1: \documentstyle[epsf,PASJadd]{PASJ95}
2: \draft
3:
4: \newcommand{\vol}{}
5: \newcommand{\no}{}
6: \newcommand{\lett}{}
7: \newcommand{\spage}{}
8: \newcommand{\rdate}{}
9: \newcommand{\adate}{}
10:
11: \begin{document}
12:
13: \title{Overabundance of Calcium in the young SNR RX J0852$-$4622:
14: evidence of over-production of $^{44}$Ti}
15:
16: \author{Hiroshi {\sc Tsunemi} \thanks{\it Department of Earth and Space
17: Science, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, 1-1
18: Machikaneyama, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-0043 JAPAN;
19: tsunemi@ess.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp, miyata@ess.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp,
20: jhiraga@ess.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp, akutsu@ess.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp}
21: \thanks{CREST, Japan Science and Technology Corporation (JST), 2-1-6
22: Sengen, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0047 JAPAN} , Emi {\sc Miyata}$^{*\dag}$,
23: Bernd {\sc Aschenbach}\thanks{\it Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur
24: extraterrestrische Physik, D-85740, Garching, Germany;
25: bra@xray.mpe.mpg.de}, Junko {\sc Hiraga}$^*$, and Daisuke {\sc Akutsu}$^*$}
26:
27: \abst{ Recently, COMPTEL has detected $\gamma$-rays of 1157\,keV from
28: $^{44}$Ti in the direction of the SNR RX J0852$-$4622 (Iyudin et
29: al. 1998). Since $^{44}$Ti is a product of explosive nucleosynthesis
30: and its half lifetime $\tau\sb{1/2}$ is about 60\,yrs, RX J0852$-$4622
31: must be a young supernova remnant and radiation is dominated by the
32: ejecta rather than by interstellar matter. We have detected an X-ray
33: emission line at $4.1\pm 0.2$ keV which is thought to come from highly
34: ionized Ca. The emission line is so far only seen in the north-west
35: shell region of RX J0852$-$4622. The X-ray spectrum can be well fitted
36: with that of thin hot plasma of cosmic abundances except that of Ca,
37: which is overabundant by a factor of $8 \pm 5$. Assuming that
38: most of Ca is $^{44}$Ca, which originates from $^{44}$Ti by
39: radioactive decay, we estimate a total Ca mass of about $1.1\times
40: 10^{-3}M_\odot$. Combining the amount of $^{44}$Ca and the observed
41: flux of the $^{44}$Ti $\gamma$-ray line, the age of RX J0852$-$4622 is
42: around 1000\,yrs.}
43:
44: \kword{ISM: individual (RX J0852$-$4622) --- ISM: supernova remnants --- X-Rays: sources --- X-Rays: spectra }
45:
46: \maketitle
47: \thispagestyle{headings}
48:
49: \section{Introduction}
50:
51: A supernova (SN) explosion is a source of heavy elements in the
52: Galaxy. The nucleosynthesized material inside the star is dispersed into
53: interstellar space at relatively high temperature. In young supernova
54: remnants (SNRs), there are many X-ray emission lines from highly ionized
55: elements, which tend to be diluted when mixing with ambient interstellar
56: matter.
57:
58: There are two types of young SNRs from a morphological point of view:
59: shell-like structures and those of center-filled morphology. There are
60: also two types of young SNRs from the spectroscopic point of view: thin
61: thermal emission and power-law type spectra. The Crab nebula, a young
62: SNR, shows a center-filled structure with a power-law type spectrum.
63: There is a neutron star, the Crab pulsar, in its center, which is the
64: energy source of the SNR. There are more SNRs showing shell-like
65: structures with spectra due to optically thin thermal emission,
66: e.g. Cassiopeia-A, Tycho and Kepler's SNRs. The shell structure is the
67: result of the interaction of the shock waves and corresponding
68: shock-heating of the ambient plasma. This produces thin thermal
69: emission including many emission lines. We note that the SNe of Tycho
70: and Kepler have been witnessed and recorded in historical documents
71: whereas there is no record of Cassiopeia-A which is estimated to be born
72: late in the 17th century.
73:
74: The remnant of the SN which occurred in AD1006, SN1006, is another young SNR.
75: It shows a pronounced shell-like structure. Koyama et
76: al. (1996) revealed that the spectra from the north-east and
77: south-west regions of the shell are of power-law type while that from
78: the interior is thin thermal emission. They claimed that the shell
79: region in SN1006 is a site of cosmic ray shock acceleration with
80: energies of up to 200\,TeV. Accordingly, the shell-like structure does
81: not always stand for a thermally radiating SNR.
82:
83: Cassiopeia-A, one of the young SNRs, is the first source from which
84: $\gamma$-ray emission lines from $^{44}$Ti have been reported (Iyudin et
85: al. 1994). $^{44}$Ti is expected to be produced in the explosive
86: nucleosynthesis inside the SN which also produces $^{56}$Ni. $^{44}$Ti
87: decays into $^{44}$Sc emitting two hard X-ray lines of 68\,keV and
88: 78\,keV with a half lifetime, $\tau\sb{1/2}$, of 60 yrs (Ahmad et
89: al. 1998). $^{44}$Sc decays further to $^{44}$Ca emitting a
90: $\gamma$-ray line at 1157\,keV with $\tau\sb{1/2}$ of 3.9 hours which
91: has been detected with COMPTEL. In this way, $^{44}$Ti is converted
92: into $^{44}$Ca. Taking into account the short lifetime of $^{44}$Ti,
93: its detection is direct evidence of the source being a young SNR. The
94: discovery of this second celestial source of $^{44}$Ti has been reported
95: by Iyudin et al. (1998): it is located in the direction of the
96: south-east part of the Vela SNR where Aschenbach (1998) discovered a new
97: independent SNR, RX J0852$-$4622, which has a radius of $\simeq
98: 1^{\circ}$. The distance to this source is not clear while it is on the
99: way to the Vela SNR that is 250 pc away (Cha et al. 1999). Based on the
100: X-ray and $^{44}$Ti data, RX J0852$-$4622 is expected to be born several
101: hundred yrs ago in a sky region which in principle could have been
102: observed from China, and therefore some record in a historical document
103: is expected if the SN was of standard brightness. However, if it were
104: sub-luminous the event might have been missed by the contemporaries
105: (Aschenbach et al. 1999). So far, no record has been found, which
106: reminds us of some similarity with Cassiopeia-A. We note that quite
107: recently a footprint of a historical SN has been found in terms of
108: nitrate abundance in Antarctic ice cores (Burgess \& Zuber 1999).
109: The associated SN would have occurred around 1320 $\pm$ 30 yrs.
110:
111: We have observed RX J0852$-$4622 with ASCA on December 21--24, 1998 as a
112: TOO target. This observation was performed with the two CCD cameras
113: (SIS) (Yamashita et al. 1997) and the two imaging gas scintillation
114: proportional counters (GIS) (Makishima et al. 1996) which are placed at
115: the focal plane of four thin-foil X-ray mirrors (Serlemitsos et al. 1995) on
116: board the ASCA satellite (Tanaka et al. 1994). In this paper, we
117: concentrate on the emission from the north-west bright shell
118: region. The entire remnant will be reported elsewhere.
119:
120: \section{Observation and Data Screening}
121:
122: The observation was performed in 7 pointings so that we could cover the
123: entire remnant with the GIS. Figure 1 shows the GIS field of view (FOV)
124: superimposed on the ROSAT all-sky survey image (Aschenbach et
125: al. 1999). We should note that we did not cover the south bright shell
126: region. The observational log is shown in table 1. We excluded all the
127: GIS data taken at elevation angle below 5$^\circ$ from the night earth
128: rim and 25$^\circ$ from the day earth rim, a geomagnetic cutoff rigidity
129: lower than 6 GeV c$^{-1}$, and the region of the South Atlantic Anomaly
130: (SAA). We also applied a ``flare-cut'' to maximize the signal-to-noise
131: ratio described in Ishisaki et al. within the frame work of {\sl
132: ASCA\_ANL} (Ishisaki Y. et al, 1997, ASCA News letter, No.5 ). In this
133: way, the effective exposure time is $\simeq$ 76ksec after the data
134: screening. We constructed three kinds of images for the GIS data set: a
135: total count image, a non-X-ray background image, and a cosmic X-ray
136: background image. As shown in table 1, the GIS bit assignments are
137: slightly different from pointing to pointing, the binsize of coordinates
138: is different. We redistributed events in each binning area with a
139: Poisson random number to make images having the same dimensions. The
140: non-X-ray background image was generated with the H02-sorting method in
141: {\sl DISPLAY45} (the detailed description of this method is in Ishisaki
142: (1996)). The image of the cosmic X-ray background was extracted from the
143: Large Sky Survey (LSS) data observed during the ASCA PV phase (Ueda et
144: al. 1999). We also extracted the non-X-ray background image from the LSS
145: data to produce the mean cosmic X-ray background image solely. Thus, we
146: extracted background-subtracted GIS images in the energy band of
147: $0.7-10$ keV as shown in figure 2. We can find a well-defined shell
148: structure and a compact point-like source at the geometrical center of
149: the X-ray shell.
150:
151: In the case of the SIS data analysis, we excluded all the data taken at
152: elevation angle below 5$^\circ$ from the night earth rim and 30$^\circ$
153: from the day earth rim, a geomagnetic cutoff rigidity lower than 6 GeV
154: c$^{-1}$, the region from 128s before entering the SAA to the end of the
155: SAA, and the period of 120s at the day-night change of the satellite.
156: After the screening, the total exposure time is $\simeq$59 ks. We,
157: next, manually removed the time region where we could see a sudden
158: change in the light curves of the corner pixels of X-ray events. Then,
159: we removed the hot and flickering pixels and corrected CTI, DFE, Echo
160: effects, and RDD (T. Dotani et al. 1995, ASCA News Letter 3, 25;
161: T. Dotani et al. 1997, ASCA Letter News 5, 14) in our data sets. We
162: employed the calibration file of {\tt sisph2pi\_110397.fits} for CTI
163: corrections. For RDD corrections, we need to look for the frame data
164: obtained near to the epoch of our observation. Therefore, we picked up
165: {\tt rdd9812\_s[0 or 1]c[0, 1, 2, or 3]m2\_t0\_60.fits} for RDD
166: corrections retrieved from the Goddard Space Flight Center anonymous ftp
167: site.
168:
169: \section{Spectrum Analysis}
170:
171: The GIS observation shows a shell-like structure similar to that
172: obtained with ROSAT. Its X-ray spectrum is almost uniform in spectral
173: shape over the remnant, consisting of two components: a power-law
174: component with a photon index, $\Gamma$, of $\sim 2.5$ and thin thermal
175: emission of electron temperature, $kT_{\rm e}$, of $0.07-0.21$ keV. The
176: X-ray spectrum from the entire region is shown in figure 3. RX
177: J0852$-$4622 overlaps with the Vela SNR that emits thin thermal
178: emission with $kT_{\rm e}$ of about 0.17 keV. This value is very close
179: to that of the low temperature component seen in RX J0852$-$4622.
180: Furthermore, we find the intensity of this component to be very similar
181: to that appeared in the Vela SNR component around RX J0852$-$4622. We
182: assume that the low temperature component seen in RX J0852$-$4622 is
183: background emission from the Vela SNR. Therefore we can expect that the
184: emission from RX J0852$-$4622 is predominantly of the power-law type
185: originating from a shell-like region.
186:
187: The SIS can cover only the central region of each GIS FOV. Among them,
188: the spectrum of the bright north-west shell clearly shows features which
189: differ from those observed elsewhere as shown in figure 4. We see a
190: clear emission line structure around 4 keV. We see this structure only
191: in the eastern part of the north-west bright shell region. Other
192: regions covered with the SIS show featureless spectra similar to that
193: obtained with the GIS for the entire remnant. For comparison, figure 5
194: shows the SIS spectrum extracted from the rectangular region shown with
195: the broken line in figure 1. There is no clear emission line structure
196: around 4 keV. This spectrum was well represented by a thin thermal
197: emission with $kT_{\rm e}$ of $0.10^{+0.01}_{-0.02}$ keV adding a
198: power-law spectrum with $\Gamma$ of $2.8^{+0.1}_{-0.2}$. Quoted errors
199: in this paper are at 90\% confidence level.
200:
201: We fitted the SIS spectrum of the north-west shell with a two-component
202: model. First of all, we employed a low $kT_{\rm e}$ thin thermal
203: emission model with cosmic abundance ({\tt mekal}) in order to represent
204: the emission from the Vela SNR. We then added another component for the
205: emission from RX J0852$-$4622 described below. The neutral hydrogen
206: column density, $N_{\rm H}$, of two components were set to be equal as
207: one free parameter.
208:
209: We applied a thermal bremsstrahlung model for the emission from RX
210: J0852$-$4622 proper, but we could not obtain an acceptable fit as shown
211: in model-1 of table 2. The big discrepancy between data and model is
212: found around 4 keV. We thus added a Gaussian component to reproduce the
213: structure around 4 keV (model-2). In this fitting, we fixed sigma of
214: Gaussian to be 0. Then, $\chi^2$ is improved by $\sim$ 10 compared with
215: the model-1 shown in table 2. If we apply the F-test, the significance
216: level of an additional 4 keV line is $\sim$ 99\%. The line center energy
217: is $4.1 \pm 0.2$ keV and flux is $(5 \pm 2) \times 10^{-5}$ counts
218: s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ over the SIS FOV.
219:
220: We then employed the thin thermal model with variable cosmic abundance
221: ({\tt vmekal}) (model-3). Free parameters are $kT_{\rm e}$, the
222: normalization of two thermal emission components, the abundances of Si,
223: S, and Ca of the high $kT_{\rm e}$ component, and $N_{\rm
224: H}$. Abundances of the other elements are fixed to cosmic values. This
225: model is acceptable at 90\% confidence level. The Ca abundance is $8 \pm
226: 5$ times larger than the cosmic value. The absolute value is less
227: meaningful since it strongly depends on the applied model and other
228: model parameters. However, the relative abundances among the elements
229: are relatively robust. As shown in table 2, the Ca abundance is 11 times
230: and 40 times larger than those of Si and S, respectively.
231:
232: If we employ a thin thermal model with nonequilibrium collisional
233: ionization (NEI) (Masai 1984; Masai 1994), $kT_{\rm e}$ increases while
234: the metal abundances do not change within the statistical uncertainties
235: as shown in table 2 (model-4).
236:
237: \section{Discussion}
238:
239: There are some candidates for the 4.1$\pm$0.2 keV emission line from an
240: astrophysical point of view. If it is a characteristic X-ray line, it
241: must be either from neutral Sc-K or a helium-like Ca-K emission line.
242: From the cosmic abundance point of view, it is very implausible that it
243: comes from Sc. If it comes from shock-heated matter, it is plausible
244: that it comes from Ca at high temperatures. If this is not the case, it
245: can be either a red-shifted Fe-K line from an AGN or a cyclotron
246: emission line from a strongly magnetized neutron star. Since the line
247: emission region is quite extended judging from the ASCA image, none of the
248: hypotheses of a point-like source is very likely.
249:
250: The overabundance of Ca can be a result of an overabundance of $^{44}$Ti
251: which is produced only in the SN explosive nucleosynthesis process. It
252: is mainly produced deep in the interior of the star, both in a type Ia
253: and type II SNe. In the following we assume that the ejecta containing
254: $^{44}$Ti are uniformly expanding into ambient space. In the early
255: phase of the SNR evolution, the major part of the emission does not come
256: from the shock heating process but comes from accelerated and
257: decelerating particles, which produce a power-law type X-ray spectrum.
258: In the north-west bright shell region, the ejecta might have recently
259: collided with an interstellar cloud forming shock-heated thermal
260: plasma, which is the source of the Ca emission line.
261:
262: The expanding ejecta happen to hit the interstellar cloud at the
263: north-west shell. The ejecta expanding along other directions should
264: also contain similar amounts of Ca but they may not yet been
265: shock-heated, so that just the power-law type spectrum prevails with no
266: emission lines. We note that there is another bright shell region in
267: the south, which we did not observe in our ASCA observations.
268:
269: Based on the emission line detected, we can estimate the total amount of
270: Ca. The north west bright shell region is about 11$^\prime$ square
271: where we detected the emission line. We assume that the depth of this
272: region is as equal to the width. Assuming that the filling factor of
273: this region is unity, we find that the plasma density in this region is
274: $(0.9 \pm 0.1) (D/200{\rm\ pc})^{-0.5}$ H cm$^{-3}$ where $D$ is the
275: distance to the source, resulting a total mass to be $5.4 \times 10^{-3}
276: M_\odot$. Then, we can evaluate the total mass in all directions
277: assuming spherical symmetry. In this way, we obtained the total amount
278: of Ca, $M_{\rm Ca}$, contained in RX J0852$-$4622 to be $1.1 \times
279: 10^{-3} M_\odot (D/200 {\rm\ pc})^{2.5} (A/8)$, where $A$ is the
280: abundance of Ca. We assume that all the $^{44}$Ca is in the shell
281: region but only that fraction expanding towards the north-west shell is
282: actually shock-heated and visible in the Ca line.
283:
284: The major isotope of Ca on Earth is $^{40}$Ca while the fraction of
285: $^{44}$Ca is about $2 \times 10^{-2}$ (Anders \& Grevesse 1989).
286: Assuming that the other isotopes of Ca are produced with the abundances
287: similar to the terrestrial values, $^{44}$Ca, the product of $^{44}$Ti,
288: should be heavily over-abundant, and we expect that almost all the Ca
289: detected must be $^{44}$Ca.
290:
291: Based on the theoretical models of Nomoto et al. (1984) and Thielemann
292: et al. (1996), type II SN can produce Ca of 5$\times$10$^{-3}M_\odot$,
293: of which value slightly depends on the progenitor star mass, whereas
294: type I SN can produce $1.2 \times 10^{-2}\ M_\odot$. Since we do not
295: know whether we have detected all Ca in RX J0852$-$4622, it is
296: inappropriate to compare our results with those of the model
297: calculations. In both cases, the mass ratio of Ca to Si is less or
298: similar to that of the cosmic value. These models cannot explain the
299: overabundance of Ca. Whereas these models assume the point symmetric
300: explosion, asymmetric explosions can produce large metal abundance
301: anomalies (Nagataki et al. 1997), which may explain the overabundance of
302: Ca. If we assume that most of Ca comes from $^{44}$Ti, we can estimate
303: the age, $t$, of RX J0852$-$4622 using the observed flux, $F$, of the
304: 1157\,keV $\gamma$-rays. We obtain t/$\tau\sb{1/2}$ = 16 $-$ log$_2$
305: (($F/3.8\times\ 10^{-5}$ photon cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$) $(D/200 {\rm\
306: pc})^{1/2} (A / 8)$). This value results in an upper limit of the age
307: of 970\,yrs and the lowest limit for the expansion velocity of 2900\,km
308: s$^{-1}$. Since there occurs shock-heating associated with deceleration
309: of the expansion, the initial expansion velocity must have been higher
310: than this value. If we assume that Ca in RX J0852$-$4622 has an isotope
311: population similar to that of the terrestrial value, the mass of
312: $^{44}$Ti is reduced by a factor of 50. Then we obtain a lower limit of
313: the age of 630\,yrs and an upper limit of the expansion velocity of
314: 4500\,km s$^{-1}$.
315:
316: Model calculations of SNe show that the heavy elements are produced
317: relatively deep inside the progenitor star. In type II SN, $^{44}$Ti is
318: produced very close to the mass-cut point, which is the critical
319: boundary separating the ejecta and the mass forming a central compact
320: remnant. If the SN explosion occurs in a homologous fashion, $^{44}$Ti
321: and Ca are concentrated in a narrow layer. We can expect that the
322: entire Ca is shock-heated simultaneously. Based on the SN model
323: calculations the expanding velocity of the Ca dominated layer is a few
324: thousand km s$^{-1}$ (Shigeyama et al. 1988). Therefore, the age of RX
325: J0852$-$4622 is likely to be closer to 970 yrs rather than 630 yrs.
326:
327: \section{Conclusion}
328:
329: We observed the SNR, RX J0852$-$4622, that is the $^{44}$Ti $\gamma$-ray
330: source. It is towards the direction to the Vela SNR that is 250pc away
331: from us. Based on the spectral analysis, the apparent spectrum from the
332: entire remnant consists of two components; one is a power-law component
333: and the other is thermal emission coming from the Vela SNR.
334:
335: In the north-west bright shell, we have detected an emission line feature.
336: This feature is only seen by the SIS over a small
337: fraction of the remnant. The line center is $4.1 \pm 0.2$ keV which is
338: interpreted as an emission line from highly ionized Ca. We find that
339: the Ca abundance in this region is about $8 \pm 5$ times that of the cosmic
340: value while the other elements are subcosmic.
341:
342: If the Ca abundance anomaly mainly comes from the overabundance of
343: $^{44}$Ca that is produced from $^{44}$Ti, we can evaluate the age of
344: this source using the flux of the $^{44}$Ti $\gamma$-rays. Since we
345: cannot distinguish among the Ca isotopes, the age estimate is between
346: 630 yrs and 970 yrs. If the Ca isotopes except $^{44}$Ca are produced
347: at cosmic abundance levels, the age is 970 yrs.
348:
349: \vspace{1pc}\par
350: We thank {\sl ASCA\_ANL} and {\sl DISPLAY 45} developing team members,
351: especially Dr. Ishisaki. We are grateful to all the members of ASCA
352: team for their contributions to the fabrication of the apparatus, the
353: operation of ASCA, and the data acquisition. This research is partially
354: supported by the Sumitomo Foundation.
355:
356: \clearpage
357:
358: \section*{References}
359: \re Ahmad I, Bonino G., Castagnoli G.C., Fischer S.M., Kutschera W.,
360: Paul M. 1998, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2550
361: \re Anders E., Grevesse N. 1989, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 53, 197
362: \re Aschenbach B. 1998, Nature, 396, 141
363: \re Aschenbach B., Iyudin A.F., Sch\"onfelder V., 1999, A\&A, 350, 997
364: \re Burgess C. P. Zuber K. 1999, astro-ph/9909010
365: \re Cha R.N., Sembach K.R. Danks A.N. 1999, ApJ, 515, L25
366: \re Ishisaki Y. 1996, Ph.D. thesis of Univ. of Tokyo, ISAS RN 613
367: \re Iyudin A.F., Sch\"onfelder V., Bennett K., Bloemen H., Diehl R.,
368: Hermsen W., Lichti G.G., van der Meulen R.D. et al. 1998, Nature, 396, 142
369: \re Iyudin A.F., Diehl R., Bloemen H., Hermsen W.,
370: Lichti G.G., Morris D., Ryan J., Sch\"onfelder V. et al. 1994, A\&A, 284, L1
371: \re Koyama K., Petre R., Gotthelf E.V., Hwang U.
372: Matsuura M., Ozaki M., Holt S.S. 1995, Nature, 378, 255
373: \re Makishima K., Tashiro M., Ebisawa K., Ezawa H.,
374: Fukazawa Y., Gunji S., Hirayama M., Idesawa E. et al. 1996, PASJ 48, 171
375: \re Mewe R., Gronenschild E.H.B.M., van den Oord G.H.J.,
376: 1985, A\&AS, 62, 197
377: \re Masai K., 1984, Ap\&SS 98, 267
378: \re Masai K. 1994, Ap.J., 437, 770
379: \re Nagataki S., Hashimoto M., Sato K. Yamada S. 1997, ApJ, 486, 1026
380: \re Nomoto K., Thielemann F.-K., Yokoi K., 1984, ApJ, 286, 644
381: \re Serlemitsos P.J., Jalota L., Soong Y., Kunieda
382: H., Tawara Y., Tsusaka Y., Suzuki H., Sakima Y. et al. 1995, PASJ 47,
383: 105
384: \re Shigeyama T., Nomoto K., Hashimoto M. 1988, A\&Ap, 196, 141
385: \re Tanaka Y., Inoue H., Holt S.S. 1994, PASJ 46, L37
386: \re The L.-S., Leising M.D., Clayton D.D., Johnson W.N., Kinzer R.L.,
387: Kurfess J.D., Strickman M.S., Jung G.V. et al. 1995, ApJ, 444, 244
388: \re Thielemann F.-K., Nomoto K., Hashimoto M., 1996, ApJ, 460, 408
389: \re Ueda Y., Takahashi T., Inoue H., Tsuru T., Sakano M.,
390: Ishisaki Y., Ogasaka Y., Makishima K. et al. 1999, ApJ, 518, 656
391: \re Yamashita A., Dotani T., Bautz M., Crew G., Ezuka
392: H., Gendreau K., Kotani T., Mitsuda K. et al. 1997, IEEE Trans. Nuc.
393: Sci. 44, 847
394: \re Yamashita A., Dotani T., Ezuka H., Kawasaki M., Takahashi K.
395: 1999, Nuclear Inst. Method A, 436, 68
396:
397: \clearpage
398:
399: \begin{fv}{1}{5cm}{The circular FOVs of the GIS are superimposed on the X-ray
400: intensity map obatained with ROSAT. There are two bright shell regions
401: in the north and south.}
402: \end{fv}
403:
404: \begin{fv}{2}{5cm}{X-ray surface brightness map obtained with the ASCA GIS.
405: The GIS image is smoothed with a Gaussian of
406: $\sigma$=30$^{\prime\prime}$ after rebinning of 2$\times$2
407: (30$^{\prime\prime}$ square) pixels.}
408: \end{fv}
409:
410: \begin{fv}{3}{5cm}{The X-ray spectrum from the entire remnant obtained
411: with the GIS}
412: \end{fv}
413:
414: \begin{fv}{4}{5cm}{The X-ray spectrum from the white square shown in
415: figure 1. Solid lines represent the best fit curve of model-3 (see
416: text). Ca is overabundant by $8\pm 5$.}
417: \end{fv}
418:
419: \begin{fv}{5}{5cm}{The X-ray spectrum from the rectangular region shown
420: with the broken line in figure 1. Solid lines represent the best fit
421: curve of the model of thin thermal emission adding a power-law
422: spectrum.}
423: \end{fv}
424:
425: \clearpage
426:
427: \begin{table*}[t]
428: \begin{center}
429: Table~1. Observational Log\\
430: \end{center}
431: \vspace{6pt}
432: \begin{tabular*}{\columnwidth}{@{\hspace{\tabcolsep}
433: \extracolsep{\fill}}p{5pc}cccccc}
434: \hline\hline\\[-6pt]
435: Pointing ID & RA (J2000) & Decl.(J2000) &
436: SIS chips & GIS bit assignment$^\ast$ & Exposure time$\dagger$ (ks) \\
437: [4pt]\hline \\[-6pt]
438: N1\dotfill & 8$^{\rm h}$49$^{\rm m}$ 18.$\!\!^{\rm s}$1 & $-$45$^{\rm d}$ 41$^\prime$ 0$^{\prime\prime}$ & S0C12, S1C30 & 8--6--6--5--0--6 & 9.3 \\
439: N2\dotfill & 8$^{\rm h}$53$^{\rm m}$ 42.$\!\!^{\rm s}$4 & $-$45$^{\rm d}$ 32$^\prime$ 29$^{\prime\prime}$ & S0C01, S1C01 & 8--6--6--0--0--10 & 10.4 \\
440: N3\dotfill & 8$^{\rm h}$55$^{\rm m}$ 31.$\!\!^{\rm s}$2 & $-$45$^{\rm d}$ 57$^\prime$ 12$^{\prime\prime}$ & S0C12, S1C30 & 8--6--6--5--0--6 & 13.7 \\
441: N4\dotfill & 8$^{\rm h}$51$^{\rm m}$ 43.$\!\!^{\rm s}$2 & $-$46$^{\rm d}$ 7$^\prime$ 31$^{\prime\prime}$ & S0C12, S1C30 & 8--6--6--5--0--6 & 11.3 \\
442: N5\dotfill & 8$^{\rm h}$47$^{\rm m}$ 47.$\!\!^{\rm s}$1 & $-$46$^{\rm d}$ 18$^\prime$ 5$^{\prime\prime}$ & S0C12, S1C30 & 8--6--6--5--0--6 & 9.8 \\
443: N6\dotfill & 8$^{\rm h}$51$^{\rm m}$ 6.$\!\!^{\rm s}$6 & $-$46$^{\rm d}$ 46$^\prime$ 58$^{\prime\prime}$ & S0C12, S1C30 & 8--6--6--5--0--6 & 11.9 \\
444: N7\dotfill & 8$^{\rm h}$54$^{\rm m}$ 50.$\!\!^{\rm s}$9 & $-$46$^{\rm d}$ 32$^\prime$ 17$^{\prime\prime}$ & S0C12, S1C30 & 8--6--6--5--0--6 & 9.8 \\
445: \hline
446: \end{tabular*}
447: \vspace{6pt}\par\noindent
448: $^\ast$ Each field stands for bit number of a pulse-height, x coordinate,
449: y coordinate, rise-time, spread discrimination, and timing.\\
450: $\dagger$ Exposure time of the GIS is shown.
451: \end{table*}
452:
453: \clearpage
454:
455: \begin{table*}[t]
456: \begin{center}
457: Table~2. Fitting results of the SIS spectrum at the north-west region.\\
458: \end{center}
459: \vspace{6pt}
460: \begin{tabular*}{\columnwidth}{@{\hspace{\tabcolsep}
461: \extracolsep{\fill}}p{4pc}cccccccc}
462: \hline\hline\\[-6pt]
463: model & low $kT_{\rm e}$ & high $kT_{\rm e}$
464: & Si & S & Ca
465: & $N_{\rm H}$ & $\chi^2$ (dof) \\
466: & (keV) & (keV) & & & & ($10^{22}$cm$^{-2}$) & \\
467: [4pt]\hline \\[-6pt]
468: model-1 & $(3.28^{+0.04}_{-0.66}) \times 10^{-2}$ & $2.0^{+0.4}_{-0.3}$
469: & --- & --- & ---
470: & $0.12^{+0.09}_{-0.05}$ & 99.3 (81) \\
471: model-2 & $(3.29^{+0.04}_{-0.63}) \times 10^{-2}$ & 1.8$\pm$0.3
472: & --- & --- & ---
473: & $0.14^{+0.09}_{-0.06}$ & 89.2 (79) \\
474: model-3 & $(4.25^{+0.70}_{-0.05}) \times 10^{-2}$ & 1.32$\pm$0.09
475: & 0.7$\pm$0.4 & $\le$ 0.2 & 8$\pm$5
476: & 1.1$\pm$0.1 & 87.2 (78)\\
477: model-4$^\ast$ & $(5 \pm 1) \times 10^{-2}$ & $3.1^{+1.6}_{-0.8}$
478: & $0.9^{+0.3}_{-0.2}$ & $\le$ 0.1 & $7^{+7}_{-5}$
479: & $0.83\pm 0.1$ & 88.9 (77)\\
480: \hline
481: \end{tabular*}
482: \vspace{6pt}\par\noindent
483: Quoted errors are at 90\% confidence level. \\
484: $^\ast$ Obtained ionization parameter is $10.8 \pm 0.1$.
485: \end{table*}
486:
487: \end{document}
488:
489: