1: %% $Id: ms.tex,v 1.7 2000/09/06 18:17:36 duncan Exp duncan $
2: %%
3: %% Beginning of file 'paper-b/ms.tex'
4: %% (copied from aastex sample.tex by D.Galloway 7/7/2000)
5: %%
6: %% $Log: ms.tex,v $
7: %% Revision 1.7 2000/09/06 18:17:36 duncan
8: %% Corrected minor typo in abstract thanks to final reply from reviewer.
9: %% Modified wording of final paragraph to clarify things.
10: %%
11: %% Revision 1.6 2000/08/23 14:03:44 duncan
12: %% Small changes. Ready for submission
13: %%
14: %% Revision 1.5 2000/08/23 13:50:54 duncan
15: %% Added a plot of the pulse-phase spectral results for May 17 and appropriate
16: %% discussion in the text. Hopefully still under the 4 page limit
17: %%
18: %% Revision 1.4 2000/08/22 20:20:37 duncan
19: %% Extensive revisions on return of referees report.
20: %% Resulting page count was only 2.19; so substantial additions are possible.
21: %% - Expanded and upgraded introduction
22: %% - Included spectral fitting for Y5 (using background for Y4) and included
23: %% results in the table
24: %% - Modified figure to also plot the pulse profiles from each observation
25: %% - Modified discussion of spectral fits so that comparison for Y2 was made
26: %% under identical conditions, i.e. frozen MaxTau
27: %% - Expanded discussion to go deeper into possibilities for moving the column
28: %% - Generally upgraded the discussion
29: %% This version still contains only the one figure
30: %%
31: %% Revision 1.3 2000/07/19 23:06:01 duncan
32: %% Modified file to not include the figure, instead use the figcaption field
33: %% because the caption went off the page. For submission to astro-ph
34: %%
35: %% Revision 1.2 2000/07/19 22:58:10 duncan
36: %% Small revisions in abstract, version as submitted to astro-ph
37: %%
38: %% Revision 1.1 2000/07/19 22:46:55 duncan
39: %% Initial revision
40: %%
41:
42: %% The command below calls the default manuscript style,
43: %% which will produce a double-spaced document on one column.
44: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
45: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
46:
47: % \documentclass{aastex}
48:
49: %% preprint produces a one-column, single-spaced document:
50:
51: \documentclass[preprint]{aastex}
52:
53: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
54:
55: % \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
56:
57: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
58: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
59: %% the \begin{document} command.
60: %%
61: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
62: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
63: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.0 Author Guide
64: %% for information.
65:
66: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
67: \newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
68: \newcommand{\cps}{${\rm count\,s}^{-1}$}
69:
70: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
71:
72: % \slugcomment{Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45.}
73:
74: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
75: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
76: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
77: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
78: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters. Running heads
79: %% will not print in the manuscript style.
80:
81: \shortauthors{Galloway}
82: \shorttitle{Accretion column disruption in GX~1+4}
83:
84:
85: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
86: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
87:
88: \begin{document}
89:
90: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
91: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
92: %% you desire.
93:
94: \title{Accretion column disruption in GX~1+4}
95:
96:
97: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
98: %% author and affiliation information.
99: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
100: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
101: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
102: %% As in the title, you can use \\ to force line breaks.
103:
104: \author{D.~K. Galloway\altaffilmark{1}}
105: \affil{School of Mathematics and Physics, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7001,
106: Australia}
107: \affil{RCfTA, School of Physics, University of Sydney, NSW 2006 Australia}
108:
109: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
110: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
111: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
112: %% affiliation.
113:
114: \altaffiltext{1}{present address: Center for Space Research, MIT,
115: 37-571, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139-4307}
116:
117: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
118: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
119: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
120: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
121: %% editorial office after submission.
122:
123: \begin{abstract}
124: Daily observations of the binary X-ray pulsar GX~1+4 were made with the
125: {\it Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer\/} ({\it RXTE\/}) satellite between 1997
126: May 16--20 as part of a four-month monitoring program. On May 17 the
127: sharp dips normally observed in the lightcurve were all but absent,
128: resulting in a pulse fraction $f_{\rm p}\approx 0.5$ instead of the more
129: typical value of $\approx 0.8$ measured before and after. Also observed
130: was a dramatic hardening of the 2--40~keV phase-averaged spectrum. The
131: power-law photon index was $1.16\pm0.02$, whereas values of 1.6--2.0 are
132: more typical. In terms of a Comptonization continuum component, the
133: optical depth for scattering was $\tau\approx 19$, with 4--6 the usual
134: range for {\it RXTE\/} spectra \cite[]{myphd:a}. Pulse-phase spectrosopy
135: indicates that $\tau$ is decreased relative to the phase-averaged value
136: around the primary minimum, where an increase is normally observed. The
137: reduced depth of the dip is interpreted as disruption of the accretion
138: column, and the accompanying spectral variation suggests a substantially
139: different accretion regime than is usual for this source.
140: \end{abstract}
141:
142: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
143: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
144: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
145: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
146:
147: % \keywords{clusters: globular, peanut---bosons: bozos}
148: \keywords{X-rays: stars --- pulsars: individual (GX~1+4) --- accretion
149: --- scattering}
150:
151:
152: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
153: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
154: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
155: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
156: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
157: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
158: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
159: %% each reference.
160:
161: \section{Introduction}
162:
163: The X-ray pulsar GX~1+4 is unusual in several respects. It is the only
164: confirmed neutron star in a symbiotic binary \cite[]{symcat00} which
165: appears to be accreting from the giant companions' stellar wind. The
166: neutron star spin period evolution exhibits long periods of almost
167: constant spin-up or -down, punctuated by `torque reversals' lasting tens
168: of days \cite[e.g.][]{nel97}. Indirect estimates indicate a surface
169: magnetic field strength of 2--3$\times 10^{13}$~G
170: \cite[]{beu84,dot89,mony91,gre93,cui97}. These values are significantly
171: greater than the $\sim10^{12}$~G inferred for other accreting X-ray
172: pulsars, generally from measurements of cyclotron scattering resonance
173: features \cite[CSRFs; e.g.][]{heindl00} in the X-ray spectra. As the
174: presence of such a strong field in GX~1+4 awaits confirmation by such
175: methods, the possibility that the field strength may in fact be one or
176: more orders of magnitude lower remains.
177:
178: Historically X-ray pulsar spectra have generally been fitted with
179: variations on a power law, which is well known to be a signature of
180: unsaturated Comptonization \cite[e.g][]{pss83}. Model fitting to the
181: available archival {\it RXTE\/} data show that the spectra of GX~1+4 are
182: broadly consistent with an analytic approximation to a Comptonization
183: continuum component combined with a gaussian to represent iron line
184: emission, both attenuated by neutral absorbtion with variable column
185: density \cite[]{myphd:a}.
186:
187: The archival {\it RXTE\/} data, which span two orders of magnitude in flux
188: for the source, has also revealed that the X-ray lightcurves and mean
189: pulse profiles of all but one of the observations exhibit sharp dips
190: spanning $\Delta\phi\approx0.1$--0.2 in phase. During 1996 July the
191: countrate dropped to $\approx 10$~\cps\ over $\approx6$~h; sharp dips were
192: observed in the mean pulse profiles even then \cite[]{gil00}. Similar
193: dips are observed in only two other X-ray pulsars, RX~J0812.4-3114
194: \cite[]{rei99} and A~0535+262 \cite[]{cem98}. A recent analytic and
195: modelling study suggests that the sharp dips are signatures of eclipses of
196: the emitting region by the accretion column (Galloway et al. 2000, in
197: preparation). Pulse-phase spectroscopy using a continuum spectral model
198: simulating thermal Comptonization of both GX~1+4 and RX~J0812.4$-$3114
199: shows a significant increase in the fitted optical depth $\tau$ coincident
200: with the dip phase. If the inclination angle $i$ of these systems are
201: roughly equal to their magnetic colatitude $\beta$, such an increase may
202: result when one of the accretion columns approaches alignment with the
203: line of sight once each rotation period. At the phase of closest
204: alignment, photons emitted from the polar cap must propagate a greater
205: distance through the column to escape and ultimately reach the observer.
206: Numerical modeling using a simplified column geometry confirms that the
207: resulting increase in optical depth will have just the effect observed in
208: GX~1+4 and RX~J0812.4$-$3114 \cite[]{gal00:beam}.
209:
210: % If the accretion column is indeed responsible for the X-ray dips, GX~1+4
211: % offers a rare opportunity to probe the accretion column and understand
212: % more about the accretion dynamics in this and other sources.
213:
214: \section{Observations and Data Analysis}
215:
216: {\em RXTE\/} consists of three instruments, the proportional counter array
217: (PCA) sensitive to photons in the energy range 2--60~keV, the high-energy
218: X-ray timing experiment (HEXTE) covering 16--250~keV, and the all-sky
219: monitor (ASM) which spans 2--10~keV \cite[]{giles95}.
220: Analysis of {\it RXTE\/} data presented in this letter was carried out using
221: {\sc lheasoft~5.0}, released 23 February 2000 by the {\it RXTE\/} Guest
222: Observer Facility (GOF). The data were first screened to ensure that the
223: pointing offset was $<0.02\arcdeg$ and the source was $>10\arcdeg$ from the
224: sun. This introduces additional gaps to the data.
225: Instrumental background from cosmic ray interactions and as a result of
226: satellite passages close to the SAA are estimated using the {\sc pcabackest}
227: software which is included in the {\sc lheasoft} package. The `bright'
228: source background models from the 23 February 2000 release were used,
229: which are appropriate when the net source countrate is
230: $\ga 60$~\cps. Spectral fitting was undertaken using
231: the {\sc xspec} spectral fitting package version 11 \cite[]{xspec}.
232: For more details of the spectral analysis see \cite{myphd:a}.
233:
234: % \subsection{V--Y --- 26 February -- 18 May 1997}
235: \label{P20170}
236:
237: Between 1997 May 16--20 GX~1+4 was observed daily for $\approx 12$~min.
238: The phase-averaged background subtracted countrate varied from day to day,
239: from $\la 100$~\cps\ (with all 5 proportional counter units operating) on
240: 17 May to $\approx 500$~ \cps\ on 18 and 20 May (Figure \ref{P20170-Y}).
241: For four of the five observations the sharp dips which form the primary
242: minimum in the pulse profile were clearly observed in the background
243: subtracted PCA countrate. The pulse fraction is defined as
244: \begin{eqnarray}
245: f_{\rm p} = \frac{F_{\rm max}-F_{\rm min}}{F_{\rm max}}
246: \hspace{1cm}{\rm where} \nonumber \\
247: F_{\rm min} < F(\phi_i) < F_{\rm max}\ \ \forall\ i\in{1\ldots n} \nonumber
248: \end{eqnarray}
249: and where $F(\phi_i)$ is the mean pulse profile calculated over $n$ bins.
250: On May 16 and 18--20 $f_{\rm p}\approx0.8$, as is typical for the source.
251: On 17 May however, the sharp dips in the pulse profile were weaker or
252: absent, resulting in a pulse fraction $f_{\rm p}\approx 0.5$ (Figure
253: \ref{P20170-Y}, second panel from top). The minima are instead broad and
254: irregular, lacking the consistency over successive cyles observed on other
255: days.
256:
257: %\section{Mean X-ray spectra}
258:
259: Spectral model fitting of the Standard-2 mode spectra averaged over each
260: daily observation was undertaken with the Comptonization continuum model
261: \cite[`{\tt compTT}' in {\sc xspec};][]{tit94} following \cite{myphd:a}.
262: Note that it was not possible to obtain a background spectrum for the May
263: 20 observation due to problems with the filter file; the background
264: spectrum from the previous days' observation was used instead. Several of
265: the spectral fit parameters show significant variability (Table
266: \ref{tab-P20170}). The column density $n_{\rm H}$ varied between $\approx
267: 10^{23}\ {\rm cm}^{-2}$ and $\approx 3.2\times 10^{23}\ {\rm cm}^{-2}$.
268: The source spectrum temperature $T_0$ was somewhat higher than is typical
269: on 16 May but decreased to a more typical 1.2--1.3~keV by 18 May. For two
270: of the spectra the scattering plasma temperature $T_{\rm e}$ similarly
271: could not be constrained by the fitting algorithm, and instead was fixed
272: at 10~keV. For the other three days $T_{\rm e}$ varied between $\approx
273: 6.5$--7 and $\approx 10$~keV. The most dramatic variation was in the
274: fitted optical depth $\tau$, which was 3.6--4 on May 16 and 18--20 but
275: $\approx 19$ on May 17. The equivalent width of the Fe gaussian component
276: was also unusually high for this spectrum, at more than 1.8~keV. These
277: variations occurred as the luminosity varied between 1.5--$3.6\times
278: 10^{37}\ {\rm erg \,s}^{-1}$, assuming a source distance of 10~kpc. The
279: actual distance of the source is thought to be in the range 3--15~kpc
280: \cite[]{chak97:opt}.
281:
282: The $\chi^2_\nu$ values indicate good fits for each spectrum except on May
283: 17. The spectrum obtained on this day does not resemble any of the other
284: $\approx 50$ spectra extracted over the course of the {\it RXTE\/}
285: observations between 1996 and 1997. The model fit was problematic in
286: several respects. Initial fits with all parameters free to vary resulted
287: in a fit value for the $\tau_{\rm max}$ parameter (associated with the Xe
288: absorption edge at 4.83~keV) an order of magnitude greater than the
289: maximum for all the other spectra. Thus the value for this parameter was
290: instead fixed (`frozen') at the fit value for the spectrum extracted over
291: the whole of the 1997 May observation. The fitted $T_0$ value, when free
292: to vary, also became much larger than was consistent than for the other
293: spectra and so was fixed at 1.3~keV. This value is typical for the source
294: at other times \cite[]{myphd:a}. While the resulting fit statistic
295: $\chi^2_{\nu}\approx2.60$ indicates an unacceptable fit, no improvement
296: was found using alternative continuum models, including power law, power
297: law with exponential cutoff and broken powerlaw. A comparable fit was
298: obtained with a blackbody component resulting in $\chi^2_\nu=2.74$ with
299: fitted $T_{\rm bb}=6.65^{6.76}_{6.54}$~keV in rough agreement with $T_{\rm
300: e}$ for the {\tt compTT} fit of $6.51^{6.60}_{6.40}$~keV.
301:
302: The data from each of the observations on May 16--20 were divided into 10
303: phase bins based on the pulse period $P= 126.4319(0) \pm 0.0005(5)$~s
304: estimated from regular BATSE monitoring of the source. The ephemeris for
305: each day was chosen arbitrarily so that the first phase bin was centered
306: on the primary minimum, defined as phase 0.0. Each of the resulting
307: phase-selected spectra were fitted with the usual spectral model with at
308: most $T_{\rm e}$, $\tau$ and the {\tt compTT} and gaussian component
309: normalisations free to vary. The other parameters were fixed at the fit
310: values for the phase-averaged spectrum on the same day. This approach is
311: essentially identical to that of \cite{gal00:spec}. For the May 16 and 19
312: observations $T_{\rm e}$ was also fixed at the same value as for the
313: phase-averaged spectrum (see Table \ref{tab-P20170}). Variation of
314: $T_{\rm e}$ and $\tau$ with phase is small except close to the primary
315: minimum. The fitted $\tau$ around phase 0.0 on May 16 and 18--20 was
316: significantly greater than the value for the phase-averaged spectrum, by
317: 20--60~per~cent. For the May 17 observation, at the much shallower primary
318: minimum $\tau$ is instead marginally lower than the phase-averaged fit
319: values, while $T_{\rm e}$ is somewhat higher (Figure \ref{pps-Y2}).
320:
321: \section{Discussion}
322:
323: For sources with $i\approx\beta$, assuming that $i$, $\beta$ and the
324: footpoints of the accretion column on the neutron star do not change, dips
325: due to column eclipses must always be observed while accretion continues
326: through the columns. The apparent disappearance of the dip during the
327: 1997 May 17 observations clearly challenges this picture. The flux at this
328: time is more than an order of magnitude larger than the lowest level
329: measured by {\it RXTE\/}; complete cessation of accretion seems unlikely.
330: Another possibility is that the geometry of the system is changing such
331: that the accretion column drops out of alignment briefly. The inclination
332: angle $i$ may vary due to geodetic precession of the pulsar, as is
333: suggested for some radio pulsars \cite[e.g.][]{kramer98}. Alternatively,
334: the magnetic colatitude $\beta$ may change due to evolution of the neutron
335: star magnetic field. Variations due to the former effect, however, are
336: only expected on timescales of years. And while the latter possibility
337: cannot be discounted due to the lack of knowledge regarding such
338: evolution, it seems much more likely that each of these mechanisms would
339: cause a much longer-lasting, if not permanent, cessation of eclipses
340: rather than what is observed in GX~1+4.
341:
342: Variations in the position of the column itself are much more plausible.
343: As the accretion rate $\dot{M}$ (and hence the luminosity $L_{\rm X}$)
344: decreases, the balance of magnetic and gas pressures at the inner edge of
345: the accretion disc means that the disk will be truncated further out from
346: the neutron star \cite[]{gl79a,gl79b}. Field lines threading the boundary
347: region where disk material decelerates and becomes bound to the accretion
348: column will thus meet the neutron star at progressively higher latitudes
349: on the star. In principle at least this mechanism may cause the column to
350: move in and out of alignment, in which case eclipses (and dips) would be
351: expected only over a finite range of $L_{\rm X}$. Instead what appears to
352: be the case for GX~1+4 is that dips are normally observed at the full
353: range of luminosities at which the source was observed by {\it RXTE}, and
354: are perhaps absent at a particular flux level only within that range.
355: Observations at flux levels comparable to that of 1997 May 17 however do
356: generally exhibit sharp dips. If the accretion column has indeed been
357: disrupted rather than moved, accretion must be occurring over a much
358: larger region of the neutron stars' magnetosphere to give the observed
359: X-ray flux. That material can enter the magnetosphere of the star without
360: being channeled along the field lines suggests either that the magnetic
361: field strength is in actual fact low for an X-ray pulsar, or that some
362: global magnetohydrodynamic instability is operating which can completely
363: disrupt the flow.
364:
365: The unique phase-averaged {\it RXTE\/} spectrum observed coincident with
366: the unusually low pulse fraction underlines the significance of this
367: event. That the optical depth has increased fivefold compared to values
368: obtained before and after suggests that the source has been `smothered' by
369: hot accreting material, which presumably also contributes to the unusually
370: strong Fe line emission. Such a large $\tau$ suggests that the photon
371: spectrum will approach thermalization with the scattering material; the
372: close agreement of the fitted blackbody temperature and the scattering
373: plasma temperature provides corroboration for the {\tt compTT} component
374: fits during this interval. The pulse-phase spectral variation was also
375: different to that normally observed in the source. Typically $\tau$ is
376: significantly greater than the mean value around the primary minimum; this
377: is the case for previously published results \cite[e.g.][]{gal00:spec} as
378: well as the observations on May 16 and 18--20. On May 17 $\tau$ was
379: instead somewhat {\em less} than the phase-averaged value around the
380: primary minimum. These results are strongly suggestive of a substantially
381: different distribution of matter around the source. The increase in the
382: equivalent width also observed on May 17 was not accompanied by the usual
383: increase in the neutral column density $n_{\rm H}$ \cite[]{kot99,myphd:a},
384: further indicating varying conditions close to the star rather than in the
385: outer circumstellar matter.
386:
387: At least one similar event has been observed previously from this source.
388: On 1993 December 11 a pulse fraction $\approx 35$~per cent (20--100~keV)
389: was measured using balloon-borne instruments, along with an unusually hard
390: spectrum with power law energy index $0.54\pm0.18$ \cite[]{rao94}. For
391: comparison, a power law fit was made to {\it RXTE\/} spectra from 17 May
392: in the energy band 20--40~keV only. The resulting photon index
393: $1.15_{1.03}^{1.28}$ is consistent with the fit value for the full PCA
394: energy range, and represents a significantly harder spectrum than on 1993
395: December 11. Flux measurements by the Burst and Transient Source
396: Experiment (BATSE) aboard the {\it Compton Gamma-ray Observatory}
397: satellite indicate that following that observation the source entered a
398: hard X-ray low state with $L_{\rm X}\la0.1\ {\rm keV\,cm^{-2}\,s}^{-1}$
399: (20--60~keV) which persisted (with brief interruptions) for the next
400: $\approx250$~d. In contrast, the May 17 observation was made during a
401: flare lasting $\approx20$~d where the flux peaked at $0.2\ {\rm
402: keV\,cm^{-2}\,s}^{-1}$. The other spectra from 1997 May give fitted
403: $\tau$ values at intermediate levels between the two distinct spectral
404: states suggested by analysis of the archival {\it RXTE\/} observations
405: \cite[]{myphd:a}. It is possible that the disruption of the accretion
406: column is also related to transitions between distinct spectral and
407: luminosity states inferred from analysis of the full set of {\it RXTE\/}
408: archival data \cite[]{myphd:a}.
409:
410: \acknowledgments
411:
412: This research has made use of data obtained through the
413: High Energy Astrophysics Science Archive Research Center Online Service,
414: provided by the NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, and also the BATSE pulsar
415: group home page at \url{http://www.batse.msfc.masa.gov}.
416:
417:
418: %% The reference list follows the main body and any appendices.
419: %% Use LaTeX's thebibliography environment to mark up your reference list.
420: %% Note \begin{thebibliography} is followed by an empty set of
421: %% curly braces. If you forget this, LaTeX will generate the error
422: %% "Perhaps a missing \item?".
423: %%
424: %% thebibliography produces citations in the text using \bibitem-\cite
425: %% cross-referencing. Each reference is preceded by a
426: %% \bibitem command that defines in curly braces the KEY that corresponds
427: %% to the KEY in the \cite commands (see the first section above).
428: %% Make sure that you provide a unique KEY for every \bibitem or else the
429: %% paper will not LaTeX. The square brackets should contain
430: %% the citation text that LaTeX will insert in
431: %% place of the \cite commands.
432:
433: %% We have used macros to produce journal name abbreviations.
434: %% AASTeX provides a number of these for the more frequently-cited journals.
435: %% See the Author Guide for a list of them.
436:
437: %% Note that the style of the \bibitem labels (in []) is slightly
438: %% different from previous examples. The natbib system solves a host
439: %% of citation expression problems, but it is necessary to clearly
440: %% delimit the year from the author name used in the citation.
441: %% See the natbib documentation for more details and options.
442:
443: % Use these commands to generate the bibliography using bibtex
444: % Then for submission, comment them out and read in ms.bbl instead
445: % Have to also change "Acta Astronomica" to "AcA" (is this correct?)
446:
447: % \bibliography{all}
448: % \bibliographystyle{apj}
449: \begin{thebibliography}{24}
450: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
451:
452: \bibitem[{{Arnaud}(1996)}]{xspec}
453: {Arnaud}, K.~A. 1996, in ASP Conf. Ser. 101: Astronomical Data Analysis
454: Software and Systems V, 17--20
455:
456: \bibitem[{{Belczynski} {et~al.}(2000){Belczynski}, {Mikolajewska}, {Munari},
457: {Ivison}, \& {Friedjung}}]{symcat00}
458: {Belczynski}, K., {Mikolajewska}, J., {Munari}, U., {Ivison}, R., \&
459: {Friedjung}, M. 2000, \aaps {\rm\ preprint}
460:
461: \bibitem[{{Beurle} {et~al.}(1984){Beurle}, {Bewick}, {Harper}, {Quenby},
462: {Spooner}, {Fenton}, {Fenton}, {Giles}, {Greenhill}, \& {Warren}}]{beu84}
463: {Beurle}, K., {Bewick}, A., {Harper}, P., {Quenby}, J., {Spooner}, N.,
464: {Fenton}, A., {Fenton}, K., {Giles}, A., {Greenhill}, J., \& {Warren}, D.
465: 1984, {\rm AdSpR}, 3(10--12), 43
466:
467: \bibitem[{{\v{C}emelji\'c} \& {Bulik}(1998)}]{cem98}
468: {\v{C}emelji\'c}, M. \& {Bulik}, T. 1998, {\rm AcA}, 48, 65
469:
470: \bibitem[{{Chakrabarty} \& {Roche}(1997)}]{chak97:opt}
471: {Chakrabarty}, D. \& {Roche}, P. 1997, \apj, 489, 254
472:
473: \bibitem[{{Cui}(1997)}]{cui97}
474: {Cui}, W. 1997, \apjl, 482, L163
475:
476: \bibitem[{{Dotani} {et~al.}(1989){Dotani}, {Kii}, {Nagase}, {Makishima},
477: {Ohashi}, {Sakao}, {Koyama}, \& {Tuohy}}]{dot89}
478: {Dotani}, T., {Kii}, T., {Nagase}, F., {Makishima}, K., {Ohashi}, T., {Sakao},
479: T., {Koyama}, K., \& {Tuohy}, I.~R. 1989, \pasj, 41, 427
480:
481: \bibitem[{{Galloway} \& {Wu}(2000)}]{gal00:beam}
482: {Galloway}, D. \& {Wu}, K. 2000, in \protect{X-ray} Astronomy '99 --- Stellar
483: Endpoints, AGN and the Diffuse Background. Bologna, Italy, September 6-10
484: 1999, ed. G.~{Malaguti}, G.~{Palumbo}, \& N.~{White} (Singapore: Gordon \&
485: Breach)
486:
487: \bibitem[{{Galloway}(2000)}]{myphd:a}
488: {Galloway}, D.~K. 2000, \apj, submitted (astro-ph/0007274)
489:
490: \bibitem[{{Galloway} {et~al.}(2000){Galloway}, {Giles}, {Greenhill}, \&
491: {Storey}}]{gal00:spec}
492: {Galloway}, D.~K., {Giles}, A.~B., {Greenhill}, J.~G., \& {Storey}, M.~C. 2000,
493: \mnras, 311, 755
494:
495: \bibitem[{{Ghosh} \& {Lamb}(1979{\natexlab{a}})}]{gl79a}
496: {Ghosh}, P. \& {Lamb}, F.~K. 1979{\natexlab{a}}, \apj, 232, 259
497:
498: \bibitem[{{Ghosh} \& {Lamb}(1979{\natexlab{b}})}]{gl79b}
499: ---. 1979{\natexlab{b}}, \apj, 234, 296
500:
501: \bibitem[{{Giles} {et~al.}(2000){Giles}, {Galloway}, {Greenhill}, {Storey}, \&
502: {Wilson}}]{gil00}
503: {Giles}, A., {Galloway}, D., {Greenhill}, J., {Storey}, M., \& {Wilson}, C.
504: 2000, \apj, 529, 447
505:
506: \bibitem[{{Giles} {et~al.}(1995){Giles}, {Jahoda}, {Swank}, \&
507: {Zhang}}]{giles95}
508: {Giles}, A.~B., {Jahoda}, K., {Swank}, J.~H., \& {Zhang}, W. 1995, {\rm PASA},
509: 12, 219
510:
511: \bibitem[{{Greenhill} {et~al.}(1993){Greenhill}, {Sharma}, {Dieters}, {Sood},
512: {Waldron}, \& {Storey}}]{gre93}
513: {Greenhill}, J.~G., {Sharma}, D.~P., {Dieters}, S. W.~B., {Sood}, R.~K.,
514: {Waldron}, L., \& {Storey}, M.~C. 1993, \mnras, 260, 21
515:
516: \bibitem[{{Heindl} {et~al.}(2000){Heindl}, {Coburn}, {Gruber}, {Pelling}, R.E.,
517: {Kretchmar}, {Kreykenbohm}, {Wilms}, {Pottschmidt}, \& {Staubert}}]{heindl00}
518: {Heindl}, W., {Coburn}, W., {Gruber}, D., {Pelling}, M., R.E., R., {Kretchmar},
519: P., {Kreykenbohm}, I., {Wilms}, J., {Pottschmidt}, K., \& {Staubert}, R.
520: 2000, in Proceedings of the 5th Compton Symposium
521:
522: \bibitem[{{Kotani} {et~al.}(1999){Kotani}, {Dotani}, {Nagase}, {Greenhill},
523: {Pravdo}, \& {Angelini}}]{kot99}
524: {Kotani}, T., {Dotani}, T., {Nagase}, F., {Greenhill}, J.~G., {Pravdo}, S.~H.,
525: \& {Angelini}, L. 1999, \apj, 510, 369
526:
527: \bibitem[{{Kramer}(1998)}]{kramer98}
528: {Kramer}, M. 1998, \apj, 509, 856
529:
530: \bibitem[{{Mony} {et~al.}(1991){Mony}, {Kendziorra}, {Maisack}, {Staubert},
531: {Englhauser}, {Dobereiner}, {Pietsch}, {Reppin}, {Trumpler}, {Churazov},
532: {Gilfanov}, \& {Sunyaev}}]{mony91}
533: {Mony}, B., {Kendziorra}, E., {Maisack}, M., {Staubert}, R., {Englhauser}, J.,
534: {Dobereiner}, S., {Pietsch}, W., {Reppin}, C., {Trumpler}, J., {Churazov},
535: E.~M., {Gilfanov}, M.~R., \& {Sunyaev}, R. 1991, \aap, 247, 405
536:
537: \bibitem[{{Nelson} {et~al.}(1997){Nelson}, {Bildsten}, {Chakrabarty}, {Finger},
538: {Koh}, {Prince}, {Rubin}, {Scott}, {Vaughan}, \& {Wilson}}]{nel97}
539: {Nelson}, R.~W., {Bildsten}, L., {Chakrabarty}, D., {Finger}, M.~H., {Koh},
540: D.~T., {Prince}, T.~A., {Rubin}, B.~C., {Scott}, D.~M., {Vaughan}, B.~A., \&
541: {Wilson}, R.~B. 1997, \apjl, 488, L117
542:
543: \bibitem[{{Pozdnyakov} {et~al.}(1983){Pozdnyakov}, {Sobel}, \&
544: {Syunyaev}}]{pss83}
545: {Pozdnyakov}, L.~A., {Sobel}, I.~M., \& {Syunyaev}, R.~A. 1983, {\rm
546: Astrophysics and Space Physics Research}, 2, 189
547:
548: \bibitem[{{Rao} {et~al.}(1994){Rao}, {Paul}, {Chitnis}, {Agrawal}, \&
549: {Manchanda}}]{rao94}
550: {Rao}, A.~R., {Paul}, B., {Chitnis}, V.~R., {Agrawal}, P.~C., \& {Manchanda},
551: R.~K. 1994, \aap, 289, L43
552:
553: \bibitem[{{Reig} \& {Roche}(1999)}]{rei99}
554: {Reig}, P. \& {Roche}, P. 1999, \mnras, 306, 95
555:
556: \bibitem[{{Titarchuk}(1994)}]{tit94}
557: {Titarchuk}, L. 1994, \apj, 434, 570
558:
559: \end{thebibliography}
560:
561:
562: %% Generally speaking, only the figure captions, and not the figures
563: %% themselves, are included in electronic manuscript submissions.
564: %% Use \figcaption to format your figure captions. They should begin on a
565: %% new page.
566:
567: \clearpage
568:
569: %% No more than seven \figcaption commands are allowed per page,
570: %% so if you have more than seven captions, insert a \clearpage
571: %% after every seventh one.
572:
573: %% There must be a \figcaption command for each legend. Key the text of the
574: %% legend and the optional \label in curly braces. If you wish, you may
575: %% include the name of the corresponding figure file in square brackets.
576: %% The label is for identification purposes only. It will not insert the
577: %% figures themselves into the document.
578: %% If you want to include your art in the paper, use \plotone.
579: %% Refer to the on-line documentation for details.
580:
581: % Plotted using ~/data/detail-p20170.mac, "apjfig" device postportencap
582: % combined using XFIG 3.1 patchlevel 4,
583: % file is p20170-Y-new.fig exported to eps (100%)
584: % \centerline{\psfig{file=p20170-Y-new.eps, width=14.5cm}}
585: \begin{figure}
586: \epsscale{0.9}
587: \plotone{p20170-Y-new.eps}
588: \figcaption[p20170-Y-new.eps]{ {\it RXTE\/} observations of GX~1+4, 1997
589: May 16--20. Each panel shows the countrate on 1~s bins for all 5 PCUs for
590: the short observations on May 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20 from top to bottom
591: respectively. Shown at the right are the corresponding mean pulse profiles
592: (over two full cycles) with a representative error bar. The profiles are
593: calculated by folding the 1~s lightcurves on the pulse period $126.4319(0)
594: \pm 0.0005(5)$~s estimated from regular BATSE monitoring of the source.
595: Note the change in scale on the $y$-axis between the panels.
596: \label{P20170-Y}}
597: \end{figure}
598:
599: % Plotted using ~/data/P20170/pps/pps2.mac, "pps pps-Y2-compTT" and then
600: % device postportencap combined using XFIG 3.1 patchlevel 4,
601: % file is pps-Y2.fig exported to eps (100%)
602: % \centerline{\psfig{file=p20170-Y-new.eps, width=14.5cm}}
603: \begin{figure}
604: \epsscale{0.9}
605: \plotone{pps-Y2.eps}
606: \figcaption[pps-Y2.eps]{ Pulse-phase spectroscopy of data from the {\it
607: RXTE\/} observation of GX~1+4 on 1997 May 17. The top and middle panels
608: show the variation in fitted $T_{\rm e}$ and $\tau$ respectively with
609: phase. The solid and dotted lines show the fitted values and 90~per~cent
610: uncertainty limits for the phase-averaged spectrum. Errorbars represent
611: 90~per~cent uncertainty limits. The bottom panel shows the pulse profile
612: over the full PCA energy range (as shown in Figure \ref{P20170-Y}).
613: \label{pps-Y2}}
614: \end{figure}
615:
616:
617: %% Tables should be submitted one per page, so put a \clearpage before
618: %% each one.
619:
620: %% Two options are available to the author for producing tables: the
621: %% deluxetable environment provided by the AASTeX package or the LaTeX
622: %% table environment. Use of deluxetable is preferred.
623: %%
624:
625: %% Three table samples follow, two marked up in the deluxetable environment,
626: %% one marked up as a LaTeX table.
627:
628:
629: %% In this first example, note that the \tabletypesize{}
630: %% command has been used to reduce the font size of the table.
631: %% Note also that the \label command needs to be placed
632: %% inside the \tablecaption.
633:
634: \clearpage
635:
636: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccc}
637: % \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
638: \tablecaption{Spectral fit parameters using the Comptonization continuum
639: component for the May 1997 {\it RXTE\/} observations of GX~1+4.
640: Fit parameters are the absorption column density $n_{\rm H}$ (in units of
641: $10^{22}\ {\rm cm}^{-2}$), source spectrum temperature $T_0$,
642: plasma temperature $T_{\rm e}$ and optical depth $\tau$, Comptonization
643: component normalisation $A_{\rm C}$ (in units of $10^{-2}\ {\rm
644: photons\,cm^{-2}\,s^{-1} \,keV^{-1}}$), gaussian component center energy
645: $E_{\rm Fe}$, width $\sigma$, normalisation $A_{\rm Fe}$ (in units of
646: $10^{-3}\ {\rm photons\,cm^{-2}\,s^{-1}\,keV^{-1}}$) and equivalent width
647: EW, and finally the 2--60~keV flux $L_{\rm X}$ in units of $10^{37}\ {\rm
648: erg \,s}^{-1}$ (assuming a distance of 10~kpc). Energy range for fitting is
649: typically 2.8--35~keV.
650: \label{tab-P20170} }
651: % Conversion factor for flux -> L_X is 1.197e46
652: % \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.5}
653: \tablewidth{0pt}
654: \tablehead{
655: \colhead{Parameter} & \colhead{May 16} & \colhead{May 17} & \colhead{May 18}
656: & \colhead{May 19} & \colhead{May 20} }
657: \startdata
658: $n_{\rm H}$
659: & $17.7^{21.0}_{14.9}$ & $10.6^{11.9}_{9.33}$ & $21.4^{24.7}_{17.8}$
660: & $31.9^{35.5}_{26.2}$ & $21.1^{24.2}_{20.0}$ \\
661: $T_0$ (keV)
662: & $1.515^{1.662}_{1.351}$ & 1.3 (fixed) & $1.272^{1.424}_{1.139}$
663: & $1.231^{1.498}_{1.073}$ & $1.292^{1.378}_{1.171}$ \\
664: $T_{\rm e}$ (keV)
665: & 10 (fixed) & $6.51^{6.60}_{6.40}$ & $10.3^{13.6}_{8.96}$ & 10 (fixed)
666: & $7.11^{7.59}_{6.83}$ \\
667: $\tau$
668: & $4.02^{4.11}_{3.89}$ & $19.4^{21.1}_{18.3}$ & $3.68^{4.17}_{2.98}$
669: & $3.64^{3.84}_{3.48}$ & $4.92^{5.04}_{4.53}$ \\
670: $A_{\rm C}$
671: & $1.14^{1.26}_{1.07}$ & $0.724^{0.730}_{0.715}$
672: & $2.10^{2.33}_{1.76}$ & $1.58^{1.82}_{1.30}$ & $2.83^{3.08}_{2.64}$ \\
673: $E_{\rm Fe}$ (keV)
674: & $6.447^{6.507}_{6.382}$ & $6.441^{6.468}_{6.409}$
675: & $6.399^{6.475}_{6.238}$ & $6.442^{6.513}_{6.350}$
676: & $6.480^{6.504}_{6.428}$ \\
677: $\sigma$
678: & $0.337^{0.451}_{0.210}$ & $0.210^{0.263}_{0.160}$
679: & $0.434^{0.628}_{0.296}$ & $0.319^{0.464}_{0.172}$
680: & $0.315^{0.405}_{0.249}$ \\
681: $A_{\rm Fe}$
682: & $2.69^{3.28}_{2.29}$ & $2.53^{2.64}_{2.44}$
683: & $4.61^{7.31}_{3.58}$ & $3.57^{4.82}_{2.85}$ & $4.40^{5.19}_{3.98}$ \\
684: EW (eV)
685: & $434^{522}_{349}$ & $1820^{1920}_{1750}$ & $381^{550}_{318}$
686: & $407^{525}_{337}$ & $396^{443}_{349}$ \\
687: $L_{\rm X}$
688: & $2.17 \pm 0.41$ & $1.51 \pm 0.23$ & $3.6 \pm 1.1$ & $2.52 \pm 0.30$
689: & $2.70 \pm 0.18$ \\
690: \tableline
691: $\chi_{\nu}^{2}$
692: & 1.20 & 2.60 & 0.899 & 1.03 & 1.68 \\
693: \enddata
694: \end{deluxetable}
695:
696:
697:
698: %% If you use the table environment, please indicate horizontal rules using
699: %% \tableline, not \hline.
700: %% Do not put multiple tabular environments within a single table.
701: %% The optional \label should appear inside the \caption command.
702:
703:
704: %% The following command ends your manuscript. LaTeX will ignore any text
705: %% that appears after it.
706:
707: \end{document}
708:
709: