
588: origin. The origin for the ``Galactocentric''
589: radial velocity, or $v_{GSR}$, is the Sun and not the Galactic center.
590: Therefore, the sign convention for $v_{GSR}$ is that a positive
591: velocity indicates that the object is moving away from a stationary
592: observer at the position of the Sun and a negative velocity indicates
593: that the object is moving towards a stationary observer at the position
594: of the Sun. The right hand sides of the two equations above are collectively
595: the velocity of the Sun along the line of sight.
596: This sign convention introduces additional confusion
597: because the sign may not agree with the sign convention for the
598: Cartesian Galactocentric $(U,V,W)$ system, and because the sign of
599: the contribution of the Sun's motion, $v_{\sun LOS}$ can seem
600: counterintuitive.
601:
602: For example, the Pyxis globular cluster has been measured to have a
603: heliocentric radial velocity of $\sim\,$36 km/sec. Using the above
604: equations, $v_{GSR} = -191$ km/sec for Pyxis. The proper
605: interpretation of this velocity is that Pyxis is approaching a
606: stationary observer at the position of the Sun with a velocity
607: magnitude of 191 km/sec. However, the Sun is located in Galactic
608: Cartesian coordinates at $(X,Y,Z) = (-8,0,0)$ and Pyxis is located at
609: $(X,Y,Z) = (-13.9,-38.6,4.8)$. Therefore, the components of this
610: velocity, $v_{GSR} = -191$ km/sec, in Galactic Cartesian coordinates
611: are positive in $X$, positive in $Y$, and negative in $Z$. Moreover,
612: even though the Sun's motion is {\it increasing} the separation
613: of Pyxis from us (i.e., {\it increasing} the recessional velocity)
614: $v_{\sun LOS}$ is {\it negative}.
615:
616:
617:
618: \clearpage
619:
620: \begin{thebibliography}{}
621:
622: \bibitem[Caldwell et al. (1993)]{saao} Caldwell, J. A. R., Cousins, A. W. J.,
623: Ahlers, C. C., van Wamelen, P., \& Maritz, E. J. 1993, SAAOC, 15, 1
624:
625: \bibitem[Da Costa 1995]{d95} Da Costa, G. S. 1995, \pasp, 107, 937
626:
627: \bibitem[Dinescu et al.\ (1999)]{dd99} Dinescu, D., Girard, T. M., \& van Altena,
628: W. F. 1999, \aj, 117, 1792.
629:
630: \bibitem[Dinescu et al.\ 2000]{dd00} Dinescu, D., Majewski, S. R., Girard, T. M.,
631: Johnston, K. V., \& Cudworth, K. C. 2000, {\it in prep.}
632:
633: \bibitem[Harris (1996)]{mwgc} Harris, W. E. 1996, \aj, 112, 1487
634:
635: \bibitem[Irwin et al.\ 1995]{idk95} Irwin, M. J., Demers, S., \&
636: Kunkel, W. E. 1995, \apj, 453, L21
637:
638: \bibitem[Irwin et al.\ 1996]{i4} Irwin, M., Demers, S., \& Kunkel, W. 1996,
639: \baas, 28, 932
640:
641: \bibitem[Johnson, et al. (1999)]{johnson99} Johnson, J. A.,
642: Bolte, M., Stetson, P. B., Hesser, J. E. and Somerville, R. S. 1999, \apj,
643: 527, 199
644:
645: \bibitem[Johnston et al.\ (1995)]{jsh95} Johnston, K. V., Spergel, D. N.,
646: \& Hernquist, L. 1995, \apj, 451, 598
647:
648: \bibitem[Johnston (1998)]{kvj98} Johnston, K. V. 1998, \apj, 495, 297
649:
650: \bibitem[Jones et al.\ (1994)]{jones} Jones, B. F., Klemola, A. R., \&
651: Lin, D. N. C. 1994, \aj, 107, 1333
652:
653: \bibitem[Kochanek (1996)]{k96} Kochanek, C. S. 1996, \apj, 457, 228
654:
655: \bibitem[Kunkel \& Demers (1976)]{kd76} Kunkel, W. E., \& Demers, S.,
656: 1976, Roy. Green. Obs. Bull. 182, 241
657:
658: \bibitem[Lasker et al.\ 1990]{dss} Lasker, B. M., Sturch, C. R., McLean, B. J.,
659: Russell, J. L., Jenkner, H., \& Shara, M. M., 1990, \aj, 99, 2019
660:
661: \bibitem[Lin \& Richer (1992)]{lin92} Lin, D. N. C., \& Richer, H. B. 1992,
662: \apj, 388, L57
663:
664: \bibitem[Lynden-Bell \& Lynden-Bell 1995]{lb295} Lynden-Bell, D. \& Lynden-Bell,
665: R. M. 1995, \mnras, 275, 429
666:
667: \bibitem[Majewski (1994)]{srm94} Majewski, S. R. 1994, \apj, 431, L17
668:
669: \bibitem[Mighell et al.\ 1998]{msf98}
670: Mighell, K. J., Sarajedini, A. and French, R. S. 1998, \aj, 116, 2395
671:
672: \bibitem[Mihalas \& Binney 1981]{mb81} Mihalas, D., \& Binney, J. 1981,
673: Galactic Astronomy (San Francisco: Freeman)
674:
675: \bibitem[Olsen et al.\ 1998]{olsen98} Olsen, K. A. G., Hodge,
676: P. W., Mateo, M., Olszewski, E. W., Schommer, R. A., Suntzeff, N. B. \&
677: Walker, A. R. 1998, \mnras, 300, 665
678:
679: \bibitem[Palma et al.\ (2000)]{palma99} Palma, C., Majewski, S. R., \& Johnston,
680: K. V. 2000, \apj, submitted
681:
682: \bibitem[Rutledge et al.\ (1997a)]{ra97} Rutledge, G. A., Hesser, J. E.,
683: Stetson, P. B., Mateo, M., Simard, L., Bolte, M., Friel, E. D., \&
684: Copin, Y. 1997a, \pasp, 109, 883
685:
686: \bibitem[Rutledge et al.\ (1997b)]{rb97} Rutledge, G. A., Hesser, J. E.,
687: \& Stetson, P. B. 1997b, \pasp, 109, 907
688:
689: \bibitem[Sarajedini \& Geisler (1996)]{sg96} Sarajedini, A., \& Geisler, D. 1996,
690: \aj, 112, 2013
691:
692: \bibitem[Searle \& Zinn (1978)]{SZ} Searle, L., \& Zinn, R. 1978, \apj, 225, 357
693:
694: \bibitem[Shara et al.\ 1998]{sfrz98} Shara, M.
695: M., Fall, S. M., Rich, R. M. and Zurek, D. 1998, \apj, 508, 570
696:
697: \bibitem[Zinn 1985]{zinn85} Zinn, R. 1985, \apj, 293, 424
698:
699: \end{thebibliography}
700:
701: \clearpage
702:
703: \begin{figure}
704:
705: \plotone{fig1.eps}
706:
707: \caption{A finding chart for the six Pyxis stars observed. The image was created
708: using the Digitized Sky Survey (\cite{dss}). In this image, the center is
709: $\alpha_{2000.0} = 9^{\rm h} 07^{\rm m} 57.8^{\rm s}$,
710: $\delta_{2000.0} = -37\arcdeg 13\arcmin 17\arcsec$. North is up and
711: East is to the left.}
712:
713: \end{figure}
714:
715: \clearpage
716:
717: \begin{figure}
718:
719: \plotone{fig2.eps}
720:
721: \caption{An Aitoff projection of the sky in Galactocentric
722: coordinates. The solid arc near the center traces the locations of all
723: possible poles for the orbit of the LMC determined from the
724: \cite{jones} proper motion. The locations of the possible orbital
725: poles for the SMC (using the Irwin et al.\ (1996) proper motion) are
726: shown, as well. The dashed great circle is the family of all possible
727: normals to the current location of the Pyxis globular cluster. The
728: orbital pole of Pyxis is assumed to lie somewhere along this great
729: circle. The solid arc along the great circle contains all points
730: within $15^{\circ}$ of the intersection between the LMC's possible
731: orbital poles and those of Pyxis. If Pyxis has been recently captured
732: from the LMC by the Milky Way, its orbit should share nearly the same
733: pole as the LMC, and it is likely to lie along the arc shown here.}
734:
735: \end{figure}
736:
737: \clearpage
738:
739: \begin{figure}
740:
741: \plotone{fig3.eps}
742:
743: \caption{see next page}
744:
745: \end{figure}
746:
747: \clearpage
748:
749: \noindent Fig. 3. --- A 3-D projection of the sky in Galactic Cartesian
750: coordinates. The Sun is located at $(X,Y,Z) = (-8,0,0)$ kpc and Pyxis
751: lies at $(-13.9,-38.6, 4.8)$ kpc. The shaded plane contains the line of
752: sight connecting the Galactic Center to Pyxis and is perpendicular to
753: the vector $\hat{P}$, which is a unit vector that points in the
754: direction of the orbital pole located at $(l,b) = (163,-22)^{\circ}$, a
755: pole that Pyxis may share with the LMC. Any velocity vector for Pyxis
756: that lies in the shaded plane will give Pyxis an orbital pole in the
757: direction of $\hat{P}$ (by definition). The circular motion orbital
758: vector $\hat{v}_{circ}$ is a unit vector that is mutually perpendicular
759: to both $\hat{P}$ and the Pyxis/Galactic Center line of sight and
760: therefore lies in the shaded plane. If Pyxis is following a circular
761: orbit with its pole at $(163,-22)^{\circ}$, then its space velocity
762: should lie along $\hat{v}_{circ}$. Assuming that the space velocity of
763: Pyxis has a magnitude near the circular velocity of the Galaxy at 40
764: kpc, or $\sim\,$200 km/sec, the predicted radial velocity (as seen by a
765: stationary observer at the location of the Sun) for Pyxis is $V_{c}$,
766: or $-33$ km/sec, which corresponds to a heliocentric radial velocity
767: ($V_{c\ helio}$) of 194 km/sec. Given that the solar motion along the
768: line of sight to Pyxis ($V_{Sun}$) is $-227$ km/sec and that the
769: measured heliocentric radial velocity of Pyxis ($V_{m\ helio}$) is 36
770: km/sec, the measured radial velocity of Pyxis with respect to a
771: stationary observer at the location of the Sun ($V_{m}$), is $-191$
772: km/sec, ruling out a {\em circular} orbit for Pyxis with a pole in the
773: direction of $\hat{P}$. The unknown proper motion of Pyxis is only
774: constrained to be perpendicular to $V_{m}$ (by definition). It is
775: plausible that Pyxis may be following an eccentric orbit, as is the
776: case for the majority of the Galactic globular cluster population, in
777: which case the space velocity of Pyxis is unlikely to be perpendicular
778: to its radius vector. There exists a set of proper motions for Pyxis
779: (see Figure 4) that, when combined with $V_{m}$, produce a space motion
780: with a pole at $(163,-22)^{\circ}$ and leave the cluster bound to the
781: Milky Way.
782:
783: \clearpage
784:
785: \begin{figure}
786:
787: \plotone{fig4.eps}
788:
789: \caption{A plot of possible proper motions in equatorial coordinates
790: for the Pyxis globular cluster. The interior of the circle defines the
791: region of values for the transverse velocity that gives Pyxis a total
792: space velocity less than the escape velocity from the Galaxy ($\sim\,$415
793: km/sec). The shaded region defines the permissible proper motions that
794: result in Pyxis having an orbital pole within $15^{\circ}$ of the
795: orbital pole of the LMC. If Pyxis has been recently captured by the
796: Milky Way, its proper motion should lie in this region. Given a proper
797: motion in the shaded region and our measured radial velocity, the
798: minimum eccentricity of the possible orbits will vary from $\sim0.70 -
799: 1.0$. The greyscale indicates the range of minimum eccentricities of
800: the orbits given a proper motion in the various shaded areas. The
801: scale is given by the bar below the plot.}
802:
803: \end{figure}
804:
805: \clearpage
806:
807: \begin{figure}
808:
809: \plotfiddle{fig5.eps}{3.5truein}{90}{67}{67}{250}{0}
810:
811: \caption{The distribution of orbital eccentricities for globular clusters
812: in the sample of \cite{dd99}. The open histogram represents the eccentricities
813: for the entire sample of 38 globular clusters with known orbits. The hatched
814: histogram represents the distribution of eccentricities for the 10 objects in
815: the sample that have $R_{apo} > 20$ kpc, i.e., the outer halo objects. Given
816: our large measured radial velocity for Pyxis, the only allowed orbits it may
817: follow that nearly share the orbital pole of the LMC have $e \sim\,$0.8. Since
818: the majority of the outer halo clusters in the sample of \cite{dd99} have
819: $0.6 < e < 0.8$, it is plausible to assume that Pyxis may also follow such an
820: eccentric orbit.}
821:
822: \end{figure}
823:
824: \clearpage
825:
826: \begin{deluxetable}{lllcccc}
827: \tablenum{1}
828: \tablecaption{Observed Pyxis Giant Stars}
829: \tablehead{ \colhead{ID} & \colhead{$\alpha_{2000.0}$} & \colhead{$\delta_{2000.0}$}
830: & \colhead{\# of Obs.} & \colhead{$v_{helio}$}
831: & $R$\tablenotemark{a} & $(B-R)$\tablenotemark{a} \nl
832: & \colhead{(h:m:s)} & \colhead{(d:m:s)} & & \colhead{(km/sec)} & &}
833: \startdata
834: Pyxis A & 09:08:01.7 & -37:13:48 & 4 & 32.7 & 17.08 & 2.01 \nl
835: Pyxis B & 09:07:58.6 & -37:14:42 & 2 & 38.4 & 17.75 & 1.80 \nl
836: Pyxis C & 09:07:56.2 & -37:13:16 & 4 & 36.6 & 18.28 & 1.78 \nl
837: Pyxis D & 09:07:54.5 & -37:14:01 & 5 & 26.1 & 18.33 & 1.75 \nl
838: Pyxis E & 09:07:57.8 & -37:13:17 & 4 & 37.9 & 18.08 & 1.78 \nl
839: Pyxis F & 09:07:55.7 & -37:14:02 & 3 & 33.9 & 18.09 & 1.71 \nl
840: \enddata
841:
842: \tablenotetext{a}{Photometry from \cite{sg96}.}
843:
844: \end{deluxetable}
845:
846:
847: \end{document}
848: