1: % SAMPLE1.TEX -- AASTeX sample paper with minimal markup.
2:
3: \documentstyle[12pt,aasms4]{article}
4:
5: \begin{document}
6:
7: \title
8: {The FIRST Sample of Ultraluminous Infrared Galaxies at High Redshift
9: I. Sample and Near-IR Morphologies}
10:
11: \author{S.A. Stanford\altaffilmark{1}}
12:
13: \affil{Physics Department, University of California at Davis, and the Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics,
14: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories, Livermore, CA, 94550;
15: adam@igpp.ucllnl.org}
16:
17: \author{Daniel Stern\altaffilmark{1,}\altaffilmark{2}}
18:
19: \affil{Department of Astronomy, University of California, Berkeley, CA
20: 94720; dan@bigz.berkeley.edu}
21:
22: \author{Wil van Breugel}
23:
24: \affil{Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics,
25: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories, Livermore, CA, 94550;
26: wil@igpp.ucllnl.org}
27:
28: \author{Carlos De Breuck}
29:
30: \affil{Leiden Observatory, and Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics,
31: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories, Livermore, CA, 94550;
32: debreuck@igpp.ucllnl.org}
33:
34: \altaffiltext{1}{Visiting Astronomer, Infrared Telescope Facility,
35: University of Hawaii, NASA}
36:
37: \altaffiltext{2}{current address: Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
38: California Institute of Technology, Mail Stop 169-327, Pasadena, CA 91109}
39:
40: \begin{abstract}
41:
42: We present a new sample of distant ultraluminous infrared galaxies.
43: The sample was selected from a positional cross--correlation of the
44: $IRAS$ Faint Source Catalog with the FIRST database. Objects from
45: this set were selected for spectroscopy by virtue of following the
46: well-known star-forming galaxy correlation between 1.4 GHz and 60
47: $\mu$m flux, and by being optically faint on the POSS. Optical
48: identification and spectroscopy were obtained for 108 targets at the
49: Lick Observatory 3~m telescope. Most objects show spectra typical of
50: starburst galaxies, and do not show the high ionization lines of
51: active galactic nuclei. The redshift distribution covers $0.1 < z <
52: 0.9$, with 13 objects at $z > 0.5$ and an average redshift of $\bar{z}
53: = 0.31$. $K$-band images were obtained at the IRTF, Lick, and Keck
54: observatories in sub-arcsec seeing of all optically identified
55: targets. About 2/3 of the objects appear to be interacting galaxies,
56: while the other 1/3 appear to be normal. Nearly all the identified
57: objects have far-IR luminosities greater than $10^{11} L_\odot$, and
58: $\sim$25 \% have $L_{FIR} > 10^{12} L_\odot$.
59:
60: \end{abstract}
61:
62: \keywords{galaxies: starburst --- galaxies: interactions --- infrared:
63: galaxies --- radio continuum: galaxies}
64:
65: \section{Introduction}
66:
67: Observations by the Infrared Astronomy Satellite ($IRAS$) led to the
68: discovery of a class of galaxies with enormous far-IR luminosities.
69: Subsequent observations over a large range of wavelengths have shown
70: that these objects, called ULIG for ultraluminous infrared galaxies,
71: have 1) bolometric luminosities and space densities comparable to
72: those of optical quasars (Sanders et al.\ 1988); 2) a broad range in
73: host galaxy spectral type, including starburst galaxies, Seyfert I and
74: II, radio galaxies, and quasars; 3) morphologies often suggestive of
75: recent interactions or merging (Carico et al.\ 1990; Leech et al.\
76: 1994; Rigopoulou et al.\ 1999); and 4) large amounts of molecular gas
77: concentrated in small ($<$1 kpc) central regions (e.g.\ Scoville et
78: al.\ 1989; Solomon et al.\ 1997). Understanding the nature of the
79: prime energy source in ULIG has proven difficult (e.g.\ Smith,
80: Lonsdale, \& Lonsdale 1998). Many of the observed characteristics
81: indicate that very strong starbursts could be the culprit.
82: Alternatively, an active galactic nucleus (AGN) may power the ULIG
83: (e.g.\ Lonsdale, Smith, \& Lonsdale 1993). The very high luminosities
84: suggest an evolutionary connection between ULIG and quasars, wherein a
85: dust-enshrouded central massive black hole is gradually revealed as
86: the appearance of the object changes from ULIG to quasar (Sanders et
87: al.\ 1988).
88:
89: Much effort has been expended in trying to determine the primary
90: source of energy---starbursts or AGN---driving the large FIR
91: luminosities. The recent studies using ISO indicate that the vast
92: majority of the power comes from starbursts in $\sim80\%$ of the
93: observed systems (Genzel et al.\ 1998; Lutz et al.\ 1998). Rigopoulou
94: et al.\ (1999) present the results of an expanded version of the mid-IR
95: spectroscopic survey first reported by Genzel et al.\ (1998). Using
96: ISO to observe 62 ULIG at $z < 0.3$, they measured the line to
97: continuum ratio of the 7.7 $\mu$m polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
98: (PAH) feature to differentiate between starburst and AGN as the
99: dominant source of the large FIR luminosity. PAH features have been
100: shown to be strong in starburst galaxies and weak in AGN (Moorwood
101: 1986; Roche et al.\ 1991). Rigopoulou et al.\ confirmed the results
102: of Genzel et al.\ (1998), and also found, based on near-IR imaging,
103: that approximately 2/3 of their sample have double nuclei and nearly
104: all the objects show signs of interactions. For a recent review of
105: ULIG see Sanders \& Mirabel (1996).
106:
107: ULIG are also of great interest for studies of early star formation in
108: the building of galaxies. Recent sub-mm observations suggest that
109: objects similar to ULIG may contain a significant fraction of the star
110: formation at high redshifts (e.g.\ Lilly et al.\ 1999). But so far
111: most studies have found ULIG only in the nearby universe. Sanders et
112: al.\ (1988) initially studied a group of 10 objects at $z < 0.1$.
113: Previously published systematic surveys have found objects mostly at
114: $z < 0.4$ (Leech et al.\ 1994; Clements et al.\ 1996a, 1996b). A few
115: high redshifts objects have been found, all of which turn out to
116: contain hidden AGN. These include FSC~15307+3252 at $z=0.926$ (Cutri
117: et al.\ 1994) and FSC~10214+4724 at $z=2.286$ (Rowan-Robinson et al.\
118: 1991). The former object was found to exhibit a highly polarized
119: continuum, indicating the presence of a buried quasar (Hines et al.\
120: 1995) while the latter was found to be lensed (Eisenhardt et al.\
121: 1996) and also shows signs of containing a hidden AGN (Lawrence et
122: al.\ 1993; Elston et al.\ 1994; Goodrich et al.\ 1996). Further
123: progress in this field has been hampered by the lack of identified
124: ULIG at moderately high redshifts.
125:
126: No new deep far-IR survey will become available prior to the launch of
127: {\it SIRTF}, which will be capable of studying ULIG in detail at high
128: redshifts. So, the $IRAS$ database remains the primary source of
129: targets for finding high redshift ULIG. Radio observations provide a
130: relatively unbiased method for extracting FIR galaxies from the $IRAS$
131: Faint Source Catalog (FSC; Moshir et al.\ 1992) because radio
132: continuum emission is relatively unaffected by extinction in dense gas
133: and dust. Such FIR/radio samples are ideal for detailed
134: investigations of the complex relationships between the interstellar
135: media, starbursts, and possible AGN in ULIG. For example, a sample of
136: radio-loud objects was constructed by cross-correlating the $IRAS$ FSC
137: with the Texas 365 MHz radio catalog (TXFS; Dey \& van Breugel 1990).
138: Subsequent optical identifications and spectroscopy showed that the
139: TXFS objects tend to be distant AGN. So a radio-quiet sample,
140: extracted from the FSC, should be an excellent means of finding ULIG
141: without AGN---i.e.\ powered by starbursts---at interesting
142: cosmological distances. In this paper, we report on such a sample: we
143: describe the sample selection process and discuss the near-IR imaging.
144: We defer a detailed analysis of the radio properties and optical
145: spectroscopy to future papers.
146:
147: \section{The FIRST/FSC Sample}
148:
149: We have used two large area surveys in the radio and far-IR, which we
150: briefly describe here, to select ULIG candidates. In the radio, we
151: have used the FIRST (Faint Images of the Radio Sky at Twenty cm;
152: Becker, White, \& Helfand 1995). Using the VLA, this project is
153: surveying $\pi$ steradians down to a 5$\sigma$ limit of 1 mJy with 5
154: arcsec resolution and subarcsec positional accuracy. One of the
155: problems with finding distant ULIG using $IRAS$ is that there are many
156: faint galaxies visible in a deep optical image within the relatively
157: large error ellipse of an FIR source. The high resolution and good
158: positional information of FIRST offer an excellent means of choosing
159: the best of the many optical candidates on which to spend valuable
160: large telescope time getting redshifts. We used the second version of
161: the catalog (released 1995 October 16), which samples 2925 degrees$^2$
162: in two regions of sky in the North ($7^h20^m < $ RA(J2000) $<
163: 17^h20^m$, $22\fdg2 < $ Dec(J2000) $< 42\fdg5$) and South ($21^h20^m <
164: $ RA(J2000) $< 3^h20^m$, $-2\fdg5 < $ Dec(J2000) $< 1\fdg6$) Galactic
165: Caps. In the far-IR we have used the $IRAS$ FSC (Moshir et al.\ 1992)
166: which resulted from the Faint Source Survey (FSS). Relative to the
167: $IRAS$ Point Source Catalog, the FSS achieved better sensitivity by
168: point-source filtering the detector data streams and then coadding
169: those data before finding sources. At 60~$\mu$m (the band used for
170: defining our candidates), the FSC covers the sky at $|b|
171: \gtrsim 10\fdg0$ and has a reliability (integrated over all
172: signal-to-noise ratios) of $\gtrsim 94\%$. The limiting 60~$\mu$m flux
173: density of the FSC is approximately 0.2 Jy, where the signal-to-noise
174: ratio (SNR) is $\sim$5. The FSS also resulted in the Faint Source
175: Reject file which contains extracted sources not in the FSC with an
176: SNR above 3.0. We used the FSR, in addition to the FSC, with part of
177: FIRST to increase the number of targets in the fall sky.
178:
179: The $IRAS$ FSC was positionally cross-correlated with the second
180: version of the FIRST catalog, with the requirements that an FSC source
181: must have a real 60 $\mu$m detection ($f_{qual} \geq 1$) and that it
182: be within 60 arcsec of the FIRST source. The 60 $\mu$m band was
183: chosen because it is more reliable than the 100 $\mu$m band and
184: samples close to the wavelength peak of the ULIG power. The resulting
185: FIRST-FSC (FF) catalog contains 2328 matches. To increase the
186: available objects in the fall sky, we also performed a positional
187: match of the FSR with the South Galactic Cap portion of FIRST, which
188: yielded an additional 176 matches. The 20 cm and 60 $\mu$m flux
189: densities for this sample of 2504 sources are plotted in
190: Figure~\ref{f20v60}. The majority of the FF sources fall along the
191: well-known radio-FIR correlation (Condon et al.\ 1991), extending from
192: nearby starburst galaxies to much fainter FIR/radio flux levels. The
193: surface density of such objects is approximately 1 degree$^{-2}$ down
194: to the $\sim 5 \sigma$ limits of 1 mJy at 20~cm and $\sim$0.2 Jy at 60
195: $\mu$m.
196:
197: We generated optical finding charts using the Digitized Sky Surveys,
198: available from the Space Telescope Science Institute, for all 2504
199: matches. The radio source position and the FSC error ellipse were
200: overlaid on these charts. Visual inspection of these finding charts
201: was carried out to select optically faint targets for further study,
202: with the expectation that such targets would be distant ULIG.
203: Approximately 150 targets, which will carry the designation FF along
204: with the usual coordinate naming scheme, were selected in this manner.
205: A strict cutoff in optical magnitude was not employed, and we make no
206: attempt to construct a sample which has a well-defined limiting
207: magnitude in the optical. In practice, the magnitude of the targets
208: selected for optical imaging and spectroscopy depended on the
209: observing conditions, i.e.\ some targets which are not visually faint
210: on the DSS image were observed during cloudy conditions. While the
211: FIRST and FSC catalogs do have well-defined flux limits, our sample
212: was not constructed in order to be complete to a chosen flux level in
213: either the radio nor the far-IR bands. The main goal of the survey is
214: simply to find high-redshift ULIG. It is worth noting that our target
215: list would include objects with observed characteristics in the radio,
216: optical, and far-IR similar to those of FSC10214+4724 (which itself
217: lies outside of the FIRST area that we used and so cannot fall into
218: our catalog). We have not found any ULIG at redshifts as great as
219: that of FSC10214+4724 in the $\sim$3000 degree$^2$ surveyed.
220:
221: \section{Observations}
222:
223: During several runs from March 1996 to April 1999, the Kast
224: spectrograph (Miller \& Stone 1994) at the Shane 3~m telescope of Lick
225: Observatory was used to obtain optical images and spectroscopy of the
226: candidate ULIG from our FF catalog. The observing procedure typically
227: consisted of taking two 300~s images in the $r_S$ band, identifying
228: the optical counterpart of the FF source in these data, and
229: immediately following up with slit spectroscopy of the optical object.
230: Because the resolution and positional accuracy of FIRST are high, it
231: was usually clear which optical object coincided with the radio
232: source. The FWHM of the seeing in the images was usually in the range
233: 1.5--2.0 arcsec. Standard stars were observed in imaging mode when
234: conditions were photometric. However, because much of the data were
235: obtained during non-photometric conditions, $r_S$ magnitudes will not
236: be presented here for the sample. Unless the source morphology
237: demanded a particular value, the position angle of the slit was set to
238: the parallactic angle. The object was dithered along the slit by
239: $\sim 10$ arcsec between two exposures to aid in fringe subtraction.
240: Optical spectra of 1200-6000s duration were obtained of the optical
241: source using the 300 line mm$^{-1}$ grating in the red-side
242: spectrograph, which provides $\sim$4.6 \AA~pixel$^{-1}$ resolution
243: from 5070--10590 \AA, and a 452/3306 grism in the blue-side
244: spectrograph which provides $\sim$2.5 \AA~ pixel$^{-1}$ resolution
245: from 3000--5900 \AA. The slit width was set at 2 arcsec. The images
246: and spectra were reduced using standard techniques.
247:
248: Near-infrared images were obtained of the targets for which redshifts
249: had been determined in order to better ascertain the morphologies of
250: the galaxies. $K'$ images were obtained for nearly all identified
251: targets with NSFCAM at the IRTF 3~m telescope in 1998 August and 1999
252: February. Additional observations of 3 targets were obtained in
253: service mode in September 1999. NSFCAM was used in its 0.3 arcsec
254: pixel$^{-1}$ mode which provides a 77$\times$77 arcsec field. Typical
255: total exposure times per object were 960s; more distant objects were
256: observed for twice this period. Conditions were photometric with
257: seeing averaging 0.9 arcsec. Observations of standard stars from the
258: Persson et al.\ (1998) list were obtained and used to calibrate the
259: images onto the California Institute of Technology (CIT) system, which
260: is defined in Elias et al.\ (1982). The data were reduced using
261: standard techniques.
262:
263: Five targets were observed in the $K$ band using Gemini (McLean et
264: al.\ 1993) at the Shane 3~m telescope on 1998 October 7. Gemini has
265: 0.68 arcsec pixels which give it a 174 arcsec field. Objects were
266: observed for 1080~s each in photometric conditions with seeing of
267: $\sim$1.2 arcsec. The data were reduced using standard techniques and
268: calibrated onto the CIT system using observations of UKIRT faint
269: source standards (Casali \& Hawarden 1992).
270:
271: Two distant targets were imaged at the Keck I telescope with NIRC
272: (Matthews \& Soifer 1994) in 1998 April. FF1106+3201 was observed in
273: the $K$ band for 16 minutes and FF1614+3234 was observed for 32
274: minutes in the $K_s$ band. Both objects were observed in clear
275: conditions with $\sim$0.5 arcsec seeing. These data were reduced
276: using standard techniques and calibrated onto the CIT system using
277: observations of UKIRT faint source standards (Casali \& Hawarden
278: 1992).
279:
280:
281: \section{Results}
282:
283: \subsection{Optical}
284:
285: We attempted spectroscopic observations of approximately 150
286: IRAS/FIRST candidates, of which 116 yielded redshift information. The
287: 108 with infrared imaging are listed in Table 1; the 8 sources with
288: redshifts but lacking infrared images are not considered further. The
289: sources which did not provide useful spectra were usually observed in
290: poor conditions; the reasons for their lack of redshifts were not
291: because of having intrinsically challenging spectra. The object names
292: in Table 1 are based on the FIRST radio position. The source in the
293: FIRST catalog would have the name given by the object's coordinates
294: shown in our Table 1, in the format FIRST J{\it hhmmss.s+ddmmss} where
295: the coordinates are truncated, not rounded. In the $IRAS$ FSC, the
296: FIR source name is different from that implied by our FF name, so we
297: have included the FSC source name as a column in Table 1. The Z
298: designation in the FSC name means that the FIR source is from the FSR
299: catalog.
300:
301: The typical resolution of the spectroscopy was $\approx 15$
302: \AA\ (FWHM) at $\lambda > 5500$ \AA, implying typical uncertainties of
303: $\lesssim 0.002$ in redshift. Redshifts were determined from the spectra
304: after identifying probable emission lines and continuum features. In
305: practice the features most often used were the [O II]$\lambda$3727, [O
306: III]$\lambda$4959,5007, and H$\alpha$ lines, and the D4000 break. The
307: vast majority of the spectra have the emission lines characteristic of
308: star formation; very few show any signs, such as high ionization
309: lines, of an AGN. Four sample spectra, covering a range in redshift,
310: signal to noise, and spectral type, are shown in Figure~\ref{spex}. A more
311: detailed analysis of the optical spectra is deferred to a later paper.
312:
313: \subsection{Near Infrared}
314:
315: The $K'$ images are displayed for each object, along with the optical
316: finding chart from the DSS, in Figure~\ref{optir}. Photometry of the FF objects
317: was obtained from the $K'$ images. In Table 1, the $K$ magnitudes
318: within 3 arcsec diameter apertures, centered on the peak of the
319: near-IR emission, are given for each object. The 5 $\sigma$ detection
320: limit in most of the images is $K \sim 19$ so the limiting factor in
321: the uncertainty of the photometry is not the signal to noise, since
322: most objects have magnitudes some 3--4 magnitudes brighter than the
323: detection limit, but rather systematics in the zeropoint. We estimate
324: that the uncertainty in the zeropoint is $0.03$ mag. For most objects the 3
325: arcsec diameter aperture contains $\sim 70\%$ of the total light. The
326: morphologies of the objects tend to show signs of galaxy interactions,
327: including tidal tails, multiple nuclei, and disturbed outer envelopes.
328: Approximately 2/3 of the sample show such features, while 1/3 of the
329: sample appear to be normal galaxies. A brief description of the
330: near-IR morphology for each FF is included in Table 1.
331:
332: \subsection{Radio}
333:
334: One of the major advantages of using FIRST in our survey is the high
335: accuracy of its positional information. The coordinates listed in
336: Table 1 are those of the radio source as given by the FIRST catalog,
337: which has an absolute astrometric uncertainty of $\sim$1 arcsec. The
338: 20~cm VLA images of all objects listed in Table 1 were extracted from
339: the FIRST database. The radio morphologies were classified by visual
340: inspection of these cutout images, and by consulting the deconvolved
341: sizes listed in the FIRST catalog. The 20~cm morphological
342: information is given for each FF source in Table 1. The 20~cm flux
343: densities listed in Table 1 have typical uncertainties of 10\% at the
344: 2 mJy level.
345:
346: \subsection{Far Infrared}
347:
348: Improved $IRAS$ flux densities were obtained for all objects in Table
349: 1 with the ADDSCAN utility at IPAC. In addition to the 60~$\mu$m band
350: used to construct our FF catalog, data at 12~$\mu$m, 25~$\mu$m, and
351: 100~$\mu$m was searched for detections. Almost none of the objects in
352: Table 1 were detected at either of the shorter two wavelengths, so no
353: information is included from these wavebands in Table 1. Many
354: detections were obtained in the 100~$\mu$m data; these are included
355: where available in Table 1, and one $\sigma$ upper limits are
356: indicated in parentheses. The uncertainty in the typical 60~$\mu$m
357: measurement in the sample is $\sim 10\%$, and $\sim 15\%$ in the
358: 100~$\mu$m band where detected. The 60~$\mu$m and 100~$\mu$m flux densities were
359: used to calculate the far-infrared luminosity, as defined by Sanders
360: \& Mirabel (1996): L(40--500 $\mu$m) $= 4 \pi ~ D^2_L ~ C ~ F_{FIR}
361: [L_\odot]$, where $D^2_L$ is the luminosity distance in Mpc, $F_{FIR}
362: = 1.26 \times 10^{-14} (2.58 \times f_{60} + f_{100}) [W m^{-2}]$, and
363: $C = 1.6$. Throughout this paper we use H$_0 = 65$ km s$^{-1}$
364: Mpc$^{-1}$ and $\Omega_M = 0.3$ with $\Lambda = 0$. When 100~$\mu$m
365: detections could not be obtained with ADDSCAN, the 1$\sigma$ limiting
366: flux densities were used in the calculation of the L$_{FIR}$. The
367: L$_{FIR}$ are given in Table 1, and are plotted in
368: Figure~\ref{p20vlfir}. The uncertainty in the L$_{FIR}$ is dominated
369: by a combination of the typical $\sim 10-15\%$ flux measurement
370: errors and the $\sim 15\%$ uncertainty in the scaling factor C
371: which accounts for the extrapolated flux longward of the 100 $\mu$m
372: band.
373:
374: \section{Discussion}
375:
376: The reliability of the optical identification with the radio source
377: for the objects in Table 1 is very high. The optical/radio source
378: association with the FSC far-infrared source is less certain, because
379: of the relatively large positional uncertainty of the $IRAS$
380: detections. But there are at least four reasons to believe that the
381: identified optical/radio sources are indeed the FSC sources as well.
382: First, in all cases, the FIRST position is within twice the 1 $\sigma$
383: error ellipse of the FSC source. Second, the optical spectra show
384: emission lines typical of star-forming galaxies, as expected for most
385: far-IR luminous objects. Third, in the cases where both 60 and 100
386: $\mu$m detections were obtained, the $IRAS$ flux ratios are typical of
387: FIR luminous galaxies (Soifer et al.\ 1987). Finally, in nearly all
388: cases the FIR/radio flux ratio lies on the well-established
389: correlation as seen in Figure~\ref{f20v60}.
390:
391: There are at least two possible ways that the wrong association is
392: being made. First, a galaxy optically brighter than the identified
393: FF source could lie just outside the $IRAS$ error ellipse and still be the
394: source of the IRAS detection. But in our sample there are no such
395: galaxies which are also detected by FIRST, as would be expected if such
396: objects were the true source of the FIR emission. Second, a faint
397: radio source could be missed by the FIRST survey that would coincide with
398: the $FSC$ source. Using the rms given in the FIRST catalog for each
399: object, lower limits to the resulting $S_{60\mu{\rm m}}/S_{20cm}$
400: ratios for objects beneath the $FIRST$ detection limits are found to
401: be $\sim$500-700, far greater than the standard ratio for star-forming
402: galaxies. Finally its worth noting that on average one expects to
403: find only 0.035 FIRST sources within the typical IRAS error ellipse
404: area, so the probability of a random radio source being associated with
405: an FSC source is low. In our sample of 108 identified FF objects,
406: approximately 4 could be due to radio sources unassociated with the
407: far-IR source.
408:
409: Although we defer the scientific analysis of the new sample to future
410: contributions, we will briefly compare some basic global properties of
411: our FF sample to those of other similarly large samples of high
412: redshift ULIG which have been previously published, e.g.\ Leech et
413: al.\ (1994) and Clements et al.\ (1996). Our new sample has ULIG at
414: higher average redshift ($\bar{z} \sim 0.3$) than that of Leech et
415: al.\ ($\bar{z} \sim 0.17$) and that of Clements et al.\ ($\bar{z} \sim
416: 0.21$). As for the interaction rate, on which there has been
417: some disagreement in the literature (Sanders \& Mirabel 1996), our
418: result that 2/3 of the sample shows signs of galaxy interactions
419: is in agreement with Leech et al.\ but not Clements et al., who found
420: that $\sim 90\%$ of their sample were interacting systems. Finally,
421: the rate of AGN-type optical spectra in our sample, which is only
422: $10\%$, is somewhat less than the $\sim 25\%$ found by Clements et al. We
423: do see a higher incidence of AGN-type spectra at the highest L$_{FIR}$
424: as has been noted previously by several studies; for a review of this
425: topic see Sanders
426: \& Mirabel (1996).
427:
428: \section{Summary}
429:
430: We have constructed a new survey of ULIG using a match of the $IRAS$
431: FSC with the second version of the FIRST catalog, which covered nearly
432: 3000 degrees$^2$. By choosing for further study only optically faint
433: matches from the DSS which also fall on the radio-FIR flux
434: correlation, we have attempted to find high redshift ULIG which are
435: powered primarily by starbursts. Optical images and spectra were
436: obtained of 108 such targets, which were found to lie in the redshift
437: range $0.1 < z < 0.9$; a redshift histogram is shown in Figure~\ref{zhist}.
438: Nearly all of these targets have $L_{FIR}$ greater than $10^{11}
439: L_\odot$, and have a higher average redshift of $\bar{z}=0.31$ than in other
440: recent ULIG surveys. Near-IR imaging shows that while more than the
441: majority of objects show clear signs of galaxy interactions, nearly
442: 1/3 appear to be normal at arcsec resolution in the $K$ band. With
443: this sample, we intend to examine the nature of ULIG evolution in
444: future contributions.
445:
446:
447: \acknowledgments
448:
449: The authors thank the staff of Lick Observatory for their help in
450: obtaining the optical data, and Bill Vacca and Dave Griep at the IRTF
451: for their assistance in obtaining the near-IR data, and for conducting
452: servicing observing for three of the sample objects. We have made use
453: of the online facilities provided by IPAC. We also thank Bob Becker
454: for providing us with the FIRST catalog and for help in using its
455: contents. Finally we thank Rob Kennicutt for a speedy referee
456: report. The Digitized Sky Surveys were produced at the Space
457: Telescope Science Institute under U.S. Government grant NAG-W-2166.
458: The images of these surveys are based on photographic data obtained
459: using the Oschin Schmidt Telescope on Palomar Mountain and the UK
460: Schmidt Telescope. The plates were processed into the compressed
461: digital form with permission of these institutions. The work by SAS,
462: WvB, and CDB at IGPP/LLNL was performed under the auspices of the
463: U.S.\ Department of Energy under contract W-7405-ENG-48 to the
464: University of California. The work by DS was supported by IGPP grants
465: 98-AP017 and 99-AP026.
466:
467: \begin{references}
468:
469: \reference{B95}Becker, R.\, White, R.\, \& Helfand, D.\ 1995, \apj, 450,
470: 559
471:
472: \reference{C90}Carico, D., Graham, J. R., Matthews, K., Wilson, T. D., Soifer, B. T.,
473: Neugebauer, G., \& Sanders, D. B. 1990, \apj, 349, L39
474:
475: \reference{C92}Casali, M.\ \& Hawarden, T.\ 1992, JCMT-UKIRT Newsletter, 4, 33
476:
477: \reference{C96a}Clements, D., Sutherland, W. J., Sauders, W., Efstathiou, G. P.,
478: McMahon, R. G., Maddox, S., Lawrence, A., \& Rowan-Robinson, M. 1996a, \mnras, 279, 459
479:
480: \reference{C96b}Clements, D., Sutherland, W. J., McMahon, R. G., \& Saunders, W. 1996b, \mnras, 279, 477
481:
482: \reference{C91}Condon, J. J., Anderson, M. L., \& Helou, G. 1991, \apj, 378, 65
483:
484: \reference{C94}Cutri, R. M., Huchra, J. P., Low, F. J., Brown, R. L., \& vanden Bout,
485: P. A. 1994, \apj, 424, L65
486:
487: \reference{D90}Dey, A.\ \& van Breugel, W.\ 1990, IAU Colloquium 124, p.\ 309
488:
489: \reference{E96}Eisenhardt, P. R., Armus, L, Hogg, D. W., Soifer, B. T., Neugebauer,
490: G., \& Werner, M. 1996, \apj, 461, 72
491:
492: \reference{E82}Elias, J.H., Frogel, J.A., Matthews, K., \& Neugebauer,
493: G.\ 1982, AJ, 87, 1029
494:
495: \reference{E94}Elston, R., McCarthy, P. J., Eisenhardt, P., Dickinson, M., Spinrad,
496: H., Januzzi, B. T., \& Maloney, P. 1994, \aj, 107, 910
497:
498: \reference{G98}Genzel, R.\ et al.\ 1998, \apj, 498, 579
499:
500: \reference{G96}Goodrich, R. W., Miller, J. S., Martel, A., Cohen, M. H., Tran, H. D.,
501: Ogle, P. M., \& Vermeulen, R. C. 1996, \apj, 456, L9
502:
503: \reference{H95}Hines, D. C., Schmidt, G. D., Smith, P. S., Cutri, R. M., \& Low,
504: F. J. 1995, \apj, 450, L1
505:
506: \reference{K88}Kleinmann, S.G., Hamilton, D., Keel, W.C., Wynn-Williams, C.G., Eales,
507: S.A., Becklin, E.E., \& Kuntz, K.D.\ 1988, \apj, 328, 161
508:
509: \reference{L93}Lawrence, A., et al.\ 1993, \mnras, 260, 281
510:
511: \reference{L94}Leech, K.J., Rowan-Robinson, M., Lawrence, A., \& Hughes, J. D. 1994, \mnras, 267, 253
512:
513: \reference{L99}Lilly, S.J., Eales, S.A., Gear, W.K.P., Hammer, F., Le Fevre, O.,
514: Crampton, D., Bond, J.R., \& Dunne, L.\ 1999, \apj, 518, 641
515:
516: \reference{L93}Lonsdale, C., Smith, H., \& Lonsdale, C.\ 1993, \apj,
517: 405, L9
518:
519: \reference{L98}Lutz, D., Spoon, H. W. W., Rigopoulou, D., Moorwood, A. F. M., \&
520: Genzel, R. 1998, \apj, 505, 103
521:
522: \reference{M94}Matthews, K.\ \& Soifer, B. T.\ 1994, Experimental Astronomy, 3, 77
523:
524: \reference{M93}McLean, I.S.\ et al.\ SPIE, 1946, 513
525:
526: \reference{MS94}Miller, J.S.\ \& Stone, R.P.S.\ 1994, Lick Observatory Technical Reports \# 66
527:
528: \reference{M86}Moorwood, A.F.M.\ 1986, A\&A, 166, 4
529:
530: \reference{M92}Moshir, M., Kopman, G., \& Conrow, T. 1992, $IRAS$ Faint Source Survey,
531: Explanatory Supplement, Version 2
532:
533: \reference{P98}Persson, S. E., Murphy, D. C., Krzeminski, W., Roth, M., \& Rieke,
534: M. J. 1998, \aj, 116
535:
536: \reference{R99}Rigopoulou, D., Spoon, H.W.W., Genzel, R., Lutz, D., Moorwood, A.F.M.,
537: Tran, Q.D.\ 1999, \aj, 118, 2625
538:
539: \reference{R91}Roche, P.F., Aitken, D.K., Smith, C.H., \& Ward, M.J.\ 1991, \mnras,
540: 248, 606
541:
542: \reference{RR91}Rowan-Robinson, M.\ et al.\ 1991, Nature, 351, 719
543:
544: \reference{S88}Sanders, D.B., Soifer, B. T., Elias, J. H., Madore, B. F., Matthews,
545: K., Neugebauer, G., \& Scoville, N. Z. 1988, \apj, 325, 74
546:
547: \reference{S96}Sanders, D. B. \& Mirabel, I. F. 1996, ARAA, 34, 749
548:
549: \reference{S89}Scoville, N. Z., Sanders, D. B., Sargent, A. I., Soifer, B. T., \&
550: Tinney, C. G. 1989, \apj, 345, L25
551:
552: \reference{S98}Smith, H.E., Lonsdale, C.J., \& Lonsdale, C.J.\ 1998,
553: ApJ, 492, 137
554:
555: \reference{S87}Soifer, B.T., Sanders, D. B., Madore, B. F., Neugebauer, G.,
556: Danielson, G. E., Elias, J. H., Lonsdale, C. J., \& Rice, W. L. 1987, \apj, 320, 238
557:
558: \reference{S97}Solomon, P.M., Downes, D., Radford, S.J.E., \& Barrett, J.W.\ 1997,
559: \apj, 487, 144
560:
561: \reference{S98}Surace, J., Sanders, D. B., Vacca, W. D., Veilleux, S., \& Mazzarella, J.
562: M. 1998, \apj, 492, 116
563:
564: \reference{V00}van Breugel, W.\ 2000, ``Proceedings on Ultraluminous Galaxies:
565: Monsters or Babies'', (Kluwer: Germany), eds.\ L.\ Tacconi and D.\
566: Lutz, in press
567:
568:
569: \end{references}
570:
571: \begin{figure}
572: \epsscale{1.0}
573: \caption{A plot of F$_\nu$ at 1.4 GHz against F$_\nu$ at 60$\mu$m
574: showing all matches of the positional cross-correlation of FIRST with
575: the $IRAS$ FSC (the open triangles), along with several comparison
576: samples taken from the literature. The well-known radio--FIR
577: correlation for star-forming galaxies extends to the faintest flux
578: limits probed by the FF objects. }
579: \label{f20v60}
580: \plotone{f1.ps}
581: \end{figure}
582:
583: \begin{figure}
584: \epsscale{1.0}
585: \caption{Spectra of four objects from Table 1 which cover the range in
586: redshift, spectral type, and signal to noise of the sample.}
587: \label{spex}
588: \plottwo{f2a.eps}{f2b.eps}
589: \plottwo{f2c.eps}{f2d.eps}
590: \epsscale{1.0}
591: \end{figure}
592:
593: \begin{figure}
594: \caption{(a-bb) For each of the FF objects in Table 1 we show on the left the DSS
595: finding chart centered on the FIRST radio position, which is marked
596: by a small circle of diameter 5 arcsec, with the FSC 95\% confidence
597: limit error ellipse superposed. The astrometric uncertainty between
598: the optical and radio reference frames is $\sim$1 arcsec. On the
599: right in each panel is a closeup view of the $K$-band image of the
600: identified source. North is up and East to the left in all panels. }
601: \label{optir}
602: \end{figure}
603:
604: \begin{figure}
605: \caption{A plot of the log P$_{1.4 GHz}$ against log L$_{FIR}$
606: showing our new FF sample as solid triangles, along with several
607: comparison samples taken from the literature. Three well-known ULIG
608: are marked by name. Radio-loud quasars and BL Lacs are included at
609: the most luminous end of the track traced by the Texas-FSC sources.
610: The luminosities for F10214 have been corrected for gravitational
611: lensing.}
612: \label{p20vlfir}
613: \plotone{f4.ps}
614: \end{figure}
615:
616: \begin{figure}
617: \caption{A redshift histogram of the identified FF targets.}
618: \label{zhist}
619: \plotone{f5.ps}
620: \end{figure}
621:
622:
623: \end{document}
624: