1: %%%
2: %%% Sample proceedings article for rmaa.cls
3: %%%
4: %%% Converted to RMAA(SC) style and annotated by Will Henney
5: %%% (04 Oct 1999)
6:
7: %% This file contains examples of many of the commands in the LaTeX
8: %% document class rmaa.cls, such as the commands for specifying data
9: %% for the title page and the commands for including postscript
10: %% figures. For more details, you should consult the accompanying
11: %% Author Guide (`rmuser.tex'). A further sample document
12: %% (`rmtest.tex') contains examples of some commands not used in this
13: %% file, eg. for marking up tables. You may also want to use this file
14: %% as a template for your own article.
15:
16: %% Note: This article was originally published in `IAU Symposium 182:
17: %% Herbig-Haro Objects and the Birth of Low-mass Stars',
18: %% ed. B. Reipurth & C. Bertout (Dordrecht: Kluwer). Hopefully, I've
19: %% changed it enough to avoid copyright violation!
20:
21: %% All proceedings articles must begin with the following line
22: \documentclass[proceedings]{rmaa}
23: %\documentclass[manuscript]{rmaa}
24: %%
25: %% The file `rmaa.cls' should be somewhere in your TeX search path
26: %% (e.g, in the current directory, or in a personal or system-wide
27: %% directory of LaTeX packages.
28: %%
29: %% This will not work with old versions of LaTeX: any version
30: %% of LaTeX2e should be OK, but LaTeX209 is too old. If LaTeX
31: %% complains that it doesn't recognise the command `\documentclass'
32: %% then your LaTeX installation needs updating!
33:
34: %% The following package allows one to do the citations
35: %% semi-automatically. It defines the commands \cite{KEY},
36: %% \scite{KEY}, and \pcite{KEY} which respectively produce citations
37: %% in the following styles:
38: %% (AUTHOR YEAR)
39: %% AUTHOR (YEAR)
40: %% AUTHOR YEAR
41: %% For this to work, you need to pay attention to the formatting of
42: %% the `\bibitem's in your `thebibliography ' environment, qv.
43: \usepackage{rmaacite}
44: %% If you would rather do your citations by hand, then comment out the
45: %% above line
46:
47: %% Here, you can put the definitions of your own personal macros.
48: %% All the special commands defined in AASTEX 4.0 (e.g. \ion{}{},
49: %% \gtrsim, \arcsec, \apj, etc) are already defined. I haven't checked
50: %% if there are any new ones in AASTEX 5.0 yet.
51: \newcommand{\thOr}{$\theta^1\,$C~Ori}
52: \newcommand{\zero}{_0}
53: \newcommand{\kms}{\,\mbox{km s$^{-1}$}}
54: \newcommand{\Othree}{[\ion{O}{3}]~5007\AA}
55: \renewcommand{\P}[1]{%
56: \ifnum#1=1\hbox{OW~168--326E}\fi
57: \ifnum#1=2\hbox{OW~167--317}\fi
58: \ifnum#1=3\hbox{OW~163--317}\fi
59: \ifnum#1=5\hbox{OW~158--323}\fi
60: \ifnum#1=0\hbox{OW~171--334}\fi}
61:
62: %%
63: %% The following commands specify the title, authors etc
64: %%
65: \title{Hipparcos, IUE, and the Stellar Content of the Solar Neighbourhood}
66: \author{Carlos Allende Prieto
67: \affil{McDonald Observatory and Department of Astronomy, The University of Texas at Austin} }
68: %\altaffiltext{1}{A footnote to the title.}
69: %\altaffiltext{2}{Another address for one of the authors (note period).}
70: %% Note that the \affil{} command is inside the argument of the
71: %% \author{} command and that a short version of the address should go
72: %% here. More complicated author/address examples are discussed in the
73: %% Author Guide (`rmuser.tex') and illustrated in the example document
74: %% `rmtest.tex'
75:
76: %% The full postal addresses are specified here - they will be typeset
77: %% at the end of the article. Here is also the place to put email
78: %% addresses. Please try to follow the format given here. Consult
79: %% issues of the RevMexAA for further examples.
80: \fulladdresses{
81: \item Carlos Allende Prieto: McDonald Observatory and Department of Astronomy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712-1083, USA (callende@astro.as.utexas.edu).}
82: %% Note that the `\fulladdresses' command defines a list-like
83: %% environment, so each separate address must be preceded by the
84: %% `\item' command (here there is only one, since the authors share the
85: %% same address).
86:
87: %% Title/author for running headers
88: \shortauthor{Allende Prieto}
89: \shorttitle{Hipparcos, IUE, and the Solar Neighbourhood}
90: %% These will automatically be converted to upper case in the current
91: %% style.
92:
93:
94: %% No more than 5 keywords, chosen from the standard list
95: \keywords{Stars: atmospheres --- Stars: fundamental parameters --- Stars: late-type --- Ultraviolet: stars --- solar neighbourhood}
96:
97: %% The abstract:
98: \abstract{The spectroscopic parallaxes in the Hipparcos catalogue can be used to translate absolute stellar fluxes observed at Earth to the fluxes emerging at the stellar surface for nearby stars. The comparison of these fluxes with the predictions of theoretical model atmospheres allows us to determine the effective temperature and the metallicity of the stars. It is suggested that is possible to study the stellar content of the solar neighbourhood making use of the large number of ultraviolet spectra in the archive of the IUE satellite.}
99:
100: %% If your spanish is up to it, you may want to supply the resumen by
101: %% uncommenting the following line:
102: \resumen{La combinaci\'on de flujos absolutos estelares medidos en la Tierra con las pa\-ra\-la\-jes espectrosc\'opicas del cat\'alogo de Hipparcos, permite determinar con precisi\'on los flujos emergentes en las superficies de estrellas cercanas. Comparando estos flujos con las predicciones de modelos de atm\'osfera te\'oricos, es posible determinar la temperatura efectiva y la metalicidad de las estrellas. Se plantea la posibilidad de estudiar el contenido estelar de la vecindad solar haciendo uso del gran n\'umero de espectros ultravioletas disponibles en el archivo del sat\'elite IUE.}
103: %% Alternatively, you can leave the translation to the editors.
104:
105:
106: %% The following commands are only used when formatting an entire
107: %% volume of the proceedings. They allow the automatic production of
108: %% the Table of Contents and Index. By putting them in yourself, you
109: %% will save the editors some work.
110: %%
111: %% Indexing commands
112: \listofauthors{C. ~Allende ~Prieto}
113: \indexauthor{Allende ~Prieto, ~C.}
114: %% End of Indexing commands
115:
116: %% This command is so LaTeX won't stop on errors. I've put it in so
117: %% you will still be able to compile the file even if you have lost
118: %% the associated PS files of the figures.
119: %\nonstopmode
120:
121: %% The following command is necessary before beginning the text of
122: %% your article. There should be a matching \end{document} at the end
123: %% of the file.
124: \begin{document}
125:
126: %% This command is necessary to typeset the title, abstract, etc.
127: \maketitle
128:
129: %%
130: %% And here starts the text....
131: %%
132: \section{Introduction}
133: \label{sec:intro}
134: Understanding how the complex near-UV region of the spectra of stars is
135: shaped within the stellar atmospheres can provide a homogeneous source of
136: information on several of the fundamental stellar parameters, the chemical
137: composition, magnetic activity, rotational velocity, atmospheric velocities,
138: and ages. Many neutron capture elements, whose abundance in
139: metal-deficient stars keeps log of the supernovae rates along the galactic
140: evolution, produce undetectable (or subjected to large measurement errors)
141: features in the optical spectrum, but strong lines in the near-UV (see e.g.
142: Sneden et al. 1998). Interesting absorption lines in the spectrum of light atoms, such as boron and beryllium
143: (see e.g. Garc\'{\i}a L\'opez et al. 1998), are only present in the near-UV. Furthermore, F-type main sequence stars dominate this
144: region of the spectrum for intermediate-age stellar populations, and
145: therefore constitute a powerful prospective tool for dating galaxies (Heap
146: et al. 1999).
147:
148: A lack of proper understanding has prevented full use of the data
149: gathered by the space observatory IUE to study the stellar population in the
150: proximity to the Sun. Indeed all the available determinations of the
151: metallicity distribution in the solar neighbourhood, except for the
152: polemical work by Favata et al. (1997), are based on photometric
153: calibrations (Twarog 1980, Wyse \& Gilmore 1995, Rocha-Pinto \& Maciel 1998,
154: Flynn \& Morell 1997). The star counts do not fit, and the so-called G-dwarf
155: problem, the deficiency in relative numbers of metal-poor stars in the main
156: sequence, seems to extend to other spectral types as well to the more
157: metal-rich end of the metallicity distribution (Rocha-Pinto \& Maciel 1998).
158: Ideally, to extract the available information from the near-UV spectrum, the model atmospheres and other spectral synthesis ingredients
159: should be carefully tuned for each of the stars: the abundances and
160: abundance anomalies of all relevant elements, microturbulence, effective
161: temperature, gravity, interstellar extinction, etc. However, as a first step
162: I am neglecting here the abundance anomalies, variations in microturbulence, and the effect of interstellar extinction, to derive only the
163: effective temperatures ($T_{\rm eff}$s) and overall metallicities ([Fe/H]s).
164: Selecting a sample limited in volume to 100 pc, makes the availability of
165: Hipparcos (ESA 1997) parallaxes very likely for the stars observed by IUE,
166: and places a safe limit on the role of the interstellar extinction.
167:
168: \section{Observations and analysis}
169:
170: The Hipparcos Catalogue includes data for 22982 stars within 100 pc
171: from the Sun. Making use of the MAST Cross Correlation Search Tool, I
172: have identified 3421 low-resolution LW ($\sim 1800-3500$ \AA) spectra of 992 of
173: such stars. The IUE (NEWSIPS) observations have been retrieved from the
174: Villafranca node of the IUE Final Archive in Spain. A newer version of the archive has being released
175: recently (INES; Rodr\'{\i}guez-Pascual et al. 1999). When more than a single
176: spectra was available for a given star, they were combined and cleaned
177: using the IUEDAC IDL Software libraries to produce a single spectrum
178: per star.
179:
180: I have made use of the flux distributions calculated by Kurucz, and
181: available at CCP7 since 1993. The grid includes models for different
182: gravities (log g), effective temperatures ($T_{\rm eff}$) and metallicities
183: ([Fe/H]), while the parameters in the mixing-length treatment of the
184: convection are fixed, as well as it is the microturbulence (2 km/s), and the
185: abundance ratio between different metals (solar proportions). For a given
186: set of ($T_{\rm eff}$, log g, [Fe/H]), I obtain the theoretical flux from linear
187: interpolation, therefore using the information of the eight nearest models
188: available in the grid, which is divided in steps of 200 K in $T_{\rm eff}$,
189: 0.5 dex in logg, and 0.5 dex in [Fe/H].
190:
191: Making use of an accurate stellar parallax (p), $BV$ photometry and
192: state-of-the-art evolutionary isochrones (Bertelli et al. 1994), one
193: can estimate the stellar radius (R) with an accuracy of roughly 6\%
194: (Allende Prieto \& Lambert 2000, Lambert \& Allende Prieto 2000), and
195: get a small error in the determination of the ratio (pR)$^2$, which
196: allows to transform the absolute flux measured at Earth to flux
197: emerging from the stellar atmosphere. It is as well possible to
198: constrain the mass to within 8\% (in the range of metallicities we are
199: interested on) and, therefore, the gravity within 0.07 dex. Once the
200: gravity and the dilution factor for the flux are fixed, it is possible to compare
201: the absolute near-UV fluxes measured by IUE with theoretical fluxes,
202: and determine $T_{\rm eff}$ and [Fe/H]. As showed by Allende Prieto \&
203: Lambert (2000), knowing the absolute visual magnitude and the $B-V$ color index, comparison with evolutionary isochrones provides an independent
204: estimate of the $T_{\rm eff}$, precise to roughly 2\% for stars with
205: $4500 < $ $T_{\rm eff}$ $< 8500$ K, which can be used to check for
206: systematic errors (see below).
207:
208: \begin{figure}
209: \begin{center}
210: \leavevmode
211: \includegraphics[width=5.5cm,angle=90]{ALC_f1a.ps}
212: \includegraphics[width=5.5cm,angle=90]{ALC_f1b.ps}
213: \caption{Two examples of the match between observed (dashed lines) and theoretical (solid lines) absolute fluxes at the stellar surface in the region between 2000 and 3000 \AA. Within the panels, $T_{\rm eff}$ (K), [Fe/H] (dex) and logg (g in cgs) have been printed, as well as the star's identification in the Hipparcos catalogue.}
214: \label{f1}
215: \end{center}
216: \end{figure}
217:
218:
219: For each of the analyzed stars I first derive its gravity and the flux
220: dilution factor, then the values of [Fe/H] and $T_{\rm eff}$ are obtained by finding the minimum of the square of the difference between the observed and the synthetic spectrum. Previously, the
221: observed spectrum, which has a resolution between 5.2 and 8.0 \AA\, is degraded
222: to that of the synthetic spectra, roughly twice poorer. The search for the
223: optimum ($T_{\rm eff}$,[Fe/H]) pair is performed using the Nelder-Mead simplex
224: method, as implemented by Press et al. (1988). Figure \ref{f1} shows two
225: examples of the typical goodness-of-fit achieved.
226:
227: \section{Discussion}
228:
229: The sample was restricted to stars with $3500 <$ $T_{\rm eff}$ $<
230: 10000$ K. The employed models are known to be inappropriate close to
231: and below the cooler limit, as the plentiful molecules are not properly
232: taken into account, and the number of nearby stars beyond the upper
233: limit is very small.
234:
235: \begin{figure}
236: \begin{center}
237: \leavevmode
238: \includegraphics[width=5.5cm,angle=90]{ALC_f2a.ps}
239: \includegraphics[width=5.5cm,angle=90]{ALC_f2b.ps}
240: \caption{{\it Left panel}: Differences between the effective temperatures derived from the comparison of the stars' position in the colour-magnitude diagram with evolutionary isochrones (labeled ISO) and those from fitting the near-ultraviolet continuum (labeled UV). Stars with strong Mg II 2852 \AA\ emission are identified with rhombi, those with a continuum in the region
241: 2000-2400 \AA\ much stronger than prediction of the models with open circles, and the rest with filled circles. {Right panel}: Position of the {\it normal} stars (whose spectra do not show evidence for a chromosphere), on the [Fe/H]--$T_{\rm eff}$ plane. Two stars mark off the rest, one is the halo star HD 84937 (HIP 48152; [Fe/H] $\simeq -2.0$) and the other is HD 192640, a well-known $\lambda$ Bootis star. The two hot stars with [Fe/H] $\simeq -1.0$ are both peculiar too -- HD 161868 is a spectroscopic binary and HD 177724 has been assigned a spectral type A0Vpnn by Abt \& Morrell (1995).}
242: \label{f2}
243: \end{center}
244: \end{figure}
245:
246:
247: A first look at the comparison between the 'evolutionary' and near-UV $T_{\rm eff}$s
248: reveals systematic differences. The left panel of Figure \ref{f2} shows the comparison for the 253 stars whose IUE spectra have perfect quality flags in
249: the considered spectral range (2000-3000 \AA). Stars with strong Mg II 2852 \AA\ emission are identified with rhombi, those with a continuum in the region
250: 2000-2400 \AA\ much stronger than the models' prediction with open circles, and
251: the rest with filled circles. Disregarding the stars for which there is
252: indication of a chromospheric component in the spectrum (open symbols), the
253: spectroscopic $T_{\rm eff}$s of 'normal' stars exhibit a systematic difference from
254: the evolutionary $T_{\rm eff}$s. Similar -- although smaller-- effects could be present
255: in other $T_{\rm eff}$ scales that make use of the same type of model atmospheres,
256: such as that derived from the InfraRed Flux Method (IRFM; e.g. Blackwell \&
257: Lynas-Gray 1994). di Benedeto (1998) showed indeed that the IRFM $T_{\rm eff}$s of A
258: stars are about 2.3\% lower than his empirical scale. The 150 stars whose spectra do not show evidence for a
259: chromosphere are spread out the [Fe/H]--$T_{\rm eff}$ plane as shown in the right panel of Figure \ref{f2}.
260:
261:
262: It is obviously very difficult to determine the selection effects of the
263: sample, as the stars are required to have been observed by IUE.
264: It is likely that peculiar objects were favoured: multiple systems, stars with abundance
265: anomalies, pulsating/variable stars, metal-poor stars, etc. That explains
266: the excess of stars with $-1.0 <$ [Fe/H] $< -0.5$ find here, in comparison with
267: every other photometric study in the literature. Many of theses stars would
268: indeed be chemically peculiar stars (not being deficient in all metals, but
269: having a low abundance of some of the species relevant to the atmospheric
270: structure and the near-UV opacities) or spatially-unresolved binary
271: (multiple) systems. In both cases the stars would tend to be erroneously
272: shifted towards hotter $T_{\rm eff}$s and lower metallicities, in order to
273: compensate for the excess flux. The same argument could provide an
274: explanation for the lack of stars with $T_{\rm eff}$ $> 7000$ K at near/super-solar
275: metallicities: the peculiar stars, preferred by IUE observers, would tend to
276: have lower metallicities. Further study is clearly needed to shed light on this issue.
277:
278: \section{Conclusion}
279:
280: Several issues have been raised in this preliminary analysis, and are fundamental. The first of all is
281: that it is necessary to identify ALL the basic elements (chemical and
282: non-chemical) that affect the shape of the near-UV spectrum. They may be
283: quite different for different types of stars. Once those elements are identified,
284: we should attempt the fit of the spectrum allowing for ALL to vary. The parameters determined should be compared with other scales, of
285: empirical or independent nature, to asses the real possibilities of this
286: kind of analysis and the performance of the model atmospheres, opacities,
287: and other modelling ingredients. That procedure will likely help improving
288: the modelling. It will very likely shed light on another basic problem still
289: far from solved: the effective temperature scale.
290:
291: At that stage, we should look back to the application of near-UV
292: spectroscopic analysis to other affairs, such as the stellar content of
293: local neighbourhood, and review then the apparent scarcity of solar and
294: super-solar metallicity A-F stars.
295:
296: \acknowledgements
297:
298: I am grateful to Benjam\'{\i}n Montesinos and Enrique Solano for their help with the IUE spectra, and to David Lambert for interesting discussions.
299: This research has made use of the cross-correlation tool of the
300: Multimission Archive at the Space Telescope Science Institute
301: (MAST). STScI is operated by the Association of Universities for
302: Research in Astronomy, Inc., under NASA contract NAS5-26555.
303: Support for MAST for non-HST data is provided by the NASA Office
304: of Space Science via grant NAG5-7584 and by other grants and
305: contracts. I have made extensive use of the IDL software libraries
306: developed at the IUE Data Analysis Center (IUEDAC). All the data
307: used in this work were retrieved from the IUE data server at Villafranca del
308: Castillo satellite tracking station of the ESA. The SIMBAD database, operated at CDS and the NASA ADS were very useful in this work.
309:
310: %% When using the rmaacite package, the \bibitem command should be of
311: %% the format:
312: %%
313: %% \bibitem[AUTHOR<YEAR>]{KEY}
314: %%
315: %% so that the \cite{KEY}, etc. commands will work properly.
316: %%
317: %% If you are doing the citations manually, then you can just use
318: %% `\bibitem{}' instead. This will give you a warning about
319: %% `multiply-defined labels' which you can safely ignore.
320: %%
321:
322: \begin{thebibliography}
323:
324: \bibitem[<>]{} {Abt}, H. ~A. \& {Morrel}, N. ~I. 1995, ApJS {99}, 135
325:
326: \bibitem[<>]{}
327: {Allende Prieto}, C. \& {Lambert}, D. ~L. 1998, A\&A {352}, 555
328:
329: \bibitem[<>]{}
330: {Bertelli}, G., {Bressan}, A., {Chiosi}, C., {Fagotto}, F. \& {Nasi}, E. 1994, A\&AS {106}, 275
331:
332: \bibitem[<>]{}
333: {Blackwell}, D. ~E. \& {Lynas-Gray}, A. ~E. 1994, A\&A {282}, 3
334:
335: %\bibitem[<>]{}
336: % {Cochran}, W. ~D. \& {Hatzes}, A.~ P. 1999, In: J. ~B. Hearnshaw \& C. ~D. %Scarfe (eds.): {Precise Stellar Radial Velocities}, ASP (Conf. Series) {185}, 113
337:
338: \bibitem[<>]{}
339: {di Benedetto}, G. ~P. 1998, A\&A {339}, 848
340:
341: \bibitem[<>]{}
342: {ESA} 1997, The Hipparcos and Tycho Catalogues (ESA SP-1200)
343:
344: \bibitem[<>]{}
345: {Favata}, F., {Micela}, G. \& {Sciortino}, S. 1997, A\&A {323}, 809
346:
347: \bibitem[<>]{}
348: {Flynn}, C. \& {Morel}, O. 1007, MNRAS {286}, 617
349:
350: \bibitem[<>]{}
351: {Garc\'{\i}a L\'opez}, R. ~J., {Lambert}, D. ~L., {Edvardsson}, B., {Gustafsson}, B., {Kiselman}, D. \& {Rebolo}, R. 1998, ApJ {500}, 241
352:
353: \bibitem[<>]{}
354: {Heap}, S., {Brown}, T., {Lanz}, T. \& {Yi}, S. 1999, Ap\&SS {265}, 531
355:
356: %\bibitem[<>]{}
357: % {Horowitz}, P., {Coldwell}, C., {Latham}, D., {Papaliolios}, C., {Stefanik}, R., %{Wolff}, J. \& {Zajac}, J. 1999, In: {Bioastronomy 99: A New Era in %Biosastronomy}, 6th Bioastronomy Meeting, Kohala Coast Hawaii - August %2-6, {E111}
358:
359: \bibitem[<>]{}
360: {Lambert}, D. ~L. \& {Allende Prieto}, C. 2000, In: R.~J. Garc\'{\i}a L\'opez, R. Rebolo \& M.~R. Zapatero Osorio (eds.): {The 11$^{\rm th}$ Cambridge Workshop on Cool Stars, Stellar
361: Systems and the Sun}, ASP (Conf. Series), in press (Available at
362: http://hebe.as.utexas.edu/cs11rt/rt.html)
363:
364: %\bibitem[<>]{}
365: % {Matloff}, G. ~L. \& {Pazmino}, J. 1997, In: {Astronomical and Biochemical Origins and the Search for Life in the Universe}, IAU Coll. {161}, 757
366:
367: %\bibitem[<>]{}
368: % {Olsson}, B. 1999, BAAS {195}, 10911
369:
370: \bibitem[<>]{}
371: {Press}, W.~H., {Flannery}, B.~P., {Teukolsky}, S.~A. \& {Vetterling}, W.~T. 1988, {Numerical Recipes} (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press)
372:
373: \bibitem[<>]{}
374: {Rocha-Pinto}, H.~J. \& {Maciel}, W.~J. 1998, A\&A {339}, 791
375:
376: \bibitem[<>]{}
377: {Rodr\'{\i}guez-Pascual}, P.~M., {Gonz\'alez-Riestra}, R., {Schartel}, N. \& {Wamsteker}, W. 1999, A\&AS {139}, 183
378:
379: \bibitem[<>]{}
380: {Sneden}, C., {Cowan}, J.~ J., {Burris}, D. ~L. \& {Truran}, J. ~W. 1998, ApJ {496}, 235
381:
382: \bibitem[<>]{}
383: {Twarog}, B. A. 1980, ApJ {242}, 242
384:
385: %\bibitem[<>]{}
386: % {van den Bergh}, S. 1962, AJ {67}, 486
387:
388: \bibitem[<>]{}
389: {Wyse}, R. ~F.~ G. \& {Gilmore}, G. 1995, AJ {110}, 2771
390:
391: \end{thebibliography}
392:
393: \end{document}
394: