1: %

2: \begin{table}

3: \begin{center}

4: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c} \hline

5: Planet & $\magad$ & $R$ (in km) \\ \hline

6: Mercury & $0.6$ & $-$ \\ \hline

7: Venus & $1.7$ & $0.8$ \\ \hline

8: Earth & $2.0$ & $1.0$ \\ \hline

9: Mars & $3.5$ & $1.9$ \\ \hline

10: \end{tabular}

11: \end{center}

12: \caption{For the asteroidal cloud around each planet, this shows

13: the magnitude adjustment $\magad$ at the region of greatest

14: concentration on the sky. The GAIA all-sky survey satellite will scan

15: the triangular Lagrange points of Venus, the Earth and Mars.  The

16: magnitude adjustment is used to estimate the radius $R$ of the

17: smallest asteroid detectable by GAIA, assuming the survey is complete

18: to $V \approx 20$.}

19: \label{table:tableofgaia}

20: \end{table}

21: 

22: \section{Venus} 

23: %

24: \subsection{Observables}

25: 

26: \noindent

27: We first discuss the results for Sample I (all survivors).

28: Fig.~\ref{fig:venuspanelsall}(a) shows the enormous area of sky that

29: these objects can occupy. The 50\% contour encloses $\approx 300$

30: square degrees of sky. The distribution is centered around the

31: ecliptic. Note that the orbital plane of Venus, which marks the

32: midplane of the distribution of coorbiting objects, is misaligned with

33: the ecliptic by $\approx 3^\circ$. This accounts for some of the

34: thickness in the latitudinal direction. The highest probability

35: density occurs at geocentric ecliptic longitudes corresponding to

36: Venus' greatest eastern and western elongations. These are at $\ellg =

37: \pm \asin\, \aV \approx \pm 44^\circ$, where $\aV$ is the semimajor

38: axis of Venus in AU.  Fig.~\ref{fig:venuspanelsall}(b) shows the same

39: distribution in the plane of heliocentric ecliptic longitude and

40: latitude. The distribution is concentrated towards the plane of the

41: ecliptic, but the disk is quite thick.  There is an asymmetry evident

42: between the leading $\Lfour$ and trailing $\Lfive$ points.  For

43: $\Lfour$, the probability density has a narrow peak at the classical

44: value of ($\ellh =60^\circ, \betah=0^\circ$), but for $\Lfive$, the

45: peak is broader and runs from ($\ellh \approx 260^\circ - 310^\circ,

46: \betah = 0^\circ$). In fact, the Jovian Trojans are known to have a 

47: markedly asymmetric distribution with $\approx 80 \%$ librating about

48: the leading $\Lfour$ point. In all our simulations, asymmetries arise

49: because more of our initial sample of 2000 objects survive the

50: preliminary 1 million year integration about $\Lfour$ than $\Lfive$

51: (see Table~\ref{table:tableoforbits}). However, these asymmetries are

52: always rather mild.

53: 

54: The distribution of velocities in the plane of, and perpendicular to,

55: the ecliptic is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:venuspanelsall}(c). The

56: velocity dispersion perpendicular to the ecliptic is much larger than

57: the velocity dispersion in the plane. Let us recall that the objects

58: in our sample come from a narrow range of initial semimajor axes

59: corresponding to the coorbital zone. The width of this zone can be

60: deduced from the resonance overlap criterion (Wisdom 1980). By itself,

61: this range in semimajor axes implies a very small scatter in the

62: velocities in the plane, so it is the distribution of eccentricities

63: that is responsible for most of the broadening. As regards the

64: velocity distribution out of the plane, the substantial scatter is

65: largely produced by the range of inclinations.  Finally,

66: Fig.~\ref{fig:venuspanelsall}(d) shows the distribution of magnitude

67: adjustment versus geocentric longitude. The brightest objects occur at

68: $\ellg \approx 0^\circ$. These are the asteroids at superior

69: conjunction. Even though they are furthest away from the Earth, this

70: is outweighed by the effects of the almost zero phase angle. Of

71: course, this portion is of little observational relevance. The

72: broadest range of magnitude adjustments occurs at the greatest eastern

73: and western elongations $\ellg \approx \pm 45^\circ$. Here, the phase

74: angle changes quickly for small changes in the longitude. At this

75: point, where the greatest concentration of objects occurs and so is

76: probably of most observational relevance, the typical magnitude

77: adjustment is $\approx 1.7$.

78: 

79: For the case of Venus, the contour plots for Sample II (Trojans alone)

80: are very similar to Sample I -- even down to the detailed shapes of

81: the contours. Accordingly, we do not present them here, although they

82: are available in Tabachnik (1999). The only figure that is markedly

83: different is the distribution as seen in the plane of heliocentric

84: longitude and latitude. Obviously, a sample of Trojans do not reach

85: the conjunction point at $\ellh = 180^\circ$ and so the probability

86: density falls to zero here.

87: 

88: Fig.~\ref{fig:venuslines} shows the one-dimensional distributions,

89: while Table~\ref{table:tableofstatv} gives the means, full-width

90: half-maximum (FWHM) thicknesses, the minima and maxima (at the 99\%

91: confidence level) of the distributions.  In each case, results are

92: presented for Sample I (full lines) and Sample II (dotted lines). Only

93: in the case of heliocentric ecliptic longitude and differential

94: longitude are there are any readily discernable differences between

95: Sample I and Sample II. The distributions in both heliocentric and

96: geocentric ecliptic latitude show that coorbiting Venusian asteroids

97: are most likely to be found in or near to the ecliptic. As regards

98: longitude, the distributions always peak at or close to the classical

99: Lagrange points, but they are broad. The horseshoe orbits in Sample I

100: cause the probability of discovery even at the conjunction points to

101: be far from insignificant.  The angular velocity of Venus is $240.4$

102: \arcsechr\ and this coincides exactly with the mean of the

103: distribution of total angular velocity. However, this distribution,

104: too, is rather broad with a FWHM of $27.8$ \arcsechr. This hints that

105: it may not be optimum to track the telescope with the expected rate of

106: Venus.

107: %

108: \subsection{Strategy}

109: 

110: \noindent

111: One strategy for finding coorbiting Venusian asteroids is wide-field

112: imaging.  Fig.~\ref{fig:venusview} shows the viewing time of the

113: Venusian Lagrange points as a function of calendar date for the year

114: 2000, tailored for the case of the observatories at Mauna Kea (upper

115: panel) and La Silla (lower panel).  The figure is constructed by

116: taking the difference between the moment when the $\Lfive$ point

117: reaches 2.5 airmasses and the end of morning civil twilight. In the

118: later months of 2000, only the leading $\Lfour$ point is visible and

119: the figure gives the difference between the onset of evening civil

120: twilight and the moment when the $\Lfour$ point reaches 2.5 airmasses.

121: This is a very generous definition of observing time, but even so the

122: Venusian Lagrange points are visible in 2000 for, at best, barely more

123: than an hour.  In 2000, Venus is visible in the morning sky till the

124: middle of April; it reappears in the evening sky after early

125: August. In the early months of 2000, only the trailing $\Lfive$ point

126: is visible, whereas in the later months, only the leading $\Lfour$

127: point is.  Venus is below the plane of the ecliptic for all of 2000,

128: and so the southern observatories provide more propitious observing

129: conditions. For La Silla, the best times are February or March for the

130: $\Lfive$ point, and October or November for the $\Lfour$ point.

131: %

132: \begin{figure*}

133: \centerline{\psfig{figure=Earth/newearthpanelsall.ps,height=0.8\hsize}}

134: \caption{This shows the observable properties of Sample I of

135: long-lived horseshoe and tadpole orbits around the terrestrial

136: Lagrange points. The panels illustrate the probability density in the

137: planes of (a) geocentric ecliptic latitude and longitude, (b)

138: heliocentric ecliptic latitude and longitude, (c) angular velocity in

139: the ecliptic ($X-Y$) versus angular velocity perpendicular ($Z$) to

140: the ecliptic, and (d) magnitude adjustment versus geocentric

141: longitude.}

142: \label{fig:earthpanelsall}

143: \end{figure*}

144: %

145: \begin{figure*}

146: \centerline{\psfig{figure=Earth/newearthpanelstrojan.ps,height=0.8\hsize}}

147: \caption{As Fig.~\ref{fig:earthpanelsall}, but for the sample II

148: (terrestrial Trojans alone).}

149: \label{fig:earthpanelstadpoles}

150: \end{figure*}

151: %

152: \begin{figure*}

153: \centerline{\psfig{figure=Earth/earthlines.ps,height=0.55\hsize}}

154: \caption{The one-dimensional probability distributions for synthetic

155: observations of coorbiting terrestrial asteroids. These are (a)

156: geocentric longitude (b) geocentric latitude, (c) angular velocity,

157: (d) heliocentric longitude, (e) heliocentric latitude and (f)

158: differential longitude. Full lines represent Sample I, dotted lines

159: Sample II.}

160: \label{fig:earthlines}

161: \end{figure*}

162: 

163: 

164: The other major problem is the very fast motions that these objects

165: typically have ($240.4$ \arcsechr\ is the mean for Venusian Trojans).

166: As the velocity distributions are broad, this may hinder techniques

167: such as tracking the camera at the average motion rate and looking for

168: unstreaked objects.  It may be better to track the telescope at the

169: sidereal rate and use short exposures to minimise trailing loss in

170: candidate Trojans. In any case, it is imperative that discovery of any

171: object happen preferably in real time, but certainly within 24 hours,

172: so that follow-up frames can be obtained as quickly as possible and

173: the candidate is not lost. This necessitates the development of

174: optimised software for real-time analysis (similar to that already

175: used in the Kuiper-Edgeworth Belt searches).

176: 

177: A second strategy for finding coorbiting Venusian asteroids is to

178: exploit the database that will be provided by GAIA. This is an ESA

179: all-sky survey satellite and will provide multi-colour and multi-epoch

180: photometry, spectroscopy and astrometry on over a billion objects. The

181: database will be complete to at least $V \approx 20$. GAIA will

182: observe to within $35^\circ$ of the Sun, so identification of

183: coorbiting asteroidal companions of Venus, the Earth and Mars will be

184: possible. {\it To our knowledge, this will be the first time the

185: Venusian Lagrange points have ever been scanned}. For each of the

186: planets, Table~\ref{table:tableofgaia} shows the minimum size C-type

187: asteroid that can be found with GAIA. For the Venusian cloud,

188: asteroids with radii $\gta 0.8$ km can be detected.  GAIA will observe

189: each asteroid roughly a hundred times over the mission

190: lifetime. Identification of successive apparitions of the same objects

191: in the database will be possible using estimates of the proper

192: motions.  Thanks to the astrometric accuracy of the GAIA satellite,

193: precise orbits for any newly discovered Trojans will be obtained.

194: %

195: %

196: \begin{table*}

197: \begin{center}

198: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline

199: Quantity & Sample & Mean & FWHM & Minimum & Maximum \\ \hline

200: XY Angular Velocity & I & 144.4\ah  & 22.5\ah  & 109\ah & 179\ah \\ \hline

201: Z Angular Velocity & I &0.0\ah  & 22.3\ah  & -84\ah  & 84\ah \\ \hline

202: Total Angular Velocity & I & 147.9\ah & 21.0\ah & 113\ah & 181\ah \\ \hline

203: Geocentric Latitude & I & $0.0^\circ$ & $4.0^\circ$ &

204: $-42^\circ$ & $42^\circ$\\ \hline

205: Geocentric Longitude & I & $59.6^\circ, -59.7^\circ$ 

206: & $153.4^\circ$ &$-84^\circ$ & $84^\circ$\\ \hline

207: Heliocentric Latitude & I & $0.0^\circ$ & $5.0^\circ$ &

208: $-42^\circ$ & $42^\circ$\\ \hline

209: Heliocentric Longitude & I & $60.0^\circ, 299.5^\circ$ 

210: & $328.1^\circ$ &$13^\circ$ & $347^\circ$\\ \hline \hline

211: XY Angular Velocity & II & 142.8\ah  & 28.3\ah  & 102\ah & 182\ah \\ \hline

212: Z Angular Velocity & II & 0.0\ah  & 27.3\ah  & -88\ah  & 88\ah \\ \hline

213: Total Angular Velocity & II & 147.9\ah & 25.1\ah & 108\ah & 186\ah \\ \hline

214: Geocentric Latitude & II & $0.0^\circ$ & $1.8^\circ$ &

215: $-43^\circ$ & $43^\circ$\\ \hline

216: Geocentric Longitude & II & $59.3^\circ, -59.3^\circ$ 

217: & $153.4^\circ$ &$-84^\circ$ & $84^\circ$\\ \hline

218: Heliocentric Latitude & II & $0.0^\circ$ & $5.19^\circ$ &

219: $-17^\circ$ & $17^\circ$\\ \hline

220: Heliocentric Longitude & II & $60.0^\circ, 299.5^\circ$ 

221: & $90^\circ$ &$27^\circ$ & $333^\circ$\\ \hline

222: \end{tabular}

223: \end{center}

224: \caption{The statistical properties of the synthetic observations of

225: our samples of long-lived coorbiting terrestrial asteroids. As usual,

226: Sample I is all surviving asteroids, Sample II is tadpoles only.}

227: \label{table:tableofstate}

228: \end{table*}

229: %

230: 

231: 

232: 

233: 

234: 

235: 

236: 

237: 

238: 

239: 

240: 

241: 

242: 

243: 

244: 

245: 

246: 

247: 

248: 

249: 

250: 

251: