1: \documentstyle[12pt,aaspp4,flushrt]{article}
2: %\documentclass[preprint]{aastex}
3: \begin{document}
4:
5: \title{The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical Summary}
6:
7: {
8: \author{Donald G. York\altaffilmark{\ref{Chicago}},
9: J. Adelman\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},
10: John E. Anderson, Jr.\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},
11: Scott F. Anderson\altaffilmark{\ref{Washington}},
12: James Annis\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},
13: %John N. Bahcall\altaffilmark{\ref{IAS}},
14: Neta A. Bahcall\altaffilmark{\ref{Princeton}},
15: J. A. Bakken\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},
16: Robert Barkhouser\altaffilmark{\ref{JHU}},
17: Steven Bastian\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},
18: Eileen Berman\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},
19: William N. Boroski\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},
20: Steve Bracker\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},
21: Charlie Briegel\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},
22: John W. Briggs\altaffilmark{\ref{Yerkes}},
23: J. Brinkmann\altaffilmark{\ref{APO}},
24: %Yorke Browne\altaffilmark{\ref{Washington}},
25: Robert Brunner\altaffilmark{\ref{Caltech}},
26: Scott Burles\altaffilmark{\ref{Chicago}},
27: Larry Carey\altaffilmark{\ref{Washington}},
28: Michael A. Carr\altaffilmark{\ref{Princeton}},
29: Francisco J. Castander\altaffilmark{\ref{Chicago},\ref{Pyrenees}},
30: Bing Chen\altaffilmark{\ref{JHU}},
31: Patrick L. Colestock\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},
32: A. J. Connolly\altaffilmark{\ref{Pittsburgh}},
33: J. H. Crocker\altaffilmark{\ref{JHU}},
34: Istv\'an Csabai\altaffilmark{\ref{JHU},\ref{Eotvos}},
35: Paul C. Czarapata\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},
36: John Eric Davis\altaffilmark{\ref{APO}},
37: Mamoru Doi\altaffilmark{\ref{UTokyo}},
38: Tom Dombeck\altaffilmark{\ref{Chicago}},
39: Daniel Eisenstein\altaffilmark{\ref{IAS},\ref{Chicago},\ref{Hubble}},
40: Nancy Ellman\altaffilmark{\ref{Yale}},
41: Brian R. Elms\altaffilmark{\ref{Princeton},\ref{NAOJapan}},
42: Michael L. Evans\altaffilmark{\ref{Washington}},
43: Xiaohui Fan\altaffilmark{\ref{Princeton}},
44: Glenn R. Federwitz\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},
45: %Paul D. Feldman\altaffilmark{\ref{JHU}},
46: Larry Fiscelli\altaffilmark{\ref{Chicago}},
47: Scott Friedman\altaffilmark{\ref{JHU}},
48: Joshua A. Frieman\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab},\ref{Chicago}},
49: Masataka Fukugita\altaffilmark{\ref{CosmicRay},\ref{IAS}},
50: Bruce Gillespie\altaffilmark{\ref{APO}},
51: James E. Gunn\altaffilmark{\ref{Princeton}},
52: Vijay K. Gurbani\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},
53: Ernst de Haas\altaffilmark{\ref{Princeton}},
54: Merle Haldeman\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},
55: Frederick H. Harris\altaffilmark{\ref{Flagstaff}},
56: J. Hayes\altaffilmark{\ref{APO}},
57: Timothy M. Heckman\altaffilmark{\ref{JHU}},
58: G. S. Hennessy\altaffilmark{\ref{USNO}},
59: Robert B. Hindsley\altaffilmark{\ref{NRL}},
60: %Craig J. Hogan\altaffilmark{\ref{Washington}},
61: Scott Holm\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},
62: Donald J. Holmgren\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},
63: Chi-hao Huang\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},
64: Charles Hull\altaffilmark{\ref{OCIW}},
65: Don Husby\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},
66: Shin-Ichi Ichikawa\altaffilmark{\ref{NAOJapan}},
67: Takashi Ichikawa\altaffilmark{\ref{Tohoku}},
68: \v{Z}eljko Ivezi\'{c}\altaffilmark{\ref{Princeton}},
69: Stephen Kent\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},
70: Rita S.J. Kim\altaffilmark{\ref{Princeton}},
71: E. Kinney\altaffilmark{\ref{APO}},
72: Mark Klaene\altaffilmark{\ref{APO}},
73: A. N. Kleinman\altaffilmark{\ref{APO}},
74: S. Kleinman\altaffilmark{\ref{APO}},
75: G. R. Knapp\altaffilmark{\ref{Princeton}},
76: John Korienek\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},
77: Richard G. Kron\altaffilmark{\ref{Chicago},\ref{Fermilab}},
78: Peter Z. Kunszt\altaffilmark{\ref{JHU}},
79: D.Q. Lamb\altaffilmark{\ref{Chicago}},
80: B. Lee\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},
81: R. French Leger\altaffilmark{\ref{Washington}},
82: Siriluk Limmongkol\altaffilmark{\ref{Washington}},
83: Carl Lindenmeyer\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},
84: Daniel C. Long\altaffilmark{\ref{APO}},
85: Craig Loomis\altaffilmark{\ref{APO}},
86: Jon Loveday\altaffilmark{\ref{Chicago}},
87: Rich Lucinio\altaffilmark{\ref{APO}},
88: Robert H. Lupton\altaffilmark{\ref{Princeton}},
89: Bryan MacKinnon\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab},\ref{MerrillLynch}},
90: Edward J. Mannery\altaffilmark{\ref{Washington}},
91: P. M. Mantsch\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},
92: Bruce Margon\altaffilmark{\ref{Washington}},
93: Peregrine McGehee\altaffilmark{\ref{LosAlamos}},
94: Timothy A. McKay\altaffilmark{\ref{Michigan}},
95: Avery Meiksin\altaffilmark{\ref{Edinburgh}},
96: Aronne Merelli\altaffilmark{\ref{CMU}},
97: David G. Monet\altaffilmark{\ref{Flagstaff}},
98: %Jeff Morgan\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},
99: Jeffrey A. Munn\altaffilmark{\ref{Flagstaff}},
100: Vijay K. Narayanan\altaffilmark{\ref{Princeton}},
101: Thomas Nash\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},
102: Eric Neilsen\altaffilmark{\ref{JHU}},
103: Rich Neswold\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},
104: Heidi Jo Newberg\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab},\ref{RPI}},
105: R. C. Nichol\altaffilmark{\ref{CMU}},
106: Tom Nicinski\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab},\ref{Lucent}},
107: Mario Nonino\altaffilmark{\ref{Trieste}},
108: Norio Okada\altaffilmark{\ref{NAOJapan}},
109: Sadanori Okamura\altaffilmark{\ref{UTokyo}},
110: Jeremiah P. Ostriker\altaffilmark{\ref{Princeton}},
111: Russell Owen\altaffilmark{\ref{Washington}},
112: A. George Pauls\altaffilmark{\ref{Princeton}},
113: John Peoples\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},
114: R. L. Peterson\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},
115: Donald Petravick\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},
116: Jeffrey R. Pier\altaffilmark{\ref{Flagstaff}},
117: Adrian Pope\altaffilmark{\ref{CMU}},
118: Ruth Pordes\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},
119: Angela Prosapio\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},
120: Ron Rechenmacher\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},
121: Thomas R. Quinn\altaffilmark{\ref{Washington}},
122: %Stuart Rice\altaffilmark{\ref{Chicago}},
123: Gordon T. Richards\altaffilmark{\ref{Chicago}},
124: Michael W. Richmond\altaffilmark{\ref{Rochester}},
125: Claudio H. Rivetta\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},
126: Constance M. Rockosi\altaffilmark{\ref{Chicago}},
127: %Robert Rosner\altaffilmark{\ref{Chicago}},
128: Kurt Ruthmansdorfer\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},
129: Dale Sandford\altaffilmark{\ref{Yerkes}},
130: David J. Schlegel\altaffilmark{\ref{Princeton}},
131: Donald P. Schneider\altaffilmark{\ref{PennState}},
132: Maki Sekiguchi\altaffilmark{\ref{CosmicRay}},
133: Gary Sergey\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},
134: Kazuhiro Shimasaku\altaffilmark{\ref{UTokyo}},
135: Walter A. Siegmund\altaffilmark{\ref{Washington}},
136: %Allan J. Sinisgalli\altaffilmark{\ref{Princeton}},
137: Stephen Smee\altaffilmark{\ref{JHU}},
138: J. Allyn Smith\altaffilmark{\ref{Michigan}},
139: S. Snedden\altaffilmark{\ref{APO}},
140: R. Stone\altaffilmark{\ref{Flagstaff}},
141: Chris Stoughton\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},
142: Michael A. Strauss\altaffilmark{\ref{Princeton}},
143: Christopher Stubbs\altaffilmark{\ref{Washington}},
144: Mark SubbaRao\altaffilmark{\ref{Chicago}},
145: Alexander S. Szalay\altaffilmark{\ref{JHU}},
146: Istvan Szapudi\altaffilmark{\ref{CITA}},
147: Gyula P. Szokoly\altaffilmark{\ref{JHU}},
148: Anirudda R. Thakar\altaffilmark{\ref{JHU}},
149: Christy Tremonti\altaffilmark{\ref{JHU}},
150: Douglas L. Tucker\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},
151: %Michael S. Turner\altaffilmark{\ref{Chicago}},
152: Alan Uomoto\altaffilmark{\ref{JHU}},
153: Dan VandenBerk\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}},
154: Michael S. Vogeley\altaffilmark{\ref{Drexel}},
155: Patrick Waddell\altaffilmark{\ref{Washington}},
156: Shu-i Wang\altaffilmark{\ref{Chicago}},
157: Masaru Watanabe\altaffilmark{\ref{Kanagawa}},
158: David H. Weinberg\altaffilmark{\ref{Ohio}},
159: Brian Yanny\altaffilmark{\ref{Fermilab}}, and
160: Naoki Yasuda\altaffilmark{\ref{NAOJapan}}
161: (The SDSS Collaboration)
162: }
163:
164: %xxxx
165:
166: \newcounter{address}
167: \setcounter{address}{1}
168: \altaffiltext{\theaddress}{The University of Chicago, Astronomy \& Astrophysics
169: Center, 5640 S. Ellis Ave., Chicago, IL 60637
170: \label{Chicago}}
171: \addtocounter{address}{1}
172: \altaffiltext{\theaddress}{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, P.O. Box 500,
173: Batavia, IL 60510
174: \label{Fermilab}}
175: \addtocounter{address}{1}
176: \altaffiltext{\theaddress}{University of Washington, Department of Astronomy,
177: Box 351580, Seattle, WA 98195
178: \label{Washington}}
179: \addtocounter{address}{1}
180: \altaffiltext{\theaddress}{Princeton University Observatory, Princeton, NJ 08544
181: \label{Princeton}}
182: \addtocounter{address}{1}
183: \altaffiltext{\theaddress}{
184: Department of Physics and Astronomy, The Johns Hopkins University,
185: 3701 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
186: \label{JHU}
187: }
188: \addtocounter{address}{1}
189: \altaffiltext{\theaddress}{Yerkes Observatory, University of Chicago,
190: 373 W. Geneva St. Williams Bay, WI 53191
191: \label{Yerkes}}
192: \addtocounter{address}{1}
193: \altaffiltext{\theaddress}{Apache Point Observatory, P.O. Box 59,
194: Sunspot, NM 88349-0059
195: \label{APO}}
196: \addtocounter{address}{1}
197: \altaffiltext{\theaddress}{Department of Astronomy, California Institute
198: of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125
199: \label{Caltech}}
200: \addtocounter{address}{1}
201: \altaffiltext{\theaddress}{Observatoire Midi Pyrenees, 14 ave Edouard Belin,
202: Toulouse, F-31400, France
203: \label{Pyrenees}}
204: \addtocounter{address}{1}
205: \altaffiltext{\theaddress}{Department of Physics and Astronomy,
206: University of Pittsburgh,
207: Pittsburgh, PA 15260
208: \label{Pittsburgh}}
209: \addtocounter{address}{1}
210: \altaffiltext{\theaddress}{Department of Physics of Complex Systems,
211: E\"otv\"os University,
212: P\'azm\'any P\'eter s\'et\'any 1/A, Budapest, H-1117, Hungary
213: \label{Eotvos}
214: }
215: \addtocounter{address}{1}
216: \altaffiltext{\theaddress}{Department of Astronomy and Research Center
217: for the Early Universe, School of Science, University of Tokyo, Hongo,
218: Bunkyo, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan
219: \label{UTokyo}}
220: \addtocounter{address}{1}
221: \altaffiltext{\theaddress}{Institute for Advanced Study, Olden Lane,
222: Princeton, NJ 08540
223: \label{IAS}}
224: \addtocounter{address}{1}
225: \altaffiltext{\theaddress}{Hubble Fellow
226: \label{Hubble}}
227: \addtocounter{address}{1}
228: \altaffiltext{\theaddress}{Department of Physics, Yale University,
229: PO Box 208121, New
230: Haven, CT 06520-8121
231: \label{Yale}}
232: \addtocounter{address}{1}
233: \altaffiltext{\theaddress}{National Astronomical Observatory, 2-21-1, Osawa,
234: Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan
235: \label{NAOJapan}}
236: \addtocounter{address}{1}
237: \altaffiltext{\theaddress}{Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, University of
238: Tokyo, Midori, Tanashi, Tokyo 188-8502, Japan
239: \label{CosmicRay}}
240: \addtocounter{address}{1}
241: \altaffiltext{\theaddress}{U.S. Naval Observatory, Flagstaff Station,
242: P.O. Box 1149,
243: Flagstaff, AZ 86002-1149
244: \label{Flagstaff}}
245: \addtocounter{address}{1}
246: \altaffiltext{\theaddress}{U.S. Naval Observatory,
247: 3450 Massachusetts Ave., NW,
248: Washington, DC 20392-5420
249: \label{USNO}}
250: \addtocounter{address}{1}
251: \altaffiltext{\theaddress}{Remote Sensing Division, Code 7215, Naval
252: Research Laboratory, 4555 Overlook Ave. SW, Washington, DC 20375
253: \label{NRL}}
254: \addtocounter{address}{1}
255: \altaffiltext{\theaddress}{The Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of
256: Washington, 813 Santa Barbara St, Pasadena, CA 91101
257: \label{OCIW}}
258: \addtocounter{address}{1}
259: \altaffiltext{\theaddress}{Astronomical Institute,
260: Tohoku University,
261: Aoba, Sendai 980-8578
262: Japan
263: \label{Tohoku}}
264: \addtocounter{address}{1}
265: \altaffiltext{\theaddress}{Merrill Lynch,
266: 1-1-3 Otemachi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100, Japan
267: \label{MerrillLynch}}
268: \addtocounter{address}{1}
269: \altaffiltext{\theaddress}{Los Alamos National Laboratory, PO Box 1663, Los
270: Alamos, NM 87545
271: \label{LosAlamos}}
272: \addtocounter{address}{1}
273: \altaffiltext{\theaddress}{University of Michigan, Department of Physics,
274: 500 East University, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
275: \label{Michigan}}
276: \addtocounter{address}{1}
277: \altaffiltext{\theaddress}{Royal Observatory, Edinburgh, EH9 3HJ, United
278: Kingdom
279: \label{Edinburgh}}
280: %\addtocounter{address}{1}
281: %\altaffiltext{\theaddress}{Illinois Institute of Technology, 3300 S. Federal Street
282: %Chicago, Il 60616
283: %\label{IIT}}
284: \addtocounter{address}{1}
285: \altaffiltext{\theaddress}{Dept. of Physics, Carnegie Mellon University,
286: 5000 Forbes Ave., Pittsburgh, PA-15232
287: \label{CMU}}
288: \addtocounter{address}{1}
289: \altaffiltext{\theaddress}{Physics Department, Rensselaer Polytechnic
290: Institute, SC1C25, Troy, NY 12180
291: \label{RPI}}
292: \addtocounter{address}{1}
293: \altaffiltext{\theaddress}{Lucent Technologies, 2000 N Naperville Rd,
294: Naperville, IL 60566
295: \label{Lucent}}
296: \addtocounter{address}{1}
297: \altaffiltext{\theaddress}{Department of Astronomy, Osservatorio Astronomico,
298: via G.B. Tiepolo 11, Trieste 34131, Italy
299: \label{Trieste}}
300: \addtocounter{address}{1}
301: \altaffiltext{\theaddress} {Physics Department,
302: Rochester Institute of Technology,
303: 85 Lomb Memorial Drive,
304: Rochester, NY 14623-5603
305: \label{Rochester}}
306: \addtocounter{address}{1}
307: \altaffiltext{\theaddress}{Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics,
308: The Pennsylvania State University,
309: University Park, PA 16802
310: \label{PennState}}
311: \addtocounter{address}{1}
312: \altaffiltext{\theaddress}{Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics,
313: University of Toronto,
314: 60 St. George Street,
315: Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3H8, Canada
316: \label{CITA}}
317: \addtocounter{address}{1}
318: \altaffiltext{\theaddress}{Department of Physics, Drexel University,
319: 3141 Chestnut St., Philadelphia, PA 19104
320: \label{Drexel}}
321: \addtocounter{address}{1}
322: \altaffiltext{\theaddress}{
323: Institute of Space and Astronautical Science
324: Sagamihara, Kanagawa 229, Japan
325: \label{Kanagawa}}
326: \addtocounter{address}{1}
327: \altaffiltext{\theaddress}{Ohio State University, Dept.~of Astronomy, 140
328: W. 18th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210
329: \label{Ohio}}
330: }
331:
332:
333: %xxx
334: \newpage
335: \begin{abstract}
336: The Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) will
337: provide the data to support detailed investigations of the
338: distribution of luminous and non-luminous matter in the Universe:
339: a photometrically
340: and astrometrically calibrated digital imaging survey
341: of $\pi$ steradians above about Galactic latitude $30^{\circ}$
342: in five broad optical bands to a depth of
343: $g' \sim 23^m$, and a spectroscopic survey of the approximately $10^6$ brightest
344: galaxies and $10^5$ brightest quasars found in the photometric
345: object catalog produced by the imaging survey.
346: This paper summarizes the observational parameters and data products of the
347: SDSS, and serves as an introduction to extensive
348: technical on-line documentation.
349:
350: \end{abstract}
351: \keywords{instrumentation - - - cosmology: observations}
352:
353: \section{Introduction}
354:
355: At this writing (May 2000) the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS)
356: is ending its commissioning phase and beginning operations.
357: The purpose of this paper is to
358: provide a concise summary of the vital statistics of the
359: project, a definition of some of the terms used in the
360: survey and, via links to documentation in
361: electronic form, access to detailed descriptions of the project's
362: design, hardware, and software, to serve as technical
363: background for the project's science papers.
364: The electronic material is extracted from the text (the ``Project Book'')
365: written to support major funding proposals, and is
366: available at the {\it Astronomical Journal} web site via the on-line
367: version of this paper. The official SDSS web site
368: ({\tt http://www.sdss.org}) also provides links to the on-line Project
369: Book, and it can be accessed directly
370: at {\tt http://www.astro.princeton.edu/PBOOK/welcome.htm}. In the
371: discussion below we reference the chapters in the Project Book by
372: the last part of the URL, i.e. that following {\tt PBOOK/}.
373: The versions accessible at the SDSS web sites also contain extensive
374: discussions and summaries of the scientific goals of the survey,
375: which are not included here.
376:
377: The text of the on-line Project Book
378: was last updated in August 1997. While there have been a number of changes
379: in the hardware and software described therein, the material accurately
380: describes the design goals and the implementation of the major observing
381: subsystems.
382: As the project becomes operational, we will provide a series of formal
383: technical papers (most still in preparation),
384: which will describe in detail the project hardware and software
385: in its actual operational state.
386:
387: Section 2 describes the Survey's objectives: the imaging depth,
388: sky coverage, and instrumentation.
389: Section 3 summarizes the
390: software and data reduction components of the SDSS and its data
391: products. Section 4 reviews some recent scientific
392: results from the project's initial commissioning data runs, which demonstrate
393: the ability of the project to reach its technical goals.
394: All Celestial coordinates are in epoch J2000.
395:
396: \section{Survey Characteristics}
397:
398:
399: The Sloan Digital Sky Survey will produce both imaging and spectroscopic
400: surveys over a large area of the sky. The survey uses a dedicated 2.5 m
401: telescope equipped with a large format mosaic CCD camera
402: to image the sky
403: in five optical bands, and two digital spectrographs
404: to obtain the spectra of about
405: one million galaxies and 100,000 quasars selected from the imaging data.
406:
407: The SDSS calibrates its photometry using observations of a network of
408: standard stars established by the United States Naval Observatory
409: (USNO) 1 m
410: telescope, and its astrometry using observations by an array of
411: astrometric CCDs in the imaging camera.
412:
413: \subsection{Telescope}
414:
415: The SDSS telescope is a 2.5m f/5 modified Ritchey-Chr\'etien wide-field
416: altitude-azimuth telescope
417: (see {\tt telescop/telescop.htm}) located at the
418: Apache Point Observatory (APO), Sunspot, New Mexico ({\tt site/site.htm}).
419: The telescope achieves a very wide ($3^{\circ}$) distortion-free
420: field by the use of a large secondary mirror and
421: two corrector lenses.
422: It is equipped with the photometric/astrometric mosaic camera
423: ({\tt camera/camera.htm},
424: Gunn et al. 1998) and images the sky by scanning along great circles
425: at the sidereal rate.
426: The imaging camera mounts at the Cassegrain focus.
427: The telescope is also equipped with two double fiber-fed spectrographs,
428: permanently mounted on the image rotator, since the spectrographs are
429: fiber fed. This ensures that the fibers do not flex during an exposure.
430: The telescope is changed from imaging mode to spectroscopic mode
431: by removing the imaging camera and mounting at the Cassegrain
432: focus a fiber plug plate, individually drilled for each field,
433: which feeds the spectrographs.
434: In survey operations, it is expected that up to nine
435: spectroscopic plates per night will be observed, with
436: the necessary plates being plugged with fibers during the day. The telescope
437: mounting and enclosure allow easy access for rapid
438: changes between fiber plug plates and between spectroscopic
439: and imaging modes. This strategy allows imaging to be done in pristine
440: observing conditions
441: (photometric sky, image size $\leq 1.5''$ FWHM) and spectroscopy to
442: be done during less ideal conditions.
443: All observing will be done in moonless sky.
444:
445: Besides the 2.5m telescope, the SDSS makes use of three subsidiary
446: instruments at the site.
447: The {\it Photometric Telescope} (PT) is a 0.5m telescope
448: equipped with a CCD camera and the SDSS filter set. Its task is to
449: calibrate the photometry.
450: Two instruments,
451: a {\it seeing monitor} and a 10$\mu$m {\it cloud scanner} (Hull et
452: al. 1995; {\tt site/site.htm}) monitor the astronomical weather.
453:
454: \subsection{Imaging Camera}
455:
456: The SDSS imaging camera contains two sets of CCD arrays: the imaging array
457: and the astrometric arrays ({\tt camera/camera.htm}, Gunn et al. 1998).
458:
459: The {\it imaging array} consists of 30 2048
460: $\times$ 2048 Tektronix CCDs, placed in an
461: array of six columns and five rows. The telescope scanning is aligned with
462: the columns. Each row observes the sky through a different filter,
463: in temporal sequence $r', i', u', z'$, and $g'$.
464: The pixel size is 24$\mu m$
465: ($0.396''$ on the sky).
466: The imaging survey is taken in drift-scan (time-delay-and-integrate,
467: or TDI) mode, i.e. the camera continually sweeps the sky
468: in great circles, and a given
469: point on the sky passes through the five filters in succession.
470: The effective integration time per filter
471: is 54.1 seconds, and the time for passage over the entire
472: photometric array is about 5.7 minutes ({\tt strategy/strategy.htm};
473: Gunn et al. 1998). Since the camera contains six columns of CCDs,
474: the result is a long {\it strip} of six {\it scanlines},
475: containing almost simultaneously
476: observed five-color data for each of the six CCD columns. Each CCD observes
477: a swath of sky $13.52'$ wide. The CCDs are separated in the {\it row}
478: direction (i.e. perpendicular to the scan direction) by
479: 91.0 mm ($25.2'$ on the sky) center-to-center.
480: The observations are filled in by a second strip, offset from the
481: first by 93\% of the CCD width, to produce a filled {\it stripe},
482: $2.54^{\circ}$ wide,
483: with 8\% ($1'$) lateral overlap on each side.
484: Because of the camera's large field of view,
485: the TDI tracking must be done
486: along great circles. The Northern Galactic Cap is covered by 45
487: great-circle arcs (shown projected on the sky in Figures 1 and 2).
488:
489: \subsection{Photometry and Photometric Calibration}
490:
491:
492: The five filters in the imaging array of the camera,
493: [$u', ~ g', ~ r', ~ i'$ and $z'$] have effective wavelengths of
494: [3590 \AA{}, 4810 \AA{}, 6230 \AA{}, 7640 \AA{} and 9060 \AA{}]
495: (Fukugita et al. 1996; Gunn et al. 1998).
496: An a priori model estimate of the telescope and camera throughputs
497: and of the sky brightness predicted that we would reach the 5$\sigma$ detection
498: limit for point sources in $1''$ seeing at [22.3, 23.3, 23.1, 22.3, 20.8]
499: in the ($u',g',r',i',z'$) filters, respectively, at an airmass of 1.4.
500: We have put formal requirements on throughput at 75\% of the values
501: used for the above estimation, and have demonstrated that we meet
502: this requirement in all bands with the possible exception of $z'$.
503: The sensitivity limit can be tested by finding the magnitude at which
504: repeat observations of a given area of sky yield 50\% reproducibility
505: of the objects detected. This has been tested most thoroughly with
506: data taken in less than optimal seeing ($1.3''-1.6''$); nevertheless, the
507: 50\% reproducibility level lies within a few tenths of a
508: magnitude of the above-quoted 5$\sigma$ detection limit in all five
509: bands (see Ivezi\'c et al. 2000).
510: The SDSS science requirements demand that photometric calibration
511: uncertainties for point sources be 0.02 in $r'$,
512: 0.02 in $r'-i'$
513: and $g'-r'$, and 0.03 in $u'-g'$ and $i'-z'$. To meet these
514: stringent requirements in both signal-to-noise ratio and
515: photometricity, imaging data are declared to be survey quality only if
516: the PT determines that the night is photometric, with a
517: zero-point uncertainty below 1\%, and if the seeing is better than
518: $1.5''$.
519: The imaging data saturate
520: at about [13, 14, 14, 14, 12] magnitudes for point sources.
521:
522: The magnitude scale is on the $AB_{\nu}$ system (Oke 1969,
523: unpublished), which was updated to the $AB_{79}$ system by Oke \& Gunn (1983)
524: and to $AB_{95}$ by Fukugita et al. (1996). The magnitudes m are
525: related to flux density $f$ by m$\sim sinh^{-1}(f)$
526: rather than logarithmically (see Lupton, Gunn \& Szalay 1999 and Fan et al.
527: 1999).
528: This definition is essentially identical to the logarithmic magnitude
529: at signal-to-noise ratios greater than about 5 and is well behaved for
530: low and even zero and negative flux densities.
531:
532: The calibration and definition
533: of the magnitude system is carried out by the
534: USNO 1 m telescope and the 0.5m PT.
535: The SDSS photometry is placed
536: on the $AB_{\nu}$ system using
537: three {\it fundamental standards} ($\rm BD+17^{\circ}4708$,
538: $\rm BD+26^{\circ}2606$, and $\rm BD+21^{\circ}609$), whose magnitude scale
539: is as defined by Fukugita et al. (1996);
540: a set of 157 {\it primary standards}, which are calibrated by the
541: above fundamental standards using the USNO 1m telescope, and which
542: cover the whole range of right ascension and enable the calibration
543: system to be made self-consistent; and a set of {\it secondary
544: calibration patches} lying across the imaging stripes, containing
545: stars fainter than $14^m$ whose magnitudes are calibrated
546: by the PT with respect
547: to those of the primary standards and which transfer that calibration to the
548: imaging survey. The locations of these patches on the survey stripes
549: are shown in Figure 1.
550: On nights when the 2.5 m is observing, the PT
551: observes primary standard stars to provide the
552: atmospheric extinction coefficients
553: over the night and to confirm that the night is photometric.
554: The standard star network is described
555: in {\tt photcal/photcal.htm} --- note that
556: the telescope described there has now been replaced
557: by the 0.5m PT.
558:
559: \subsection{Astrometric Calibration}
560:
561: The camera also contains leading and trailing {\it astrometric arrays} ---
562: narrow (128$\times$2048),
563: neutral-density-filtered, $r'$-filtered CCDs covering the
564: entire width of the camera. These arrays can measure
565: objects in the magnitude range
566: $r' \sim$ 8.5 - 16.8, i.e. they cover the dynamic range between the standard
567: astrometric catalog stars and the brightest unsaturated stars in the
568: photometric array. The astrometric calibration is thereby referenced to
569: the fundamental astrometric catalogues (see
570: {\tt astrom/astrom.htm}), using the Hipparcos and Tycho Catalogues
571: (ESA 1997) and specially observed equatorial fields (Stone et al. 1999).
572: Comparison with positions from the FIRST (Becker et al. 1995)
573: and 2MASS (Skrutskie 1999) catalogues shows that the rms astrometric accuracy
574: is currently better than 150 milliarcseconds
575: (mas) in each coordinate.
576:
577: \subsection{Imaging Survey: North Galactic Cap}
578:
579: The imaging survey covers about 10,000 contiguous square degrees in the
580: Northern Galactic Cap. This area lies basically above Galactic latitude
581: $30^{\circ}$, but its footprint is adjusted slightly to lie within the minimum
582: of the Galactic extinction contours (Schlegel, Finkbeiner \& Davis 1998),
583: resulting in an elliptical region. The region is
584: centered at $\alpha ~ = ~ 12^h ~ 20^m$, $\delta ~ = ~
585: +32.5^{\circ}$. The minor axis is at an angle $20^{\circ}$
586: East of North
587: with extent $\pm 55^{\circ}$. The major axis is a great
588: circle perpendicular to the minor axis with extent
589: $\pm 65^{\circ}$. The survey footprint with the location of the
590: stripes is shown in Figure 2 --- see
591: {\tt strategy/strategy.htm} for details.
592:
593:
594: \subsection{Imaging Survey: The South Galactic Cap}
595:
596: In the South Galactic Cap, three stripes will be observed, one
597: along the Celestial Equator and the other two north and south
598: of the equator (see Figure 2).
599: The {\it equatorial stripe} ($\alpha$ = $20.7^h$ to
600: $4^h$, $\delta$ = $0^{\circ}$) will be observed repeatedly,
601: both to find variable objects
602: and, when co-added, to reach magnitude limits about $2^m$ deeper than
603: the Northern imaging survey.
604:
605: The other two stripes will cover great circles lying between
606: $\alpha,~\delta$
607: of ($20.7^h$, -$5.8^{\circ} \rightarrow 4.0^h$,
608: -$5.8^{\circ}$)
609: and ($22.4^h, 8.7^{\circ} \rightarrow 2.3^h$, $13.2^{\circ}$).
610:
611: \subsection{The Spectroscopic Survey}
612:
613: Objects are detected in the imaging survey,
614: classified as point source or extended, and
615: measured, by the image analysis software (see below).
616: These imaging data are used to select in a uniform way
617: different classes of objects
618: whose spectra will be taken. The final details of this {\it
619: target selection} will be described once the survey is well underway;
620: the criteria discussed here are likely to be very
621: close to those finally used.
622:
623: Two samples of {\it galaxies} are selected from the objects
624: classified as ``extended''. About $9 \times 10^5$
625: galaxies will be selected to have Petrosian (1976) magnitudes
626: $r'_P ~ \leq$ 17.7.
627: Galaxies with a mean $r'$ band surface brightness within the half light radius
628: fainter than 24 magnitudes/$\rm arc~second^2$
629: will be removed, since spectroscopic
630: observations are unlikely to produce a redshift. For illustrative purposes,
631: a simulation of a slice of the
632: SDSS redshift survey is shown in Figure 3
633: (from Colley et al. 2000). Galaxies in this CDM simulation are `selected'
634: by the SDSS selection criteria.
635: As Figure 3 demonstrates,
636: the SDSS volume is large enough to contain a statistically significant
637: sample of the largest structures predicted.
638:
639: The second sample, of approximately $10^5$ galaxies, exploits the
640: characteristic very red color
641: and high metallicity (producing strong absorption lines) of the
642: most luminous galaxies: the
643: ``Brightest Cluster Galaxies'' or ``Bright Red Galaxies'' (BRGs);
644: redshifts can be well measured with the SDSS spectra for these galaxies
645: to about $r'$ = 19.5.
646: Galaxies located at the dynamical centers of nearby dense clusters often have
647: these properties. Reasonably accurate photometric redshifts
648: (Connolly et al. 1995) can be determined for these
649: galaxies, allowing the selection by magnitude and $g'r'i'$ color
650: of an essentially {\it distance
651: limited} sample of the highest-density regions of the Universe to a redshift of
652: about 0.45 (see Figure 4 for a simulation).
653:
654: With their power-law continua and the influence of Lyman-$\alpha$
655: emission and the
656: Lyman-$\alpha$ forest, {\it quasars} have $u'g'r'i'z'$ colors quite distinct
657: from those of the vastly more numerous stars over most of their
658: redshift range (Fan 1999). Thus about $1.5 \times 10^5$ {\it quasar
659: candidates} are selected for spectroscopic observations as outliers
660: from the stellar locus (cf., Krisciunas et al. 1998; Lenz et
661: al. 1998; Newberg et al. 1999; Figure 5 below) in
662: color-color space. At the cost of some loss of efficiency, selection
663: is allowed closer to the stellar locus around z = 2.8, where quasar
664: colors approach those of early F and late A stars (Newberg \& Yanny
665: 1997; Fan 1999). Some further regions of color-color space outside
666: the main part of the stellar locus where quasars are very rarely found
667: are also excluded, including the regions containing M dwarf-white dwarf pairs,
668: early A stars, and white dwarfs (see Figure 5). The
669: SDSS will compile a sample of quasars brighter than $i' \approx$
670: 19 at $z <$ 3.0; at redshifts between 3.0 and about 5.2, the limiting
671: magnitude will be about $i'$ = 20.
672: Objects are also required to be
673: point sources, except in the region of color-color space where
674: low-redshift quasars are expected to be found. Stellar
675: objects brighter than $i'$ =20 which are FIRST sources (Becker, White
676: and Helfand 1995) are also selected. Based on early spectroscopy, we
677: estimate that roughly 65\% of our quasar candidates are genuine
678: quasars; comparison with samples of known quasars indicates that our
679: completeness is of order 90\%.
680:
681: In all cases, the magnitudes of the objects are corrected for Galactic
682: extinction before selection, using extinction in the SDSS bands calculated from
683: the reddening map of Schlegel, Finkbeiner \& Davis (1998). Objects
684: are then selected to have a
685: magnitude limit {\it outside} the Galaxy.
686: If this correction were not made, the systematic effects of Galactic extinction
687: over the survey area would overwhelm the statistical uncertainties in the
688: SDSS data set.
689: After the imaging and
690: spectroscopic survey is completed in a given part of the sky, the reddening
691: and extinction will be recalculated using internal standards
692: extracted from the imaging data. The SDSS plans to use a variety of
693: extinction probes,
694: including very hot halo subdwarfs, halo turnoff stars, and elliptical
695: galaxies whose intrinsic colors can be estimated from their line indices.
696:
697: Together with various classes of calibration stars and fibers which
698: observe blank sky to measure the sky spectrum, the selected
699: galaxies and quasars are mapped onto the sky, and `tiled', i.e.
700: their location on a $3^{\circ}$ diameter plug plate determined ({\tt
701: tiling/tiling.htm}). The centers of the tiles are adjusted to provide
702: closer coverage of regions of high galactic surface density, to make
703: the spectroscopic coverage optimally uniform.
704: Excess fibers are allocated to several classes of rare or peculiar
705: objects (for example objects which are positionally matched with
706: ROSAT sources, or those whose parameters lie outside any known range --
707: these are {\it serendipitous} objects) and to samples of stars.
708: The spectra are observed, 640 at a time (with a total integration time
709: of 45 - 60 minutes depending on observing conditions)
710: using a pair of fiber-fed double spectrographs
711: ({\tt spectro/spectro.htm}). The wavelength
712: coverage of the spectrographs is continuous from
713: about 3800 \AA{} to 9200 \AA{},
714: and the wavelength resolution,
715: $\lambda/\delta\lambda$, is 1800 (Uomoto et al. 1999).
716: The fibers are located at
717: the focal plane via plug plates constructed for each area of sky.
718: The fiber diameter is 0.2 mm ($3''$ on the sky),
719: and adjacent fibers cannot be located
720: more closely than $55''$ on the sky. Both members of a pair of objects
721: closer than this separation can be observed spectroscopically
722: if they are located in the overlapping regions of adjacent tiles.
723:
724: Tests of the redshift accuracy using observations of stars
725: in M67 whose radial velocities are accurately known (Mathieu et al. 1986)
726: show that the SDSS radial velocity measurements for stars have a
727: scatter of about 3.5 $\rm km~s^{-1}$.
728:
729: \section{Software and Data Products}
730:
731: The operational software is described in {\tt datasys/datasys.htm}.
732: The data are obtained using the Data Acquisition (DA) system
733: at APO (Petravick et al. 1994)
734: and recorded on DLT tape. The imaging
735: data consist of full images from all CCDs of the imaging array, cut-outs
736: of detected objects from the astrometric array, and bookkeeping
737: information. These tapes are shipped to Fermilab by express courier
738: and the data are automatically reduced through an interoperating set
739: of software pipelines operating in a common computing environment.
740:
741: The {\it photometric pipeline}
742: reduces the imaging data; it corrects the data for data defects
743: (interpolation over bad columns and bleed trails, finding and interpolating
744: over `cosmic rays', etc), calculates
745: overscan (bias),
746: sky and flat field values, calculates the point spread functions
747: (psf) as a function of time and location on the CCD array,
748: finds objects, combines the data from the
749: five bands, carries out simple model fits to the images of each
750: object, deblends overlapping
751: objects, and measures positions,
752: magnitudes (including psf and Petrosian magnitudes)
753: and shape parameters. The photometric pipeline uses
754: position calibration information from the astrometric array
755: reduced through the {\it astrometric pipeline}
756: and photometric calibration data from the
757: photometric telescope (reduced through the {\it photometric telescope
758: pipeline}). Final calibrations are applied
759: by the {\it final calibration pipeline}, which allows refinements
760: in the positional and photometric calibration
761: as the survey progresses. The photometric pipeline
762: is extensively tested using repeat observations, examination of the outputs,
763: observations of regions of the sky previously observed
764: by other telescopes (HST fields,
765: for example) and a set of simulations, described
766: in detail in {\tt simul/simul.htm}. For an example of the repeatability of
767: SDSS photometry over several timescales, see Ivezi\'c et al. (2000).
768: These repeat observations show that the mean errors (for point sources)
769: are about $0.03^m$
770: to $20^m$, increasing to about $0.05^m$ at $21^m$ and to $0.12^m$
771: at $22^m$. These observed errors are in good agreement with those quoted
772: by the photometric pipeline. They apply only to the $g', r'$ and $i'$
773: bands -- in the less sensitive $u'$ and $z'$ bands, the errors at the
774: bright end are about the same as those in $g'r'i'$, but increase to
775: $0.05^m$ at $20^m$ and $0.12^m$ at $21^m$.
776:
777: The outputs, together with
778: all the observing and processing information, are loaded into
779: the {\it operational data base}
780: which is the central collection of scientific and bookkeeping data
781: used to run the survey. To select the spectroscopic targets, objects
782: are run through the {\it target selection pipeline}
783: and flagged if
784: they meet the spectroscopic selection criteria for a particular type of
785: object. The criteria for the primary objects (quasars, galaxies and BRGs)
786: will not be changed once the survey is underway. Those for serendipitous
787: objects and samples of interesting stars can be changed throughout the
788: survey.
789: A given object can in principle receive several target flags.
790: The selected objects are tiled as described above, plug
791: plates are drilled, and the spectroscopic observations are
792: made. The spectroscopic data are automatically reduced by the
793: {\it spectroscopic pipeline}, which extracts,
794: corrects and calibrates
795: the spectra, determines the spectral types, and measures the redshifts.
796: The reduced spectra are then stored in the operational data base.
797: The contents of the operational data base are copied at regular
798: intervals into the
799: {\it science data base} for
800: retrieval and scientific analysis (see {\tt appsoft/appsoft.htm}).
801: The science data base is indexed in a hierarchical manner: the data
802: and other information are linked into `containers'
803: that can be divided and subdivided as necessary,
804: to define easily searchable regions
805: with approximately the same data content. This hierarchical scheme is
806: consistent with those being adopted by other large surveys, to
807: allow cross referencing of multiple surveys. The science data base also
808: incorporates a set of query tools and is designed for easy portability.
809:
810: The photometric data products of the SDSS include: a {\it catalog} of all
811: detected objects, with measured positions, magnitudes, shape parameters,
812: model fits and processing flags;
813: {\it atlas images} (i.e. cutouts from the imaging data in all five
814: bands) of all detected objects and of objects from the FIRST and ROSAT
815: catalogs;
816: a $4 \times 4$ {binned image} of the
817: corrected images with the objects removed: and a {\it mask}
818: of the areas of sky not processed (because of saturated stars,
819: for example) and of corrected pixels (e.g. those from which cosmic rays
820: were removed). The atlas images are sized to enclose
821: the area occupied by each object plus the PSF width, or the object
822: size given in the ROSAT or FIRST catalogues. The photometric outputs are
823: described in
824: {\tt http://www.astro.princeton.edu/SDSS/photo.html}.
825: The data base will also contain the calibrated 1D
826: {\it spectra},
827: the derived {\it redshift} and {\it spectral type}, and the bookkeeping
828: information related to the spectroscopic observations. In addition,
829: the positions of astrometric calibration stars measured
830: by the astrometric pipeline and the magnitudes of the
831: faint photometric standards
832: measured by the photometric telescope pipeline will be published
833: at regular intervals.
834:
835: \section{Early Science from the SDSS Commissioning Data}
836:
837: The goal of the SDSS is to provide the data necessary for studies of the
838: large scale structure of the Universe on a wide range of scales.
839: The imaging survey should detect $\sim
840: 5 \times 10^7$ galaxies, $\sim 10^6$ quasars and $\sim 8 \times 10^7$
841: stars to the survey limits. These photometric data, via photometric
842: redshifts and various statistical techniques such as the angular
843: correlation function, support studies of large scale structure well
844: past the limit of the spectroscopic survey. On even larger scales,
845: information on structure will come from quasars.
846:
847: The science justification for the SDSS is discussed in several conference
848: papers (e.g. Gunn \& Weinberg 1995; Fukugita 1998; Margon 1999).
849: The Project Book science sections
850: can be accessed at
851: {\tt http://www.astro.princeton.edu/PBOOK/science/science.htm}. Much
852: of the science for which the SDSS was built, the study of large
853: scale structure, will come when the survey is complete, but the initial
854: test data have already led to significant scientific discoveries in many fields.
855: In this section, we show examples of
856: the first test data and some
857: initial results. To date (May 2000),
858: the SDSS has obtained test imaging data for some 2000 square degrees
859: of sky and about 20,000 spectra. Examples of these data are shown in
860: Figures 5 (sample color-color and color-magnitude diagrams of point-source
861: objects), 6 (sample spectra) and 7
862: (a composite color image of a piece of the sky which
863: contains the cluster Abell 267),
864:
865: Fischer et al. (2000) have
866: detected the signature of the weak lensing of background galaxies by
867: foreground galaxies, allowing the halos and total masses of the
868: foreground galaxies to be measured.
869:
870: The searches by Fan et al.
871: (1999a,b; 2000a,c), Schneider et al. (2000) and Zheng et al.
872: (2000) have greatly increased
873: the number of known high redshift (z$>$3.6) quasars and include
874: several quasars with z $>$ 5.
875: Fan et al. (1999b) have found the first example of a new kind of
876: quasar: a high redshift object with a featureless spectrum and without the
877: radio emission
878: and polarization characteristics of BL Lac objects. The redshift
879: for this object ($z$ = 4.6) is found from the Lyman-$\alpha$
880: forest absorption in the spectrum.
881:
882: Some 150 distant probable RR Lyrae stars have been found in the
883: Galactic halo, enabling the halo stellar density to be mapped; the
884: distribution may have located the edge of the halo at approximately 60 kpc
885: (Ivezi\'{c} et al. 2000). The distribution of RR Lyrae stars and other
886: horizontal branch stars is very clumped, showing the presence of
887: possible tidal streamers in the halo (Ivezi\'c et al. 2000;
888: Yanny et al. 2000).
889: Margon et al. (1999) describe the discovery of faint high latitude carbon
890: stars in the SDSS data.
891:
892: Strauss et al. (1999), Schneider et al. (2000), Fan et al. (2000b),
893: Tsvetanov et al. (2000), Pier et al. (2000) and Leggett et al. (2000)
894: report the discovery of a
895: number of very low mass stars or substellar objects, those of type
896: `L' or `T', including the first field methane (`T') dwarfs and
897: the first stars of spectral type intermediate between `L' and `T'. The
898: detection rate to date shows that the SDSS is likely to identify several
899: thousand L and T dwarfs. These objects are found to occupy very
900: distinct regions of color-color and color-magnitude space, which
901: will enable the completeness of the samples to be well characterized.
902:
903: Measurements of the psf diameter variations and the image wander allow
904: variations in the turbulence in the Earth's atmosphere to be tracked.
905: These data demonstrate the presence of anomalous refraction on scales
906: at least as large as the $\rm 2.3^{\circ}$ field of view of the camera
907: (Pier et al. 1999).
908:
909: Of course the most exciting possibility for any large survey which probes new
910: regions of sensitivity or wavelength is the discovery of exceedingly
911: rare or entirely new classes of objects. The SDSS has already found a
912: number of very unusual objects; the nature of some of these remains
913: unknown (Fan et al. 1999c).
914: These and other investigations in progress show the promise of
915: SDSS for greatly advancing astronomical work in fields ranging
916: from the behavior of the Earth's atmosphere to structure on the
917: scale of the horizon of the Universe.
918:
919:
920:
921: \acknowledgements
922: The Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) is a joint project of The
923: University of Chicago, Fermilab, the Institute for Advanced Study, the
924: Japan Participation Group, The Johns Hopkins University, the
925: Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy, Princeton University, the United
926: States Naval Observatory, and the University of Washington. Apache
927: Point Observatory, site of the SDSS, is operated by the Astrophysical
928: Research Consortium. Funding for the project has been provided by the
929: Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the SDSS member institutions, the National
930: Aeronautics and Space Administration, the National Science Foundation,
931: the U.S. Department of Energy, and Monbusho. The official SDSS web site
932: is {\tt www.sdss.org}.
933:
934:
935: \begin{references}
936:
937:
938: \reference{}
939: Bade, N., Engels, D., Voges, W., et al. 1998, A\&AS, 127, 145
940:
941: \reference{}
942: Becker, R.H., White, R.L., \& Helfand, D.J. 1995, ApJ, 450, 559
943:
944: \reference{}
945: Berger, J., \& Fringant, A.-M., 1985, A\&AS, 61, 191
946:
947: \reference{}
948: Colley, W. N., Gott, J. R., Weinberg, D. H., Park, C., \& Berlind, A. A.
949: 2000, ApJ, 529, 795
950:
951: \reference{}
952: Connolly, A.J., Csabai, I., Szalay, A.S., Koo, D.C., Kron, R.G.,
953: \& Munn, J.A. 1995, AJ, 110, 2655
954:
955: \reference{}
956: Crawford, C.S., Allen, S.W., Ebeling, H., A.C., \& Fabian, A.C.
957: 1999, MNRAS, 306, 857
958:
959: \reference{}
960: ESA 1997, The Hipparcos and Tycho Catalogues, ESA SP-1020
961:
962: \reference{}
963: Fan, X. 1999, AJ, 117, 2528
964:
965: \reference{}Fan, X., Strauss, M. A., Schneider,
966: D.P., et al. 1999a, AJ, 118, 1
967:
968: \reference{} Fan, X., Strauss, M.A., Gunn, J.E. et al. 1999b, ApJ 526, L57
969:
970: \reference{}
971: Fan, X., Strauss, M.A., Schneider, D.P., Gunn, J.E., Lupton, R.L., Knapp,
972: G.R., \& Yanny, B. 1999c, AAS, 73.15
973:
974: \reference{}Fan, X., Strauss, M. A., Schneider,
975: D.P., et al. 2000a, AJ, 119, 1
976:
977: \reference{} Fan, X., Knapp, G.R., Strauss, M.A., et al. 2000b, AJ,
978: 119, 928
979:
980: \reference{} Fan, X., White, R.L., Davis, M., et al. 2000c, submitted to AJ
981:
982: \reference{}Fischer, P., McKay, T., Sheldon, E. et al. 2000, submitted to AJ
983: (astro-ph/9912119)
984:
985: \reference{} Fukugita, M.
986: 1998, in Highlights of Astronomy, 11A, ed. J Andersen, 449.
987:
988: \reference{}Fukugita, M., Ichikawa, T., Gunn, J.E.,
989: Doi, M., Shimasaku, K., \& Schneider, D.P. 1996, AJ, 111, 1748
990:
991: \reference{}Gunn, J.E., Carr, M.A., Rockosi, C.M., Sekiguchi, M.,
992: et al. 1998, AJ, 116, 3040
993:
994: \reference{}
995: Gunn, J.E., \& Weinberg, D.H. 1995, in ``Wide Field Spectroscopy and the
996: Distant Universe'', ed. S. Maddox \& A. Arag\`on-Salamanca, World
997: Scientific (Singapore), 3
998:
999: \reference{}
1000: Hull, C., Limmongkol, S., \& Siegmund, W. 1994, Proc. S.P.I.E., 2199
1001:
1002: \reference{}
1003: Ivezi\'{c}, \v{Z}., Goldston, J., Finlator, K., et al. 2000,
1004: AJ (in press: astro-ph/0004130)
1005:
1006: \reference{}
1007: Krisciunas, K., Margon, B., \& Szkody, P. 1998, PASP, 110, 1342
1008:
1009: \reference{}
1010: Lenz, D.D., Newberg, H.J., Rosner, R., Richards, G.T., \& Stoughton, C.
1011: 1998, ApJS, 119, 121
1012:
1013: \reference{}Lupton, R.H., Gunn,
1014: J.E., \& Szalay, A. 1999, AJ, 118, 1406
1015:
1016: \reference{}
1017: Mathieu, R.D., Latham, D.W., Griffin, R.F., \& Gunn, J.E. 1986, AJ, 92, 1100
1018:
1019: \reference{}Margon, B.
1020: 1999, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A, 357, 93.
1021:
1022: \reference{}
1023: Margon, B., Anderson, S.F., Deutsch, E., \& Harris, H. 1999, BAAS
1024: 195.8006
1025:
1026: \reference{} Morris, S.L., Weymann, R.J., Anderson, S.F., Hewett, P.C.,
1027: Foltz, C.B., Chaffee, F.H., Francis, P.J., \& MacAlpine, G.M. 1991,
1028: AJ, 102, 1627
1029:
1030: \reference{}
1031: Newberg, H.J., \& Yanny, B. 1997, ApJS, 113, 89
1032:
1033: \reference{}
1034: Newberg, H.H., Richards, G.T., Richmond, M.W., \& Fan, X. 1999,
1035: ApJS, 123, 377
1036:
1037: \reference{}Oke, J.B., \& Gunn, J.E. 1983, ApJ, 266, 713
1038:
1039: \reference{}Petravick, D., et al. 1994, S.P.I.E., 2198, 935
1040:
1041: \reference{}
1042: Petrosian, V. 1976, ApJ, 209, L1
1043:
1044: \reference{}
1045: Pier, J.R., Leggett, S.K., Strauss, M.A., et al.
1046: 2000, in ``From Giant Planets to Cool Stars'',
1047: ed.C. Griffith \&~M. Marley, ASP Conf. Ser., in press
1048:
1049: \reference{}
1050: Pier, J.R., Munn, J.A., Hennessy, G.S., Hindsley, R.H., \& Kent, S.M.
1051: 1999, AAS, 195, 81.04
1052:
1053: \reference{} Schlegel, D.J., Finkbeiner, D.P., \& Davis, M. 1998, ApJ, 500, 525
1054:
1055: \reference{}
1056: Schneider, D.P., Hill, G.J., Fan, X., et al. 2000, PASP, 112, 6
1057:
1058: \reference{}
1059: Skrutskie, M.F. 1999, AAS, 195, 34.01
1060:
1061: \reference{}
1062: Strauss, M.A., Fan, X., Gunn, J.E., et al., 1999, ApJ, 522, L61
1063:
1064: \reference{}
1065: Stone, R.C., Pier, J.R., \& Monet, D.G. 1999, AJ, 118, 2488
1066:
1067: \reference{}
1068: Tsvetanov, Z.I., Golimowski, D., Zheng, W., et al. 2000, ApJ, 513, L61
1069:
1070: \reference{}
1071: Uomoto, A., Smee, S., Rockosi, C., Burles, S., Pope, A., Friedman, S.,
1072: Brinkmann, J., Gunn, J.E., \& Nichol, R, 1999, AAS, 195.87.01
1073:
1074: \reference{}
1075: Yanny, B., Newberg, H., Kent, S., et al.
1076: 2000, AJ (in press: astro-ph/0004128)
1077:
1078: \reference{}
1079: Zheng, W., Tsvetanov, Z.I., Schneider, D.P., et al. 2000, submitted to AJ
1080: (astro-ph/0005247)
1081:
1082: \end{references}
1083:
1084: \newpage
1085: \begin{figure}
1086: \vspace{-0.5cm}
1087: \epsfysize=500pt \epsfbox{gk1.ps}
1088: \vspace{0.5cm}
1089: Figure 1.
1090: Projection on the sky of the northern SDSS survey area.
1091: The positions of the Yale Bright Star Catalogue stars are shown. The largest
1092: symbols are stars of $0^m$ and the smallest stars of $5^m$ -- $7^m$.
1093: The secondary calibration patches are shown by squares.
1094: \end{figure}
1095:
1096: \newpage
1097: \begin{figure}
1098: \vspace{-0.5cm}
1099: \epsfysize=500pt \epsfbox{gk2.ps}
1100: \vspace{0.5cm}
1101: Figure 2.
1102: Projection on the sky (Galactic coordinates) of the
1103: Northern and Southern SDSS surveys. The lines show the individual
1104: stripes to be
1105: scanned by the imaging camera. These are overlaid on the extinction contours
1106: of Schlegel, Finkbeiner and Davis (1998). The Survey pole is marked by
1107: the `X'.
1108: \end{figure}
1109:
1110: \newpage
1111: \begin{figure}
1112: \vspace{-0.5cm}
1113: \epsfysize=500pt \epsfbox{gk3.ps}
1114: \vspace{0.5cm}
1115: Figure 3.
1116: A six-degree wide slice of the Simulated Sloan Digital
1117: Sky Survey (from Colley et al. 2000), showing about 1/20 of the survey.
1118: \end{figure}
1119:
1120: %\newpage
1121: %\begin{figure}
1122: %\vspace{-0.5cm}
1123: %\epsfysize=500pt \epsfbox{gk4.ps}
1124: %\vspace{0.5cm}
1125: %Figure 4.
1126: %Simulated redshift distribution in a $6^{\circ}$
1127: %slice of the SDSS. Small dots: main galaxy sample (cf. Figure 3).
1128: %Large dots: the BRG sample, showing about 1/30 of the survey.
1129: %\end{figure}
1130:
1131: \newpage
1132: \begin{figure}
1133: \vspace{-0.5cm}
1134: \epsfysize=500pt \epsfbox{gk4.ps}
1135: \vspace{0.5cm}
1136: Figure 4.
1137: Simulated redshift distribution in a $6^{\circ}$
1138: slice of the SDSS. Small dots: main galaxy sample (cf. Figure 3).
1139: Large dots: the BRG sample, showing about 1/30 of the survey.
1140: \end{figure}
1141:
1142: \newpage
1143: \begin{figure}
1144: \vspace{-0.5cm}
1145: \epsfysize=500pt \epsfbox{gk5.ps}
1146: \vspace{0.5cm}
1147: Figure 5.
1148: Color-color and color-magnitude plots of
1149: about 117,000 point sources brighter than $21^m$ at $i^*$
1150: and detected at greater than 5$\sigma$ in each band
1151: from 25 square degrees of
1152: SDSS imaging data, reduced by the photometric
1153: pipeline (the $i^*$ designation is used for preliminary SDSS photometry).
1154: The contours are drawn at intervals of 10\% of the peak
1155: density of points. The redder stars extend to fainter magnitudes than
1156: do the bluer
1157: stars, due to the $i^*$ limit.
1158: \end{figure}
1159:
1160: \newpage
1161: \begin{figure}
1162: \vspace{-0.5cm}
1163: \epsfysize=400pt \epsfbox{gk6.ps}
1164: \vspace{0.5cm}
1165: Figure 6.
1166: Representative SDSS spectra taken from a single spectroscopic
1167: plate observed on 4 October 1999 for a total of one hour of integration time,
1168: processed by the SDSS spectroscopic pipeline. For display purposes,
1169: all spectra have been smoothed with a 3-pixel boxcar function.
1170: All spectra show significant residuals due to the strong sky line at 5577\AA.
1171: The objects depicted are:
1172: a. An $r^*_P$ = 18.00 galaxy; $z = 0.1913$. This object is
1173: slightly fainter than the main galaxy target selection limit. Note
1174: the H$\alpha$/[N II] emission at $\sim 7800$\AA, [OII] emission at
1175: $\sim 4450$\AA, and Ca II H and K absorption at $\sim 4700$\AA.
1176: b. An $r^*_P$ = 19.41 galaxy, $z = 0.3735$. This object is
1177: close to the photometric limit of the Bright Red Galaxy sample. The H
1178: and K lines are particularly strong.
1179: c. A star-forming galaxy with $r^*_P$ = 16.88, at $z =
1180: 0.1582$.
1181: d. A $z = 0.3162$ quasar, with $r^*_{psf}$ = 16.67. Note the unusual
1182: profile shape of the Balmer lines. This quasar is
1183: LBQS 0004+0036 (Morris et al. 1991).
1184: e. A $z = 2.575$ quasar with $r^*_{psf}$ = 19.04;
1185: note the resolution of the Lyman-$\alpha$
1186: forest. This quasar was discovered
1187: by Berger \& Fringant (1985).
1188: f. A hot white dwarf, with $r_{psf}^*$ = 18.09.
1189: \end{figure}
1190:
1191: \newpage
1192: \begin{figure}
1193: \vspace{-0.5cm}
1194: \epsfysize=300pt \epsfbox{gk7.ps}
1195: \vspace{0.5cm}
1196: Figure 7.
1197: A sample frame ($13' \times 9'$) from the SDSS
1198: imaging commissioning data. The image, a color
1199: composite made from the $g', r'$,
1200: and $i'$ data, shows a field containing the distant cluster
1201: Abell 267 ($\alpha ~ = ~ 01^h~52^m~41.0^s, ~ \delta ~ = ~
1202: +01^{\circ}~00'~24.7''$, redshift $z$ = 0.23, Crawford et al. 1999);
1203: this is the cluster of galaxies with
1204: yellow colors in the lower center of the frame. The frame also contains,
1205: in the upper center, the nearby cluster
1206: RX J0153.2+0102, estimated redshift $\sim 0.07$ (Bade et al. 1998)
1207: ($\alpha ~ = ~ 01^h~53^m~15.15^s, ~ \delta ~ = ~ +01^{\circ}~02'~18.8''$).
1208: The psf (optics plus seeing) was about $\rm 1.6''$.
1209: Right ascension increases from bottom to top of the frame, declination from
1210: left to right.
1211: \end{figure}
1212:
1213: \end{document}
1214: