1: \documentstyle[aas2pp4]{article}
2: %\documentstyle[12pt,aasms4,frbox]{article}
3:
4: % Edits to this file made by Kim Weaver - Dec. 8 1999
5: % modified to this file by H.Awaki - Dec. 9 1999
6: % edits made by K. Weaver - Jan. 3 2000
7: % revised by H. Awaki - Mar. 24 2000
8: % revised by H. Awaki - Apr. 26 2000
9:
10: \received{01/26/2000}
11: %\revised{}
12: %\accepted{}
13: %\cpright{}
14:
15: %\journalid{}{}
16: %\articleid{}{}
17: \paperid{51236}
18:
19: %\cpright{}{}
20: %\ccc{}
21:
22: \slugcomment{to be submitted to ApJ ver 2000.04.26}
23: \newcommand{\solar}{_{\odot}} %%%%%%%%%%%%%% \solar
24: \newcommand{\Lxa}{L_{\rm{2-10}}^{\rm{ac}}} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%
25: \newcommand{\Lxas}{L_{\rm{0.5-2}}^{\rm{ac}}} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%
26: \newcommand{\Lobs}{L_{\rm{2-10}}^{\rm{obs}}} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%
27: \newcommand{\Lint}{L_{\rm{2-10}}^{\rm{intrinsic}}} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%
28: \newcommand{\Lints}{L_{\rm{0.5-2}}^{\rm{intrinsic}}} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%
29: \newcommand{\Lir}{L_{\rm{FIR}}} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%
30: \newcommand{\Lsoft}{L_{\rm{0.5-2}}^{\rm{soft}}} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%
31: \newcommand{\Lhbeta}{L_{\rm{H\beta}}} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%
32: \newcommand{\Lhbetascat}{L_{\rm{H\beta\_scat}}} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%
33: \newcommand{\PBLsey}{PBL Seyfert 2 galaxies} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%
34: \newcommand{\uflux}{ergs s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$}
35: \newcommand{\ulum}{ergs s$^{-1}$}
36:
37: \begin{document}
38:
39: \title{X-ray emission from Seyfert 2 galaxies with optical polarized broad
40: lines}
41: \author{Hisamitsu Awaki\altaffilmark{1,2}}
42: \affil{Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Kyoto University}
43: \authoraddr{Kitashirakawa, Sakyo, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan}
44: \and
45: \author{Shiro Ueno}
46: \affil{Space Utilization Research Program, Tsukuba Space Center, National Space
47: Development Agency of Japan,}
48: \authoraddr{2-1-1 Sengen, Tsukuba 305-8505, Japan}
49: \and
50: \author{Yoshiaki Taniguchi}
51: \affil{Astronomical Institute, Graduate School of Science, Tohoku University}
52: \authoraddr{Aramaki, Aoba, Sendai 980-8578, Japan}
53: \and
54: \author{Kimberly A. Weaver}
55: \affil{Laboratory for High Energy Astrophysics, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center,}
56: \authoraddr{Greenbelt, MD, 20771, USA}
57:
58: \altaffiltext{1}{CREST: Japan Science and Technology Corporation (JST),
59: 4-1-8 Honmachi, Kawaguchi, Saitama 332}
60: \altaffiltext{2}{present address: Department of Fundamental Material Science,
61: Faculty of Science, Ehime University, Matsuyama, 790-8577, Japan }
62:
63: \begin{abstract}
64: %%
65:
66: We analyze the $0.5-10$ keV spectra of six Seyfert 2 galaxies observed
67: with the X-ray satellite ASCA: Mrk 3, Mrk 348, Mrk 1210, Mrk 477, NGC 7212,
68: and Was 49b. These galaxies were selected based on their possession of optical
69: polarized broad lines. In the $2-10$ keV band, their spectra are heavily absorbed,
70: with $2-10$ keV absorption-corrected X-ray luminosities ranging
71: from 10$^{42}$ to 10$^{43}$ \ulum. The observed X-ray emission is
72: generally only about one tenth that predicted based on their known infrared
73: and H$\beta$ luminosities. This apparent X-ray weakness can be
74: understood if a considerable fraction of the nuclear activity is completely
75: blocked from view by thick matter along our line of sight to the nucleus.
76:
77: All of these galaxies possess significant soft X-ray emission whose
78: origin appears to be scattered light from their nuclear emission. Based
79: on this hypothesis, we estimate
80: a typical scattering efficiency for X-rays to be about 10$\%$. This
81: efficiency is larger than the few $\%$ found
82: for ordinary Seyfert 2 galaxies with no report of optical polarized broad
83: lines. A large scattering efficiency is best explained by an apparent
84: weakness of the hard X-ray luminosity rather than unusually strong scattered
85: light in the soft band. When we estimate the scattering efficiency using the
86: intrinsic luminosity derived assuming Compton scattering
87: dominates the hard X-ray spectrum, as
88: opposed to a purely absorbed nuclear continuum, the efficiency can be less
89: and is similar to that of ordinary Seyfert 2 galaxies.
90: Since the difference between our sample and ordinary Seyfert 2 galaxies can
91: be explained by the difference of viewing angle,
92: the similar scattering efficiency suggests the existence of a scattering
93: region that is larger than the putative dusty torus.
94:
95: \end{abstract}
96:
97: \keywords{galaxies: active--- galaxies: Seyfert---X-rays: galaxies}
98:
99: \section{INTRODUCTION}
100:
101: Seyfert galaxies are nearby active galaxies that have been traditionally
102: classified into two types according to the presence or absence of broad
103: optical/UV emission lines (more than a couple thousand km s$^{-1}$ FWHM).
104: However, after broad lines were discovered in the
105: polarized spectrum of the typical Seyfert 2 galaxy, NGC 1068 (Antonucci
106: \& Miller 1985), it became clear that broad-line region
107: clouds can exist in Seyfert 2 galaxies as well as Seyfert 1s,
108: although these clouds may be located inside
109: (and hidden behind) an optically and geometrically thick disk.
110: With the development of better instruments and
111: techniques, spectropolarimetry has revealed the existence of polarized broad
112: emission lines (and hence hidden BLRs) from more than ten
113: Seyfert 2 galaxies (e.g. Miller \& Goodrich 1990, Tran, Miller, \& Kay 1992).
114:
115: Based on these polarized Seyfert 2 galaxies, a viewing-dependent
116: unification scenario has been proposed that predicts the existence of a
117: hidden active nucleus and broad line region in all Seyfert galaxies,
118: making Seyfert 1 and 2 galaxies are essentially identical.
119: Hard X-ray observations with the Japanese X-ray satellite
120: Ginga revealed hidden luminous nuclei in several Seyfert 2 galaxies (e.g. Awaki
121: et al. 1991), demonstrating that hard X-ray observations
122: are useful to reveal highly obscured nuclei. Since
123: nuclear X-rays pass though the thick matter, such galaxies
124: are the best targets to investigate AGN environments. In particular, it is
125: crucial to reveal the origin of the weak excess emission in the soft X-ray band
126: (e.g. Krupper, Urry \& Canizares 1990). One possibility is that the soft
127: X-rays represent scattered light, similar to optical polarized
128: broad lines (Netzer, Turner \& George 1998).
129: Another possibility is that soft X-rays can come from starbursts
130: (e.g., Dahlem, Weaver \& Heckman 1998) or
131: AGN-driven jets (Colbert et al. 1998).
132:
133: If X-ray and optical/UV photons are scattered in
134: the same way, there should be a relation between them.
135: To investigate whether the soft X-ray emission in Seyfert 2 galaxies is
136: related to nuclear activity, we examine those known to have optical
137: polarized broad emission lines.
138: Choosing objects with significant polarization
139: maximizes the chance of detecting scattered X-rays from the AGN
140: as opposed to X-rays from the galaxy.
141: The Japanese X-ray satellite ASCA allows spectroscopy in the entire
142: $0.5-10$ keV band, and so we can directly measure both the hard X-ray
143: emissions from obscured nuclei and any associated soft X-ray emission.
144: By comparing our X-ray results with those of optical spectropolarimetric
145: observations, we can test the origin of the soft component and investigate
146: the properties of the nuclei and scattering regions in Seyfert 2 galaxies with
147: polarized broad lines (hereafter \PBLsey). The differences between
148: the amount of polarization in \PBLsey~compared to more typical Seyfert 2
149: galaxies that
150: have no detectable polarization, should affect their corresponding
151: X-ray properties. We attempt to clarify this difference in our analysis.
152:
153: \section{TARGET SELECTION AND DATA REDUCTION}
154:
155: Miller \& Goodrich (1990) and Tran, Miller \& Kay (1992) found about
156: 10 \PBLsey. Eight of these have been observed with
157: ASCA. ASCA data for NGC 1068,
158: Mrk 463E and the first observation of Mrk 3 have been
159: reported by Ueno et al (1994), Ueno et al. (1996) and Iwasawa et al.
160: (1994), respectively. We refer to these papers for these three objects,
161: and we analyze the other five Seyfert 2 galaxies (Mrk 348, Mrk 477, Mrk 1210,
162: NGC 7212, Was 49b) and the second observation of Mrk 3.
163:
164: ASCA (Tanaka, Inoue, \& Holt 1994) has four focal-plane
165: detectors: two solid-state imaging spectrometers (called here SIS 0
166: and SIS 1) and two
167: gas imaging spectrometers (called GIS 2 and GIS 3).
168: The SIS and GIS operate simultaneously.
169: In our observations, the SIS data were taken with the instrument
170: in 1-CCD FAINT mode at all bit-rates.
171: %%high bit-rate, and in 1-CCD FAINT mode for both low and medium bit-rates.
172: The GIS data were obtained in PH mode at all bit-rates.
173: The field of view of SIS 1-CCD mode and GIS are 11$^{\prime}$ square,
174: and 40$^{\prime}$ diameter, respectively.
175:
176: We select data using the following data filtering,
177:
178: COR $>$ 4 GeV c$^{-1}$, ELV $>$ 5 deg, and T$\_$SAA $>$ 60 s,
179:
180: \noindent
181: where COR is cutoff rigidity, ELV is target elevation from Earth's rim
182: and T$\_$SAA is the time after passage through the South Atlantic Anomaly.
183: In order to reject
184: contaminating X-rays from Earth's rim, data are also filtered using the
185: angular distance from Earth's rim during daylight (BR$\_$EARTH).
186: For Mkn 3, we accept data with BR$\_$EARTH $>$ 35 deg and for the
187: other targets, we accept data with BR$\_$EARTH $>$ 10 deg.
188: The observation log and the exposure times after filtering
189: are listed in Table 1.
190:
191: We accumulate SIS0 and SIS1 data within a 6$^{\prime}$ diameter circle
192: centered on the X-ray source; background spectra
193: are taken from a non-source region $>$ 8$^{\prime}$ in diameter.
194: For the GIS, we sum data from GIS2 and GIS3 in an 8$^{\prime}$
195: diameter circle centered on the X-ray source;
196: background spectra are taken from an annulus with
197: 12$^{\prime}$-32$^{\prime}$
198: diameter centered on the X-ray source.
199: We find several X-ray sources in the background region and exclude
200: contaminating sources with 8$^{\prime}$ (for SIS) and 12$^{\prime}$ (for GIS)
201: diameter circles. The count rates after
202: background subtraction are listed in Table 1.
203:
204: In the field of Was 49b, there is a bright source, RX J1214.4+2936, located
205: 4$^{\prime}$.6 away from the target galaxy (Appenzeller et al.
206: 1998). Although this source is classified as a Seyfert 2 galaxy at redshift
207: of 0.307, the X-ray characteristics are similar to that of a Seyfert 1 galaxy or a
208: QSO, i.e. the spectrum is described by a single power-law model with a photon
209: index of 1.30$\pm$0.15 and an absorption column of less than 6$\times
210: 10^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$. The X-ray flux is $\sim$8$\times$10$^{-13}$
211: \uflux~in the $2-10$ keV band, which corresponds to an X-ray
212: luminosity of $\sim$4$\times$10$^{44}$ \ulum.
213: The amount of contamination from this source is estimated to be
214: only 10$\pm$2$\%$ of the X-ray flux of Was 49b in the $0.5-2$ keV band,
215: and so it should not seriously affect our analysis.
216:
217: For Mrk 477, Mrk 1210, and NGC 7212, which were observed twice, we first
218: analyze the two observations separately. Table 1 shows the
219: count rate in the $0.5-10$ keV band for each. Since their
220: count rates do not vary significantly and their hardness
221: ratios of $2-10$ keV versus $0.5-2$ keV rate remain the same to
222: within a 1 $\sigma$ error, we
223: conclude that their X-ray spectra do not change significantly
224: between the two observations. As a result, the
225: separate observations are added to produce one spectrum for
226: each galaxy for analysis purposes.
227:
228: We combine energy bins to contain more than 40 counts in each bin and
229: apply a $\chi^2$ method in the XSPEC package for spectral fitting.
230:
231: \section{SPECTRAL ANALYSIS AND RESULTS}
232: The X-ray spectra of Seyfert 2 galaxies can be approximated by
233: equation (1), which represents a two-component continuum
234: plus an Fe K$\alpha$ line (e.g. Turner et al. 1997a). We
235: apply this model, labeled model 1, in our fitting procedure, with a
236: power-law as the soft X-ray component to represent the contribution of
237: scattered emission from the AGN.
238: Some broadening of the Fe K line is reported by Turner et al.
239: (1997a), but it is unclear whether there is significant line broadening
240: in our data. We thus assume that the Fe K line is narrow for all cases.
241: Model 1
242: describes all sources well with a reduced $\chi^2\sim$1. The fitting
243: results are listed in Table 2, and the spectra are shown in Figure 1.
244:
245: %%%%%%% equation 1 %%%%%%%%%%
246: \begin{eqnarray*}
247: I (\rm{photon~s^{-1} cm^{-2} keV^{-1}}) = \rm {exp}(-\it{N}_{\rm H0}\sigma_{\rm abs})~\times
248: \end{eqnarray*}
249: \begin{equation}
250: ~~~(\rm{soft~component} + \rm{exp}(-\it{N}_{\rm H1}\sigma_{\rm abs})~( \it{A~E^{-\Gamma}} + \rm{line})),
251: \end{equation}
252:
253: \noindent
254: where the soft component is a power-law in models 1, 2, and 3 and
255: a Raymond plasma in model 4.
256:
257: For model 1,
258: the observed $2-10$ keV fluxes for the hard components range from
259: 3$\times$10$^{-13}$ to 1.8$\times$10$^{-12}$ \uflux, which
260: correspond to observed luminosities ($\Lobs$) of $10^{42} -
261: 10^{43}$ \ulum~assuming $H_{\rm{0}}=50$ km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$ (see Table 3).
262:
263:
264: \subsection {The hard X-ray components}
265: Hard X-ray emission with $\it{\Gamma}\sim$2 is often seen in
266: normal galaxies (e.g. Okada 1998) and is thought to originate from a
267: superposition of discrete sources (e.g. low mass X-ray binaries
268: and SNe; Makishima et al. 1989). It is well known that the ratio
269: of X-ray to blue band luminosities ($L_{\rm{B}}$) is about
270: 4$\times$10$^{-5}$ for normal and starburst galaxies (e.g. Awaki 1999),
271: i.e. the luminosity from the superposition of discrete sources is
272: estimated to be 1.5$\times$10$^{39}$ ($L_{B}$/10$^{10} L\solar$)
273: \ulum~in the $2-10$ keV band.
274: Since $L_{\rm{B}}$ for our sample is order 10$^{10} L\solar$
275: (Whittle et al. 1992), we conclude that the hard
276: X-ray emission is most likely to originate from nuclear activity.
277:
278: When applying model 1, the photon indices of the hard component
279: are poorly determined, ranging from $-0.14$ to 2.22. Assuming the
280: hard emission is related to the AGN, we next fix the
281: photon index of the hard component to be 1.7 (model 2), which
282: is the canonical observed value for type 1 AGNs (e.g. Mushotzky 1982).
283: When the best fit value of $N_{\rm{H0}}$ is less than the galactic
284: absorption, we set $N_{\rm{H0}}$ equal to the galactic column.\footnote{
285: obtained from EOLS/EINLINE V 2.4 at Smithsonian Astrophysical
286: Observatory.}
287: The equivalent
288: width of the Fe K$\alpha$ line is the most important parameter
289: to investigate the origin of the hard component (e.g. Awaki et al. 1991 and
290: Turner et al. 1997b), and so we fix the center energy of the line
291: at 6.4 keV (in the rest frame), the energy of Fe K$\alpha$ fluorescence
292: from cold matter.
293:
294: When fixing the hard X-ray photon indices (model 2), the values of
295: $\chi^{2}$ increase because the overall spectra tend to be flatter
296: than a $\it{\Gamma}\sim$1.7 spectrum.
297: However, if our assumptions about the intrinsic spectral shape of
298: the hard X-ray (AGN) component are correct, then model 2 implies
299: large column densities and large
300: equivalent widths for the Fe K$\alpha$ line (see Table 2). The
301: absorption corrected $2-10$ keV luminosities for the hard component are
302: greater than 10$^{42}$ \ulum~(see Table 4; hereafter $\Lxa$ denotes
303: this absorption corrected luminosity).
304: $\Lxa$ is useful to compare with results in the literature.
305:
306:
307: We found that some galaxies have indices from 0 to 1 in model 1, which
308: are smaller than the canonical Seyfert 1 value of $\sim$1.7. Matt et al.
309: (1996) point out that, besides absorption, a flat spectrum can result
310: from a significant
311: Compton reflection component. To test this idea, we apply a Compton
312: reflection model (model 3) to the hard
313: components of Mrk 1210, Mrk 477, Was49b and NGC 7212
314: and find that the hard X-ray emission can be reproduced
315: by Compton reflection (Table 2). The $\chi^{2}$ values
316: are less than those for the absorbed power-law model (models 1 and 2),
317: although iron line intensities are much weaker than predicted
318: for reflection by Reynolds et al. (1994) and Matt et al. (1996).
319:
320: \subsection {The Soft X-ray components}
321: For a power-law description of the soft X-ray emission we find
322: observed 0.5 to 2 keV fluxes of about 10$^{-13}$ \uflux~
323: and photon indices of $\it{\Gamma}\sim$1-2. Absorption in
324: excess of the galactic column is not indicated for
325: most galaxies. The X-ray luminosities for the soft components are listed
326: in Table 4.
327:
328: In order to test the origin of the soft component, we characterize
329: it using the Raymond-Smith plasma model (Raymond \& Smith 1977)
330: (model 4).
331: We set the metal abundance free, because the thermal
332: emission detected from starburst galaxies and NGC 1068 can be reproduced
333: by a thin thermal plasma model with sub-solar abundances (e.g. Ueno et al.
334: 1994 for NGC 1068, Tsuru et al. 1997 for M82).
335: We find the temperatures for NGC 7212 and Mrk 477 to be greater
336: than several keV, while the temperature and metal abundance for Mrk 1210 and
337: Was 49b are 0.86 keV and 0.03, and 0.72 keV and 0.02, respectively.
338:
339: It is known that some Seyfert 2 galaxies possess line-like structures
340: around 0.9 keV (e.g. Hayashi et al. 1996 for NGC 2110, Comastri et al. 1998
341: for NGC 4507). Line emission is important to investigate the origin of
342: the soft component, because highly ionized neon (Ne IX), and fully
343: ionized oxygen make a line-like structure at about 0.9 keV (e.g. Netzer
344: 1995). We examined the line emission around 0.9 keV adding a narrow line
345: to model 2. Line-like features are apparent in the spectra of Mrk 3 and
346: Mrk 477 (Table 5). The detection of the line in the spectrum for Mrk 3
347: is consistent with the result by Griffiths et al. (1998).
348:
349: \section{DISCUSSION}
350: \subsection{The Hard Component}
351: \subsubsection{Nuclear Activities in Seyfert 2 Galaxies with Polarized Broad Lines}
352:
353: Based on our spectral fits, we find hard X-ray emission associated with nuclear
354: activities in \PBLsey. For an absorbed power-law model with a photon index
355: of 1.7 (our model 2), we infer X-ray activities with $\Lxa
356: > 10^{42}$ \ulum~obscured by thick matter with column densities
357: of $\sim$10$^{23}$ cm$^{-2}$. Assembling the available X-ray results for
358: other \PBLsey, (NGC 1068; Ueno et al. 1994,
359: NGC 7674; Malaguti et al. 1998, and Mrk 463E; Ueno et al. 1996),
360: obscured nuclei are detected in all \PBLsey~observed
361: to date in the hard X-ray band. We conclude that obscured nuclei are
362: common in \PBLsey.
363:
364: Using $\Lxa$, we can examine whether the estimated number of photons
365: are sufficient to ionize the surrounding region.
366: For Seyfert 1 galaxies, the X-ray luminosity in the
367: $2-10$ keV band ($L_{\rm{X}}$) is well correlated with the broad $H\beta$
368: luminosity ($\Lhbeta$),
369: with a ratio of $L_{\rm{X}}$/$\Lhbeta\sim$ $10-100$ (e.g.
370: Blumenthal, Keel, \& Miller 1982). Figure 2 shows this correlation
371: for Seyfert 1 galaxies and QSOs, quoted from
372: Padovani \& Rafanelli (1988) and Malaguti, Bassam, \& Caroli (1994),
373: respectively (solid circles). If Seyfert 2 galaxies are
374: Seyfert 1s viewed edge-on, their intrinsic properties should
375: be the same as Seyfert 1s. We test this idea by plotting the \PBLsey\ (open circles)
376: in Figure 2, estimating $\Lhbeta$ from the polarized $H\beta$ flux, $\tau$=0.1,
377: $\Delta\Omega/4\pi$=0.1, and known polarization degree (Miller \& Goodrich 1990,
378: Tran 1995a). It is clear that
379: $\Lxa$ for \PBLsey~lies systematically below the relation
380: for Seyfert 1 galaxies and QSOs, such that there are 10 times fewer
381: ionizing photons than expected, assuming
382: our estimate of $\Lhbeta$ is correct. The discrepancy is similar
383: for other indicators of nuclear activity;
384: $\Lxa$/$L_{\rm{IR}}$ for \PBLsey~are only 1/10 that
385: of Seyfert 1 galaxies (Figure 3a)\footnote{The IRAS color for \PBLsey~are
386: warm (log ($F_{\rm{25\mu m}}$/$F_{\rm{60\mu m}} > $-0.5),
387: which indicates that the dominant energy source of
388: IR emission is AGN activity.}, and Bassani
389: et al. (1999) point out a small ratio of $\Lxa$ to the luminosity of [OIII].
390: We conclude that correcting only for hard X-ray absorption results in
391: \PBLsey~having $\Lxa$ that is 10 times less than
392: predicted if they harbor a Seyfert 1 nucleus.
393:
394: \subsubsection{Weak Activity?}
395: If models 1 or 2 do not represent the actual spectral
396: form of the nuclear source, $\Lxa$ does not represent the true luminosity.
397: We found that the X-ray spectra for some PBL Seyfert 2s are well represented
398: with the Compton reflection models, although their iron emission lines are
399: weaker than that for a pure reflection model (e.g. Matt et al. 1996).
400: Since most of the iron emission in this scenario is attributed to the
401: reflection component, the
402: contribution of reflection to the hard component can be
403: estimated from a ratio of the measured to predicted iron line
404: intensities. Assuming
405: the equivalent width of 1.5 keV for a pure reflection component, the
406: contribution is estimated to be $20-50\%$.
407: From theoretical considerations, the upper limit to the efficiency of
408: the Compton mirror in the 2--10 keV band is about $7\%$ for
409: $\Delta\Omega/2\pi$ = 1.0. If we assume an efficiency of 5$\%$, the
410: true X-ray luminosity ($\Lint$) is described as
411:
412: %%%%%%% equation 2 %%%%%%%%%%
413: \begin{equation}
414: \Lint = 20\times\Lxa (\frac{EW}{1500 eV}) (\frac{Eff_{\rm{Compton}}}{0.05})^{-1},
415: \end{equation}
416:
417: \noindent
418: where EW and Eff$_{\rm{Compton}}$ are the observed equivalent width of
419: iron K$\alpha$ line and the efficiency of the Compton mirror in the
420: 2--10 keV band respectively. Figure
421: 3b shows a plot of $\Lint$ versus $\Lir$. \PBLsey~have the same
422: ratio of $\Lint/\Lir$ as Seyfert 1s. Therefore, by accounting
423: for the observed spectrum
424: as reflected rather than absorbed emission,
425: %% with the actual continuum source completely blocked from our view,
426: the intrinsic source would be ten times more luminous and
427: \PBLsey~ would be consistent with having powerful AGN activity.
428: Tran 1995b pointed out the existence of strong nuclear activities
429: in NGC 7212 and Mrk 463E from the line ratio diagnostic of jet regions.
430: The powerful activities inferred from the X-ray data after the correction
431: of reflection efficiency
432: are consistent with his claim.
433:
434: \subsubsection{Time Variability}
435: %%Variability time scales reflect the size of the emitting regions.
436: Seyfert 1 galaxies with X-ray luminosities of 10$^{43}$ \ulum~have
437: variability time scales of 10000 seconds. If \PBLsey~ possess obscured
438: Seyfert 1 type nuclei but we are seeing their hard X-ray
439: emission directly, similar time variability is expected.
440: However, Mrk 1210, Mrk 477 and NGC 7212 show no significant
441: time variability in periods of one month, one day and one week, respectively.
442: This probably indicates that these galaxies do not have small
443: variability time scale such as Seyfert 1 galaxies, although we need more
444: X-ray monitors in order to achieve the conclusion.
445: Mrk 3 has been monitored with the Einstein, Ginga, BBXRT, ROSAT
446: and ASCA X-ray missions. Figure 4 shows light curves in the
447: soft and hard bands. As Marshall et al. (1991) and Iwasawa et al. (1994)
448: mentioned, the hard X-ray flux gradually decreases between the Ginga and
449: ASCA observations. The variability time scale is about 1 yr, which is
450: similar to that of luminous QSOs.
451:
452: A lack of short timescale spectral variability for \PBLsey~can be explained by
453: more massive black holes with smaller accretion rates and/or the dominance
454: of the Compton reflection process for energies approaching 10 keV. The latter
455: indicates more powerful X-ray activity, and so both possibilities suggest
456: the existence of more massive black holes than those of Seyfert 1 galaxies with
457: the same apparent X-ray luminosity. This result is consistent with
458: arguments by Nishiura \& Taniguchi (1998), who deduced large central black hole
459: masses from analysis of line widths of polarized broad lines.
460:
461: \subsection{The Soft X-ray Component}
462: \subsubsection {The Origin of the Soft component}
463:
464: We detect distinct soft X-ray components with
465: X-ray luminosities in the $0.5-2$ keV band of about 10$^{41}$ \ulum.
466: No associated strong absorption indicates that the
467: X-rays originate outside the thick matter that absorbs the hard X-rays.
468: The soft X-rays can be associated with circumnuclear starburst activities
469: which are often seen in Seyfert 2 galaxies (e.g. Maiolino \& Rieke 1995).
470: On the other hand, optical scattered light is observed by
471: spectropolarimetry. From the
472: analogy of these observations, it is naturally suggested that X-rays
473: from nuclei are also scattered into our line of sight.
474: We examine possibilities for the origin of the soft component
475: using 1) the X-ray spectrum, 2) the correlation between Lx
476: and $\Lir$, and 3) the correlation
477: between Lx and luminosities of scattered $H\beta$ lines.
478:
479:
480: The X-ray spectrum:
481: we tried to fit the soft components with either the absorbed power-law model
482: (models 1 and 2) or the thin thermal plasma model (model 4).
483: NGC 7212, Mrk 477, Mrk 3, and Mrk 348 have flat spectra represented
484: by a power-law model with a photon index $<$ 2.3.
485: This result, combined with little soft X-ray absorption,
486: suggests that thermal emission due to starburst activity is
487: not dominant in the soft X-ray band.
488: In addition, we detect a line-like feature around 0.9 keV for Mrk 3
489: and Mrk 477, which is one characteristic of a scattered light in
490: a highly ionized plasma region (Netzer 1995, Griffiths et al. 1998).
491:
492: On the other hand, Mrk 1210 and Was 49b have softer spectra than those
493: of the other targets. Their soft components can be
494: described as thin thermal emission with low metal abundances of
495: $<$0.1 and $<$0.14 having $kT\sim$0.86 keV and $kT\sim$0.72 keV,
496: respectively. For Mrk 463E,
497: Ueno et al (1994) report a thermal soft X-ray component with $kT\sim$1 keV.
498: Since Mrk 463E and Was 49b are galaxy-margers, there is a possibility of
499: on-going starburst activity. However, there are
500: no reports on the existence of powerful starburst activities in their nuclear
501: regions, and their infrared colors (log $F_{\rm{25\mu m}}$/$F_{\rm{60\mu m}}$)
502: in the IRAS band are about 0.
503: Therefore, we consider that most soft X-rays are associated with
504: their AGN activities. We note that a possibility of the starburst origin
505: can not be ruled out from our spectral analysis alone.
506:
507: $\Lir$ vs $L_{\rm{X}}$:
508: the X-ray luminosities of optically thin thermal emission
509: from starburst galaxies and
510: normal galaxies are well correlated with far infrared luminosity.
511: David, Jones \& Forman (1992) found the strong correlation with
512: $\Lir$/$L_{\rm{X}}\sim$2000 in the 0.5--4.5 keV band from a detail analysis
513: for a large number of galaxy samples observed by Einstein.
514: Figure 5 presents our sample.
515: We find that most Seyfert 2 galaxies have excess soft emission, and that
516: the contribution of the starburst component is estimated to be less than
517: 50$\%$ except for NGC 1068. We note that NGC 1068 is a luminous infrared
518: source with powerful starburst activity. Thus, the soft
519: components for our target galaxies are most likely to originate from
520: their AGN activities rather than starburst activities.
521:
522: $\Lhbeta$ vs $L_{\rm{X}}$:
523: it is known that the X-ray luminosities of Seyfert 1
524: galaxies are well correlated with $\Lhbeta$
525: (Blumenthal, Keel, \& Miller. 1982) because broad $H\beta$ lines are
526: emitted from photoionized regions. If the broad $H\beta$ lines
527: and nuclear light are scattered in the same region, the luminosity of
528: the scattered $H\beta$ lines should correlate with that of the
529: scattered X-ray component.
530: Figure 6 shows a correlation of the soft component and the
531: scattered broad $H\beta$ line luminosities ($\Lhbetascat$) for our
532: sample. The $\Lhbetascat$ were estimated using eq.(3.1) in Tran (1995b).
533: The two solid lines in Figure 6 show an extrapolation from the
534: relation found in Seyfert 1 galaxies (see section 4.1). Considering
535: the uncertainty of polarization degree, the objects in our sample
536: lie in the area of Seyfert 1 galaxies. The consistency of properties
537: between our sample and Seyfert 1 galaxies indicates that most of
538: the soft X-rays in \PBLsey~can be explained by scattered light,
539: and that electron
540: scattering dominates dust scattering for our sample.
541: This result is consistent with early work by Tran (1995b).
542:
543: From these relevant considerations,
544: we conclude that soft X-rays in \PBLsey~originate mostly from scattered
545: light. We note that Heckman et al. (1997) point out that Mrk 477 has a
546: powerful nuclear starburst with a bolometric luminosity of $3\times10^{10}
547: - 10^{11} L\solar$. The luminosity due to the starburst activity is
548: comparable to that of the AGN activity, however it appears to be dominated
549: by the AGN in soft X-rays (Levenson, Weaver and Heckman, in prep.).
550: Using the ratio of $\Lir$/$L_{\rm{X}}$ for starburst galaxies, the
551: contribution of the
552: starburst activity in the soft band is estimated to be about
553: 10$^{40}$ \ulum, which is about 10$\%$ of the observed luminosity.
554: %%In addition, the X-ray spectrum is not well represented by
555: %%optically thin thermal emission with $kT\sim$1 keV.
556: Therefore we conclude that we can ignore the
557: contribution of the starburst activity in Mrk 477.
558:
559: \subsubsection{Scattering Efficiency of the Warm Mirror}
560:
561: Using the wide band ASCA spectra, we can estimate the scattered and
562: intrinsic X-ray luminosities at the same time. If scattered light
563: dominates the soft X-ray component for \PBLsey, we can use the ratio of
564: normalizations between the soft and the hard components to indicate
565: the scattering efficiency in the scatterers. To do this for the continuum
566: spectra, we set $\it{\Gamma}$(soft) equal to $\it{\Gamma}$(hard).
567: However, there are several spectral lines in the scattered
568: component (e.g. Netzer 1997). Since ASCA can not separate the lines from the
569: continuum, we also test the method of not setting $\it{\Gamma}$(soft) equal to
570: $\it{\Gamma}$(hard). For this case, we determine the intrinsic luminosity
571: in the $0.5-2$ keV band by assuming a power-law model with $\it{\Gamma}$=1.7,
572: extrapolating this model to lower energies and calculating the flux. The
573: conversion factor determined by extrapolating the luminosities is deduced to
574: be 0.55, which allows us to obtain the scattering
575: efficiency. We note that these scattering efficiency is consistent with
576: those deduced from the ratio of the normalizations within 20$\%$.
577: The scattering efficiency results from an optical
578: depth($\tau_{es}$) of a scattering medium multiplied by a covering factor
579: of the scatterer($\Delta\Omega$).
580: %%%%%%% equation 2 %%%%%%%%%%
581: \begin{eqnarray}
582: (scattering~~efficiency) & = & \frac{L_{\rm{scat}}}{L_{\rm{intrinsic}}} \sim
583: \frac{\Lsoft}{\Lints}, \nonumber \\
584: & & \\
585: & \sim & \tau_{es}\times\frac{\Delta\Omega}{4\pi} \nonumber
586: \end{eqnarray}
587:
588: The $\tau_{es}$ is given by the column density ($N_{\rm{H}}^{\rm{scat}}$) in the
589: scattering region multiplied by the Thomson
590: scattering cross section. For the hard component, we infer
591: that the true AGN activity is greater than $\Lxa$. We define $B$ as the ratio
592: $\Lint/\Lxa$. From eq.(3), $N_{\rm{H}}^{\rm{scat}}$ is calculated by the
593: following relation,
594:
595: %%%%%%% equation 4 %%%%%%%%%%
596: \begin{equation}
597: N_{\rm{H}}^{\rm{scat}} \sim 1\times10^{24}~
598: (\frac{\frac{\Delta\Omega}{4\pi}}{0.133})^{-1}~(\frac{\frac{\Lsoft}{\Lxas}}{0.1})~B^{-1}~~~
599: (\rm{H/cm^{2}}).
600: \end{equation}
601:
602: The upper panel in Figure 7 shows the distribution of $\Lsoft/\Lxas$.
603: The points concentrate around 10$\%$.
604: Taking the ratio to be 0.1, the column density in the scattering region is
605: calculated to be 10$^{24} B^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$, when the covering factor is
606: 0.133, which corresponds to the opening angle of the torus of 60 degrees.
607: The analysis of
608: the hard X-ray component supports the large-$B$ case. For example,
609: for $B$=10, the column is estimated to be 10$^{23}$ cm$^{-2}$, which is less
610: than or
611: comparable to those of our line of sight. The optical depth ($\tau_{es}$) of
612: the scatterer is deduced to be $\sim$0.06, which is similar to those used in
613: the analysis of \PBLsey~(e.g. Miller \& Goodrich 1990).
614:
615: We can also estimate the location of the scattering medium. From eq. (4),
616: the column density in the scattering region is 10$^{24} B^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$.
617: If the scatterer were cold, the
618: soft X-rays would be absorbed by carbon and oxygen.
619: We do not observe a low-energy cut off and so carbon and oxygen must be
620: ionized in the scatterer.
621: Kallman \& McCray (1982) pointed out that for log $\xi > 2$, the
622: population of fully ionized carbon and oxygen is $\sim$100 $\%$ and
623: $>$30$\%$, respectively, where $\xi$ is the ionization parameter with the
624: relation of $\xi$=$L$/($n_{\rm{e}}R^{2}$). In log$\xi >$ 2, the electron temperature
625: is greater than 10$^5$ K (Kallman \& McCray 1982), which is
626: roughly consistent with the prediction with spectropolarimetry
627: (e.g. Tran 1995b). The ionization parameter,$\xi$, is calculated from the
628: observed value (see Eq. (5)), i.e. X-ray luminosity and column density of the
629: scatterer.
630:
631: %%%%%%% equation 5 %%%%%%%%%%
632: \begin{equation}
633: \xi = 30~(\frac{\Lxas}{10^{43} \rm{ergs s^{-1}}})~(\frac{N_{\rm{e}}}
634: {10^{24} \rm{cm^{-2}}})^{-1}(\frac{R}{1\rm{pc}})^{-1}~ B.
635: \end{equation}
636:
637: To obtain a large $\xi$, the scatterer should be located within 0.3 pc
638: for $B$=1 and within 30 pc for $B$=10. For the most probable dusty torus
639: model for Seyfert nuclei (e.g. Murayama, Mouri, \& Taniguchi 2000), the
640: full height of the torus is estimated to be $0.3-1.5$ pc. Assuming $B$=1, the
641: scatterer is located within the torus, while for $B$=10, the scatterer is
642: located outside the torus. Since large $B$ is more likely from the analysis
643: of the hard component, the scattering region should be larger
644: than that of the dusty torus.
645:
646: Variability restricts the size of an emitting region.
647: For Mrk 3, long-term monitoring for 10 years shows that
648: although the hard component changed by a factor of 6 during 3 years,
649: no decrease of the soft component was seen.
650: If most of the soft X-rays from Mrk 3 are scattered, the flux
651: of the soft component should decrease within the light travel time
652: from the nucleus to the scattering region. The large time lag
653: indicates that the distance of the
654: scatterer from the nucleus is comparable to 6 light years ($\sim$ 2 pc).
655: This result supports a large scattering region. Continuous monitoring of
656: Mrk 3 in the X-ray band is crucial to verify the location of the scattering
657: region.
658:
659: \subsubsection{Comparison with Other Seyfert 2 Galaxies}
660:
661: Ueno (1995) estimate a ratio of $\Lsoft/\Lxas$ for Seyfert 2 galaxies
662: without reports of polarized broad lines using the ratio of the normalization
663: of their soft and hard components (Table 4).
664: For comparison, we show a histogram of $\Lsoft/\Lxas$ for
665: Seyfert 2 galaxies with and without reports of polarized broad lines
666: (Figure 7). For typical Seyfert 2s, the
667: ratios tend to be less than those of \PBLsey.
668: This is explained either by a stronger soft component
669: or a weaker hard component in \PBLsey.
670: To examine which applies, we compare $\Lxa$-$\Lir$
671: for both types, assuming that $\Lir$ represents the real nuclear
672: activities because their infrared colors are warm except NGC 1068 (as
673: discussed above).
674: Figure 8a shows a color-color diagram of $\Lsoft/\Lxas$ and
675: $\Lxa/\Lir$. Closed circles and open circles represent PBL Seyfert 2 and
676: other Seyfert 2 galaxies, respectively. When the absorption
677: correction is applied, there is a clear separation of the two types of
678: Seyfert 2 galaxies. For the reflection correction, using $\Lints$ in place of
679: $\Lxas$ (Figure 8b), the data
680: are all concentrated in the same region, since PBL Seyfert 2s have larger
681: $\Lxas/\Lints$ ratios than those of other Seyfert 2 galaxies.
682: This result indicates that the distributions of $\Lsoft/\Lints$
683: in Figure 7 are due to underestimation of their nuclear activities, and
684: that the scattering efficiencies of \PBLsey~are similar to
685: those of other Seyfert 2 galaxies, which is a few $\%$.
686:
687: \subsubsection{Interpretation on PBL Seyfert Galaxies}
688:
689: %%Observed PBL Seyfert 2 galaxies tend to have higher polarization degrees,
690: %% because it is easy to find polarized broad lines in Seyfert 2 galaxies
691: %% with higher polarization degrees as mentioned by Miller \& Goodrich (1990).
692: We find that the ratios of $\Lxa/\Lir$ of \PBLsey~are different from those
693: of other Seyfert 2 galaxies. We propose that the difference is caused
694: by viewing angle. First, about half of our \PBLsey~were
695: selected among Seyfert 2 galaxies with high polarization degrees as
696: mentioned by Miller \& Goodrich (1990).
697: If the scattering region is larger than the torus,
698: most of the scattering region is not obscured. The polarization degree
699: ($\it{P}$) is described by the function of the viewing angle ($\it{i}$),
700: $P = \sin^{2}i/(2\alpha+\sin^{2}i)$, where $\alpha$ is the value derived
701: from cone angle of the torus (see Miller \& Goodrich 1990 in detail).
702: The difference in the amount of polarization
703: is explained as other Seyfert 2 galaxies having smaller viewing
704: angles than \PBLsey.
705: %%This idea is consistent with the fact
706: %%that Seyfert 1 galaxies, which appear to have small viewing angles, have less
707: %%polarization than Seyfert 2 galaxies (Brindle et al. 1990).
708: Next, the contribution of the Compton reflection component in the $2-10$ keV band
709: probably depends on the viewing angle, because most Seyfert 2 galaxies with
710: pure reflection in the $2-10$ keV band have an H$_{2}$O maser line which is
711: explained by their edge-on geometry (e.g. Matt et al. 1999 for the circinus
712: galaxy, Ueno et al. for NGC 1068, Iwasawa et al. for NGC 4945). Furthermore,
713: Bassani et al. (1999) find an anti-correlation between iron line equivalent
714: width and $F_{\rm{X}}$/$F_{\rm{[OIII]}}$ for a large sample including
715: Seyfert 1 galaxies and Seyfert 2 galaxies with the H$_{2}$O masers.
716: %%Since the iron line equivalent width indicates a contribution of the
717: %%reflection component, their result also indicates underestimation of
718: %%nuclear activities.
719:
720: We suggest that the X-ray properties can be
721: smoothly connected from Seyfert 1 galaxies to Seyfert 2 galaxies with
722: the H$_{2}$O masers lying between ``typical'' Seyfert 2
723: galaxies and \PBLsey.
724: We conclude that the separation seen in
725: Figure 8a results from smaller $\Lxa/\Lir$ for \PBLsey,
726: and that $\Lxa/\Lir$ decreases as the viewing angle increases.
727: Our picture is consistent with the fact that the viewing angle of Mrk 348 is
728: smaller than the other \PBLsey~(Tran 1995b).
729: Heisler, Lumsden, $\&$ Bailey (1997) proposed that \PBLsey\ have smaller
730: viewing angle than other Seyfert 2 galaxies from the analysis of their
731: extinction,$\it{E(B-V)}$. However X-ray properties suggest that the scattering
732: region is larger than the torus, and that \PBLsey\ have larger viewing angle
733: than other Seyfert 2 galaxies.
734:
735: We consider two possibilities to explain the viewing angle dependence of
736: $\Lxa/\Lir$; 1) anisotropic radiation from the Seyfert 2 nucleus due to
737: X-ray beaming and 2) the existence of thick, clumpy clouds that block a
738: considerable fraction of X-ray photons in the $2-10$ keV band (Figure 9).
739: In the former model, anisotropic radiation can result from a jet structure found
740: in radio band (Ulvestad \& Wilson 1984).
741: The latter model is referred to as the dual absorption model
742: (Weaver et al. 1994), in which absorption
743: columns are $N_{\rm{H}}\sim$10$^{23}$ and $>10^{24}$ for \PBLsey.
744: Since this model indicates the some fraction of the X-rays are not absorbed by
745: a thick matter, the thick matter should be smaller than the size of X-ray
746: emitting
747: region. In NGC 4258, it is found that H$_{2}$O vapor masing clouds are
748: very small, thick clouds located in its central nuclear region
749: (Miyoshi et al. 1995). Thus the masing cloud is one candidate of the
750: thick matter found in our observations. Although we have proposed two
751: possibilities, we have not obtained conclusive result on this issue, because
752: we only obtained the $0.5-10$ keV spectra with poor statistics.
753: This is a subject for future missions with
754: large effective area and high energy resolution, such as XMM, Astro-E,
755: Constellation-X, and XEUS.
756:
757: \section{CONCLUSION}
758:
759: We analyze the X-ray data for Seyfert 2 galaxies which have polarized broad
760: lines in the optical band.
761:
762: All galaxies show obscured nuclear activities with $2-10$ keV
763: absorption-corrected
764: luminosities of $10^{42}-10^{43}$ \ulum. However, absorption corrected
765: X-ray luminosities ($\Lxa$) are less than expected based on predictions from
766: $\Lir$, $\Lhbeta$ using relations found in Seyfert 1
767: galaxies. We examine whether the small X-ray luminosities are real or not,
768: and find that this can be explained if the effects of Compton reflection
769: rather than absorption dominate the $2-10$ keV spectra.
770: In this case, the intrinsic X-ray luminosities are consistent with the
771: higher luminosities expected from the amount of reflection.
772:
773: Soft X-ray emission is detected in all galaxies. The X-ray spectrum and
774: correlation of $\Lir$-$\Lsoft$ and $\Lhbetascat$-$\Lsoft$
775: reveal that most X-rays in the soft component are scattered light by a warm
776: scatterer. The typical scattering efficiency derived from the ratio
777: of the soft to
778: apparent hard band luminosity is about 10$\%$;
779: larger than that of Seyfert 2 galaxies without
780: polarized broad lines. This discrepancy can result from an
781: underestimation of intrinsic activity.
782: The scattering efficiencies deduced from real activities are similar
783: to those of other Seyfert 2 galaxies, which are a few $\%$. The small
784: scattering efficiency supports the existence of a large scattering region,
785: as opposed to the compact scattering region proposed by Hisler, Lumsden, \&
786: Bailey (1997).
787:
788: We suggest that \PBLsey~have larger viewing angles and are seen
789: more edge-on than
790: other Seyfert 2 galaxies. For this case, the polarization and the
791: contribution of scattered light in the hard component for Seyfert galaxies
792: are naturally explained. We consider two possibilities to explain the
793: viewing angle dependence of $\Lxa/\Lir$; 1) anisotropic radiation and
794: 2) complex absorption by thick, clumpy clouds. The ASCA data do not
795: provide conclusive results on this issue. This is a subject to
796: future X-ray missions.
797:
798: \acknowledgements
799:
800: The authors acknowledge all member of ASCA team.
801: This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED)
802: operated by the Jet Population Laboratory, and of the ASCA archive data base
803: maintained by the ASCA Guest observatory facility at NASA/GSFC.
804: This work is supported by Japan Science and Technology Corporation.
805: YT was financially supported in part by the Ministry of Education, Science,
806: and Culture (Nos. 10044052, and 10304013).
807:
808: \begin{thebibliography}{}
809: \bibitem[Antonucci \& Miller 1985]{am85}
810: Antonucci, R. R. J. \& Miller, J. S. 1985, \apj, 297, 621
811:
812: \bibitem[Appenzeller et al. 1998]{ap98}
813: Appenzeller, I., et al. 1998, \apjs, 117, 319
814:
815: \bibitem[Awaki et al. 1990]{aw90}
816: Awaki, H., Koyama, K., Kunieda, H., \& Tawara, Y. 1990, \nat, 346, 544
817:
818: \bibitem[Awaki et al. 1991]{aw91}
819: Awaki, H., Koyama, K., Inoue, H., \& Halpern, J.P. 1991, \pasj, 43, 195
820:
821: %%\bibitem[Awaki \& Koyama 1993]{ak93}
822: %%Awaki H., \& Koyama, K. 1993, {\it Adv. Space Res.}, 13, 221
823:
824: %%\bibitem[Awaki 1997]{aw97}
825: %%Awaki H. 1997 in ASP Conf. Ser. 113 Emission Lines in Active Galaxies, ed.
826: %%B.M.Peterson, F.Z.Cheng, \& A.S.Wilson (San Francisco:ASP), 44
827:
828: \bibitem[Awaki 1999]{aw99}
829: Awaki, H. 1999 {\it Adv. Space Res.}, 23, 837
830:
831: \bibitem[Bassani et al. 1999]{ba99}
832: Bassani, L., et al. 1999, \apjs, 121, 473
833:
834: %%\item[]
835: %%Bade N., et al. {\it A\&A Suppl}, {\bf 127}, 145 (1998).
836:
837: \bibitem[Blumental, Keel, \& Miller 1982]{bkm82}
838: Blumenthal, G. R., Keel, W. C., \& Miller, J. S. 1982, \apj, 257, 499
839:
840: %%\bibitem[Brindle et al. 1990]{br90}
841: %%Brindle, C., et al. 1990, \mnras, 244, 577
842:
843: \bibitem[Colbert et al. 1998]{col98}
844: Colbert, E. J. M., Baum, S. A., O'dea, C. P., \& Veilleux, S. 1998, \apj, 496, 786
845:
846: \bibitem[Comastri et al. 1998]{com98}
847: Comastri, A,. et al. 1998, \mnras, 295, 443
848:
849: \bibitem[Dahlem et al. 1998]{dwh98}
850: Dahlem, M., Weaver, K. A., \& Heckman, T. M. 1998, \apjs, 118, 401
851:
852: \bibitem[David, Jones, \& Forman 1992]{djf92}
853: David, L. P., Jones, C., \& Forman, W. 1992, \apj, 388, 82
854:
855: %%\bibitem[Greenhill et al. 1996]{gr96}
856: %%Greenhill, L.J., Gwinn, C.R., Antonucci, R., \& Barvainis, R. 1996, \apjl, 472, L21
857:
858: \bibitem[Griffiths et al. 1998]{gwgds98}
859: Griffiths, R. G., Warwick, R. S., Georgantopoulos, I., Done, C., \& Smith, D.A.
860: 1998, \mnras, 298, 1159
861:
862: \bibitem[Hayashi et al. 1996]{ha96}
863: Hayashi, I., et al. 1996, \pasj, 48, 219
864:
865: \bibitem[Heckman et al. 1997]{he97}
866: Heckman, T. M., et al. 1997, \apj, 482, 114
867:
868: \bibitem[Heisler, Lumsden, \& Bailey 1997]{hlb97}
869: Heisler, C. A., Lumsden, S. L., \& Bailey,J.A. 1997, \nat, 385, 700
870:
871: \bibitem[Iwasawa et al. 1994]{iw94}
872: Iwasawa, K., Yaqoob, T., Awaki, H., \& Ogasaka, Y. 1994, \pasj, 46, L167
873:
874: \bibitem[Kallman \& McCray 1982]{km82}
875: Kallman, T. R. \& McCray, R. 1982, \apjs, 50, 263
876:
877: \bibitem[Kruper, Urry \& Canizares 1982]{kug90}
878: Kruper, J. S., Urry C. M., \& Canizares, C. R. 1990, \apjs, 74, 347
879:
880: %%\bibitem[Lightman \& White 1988]{lw88}
881: %%Lightman \& White 1988, \apj, 335, 57
882:
883: \bibitem[Maiolino \& Rieke 1995]{mr95}
884: Maiolino, R., \& Rieke, G. H. 1995, \apj, 454, 95
885:
886: \bibitem[Makishima et al. 1989]{ma89}
887: Makishima, K., et al. 1989, \pasj, 41, 697
888:
889: \bibitem[Matt et al. 1996]{ma96}
890: Matt, G. et al., 1996, \mnras, 281, L69
891:
892: \bibitem[Malaguti, Bassam, \& Caroli 1994]{mbc94}
893: Malaguti, G., Bassam, L., \& Caroli, E. 1994, \apjs, 94, 517
894:
895: \bibitem[Malaguti et al. 1998]{m98}
896: Malaguti, G., et al. 1998, \aap, 331, 519
897:
898: \bibitem[Marshall et al. 1992]{ma92}
899: Marshall, F., et al. 1992, in Proc of Frontiers of X-ray Astronomy, ed Y.Tanaka, K.Koyama (UAP, Tokyo) p129
900:
901: \bibitem[Miller \& Goodrich 1990]{mg90}
902: Miller, J. S., \& Goodrich, R.W. 1990, \apj, 355, 456
903:
904: \bibitem[Miyoshi et al. 1995]{m95}
905: Miyoshi, M., et al. 1995, \nat, 373, 127
906:
907: \bibitem[Mulchaey et al. 1994]{mu94}
908: Mulchaey, J.S., et al. 1994, \apj, 436, 586
909:
910: \bibitem[Murayama, Mouri, \& Taniguchi 2000]{mmt00}
911: Murayama, T., Mouri, H., \& Taniguchi, Y. 2000, \apj, in press (astro-ph/9908529)
912:
913: \bibitem[Mushitzky 1982]{mu82}
914: Mushotzky, R.F. 1982 \apj, 256, 92
915:
916: \bibitem[Netzer 1996]{ne96}
917: Netzer, H. 1996 \apj, 473, 781
918:
919: \bibitem[Netzer, Turner, George 1998]{ntg98}
920: Netzer, H., Turner,T. J, \& George, I. M. 1998 \apj, 504, 680
921:
922: \bibitem[Nishiura \& Taniguchi 1998]{nt98}
923: Nishiura, S. \& Taniguchi, Y. 1998, \apj, 499, 134
924:
925: \bibitem[Okada 1998]{ok98}
926: Okada, K. 1998, {\it Ph.D thesis, University of Tokyo}
927:
928: \bibitem[Padvani \& Rafanelli 1988]{pr88}
929: Padovani, P. \& Rafanelli, P. 1988, \aap, 205, 53
930:
931: \bibitem[Raymond \& Smith 1977]{rs77}
932: Raymond, J. C. \& Smith, B. W. 1977, \apjs, 35, 419
933:
934: \bibitem[Reynolds et al. 1994]{re94}
935: Reynolds, C. S., Fabian, A. C., Makishima, K., Fukazawa, Y., \& Tamura, T.
936: 1994, \mnras, 268, L55
937:
938: %%\bibitem[Rush et al. 1996]{ru96}
939: %%Rush, B., Malkan, M. A., Fink, H. H., \& Voges, W. 1996, \apj,
940: %%471, 190
941:
942: \bibitem[Tanaka, Inoue \& Holt 1994]{tih94}
943: Tanaka, Y., Inoue, H., \& Holt, S. S. 1994, \pasj, 46, L37
944:
945: \bibitem[Tran, Miller \& Kay 1992]{tmk92}
946: Tran, H. D., Miller, J. S., \& Kay, L. E. 1992, \apj, 397, 452
947:
948: \bibitem[Tran 1995a]{tr95a}
949: Tran, H. D. 1995a, \apj, 440, 565
950:
951: \bibitem[Tran 1995b]{tr95b}
952: Tran, H. D. 1995b, \apj, 440, 578
953:
954: \bibitem[Tsuru et al. 1997]{tsuru97}
955: Tsuru, T., Awaki, H., Koyama, K., \& Ptak, A. 1997, \pasj, 49, 619
956:
957: \bibitem[Turner et al. 1997a]{tu97a}
958: Turner, T. J., George, I. M., Nandra, K., \& Mushotzky, R. F. 1997b, \apjs,113, 23
959:
960: \bibitem[Turner et al. 1997b]{tu97b}
961: Turner, T.J., et al. 1997a, \apj, 488, 164
962:
963: \bibitem[Ueno et al. 1994]{ue94}
964: Ueno, S., Mushotzky, R. F., Koyama, K., Iwasawa, K., Awaki, H., \& Hayashi,
965: I. 1994, \pasj, 46, L71
966:
967: \bibitem[Ueno et al. 1996]{ue96}
968: Ueno, S., Koyama, K., Awaki, H., Hayashi, I., \& Blanco, P. R. 1996,
969: \pasj, 48, 389
970:
971: \bibitem[Ueno 1995]{ue95}
972: Ueno, S. 1995 {\it Ph.D. thesis, Kyoto University}
973:
974: \bibitem[Ulvestad \& Wilson 1984]{uw84}
975: Ulvestad, J.S. \& Wilson, A.S. 1984, \apj, 278, 544
976:
977: %%\bibitem[Ward 1988]{wa88}
978: %%Ward, M. J. 1988, \mnras, 231, 1p
979:
980: \bibitem[Weaver 1994]{we94}
981: Weaver, K. A., Yaqoob, T., Holt, S. S., Mushotzky, R. F., Matsuoka, M.
982: \& Yamauchi, M. 1994, \apjl, 436, L27
983:
984: \bibitem[Whittle 1992]{wh92}
985: Whittle, M. 1992, \apjs, 79, 49
986:
987:
988: \end{thebibliography}
989:
990: \newpage
991:
992: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccc}
993: \tablenum{1}
994: \tablewidth{0pt}
995: \tablecaption{observation log}
996: \tablehead{
997: \colhead{Target Name} & \colhead{Obs.Date} & \colhead{Exp. Time} &
998: \colhead{count rate(SIS)} & \colhead{hardness ratio(2-10/0.5-2)} }
999: \startdata
1000: Was 49b & 95. 5.22 & 43k & 0.009$\pm$0.001 cts/s & 1.5$\pm$ 0.2 \nl
1001:
1002: Mrk 348 & 95.08.04 & 28k & 0.027$\pm$0.001 cts/s & 8.0$\pm$ 1.0 \nl
1003:
1004: Mrk 1210 & 95.10.18 & 14k & 0.016$\pm$0.002 cts/s & 1.1$\pm$ 0.1 \nl
1005: & 95.11.12 & 6k & 0.017$\pm$0.006 cts/s & 1.3$\pm$ 0.4 \nl
1006:
1007: NGC 7212 & 95.11.13 & 16k & 0.011$\pm$0.001 cts/s & 1.2$\pm$ 0.2 \nl
1008: & 95.11.19 & 13k & 0.009$\pm$0.002 cts/s & 0.94$\pm$0.2 \nl
1009:
1010: Mrk 477 & 95.12.04 & 30k & 0.011$\pm$0.001 cts/s & 1.6$\pm$ 0.1 \nl
1011: & 95.12.05 & 20k & 0.010$\pm$0.002 cts/s & 1.4$\pm$ 0.2 \nl
1012:
1013: Mrk 3 & 96.10.26 & 32k & 0.047$\pm$0.001 cts/s & 1.04$\pm$ 0.04 \nl
1014:
1015: \enddata
1016: \end{deluxetable}
1017:
1018: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccccccc}
1019: \tiny
1020: \tablenum{2}
1021: \tablewidth{0pt}
1022: \tablecaption{Fitting results for the ASCA spectra.}
1023: \tablehead{
1024: \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{Soft Component} &
1025: \multicolumn{4}{c}{Hard Component} &
1026: \colhead{} \\
1027: \cline{3-5} \cline{6-9} \\
1028: \colhead{Target} & \colhead{ID$^{a}$} & \colhead{$N_{\rm{H0}}$} & \colhead{$\Gamma$/kT} &
1029: \colhead{Z} & \colhead{$N_{\rm{H1}}$} & \colhead{$\Gamma$} &
1030: \colhead{Center Energy} & \colhead{EW} & \colhead{$\chi^{2}$ (d.o.f.)} \\
1031: \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{($\times$10$^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$)} & \colhead{--/(keV)} &
1032: \colhead{} & \colhead{($\times$10$^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$)} & \colhead{} &
1033: \colhead{(keV)} & \colhead{(eV)} & \colhead{} \\
1034: }
1035: \startdata
1036: Was 49b & 1 & 0.85($<$1.2) & 8.9(2.3--15) & ---- & 0.16($<$0.56) & 0.54(0.25--0.9) & 5.7(5.4--6.1) & 370(200--500) & 70.0(62) \nl
1037: & 2 & 0.0163(f) & 2.3(0.5--3.0) & ---- & 6.3(4.5--46) & 1.7(f) & 6.02(f) & 620(370--870) & 91.2(65) \nl
1038: & 3 & 0.56( 0.2--1.14) & 7.2(4--10) & ---- & ---- & 2.8(2.48-- 3.12 ) & 6.02(f) & 200($<$350) & 71.4(64) \nl
1039: & 4 & 0.0163(f) & 0.72(0.4--1.1) & 0.02($<$0.14) & 1.7(0.7--3.2) & 0.6(0.3--0.9) & 6.02(f) & 360(180--540) & 72.0(63) \nl
1040:
1041: Mrk 348 & 1 & 0.00($<$0.24) & 1.1(0.5--2.3) & ---- & 16(13--20) & 1.69(1.30-- 2.05) & 6.27(6.20--6.35) & 215(140--300) & 117.4(116) \nl
1042: & 2 & 0.056(f) & 1.3(0.7--1.9) & ---- & 16(15--18) & 1.7 (f) & 6.27(6.20--6.35) & 212(140--280) & 118.6(119) \nl
1043: & 3 & 0.056 (f) & -3 & ---- & ---- & 1.6 & 4.9 & 200 & 242(117) \nl
1044: & 4 & 0.056 (f) & 64( 6$>$ ) & 1(f) & 16(15--18) & 1.64(1.30--2.00) & 6.27(6.20--6.35) & 215(140--300) & 117.6(117) \nl
1045:
1046: Mrk 1210 & 1 & 0.83(0.16--1.4) & 7.3(3.4--10.7) & ---- & 0.00($<$1.7) & -0.14(-0.45-- +0.28) & 6.29(6.24--6.60) & 780(510--1020) & 33.2(35) \nl
1047: & 2 & 0.038(f) & 2.34(1.90--2.80) & ---- & 21.1(15--30) & 1.7 (f) & 6.315(f) & 760(430--990) & 50.1(38) \nl
1048: & 3 & 0.55(0.1--1.1) & 5.6(3.2--8.4) & ---- & ---- & 1.95(1.55--2.40) & 6.315(f) & 460(250--670) & 32.9(36) \nl
1049: & 4 & 0.038(f) & 0.86(0.55--1.2) & 0.03($<$0.1) & 3.7($<$7.5) & 0.08(-0.5--0.5) & 6.315(f) & 710(440--950) & 34.8(36) \nl
1050:
1051: NGC 7212 & 1 & 0.0($<$0.2) & 1.37(0.8--4.4) & ---- & 23(0--200) & 0.47(-1.5--10) & 6.18(---)$^a$ & 520(---) & 30.2(34) \nl
1052: & 2 & 0.0533(f) & 1.41(1.0--1.8) & ---- & 45(20--100) & 1.7(f) & 6.24(f) & 480($<$1500) & 32.4(37) \nl
1053: & 3 & 0.0533(f) & 1.65(0.2--2.3) & ---- & ---- & 1.87(1.35--2.7) & 6.24(f) & 340(20--700) & 30.1(37) \nl
1054: & 4 & 0.0533(f) & 12.0(4.5$<$) & 1(f) & 25($<$95) & 0.77(-1.2--5.7) & 6.24 (f) & 530(60--1200) & 32.1(36) \nl
1055:
1056:
1057:
1058: Mrk 477 & 1 & 0.0($<$0.6) & 2.3(1.6--6.5) & ---- & 4.7($<$13) & -0.02(-0.6-- +0.6) & 6.24(6.27--6.39) & 500(350--650) & 71.1(70) \nl
1059: & 2 & 0.0127(f) & 1.67(1.25--2.1) & ---- & 30(24--42) & 1.7(f) & 6.17(f) & 300(150--450) & 88.3(73) \nl
1060: & 3 & 0.01($<$0.32) & 2.75(2.1--4.8) & ---- & ---- & 1.57(1.2--1.9 ) & 6.17(f) & 230(80--380) & 69.7(71) \nl
1061: & 4 & 0.0127(f) & 7.5(4.8$<$) & 1(f) & 14(6--24) & 0.3(-0.4-- +2.0) & 6.17(f) & 340(180--450) & 82.4(72) \nl
1062:
1063: Mrk 3 & 1 & 0.04($<$0.09) & 1.57(1.41--1.75) & ---- & 72(50--100) & 2.22(1.2--3.3) & 6.29(6.27--6.34) & 700(520--1100) & 148(127) \nl
1064: & 2 & 0.087(f) & 1.72(1.60--1.82) & ---- & 57(48--68) & 1.7(f) & 6.315(f) & 760(590--930) & 190.9(130) \nl
1065: & 3 & 0.20(0.12-0.30) & 2.47(2.1--2.9) & ---- & ---- & 1.14(0.80--1.48) & 6.315(f) & 730(610--840) & 187.0(128) \nl
1066: & 4 & 0.087(f) & 0.98(0.88--1.08) & 0.05(0.03--0.09) & 0($<$0.7) & -0.23(-0.40-- -0.04) & 6.315(f) & 1100(950--1200) & 224.3(129) \nl
1067: \enddata
1068: \tablecomments{ID: (1) absorbed power law plus another absorbed power law model, (2) absorbed power law with photon index of 1.7 plus another power law model,
1069: (3) Compton reflection plus absorbed power law model, For reflection models, the reflection mirror has an inclination of $\theta$=0$^{\circ}$ and a coverage of $\Omega$=2$\pi$, (4) absorbed power law plus RAYMOND plasma. For Mrk 3, we included a narrow line at $\sim$0.9 keV in the soft component. A fixed parameter is denoted by (f).}
1070: \tablenotetext{a}{Since we did not obtain a significant iron line in this model, its confidence region is too large.}
1071: \end{deluxetable}
1072:
1073: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccccccc}
1074: \tablenum{3}
1075: \tablewidth{0pt}
1076: \tablecaption{Observed X-ray flux and luminosity$^{a}$}
1077: \scriptsize
1078: \tablehead{
1079: \colhead{Target Name} & \colhead{redshift$^{b}$} & \multicolumn{5}{c}{X-ray flux (\uflux)} &
1080: \colhead{} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{X-ray luminosity (\ulum)} \\
1081: \cline{3-7} \cline{9-10} \\
1082: \colhead{} & \colhead{}& \multicolumn{2}{c}{soft component} &
1083: \colhead{} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{hard component} &
1084: \colhead{} & \colhead{soft component} & \colhead{hard component} \\
1085: \cline{3-4} \cline{6-7} \\
1086: \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{0.5-2keV} & \colhead{2-10keV} &
1087: \colhead{} & \colhead{0.5-2keV} & \colhead{2-10keV} & \colhead{} &
1088: \colhead{0.5-2keV} & \colhead{2-10keV} }
1089: \startdata
1090: Was 49b & 0.0630 & 8.6$\times10^{-14}$ & 3.7$\times10^{-13}$ & & 5.9$\times10^{-17}$ & 6.3$\times10^{-13}$ & & 1.4$\times10^{42}$ & 1.0$\times10^{43}$ \nl
1091: Mrk 348 & 0.0149 & 7.0$\times10^{-14}$ & 2.8$\times10^{-13}$ & & 2.1$\times10^{-16}$ & 4.8$\times10^{-12}$ & & 6.3$\times10^{40}$ & 4.3$\times10^{42}$ \nl
1092: Mrk 1210 & 0.0135 & 1.8$\times10^{-13}$ & 1.8$\times10^{-13}$ & & 3.1$\times10^{-18}$ & 1.4$\times10^{-12}$ & & 1.3$\times10^{41}$ & 1.0$\times10^{42}$ \nl
1093: NGC 7212 & 0.0260 & 1.0$\times10^{-13}$ & 3.3$\times10^{-13}$ & & 5.0$\times10^{-22}$ & 5.0$\times10^{-13}$ & & 2.8$\times10^{41}$ & 1.4$\times10^{42}$ \nl
1094: Mrk 477 & 0.0378 & 1.0$\times10^{-13}$ & 2.0$\times10^{-13}$ & & 2.6$\times10^{-19}$ & 1.1$\times10^{-12}$ & & 5.8$\times10^{41}$ & 6.4$\times10^{42}$ \nl
1095: Mrk 3 & 0.0135 & 5.8$\times10^{-13}$ & 1.3$\times10^{-12}$ & & 4.0$\times10^{-25}$ & 4.2$\times10^{-12}$ & & 4.3$\times10^{41}$ & 3.1$\times10^{42}$ \nl
1096: \tablenotetext{a}{we listed the flux in the model 2.}
1097: \tablenotetext{b}{Data quated from NASA Extragalactic Database (NED).}
1098: \enddata
1099: \end{deluxetable}
1100:
1101: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccc}
1102: \tablenum{4}
1103: \tablewidth{0pt}
1104: \tablecaption{X-ray, infrared and H$_{\beta}$p luminosities for \PBLsey}
1105: \scriptsize
1106: \tablehead{
1107: \colhead{Target Name} & \colhead{$\Lsoft$ $^a$} & \colhead{$\Lxa$ $^b$} & \colhead{$\Lir$} &
1108: \colhead{log($F_{\rm{25\mu m}}$/$F_{\rm{60\mu m}}$)} & \colhead{$L_{\rm{H_{\beta}p}}$} & \colhead{Reference} }
1109: \startdata
1110: Was 49b & 1.4$\times10^{42}$ & 2.1$\times10^{43}$ & 3.5$\times10^{44}$ & & 3.1$\times10^{40}$ & 1 \nl
1111: Mrk 348 & 7.3$\times10^{40}$ & 8.0$\times10^{42}$ & 5.5$\times10^{43}$ & -0.19 & 2.6$\times10^{39}$ & 1 \nl
1112: Mrk 1210 & 1.4$\times10^{41}$ & 2.3$\times10^{42}$ & 5.7$\times10^{43}$ & 0.04 & 1.5$\times10^{39}$ & 1 \nl
1113: NGC 7212 & 3.3$\times10^{41}$ & 4.9$\times10^{42}$ & 4.0$\times10^{44}$ & -0.57 & 3.5$\times10^{39}$ & 1 \nl
1114: Mrk 477 & 6.3$\times10^{41}$ & 1.8$\times10^{43}$ & 3.8$\times10^{44}$ & -0.41 & 7.3$\times10^{39}$ & 1 \nl
1115: Mrk 3 & 6.1$\times10^{41}$ & 7.0$\times10^{42}$ & 1.2$\times10^{44}$ & -0.11 & 9.1$\times10^{39}$ & 1 \nl
1116: \nl
1117: NGC 1068 & 3.9$\times10^{40}$ & 5$\times10^{41}$ & 5.2$\times10^{44}$ & -0.32 & 2.5$\times10^{39}$ & 2, 3 \nl
1118: Mrk 463E & 1.2$\times10^{42}$ & 8$\times10^{42}$ & 9.5$\times10^{44}$ & -0.14 & 3.6$\times10^{40}$ & 1, 4 \nl
1119: NGC 7674 & 4.0$\times10^{41}$ & 2$\times10^{42}$ & 6.6$\times10^{44}$ & -0.47 & 4.8$\times10^{39}$ & 1, 5 \nl
1120: \tablenotetext{a}{the 0.5--2keV luminosity for soft component.}
1121: \tablenotetext{b}{the 2--10 keV absorption corrected luminosity for hard component.}
1122: \tablerefs{
1123: (1) Tran 1995a; (2) Antonucci \& Miller 1985; (3) Ueno et al. 1994;
1124: (4) Ueno et al. 1996; (5) Malaguti et al. 1998
1125: }
1126: \enddata
1127: \end{deluxetable}
1128:
1129: \begin{deluxetable}{lcc}
1130: \tablenum{5}
1131: \tablewidth{0pt}
1132: \tablecaption{intensity of 0.9 keV structure in model 2}
1133: \tablehead{
1134: \colhead{Target Name} & \colhead{center energy} & \colhead{equivalent width} }
1135: \startdata
1136: Was 49b & 0.85 keV (fixed) & 0 ($<$90)eV \nl
1137: Mrk 348 & 0.89 keV (fixed) & 80 ($<$240)eV \nl
1138: Mrk 1210 & 0.89 keV (fixed) & 35 ($<$700)eV \nl
1139: NGC 7212 & 0.88 keV (fixed) & 12 ($<$120)eV \nl
1140: Mrk 477 & 0.86 (0.82--0.90) keV & 85 (10--160)eV \nl
1141: Mrk 3 & 0.915 (0.89--0.93) keV & 140 (100--200) eV \nl
1142: \enddata
1143: \end{deluxetable}
1144:
1145: \begin{deluxetable}{lc}
1146: \tablenum{6}
1147: \tablewidth{0pt}
1148: \tablecaption{The ratio of $\Lsoft/\Lxas$ for \PBLsey~and Other Seyfert 2
1149: galaxies}
1150: \tablehead{
1151: \colhead{Target Name} & \colhead{$\Lsoft/\Lxas$} }
1152: \startdata
1153: Was 49b & 0.12 \nl
1154: Mrk 348 & 0.017 \nl
1155: Mrk 1210 & 0.11 \nl
1156: NGC 7212 & 0.12 \nl
1157: Mrk 477 & 0.064 \nl
1158: Mrk 3 & 0.16 \nl
1159: Mrk 463e$^{a}$ & 0.273 \nl
1160: NGC 7674$^{b}$ & 0.365 \nl
1161: \nl
1162: IC 5063$^{c}$ & 0.014 \nl
1163: NGC 4388$^{c}$ & 0.050 \nl
1164: NGC 4507$^{c}$ & 0.007 \nl
1165: IRAS1319-164$^{c}$ & 0.053 \nl
1166: TOL1351-375$^{c}$ & 0.065 \nl
1167: NGC 7172$^{c}$ & 0.001 \nl
1168:
1169: \enddata
1170: \tablerefs{
1171: (a) Ueno et al. 1996; (b) Malaguti et al. 1998; (c) Ueno 1995.
1172: }
1173: \end{deluxetable}
1174:
1175: \newpage
1176: \onecolumn
1177: \begin{figure}
1178: \plottwo{figure1a.eps}{figure1b.eps}
1179:
1180: \plottwo{figure1c.eps}{figure1d.eps}
1181:
1182: \plottwo{figure1e.eps}{figure1f.eps}
1183:
1184: \caption[figure1e.eps,figure1f.eps]{
1185: ASCA SIS and GIS spectra of Seyfert 2 galaxies with optical polarized broad lines.
1186: Histgrams show the best fit models in model 1. Please note
1187: that a narrow line at$\sim$0.9keV is included in the spectrum of Mrk 3.}
1188: \label{figure:1}
1189: \end{figure}
1190:
1191: \begin{figure}
1192: \epsscale{0.4}
1193: \plotone{figure2.eps}
1194: \caption[figure2.eps]{
1195: Absorption corrected X-ray luminosity ($\Lxa$) vs. broad H$\beta$ luminosity
1196: ($\Lhbeta$). Closed circles correspond to observations
1197: for Seyfert 1 galaxies and QSOs; open circles to estimations for Seyfert 2 galaxies
1198: with optical polarized broad lines. Two solid lines show $\Lxa/\Lhbeta$
1199: =10 (lower) and 100 (upper).
1200: }
1201: \label{figure:2}
1202: \end{figure}
1203:
1204: \begin{figure}
1205: \plottwo{figure3a.eps}{figure3b.eps}
1206: \caption[figure3a.eps,figure3b.eps]{
1207: Absorption corrected X-ray luminosity ($\Lxa$) vs. far-infrared
1208: luminosity ($\Lir$) (left), and
1209: intrinsic luminosity ($\Lint$) vs. far-infrared luminosity ($\Lir$)(right).
1210: Intrinsic luminosities were estimated from eq.\ (2) in the text. The regions
1211: for normal and starburst galaxies, and Seyfert 1
1212: galaxies and QSOs are also presented in these figures.
1213: }
1214: \label{figure:3}
1215: \end{figure}
1216:
1217: \begin{figure}[h]
1218: \epsscale{0.4}
1219: \plotone{figure4.eps}
1220: \caption[figure4.eps]{
1221: Long term monitoring of X-ray flux with various X-ray missions for Mrk 3.
1222: Closed circles
1223: and open circles show X-ray fluxes in the 0.5 -- 2keV and the 2 -- 10 keV,
1224: respectively.
1225: }
1226: \label{figure:4}
1227: \end{figure}
1228:
1229:
1230:
1231: \begin{figure}
1232: \epsscale{0.4}
1233: \plotone{figure5.eps}
1234: \caption[figure5.eps]{The 0.5--2 keV luminosities ($\Lsoft$) vs. far-infrared luminosities
1235: ($\Lir$). The 0.5--2keV luminosity for NGC 1068 is estimated by
1236: extrapolation of the scattered component seen in the 2--10 keV band.
1237: }
1238: \label{figure:5}
1239: \end{figure}
1240:
1241: \begin{figure}
1242: \epsscale{0.4}
1243: \plotone{figure6.eps}
1244: \caption[figure6.eps]{The soft X-ray band luminosities ($\Lsoft$) vs. the scattered
1245: broad H$\beta$ luminosities ($\Lhbetascat$). These $\Lhbetascat$
1246: are quoted from Tran 1995b and Miller \& Goodrich 1990.
1247: The two solid lines show $L_{\rm{2-10}}/\Lhbeta$=10 and 100 assuming a photon
1248: index of 1.7.
1249: }
1250: \label{figure:6}
1251: \end{figure}
1252:
1253: \begin{figure}[h]
1254: \epsscale{0.4}
1255: \plotone{figure7.eps}
1256: \caption[figure7.eps]{
1257: Distributions of $\Lsoft/\Lxas$ for PBL Seyfert 2 (upper) and for other
1258: Seyfert 2 galaxies (lower). The data for other Seyfert 2 galaxies are
1259: quated from Ueno (1995).
1260: }
1261: \label{figure:7}
1262: \end{figure}
1263:
1264: \begin{figure*}
1265: \plottwo{figure8a.eps}{figure8b.eps}
1266: \caption[figure8a.eps,figure8b.eps]{
1267: $\Lxa/\Lir$ vs $\Lsoft/\Lxas$ (left figure) and
1268: $\Lint/\Lir$ vs $\Lsoft/\Lints$ (right figure). Closed and open circles
1269: display PBL Seyfert 2 and other Seyfert 2 galaxies,
1270: respectively. An arrow in figure 8b shows the error region of Mrk 463e.
1271: }
1272: \label{figure:8}
1273: \end{figure*}
1274:
1275: \begin{figure*}
1276: \plottwo{figure9a.eps}{figure9b.eps}
1277: \caption[figure9a.eps,figure9b.eps]{
1278: Schematic view of Seyfert galaxies proposed in the text.
1279: Left and right figures show anistropic radiation model and
1280: dual absorption model, respectively.
1281: }
1282: \label{figure:9}
1283: \end{figure*}
1284:
1285: \end{document}
1286:
1287: